Loading…

Bonding strategies to full-contour zirconia: Zirconia pretreatment with piranha solution, glaze and airborne-particle abrasion

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of various zirconia surface pretreatments on the adhesion between full contour 3Y-TZP zirconia and glaze, and the shear bond strength (SBS) between glazed/3Y-TZP and resin cement. Specimens were allocated into groups: GL-glaze; AL+GL-sandblasting with Al2O3+GL...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of adhesion and adhesives 2017-09, Vol.77, p.151-156
Main Authors: Feitosa, Sabrina A., Lima, Nelson B., Yoshito, Walter K., Campos, Fernanda, Bottino, Marco A., Valandro, Luiz F., Bottino, Marco C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-54c083c995f8936fd27ad9abae2a11fa9e0d2991e845351ab141b1799d34e32c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-54c083c995f8936fd27ad9abae2a11fa9e0d2991e845351ab141b1799d34e32c3
container_end_page 156
container_issue
container_start_page 151
container_title International journal of adhesion and adhesives
container_volume 77
creator Feitosa, Sabrina A.
Lima, Nelson B.
Yoshito, Walter K.
Campos, Fernanda
Bottino, Marco A.
Valandro, Luiz F.
Bottino, Marco C.
description This study aimed to evaluate the effect of various zirconia surface pretreatments on the adhesion between full contour 3Y-TZP zirconia and glaze, and the shear bond strength (SBS) between glazed/3Y-TZP and resin cement. Specimens were allocated into groups: GL-glaze; AL+GL-sandblasting with Al2O3+GL; CJ+GL-tribochemical silica coating (Cojet®/CJ)+GL; PS+GL-piranha solution+GL; and CJ. Adhesion between 3Y-TZP and GL was evaluated using the scratch test. Surface topography and glaze thickness were evaluated by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). For SBS, glazed/3Y-TZP surface was etched with hydrofluoric acid and a silane was applied. For CJ only the silane was applied. Samples were tested after 24h (24h wet) or after 15,000 thermal cycles and 90 days storage (thermocycled). After SBS, the type of failure was classified as: adhesive, mixed or cohesive. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. SEM analysis after scratch test revealed circular cracks in the GL group and conformal cracks in the others groups. SEM micrographs suggested that zirconia specimens submitted to airborne-particle abrasion presents rougher and porous surface when compared to surfaces treated with GL and PS. The glaze layer was approximately 1.86µm thick in all groups. After 24h, SBS test showed highest values for AL+GL and CJ+GL and were significantly higher when compared to the GL group. Differences were not significant between PS+GL and the other groups. After aging (thermocycling+storage), groups GL and CJ presented no statistically significant difference compared to 24h and aged AL+GL, CJ+GL and PS+GL groups. The predominant type of failure was mixed. 3Y-TZP surface treatment with glaze application could be considered as an alternative treatment, since it yielded a similar resin bond strength without the need for airborne-particle abrasion.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.05.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1938549904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014374961730101X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1938549904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-54c083c995f8936fd27ad9abae2a11fa9e0d2991e845351ab141b1799d34e32c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9r3DAQxUVJoZttv0IR5Fq7kmWvrZzShP6DQC_tpRcxlsa7Mo7kjLQtzaGfvQqbnAsD8xjevGF-jL2VopZC7t7PtZ_BHUrVjZB9LbpaiP4F28ih15WQTX_GNkK2qupbvXvFzlOaRTGKVm3Y3-sYnA97njJBxr3HxHPk03FZKhtDjkfiD56K9HDJfz4pvhJmQsh3GDL_7fOBr54gHICnuByzj-Ed3y_wgByC4-BpjBSwWoGyt0uZjgSpuF6zlxMsCd889S378enj95sv1e23z19vPtxWVg1DrrrWikFZrbtp0Go3uaYHp2EEbEDKCTQK12gtcWg71UkYZStH2WvtVIuqsWrLLk65K8X7I6Zs5vJZKCeN1GroWq0Lji3bnVyWYkqEk1nJ3wH9MVKYR9ZmNs-szSNrIzpTWJfFq9Milh9-eSSTrMdg0XlCm42L_n8R_wD1l43i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1938549904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bonding strategies to full-contour zirconia: Zirconia pretreatment with piranha solution, glaze and airborne-particle abrasion</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Feitosa, Sabrina A. ; Lima, Nelson B. ; Yoshito, Walter K. ; Campos, Fernanda ; Bottino, Marco A. ; Valandro, Luiz F. ; Bottino, Marco C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Feitosa, Sabrina A. ; Lima, Nelson B. ; Yoshito, Walter K. ; Campos, Fernanda ; Bottino, Marco A. ; Valandro, Luiz F. ; Bottino, Marco C.</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of various zirconia surface pretreatments on the adhesion between full contour 3Y-TZP zirconia and glaze, and the shear bond strength (SBS) between glazed/3Y-TZP and resin cement. Specimens were allocated into groups: GL-glaze; AL+GL-sandblasting with Al2O3+GL; CJ+GL-tribochemical silica coating (Cojet®/CJ)+GL; PS+GL-piranha solution+GL; and CJ. Adhesion between 3Y-TZP and GL was evaluated using the scratch test. Surface topography and glaze thickness were evaluated by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). For SBS, glazed/3Y-TZP surface was etched with hydrofluoric acid and a silane was applied. For CJ only the silane was applied. Samples were tested after 24h (24h wet) or after 15,000 thermal cycles and 90 days storage (thermocycled). After SBS, the type of failure was classified as: adhesive, mixed or cohesive. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. SEM analysis after scratch test revealed circular cracks in the GL group and conformal cracks in the others groups. SEM micrographs suggested that zirconia specimens submitted to airborne-particle abrasion presents rougher and porous surface when compared to surfaces treated with GL and PS. The glaze layer was approximately 1.86µm thick in all groups. After 24h, SBS test showed highest values for AL+GL and CJ+GL and were significantly higher when compared to the GL group. Differences were not significant between PS+GL and the other groups. After aging (thermocycling+storage), groups GL and CJ presented no statistically significant difference compared to 24h and aged AL+GL, CJ+GL and PS+GL groups. The predominant type of failure was mixed. 3Y-TZP surface treatment with glaze application could be considered as an alternative treatment, since it yielded a similar resin bond strength without the need for airborne-particle abrasion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-7496</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.05.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abrasion ; Adhesion ; Adhesion tests ; Adhesive bonding ; Aluminum oxide ; Bond strength ; Bonding strength ; Ceramic glazes ; Contours ; Failure analysis ; Glaze ; Hydrofluoric acid ; Photomicrographs ; Piranha solution ; Pretreatment ; Sandblasting ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Scratch test ; Shape ; Shear test ; Shear tests ; Silicon dioxide ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Surface pretreatments ; Surface treatment ; Tetragonal zirconia polycrystals ; Thermal cycling ; Yttria-stabilized zirconia ; Zirconia ; Zirconium ; Zirconium dioxide</subject><ispartof>International journal of adhesion and adhesives, 2017-09, Vol.77, p.151-156</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Sep 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-54c083c995f8936fd27ad9abae2a11fa9e0d2991e845351ab141b1799d34e32c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-54c083c995f8936fd27ad9abae2a11fa9e0d2991e845351ab141b1799d34e32c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feitosa, Sabrina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Nelson B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshito, Walter K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valandro, Luiz F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco C.</creatorcontrib><title>Bonding strategies to full-contour zirconia: Zirconia pretreatment with piranha solution, glaze and airborne-particle abrasion</title><title>International journal of adhesion and adhesives</title><description>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of various zirconia surface pretreatments on the adhesion between full contour 3Y-TZP zirconia and glaze, and the shear bond strength (SBS) between glazed/3Y-TZP and resin cement. Specimens were allocated into groups: GL-glaze; AL+GL-sandblasting with Al2O3+GL; CJ+GL-tribochemical silica coating (Cojet®/CJ)+GL; PS+GL-piranha solution+GL; and CJ. Adhesion between 3Y-TZP and GL was evaluated using the scratch test. Surface topography and glaze thickness were evaluated by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). For SBS, glazed/3Y-TZP surface was etched with hydrofluoric acid and a silane was applied. For CJ only the silane was applied. Samples were tested after 24h (24h wet) or after 15,000 thermal cycles and 90 days storage (thermocycled). After SBS, the type of failure was classified as: adhesive, mixed or cohesive. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. SEM analysis after scratch test revealed circular cracks in the GL group and conformal cracks in the others groups. SEM micrographs suggested that zirconia specimens submitted to airborne-particle abrasion presents rougher and porous surface when compared to surfaces treated with GL and PS. The glaze layer was approximately 1.86µm thick in all groups. After 24h, SBS test showed highest values for AL+GL and CJ+GL and were significantly higher when compared to the GL group. Differences were not significant between PS+GL and the other groups. After aging (thermocycling+storage), groups GL and CJ presented no statistically significant difference compared to 24h and aged AL+GL, CJ+GL and PS+GL groups. The predominant type of failure was mixed. 3Y-TZP surface treatment with glaze application could be considered as an alternative treatment, since it yielded a similar resin bond strength without the need for airborne-particle abrasion.</description><subject>Abrasion</subject><subject>Adhesion</subject><subject>Adhesion tests</subject><subject>Adhesive bonding</subject><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Bonding strength</subject><subject>Ceramic glazes</subject><subject>Contours</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Glaze</subject><subject>Hydrofluoric acid</subject><subject>Photomicrographs</subject><subject>Piranha solution</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Sandblasting</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Scratch test</subject><subject>Shape</subject><subject>Shear test</subject><subject>Shear tests</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Surface pretreatments</subject><subject>Surface treatment</subject><subject>Tetragonal zirconia polycrystals</subject><subject>Thermal cycling</subject><subject>Yttria-stabilized zirconia</subject><subject>Zirconia</subject><subject>Zirconium</subject><subject>Zirconium dioxide</subject><issn>0143-7496</issn><issn>1879-0127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9r3DAQxUVJoZttv0IR5Fq7kmWvrZzShP6DQC_tpRcxlsa7Mo7kjLQtzaGfvQqbnAsD8xjevGF-jL2VopZC7t7PtZ_BHUrVjZB9LbpaiP4F28ih15WQTX_GNkK2qupbvXvFzlOaRTGKVm3Y3-sYnA97njJBxr3HxHPk03FZKhtDjkfiD56K9HDJfz4pvhJmQsh3GDL_7fOBr54gHICnuByzj-Ed3y_wgByC4-BpjBSwWoGyt0uZjgSpuF6zlxMsCd889S378enj95sv1e23z19vPtxWVg1DrrrWikFZrbtp0Go3uaYHp2EEbEDKCTQK12gtcWg71UkYZStH2WvtVIuqsWrLLk65K8X7I6Zs5vJZKCeN1GroWq0Lji3bnVyWYkqEk1nJ3wH9MVKYR9ZmNs-szSNrIzpTWJfFq9Milh9-eSSTrMdg0XlCm42L_n8R_wD1l43i</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Feitosa, Sabrina A.</creator><creator>Lima, Nelson B.</creator><creator>Yoshito, Walter K.</creator><creator>Campos, Fernanda</creator><creator>Bottino, Marco A.</creator><creator>Valandro, Luiz F.</creator><creator>Bottino, Marco C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Bonding strategies to full-contour zirconia: Zirconia pretreatment with piranha solution, glaze and airborne-particle abrasion</title><author>Feitosa, Sabrina A. ; Lima, Nelson B. ; Yoshito, Walter K. ; Campos, Fernanda ; Bottino, Marco A. ; Valandro, Luiz F. ; Bottino, Marco C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-54c083c995f8936fd27ad9abae2a11fa9e0d2991e845351ab141b1799d34e32c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abrasion</topic><topic>Adhesion</topic><topic>Adhesion tests</topic><topic>Adhesive bonding</topic><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Bonding strength</topic><topic>Ceramic glazes</topic><topic>Contours</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Glaze</topic><topic>Hydrofluoric acid</topic><topic>Photomicrographs</topic><topic>Piranha solution</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Sandblasting</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Scratch test</topic><topic>Shape</topic><topic>Shear test</topic><topic>Shear tests</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Surface pretreatments</topic><topic>Surface treatment</topic><topic>Tetragonal zirconia polycrystals</topic><topic>Thermal cycling</topic><topic>Yttria-stabilized zirconia</topic><topic>Zirconia</topic><topic>Zirconium</topic><topic>Zirconium dioxide</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feitosa, Sabrina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Nelson B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshito, Walter K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valandro, Luiz F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of adhesion and adhesives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feitosa, Sabrina A.</au><au>Lima, Nelson B.</au><au>Yoshito, Walter K.</au><au>Campos, Fernanda</au><au>Bottino, Marco A.</au><au>Valandro, Luiz F.</au><au>Bottino, Marco C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bonding strategies to full-contour zirconia: Zirconia pretreatment with piranha solution, glaze and airborne-particle abrasion</atitle><jtitle>International journal of adhesion and adhesives</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>77</volume><spage>151</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>151-156</pages><issn>0143-7496</issn><eissn>1879-0127</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of various zirconia surface pretreatments on the adhesion between full contour 3Y-TZP zirconia and glaze, and the shear bond strength (SBS) between glazed/3Y-TZP and resin cement. Specimens were allocated into groups: GL-glaze; AL+GL-sandblasting with Al2O3+GL; CJ+GL-tribochemical silica coating (Cojet®/CJ)+GL; PS+GL-piranha solution+GL; and CJ. Adhesion between 3Y-TZP and GL was evaluated using the scratch test. Surface topography and glaze thickness were evaluated by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). For SBS, glazed/3Y-TZP surface was etched with hydrofluoric acid and a silane was applied. For CJ only the silane was applied. Samples were tested after 24h (24h wet) or after 15,000 thermal cycles and 90 days storage (thermocycled). After SBS, the type of failure was classified as: adhesive, mixed or cohesive. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. SEM analysis after scratch test revealed circular cracks in the GL group and conformal cracks in the others groups. SEM micrographs suggested that zirconia specimens submitted to airborne-particle abrasion presents rougher and porous surface when compared to surfaces treated with GL and PS. The glaze layer was approximately 1.86µm thick in all groups. After 24h, SBS test showed highest values for AL+GL and CJ+GL and were significantly higher when compared to the GL group. Differences were not significant between PS+GL and the other groups. After aging (thermocycling+storage), groups GL and CJ presented no statistically significant difference compared to 24h and aged AL+GL, CJ+GL and PS+GL groups. The predominant type of failure was mixed. 3Y-TZP surface treatment with glaze application could be considered as an alternative treatment, since it yielded a similar resin bond strength without the need for airborne-particle abrasion.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.05.007</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-7496
ispartof International journal of adhesion and adhesives, 2017-09, Vol.77, p.151-156
issn 0143-7496
1879-0127
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1938549904
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Abrasion
Adhesion
Adhesion tests
Adhesive bonding
Aluminum oxide
Bond strength
Bonding strength
Ceramic glazes
Contours
Failure analysis
Glaze
Hydrofluoric acid
Photomicrographs
Piranha solution
Pretreatment
Sandblasting
Scanning electron microscopy
Scratch test
Shape
Shear test
Shear tests
Silicon dioxide
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Surface pretreatments
Surface treatment
Tetragonal zirconia polycrystals
Thermal cycling
Yttria-stabilized zirconia
Zirconia
Zirconium
Zirconium dioxide
title Bonding strategies to full-contour zirconia: Zirconia pretreatment with piranha solution, glaze and airborne-particle abrasion
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A08%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bonding%20strategies%20to%20full-contour%20zirconia:%20Zirconia%20pretreatment%20with%20piranha%20solution,%20glaze%20and%20airborne-particle%20abrasion&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20adhesion%20and%20adhesives&rft.au=Feitosa,%20Sabrina%20A.&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=77&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=151-156&rft.issn=0143-7496&rft.eissn=1879-0127&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1938549904%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-54c083c995f8936fd27ad9abae2a11fa9e0d2991e845351ab141b1799d34e32c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1938549904&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true