Loading…
Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants
According to Federal Law no. 219-FZ, dated July 21, 2014, all enterprises that have a significant negative impact on the environment shall continuously monitor and account emissions of harmful substances into the atmospheric air. The choice of measuring equipment that is included in continuous emiss...
Saved in:
Published in: | Thermal engineering 2017, Vol.64 (10), p.738-744 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 744 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 738 |
container_title | Thermal engineering |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Kondrat’eva, O. E. Roslyakov, P. V. Burdyukov, D. A. Khudolei, O. D. Loktionov, O. A. |
description | According to Federal Law no. 219-FZ, dated July 21, 2014, all enterprises that have a significant negative impact on the environment shall continuously monitor and account emissions of harmful substances into the atmospheric air. The choice of measuring equipment that is included in continuous emission monitoring and accounting systems (CEM&ASs) is a complex technical problem; in particular, its solution requires a comparative analysis of gas analysis systems; each of these systems has its advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the choice of gas analysis systems for CEM&ASs should be maximally objective and not depend on preferences of separate experts and specialists. The technique of choosing gas analysis equipment that was developed in previous years at Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI) has been analyzed and the applicability of the mathematical tool of a multiple criteria analysis to choose measuring equipment for the continuous emission monitoring and accounting system have been estimated. New approaches to the optimal choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of the continuous monitoring and accounting of harmful emissions from thermal power plants have been proposed, new criteria of evaluation of gas analysis systems have been introduced, and weight coefficients have been determined for these criteria. The results of this study served as a basis for the Preliminary National Standard of the Russian Federation “Best Available Technologies. Automated Systems of Continuous Monitoring and Accounting of Emissions of Harmful (Polluting) Substances from Thermal Power Plants into the Atmospheric Air. Basic Requirements,” which was developed by the Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, in cooperation with the Council of Power Producers and Strategic Electric Power Investors Association and the All-Russia Research Institute for Materials and Technology Standardization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1134/S0040601517100056 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1940234255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1940234255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2366-c0ab19b406b1e7cbccb2a5ff0669b27357c5f0616e913ad64b0f458e76abc3573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gLuA62rSNqldyuAfCII_65JkkpkMTdLJbZF5DZ_YxHEhiKvL5XznXs5B6JySS0qr-uqVkJpwQhltKCGE8QM0o4yxgleEHqJZlousH6MTgE1a65qyGfp80So4p_1SjDZ4wMHjca2xWgerNA4GrwRg4UW_AwtYbyc7JHrEJkQMOxi1g0yp4EfrpzABdsHbMUTrV8m3xEKpMGVxlTntLMD3IxODy6-iEz0ewoeOeOiFH-EUHRnRgz77mXP0fnf7tngonp7vHxc3T4UqK84LRYSkrUypJdWNkkrJUjBjCOetLJuKNYqlhXLd0koseS2Jqdm1briQKqnVHF3s7w4xbCcNY7cJU0xJoaNtTcqqLhlLFN1TKgaAqE03ROtE3HWUdLn67k_1yVPuPTDkGnT8dflf0xfsXIjF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940234255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Kondrat’eva, O. E. ; Roslyakov, P. V. ; Burdyukov, D. A. ; Khudolei, O. D. ; Loktionov, O. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kondrat’eva, O. E. ; Roslyakov, P. V. ; Burdyukov, D. A. ; Khudolei, O. D. ; Loktionov, O. A.</creatorcontrib><description>According to Federal Law no. 219-FZ, dated July 21, 2014, all enterprises that have a significant negative impact on the environment shall continuously monitor and account emissions of harmful substances into the atmospheric air. The choice of measuring equipment that is included in continuous emission monitoring and accounting systems (CEM&ASs) is a complex technical problem; in particular, its solution requires a comparative analysis of gas analysis systems; each of these systems has its advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the choice of gas analysis systems for CEM&ASs should be maximally objective and not depend on preferences of separate experts and specialists. The technique of choosing gas analysis equipment that was developed in previous years at Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI) has been analyzed and the applicability of the mathematical tool of a multiple criteria analysis to choose measuring equipment for the continuous emission monitoring and accounting system have been estimated. New approaches to the optimal choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of the continuous monitoring and accounting of harmful emissions from thermal power plants have been proposed, new criteria of evaluation of gas analysis systems have been introduced, and weight coefficients have been determined for these criteria. The results of this study served as a basis for the Preliminary National Standard of the Russian Federation “Best Available Technologies. Automated Systems of Continuous Monitoring and Accounting of Emissions of Harmful (Polluting) Substances from Thermal Power Plants into the Atmospheric Air. Basic Requirements,” which was developed by the Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, in cooperation with the Council of Power Producers and Strategic Electric Power Investors Association and the All-Russia Research Institute for Materials and Technology Standardization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-6015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-6301</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0040601517100056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Colleges & universities ; Electric power plants ; Emission analysis ; Emissions ; Engineering ; Engineering Thermodynamics ; Environmental impact ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Protection ; Gas analysis ; Heat and Mass Transfer ; Industrial plant emissions ; Materials selection ; Mathematical analysis ; Multiple criterion ; Pollution monitoring ; Power plants ; Research facilities ; Standardization ; Systems analysis ; Thermoelectricity</subject><ispartof>Thermal engineering, 2017, Vol.64 (10), p.738-744</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kondrat’eva, O. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roslyakov, P. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdyukov, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khudolei, O. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loktionov, O. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants</title><title>Thermal engineering</title><addtitle>Therm. Eng</addtitle><description>According to Federal Law no. 219-FZ, dated July 21, 2014, all enterprises that have a significant negative impact on the environment shall continuously monitor and account emissions of harmful substances into the atmospheric air. The choice of measuring equipment that is included in continuous emission monitoring and accounting systems (CEM&ASs) is a complex technical problem; in particular, its solution requires a comparative analysis of gas analysis systems; each of these systems has its advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the choice of gas analysis systems for CEM&ASs should be maximally objective and not depend on preferences of separate experts and specialists. The technique of choosing gas analysis equipment that was developed in previous years at Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI) has been analyzed and the applicability of the mathematical tool of a multiple criteria analysis to choose measuring equipment for the continuous emission monitoring and accounting system have been estimated. New approaches to the optimal choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of the continuous monitoring and accounting of harmful emissions from thermal power plants have been proposed, new criteria of evaluation of gas analysis systems have been introduced, and weight coefficients have been determined for these criteria. The results of this study served as a basis for the Preliminary National Standard of the Russian Federation “Best Available Technologies. Automated Systems of Continuous Monitoring and Accounting of Emissions of Harmful (Polluting) Substances from Thermal Power Plants into the Atmospheric Air. Basic Requirements,” which was developed by the Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, in cooperation with the Council of Power Producers and Strategic Electric Power Investors Association and the All-Russia Research Institute for Materials and Technology Standardization.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Electric power plants</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Protection</subject><subject>Gas analysis</subject><subject>Heat and Mass Transfer</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Pollution monitoring</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Thermoelectricity</subject><issn>0040-6015</issn><issn>1555-6301</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gLuA62rSNqldyuAfCII_65JkkpkMTdLJbZF5DZ_YxHEhiKvL5XznXs5B6JySS0qr-uqVkJpwQhltKCGE8QM0o4yxgleEHqJZlousH6MTgE1a65qyGfp80So4p_1SjDZ4wMHjca2xWgerNA4GrwRg4UW_AwtYbyc7JHrEJkQMOxi1g0yp4EfrpzABdsHbMUTrV8m3xEKpMGVxlTntLMD3IxODy6-iEz0ewoeOeOiFH-EUHRnRgz77mXP0fnf7tngonp7vHxc3T4UqK84LRYSkrUypJdWNkkrJUjBjCOetLJuKNYqlhXLd0koseS2Jqdm1briQKqnVHF3s7w4xbCcNY7cJU0xJoaNtTcqqLhlLFN1TKgaAqE03ROtE3HWUdLn67k_1yVPuPTDkGnT8dflf0xfsXIjF</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Kondrat’eva, O. E.</creator><creator>Roslyakov, P. V.</creator><creator>Burdyukov, D. A.</creator><creator>Khudolei, O. D.</creator><creator>Loktionov, O. A.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants</title><author>Kondrat’eva, O. E. ; Roslyakov, P. V. ; Burdyukov, D. A. ; Khudolei, O. D. ; Loktionov, O. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2366-c0ab19b406b1e7cbccb2a5ff0669b27357c5f0616e913ad64b0f458e76abc3573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Electric power plants</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Protection</topic><topic>Gas analysis</topic><topic>Heat and Mass Transfer</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Pollution monitoring</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Thermoelectricity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kondrat’eva, O. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roslyakov, P. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdyukov, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khudolei, O. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loktionov, O. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Thermal engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kondrat’eva, O. E.</au><au>Roslyakov, P. V.</au><au>Burdyukov, D. A.</au><au>Khudolei, O. D.</au><au>Loktionov, O. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants</atitle><jtitle>Thermal engineering</jtitle><stitle>Therm. Eng</stitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>744</epage><pages>738-744</pages><issn>0040-6015</issn><eissn>1555-6301</eissn><abstract>According to Federal Law no. 219-FZ, dated July 21, 2014, all enterprises that have a significant negative impact on the environment shall continuously monitor and account emissions of harmful substances into the atmospheric air. The choice of measuring equipment that is included in continuous emission monitoring and accounting systems (CEM&ASs) is a complex technical problem; in particular, its solution requires a comparative analysis of gas analysis systems; each of these systems has its advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the choice of gas analysis systems for CEM&ASs should be maximally objective and not depend on preferences of separate experts and specialists. The technique of choosing gas analysis equipment that was developed in previous years at Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI) has been analyzed and the applicability of the mathematical tool of a multiple criteria analysis to choose measuring equipment for the continuous emission monitoring and accounting system have been estimated. New approaches to the optimal choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of the continuous monitoring and accounting of harmful emissions from thermal power plants have been proposed, new criteria of evaluation of gas analysis systems have been introduced, and weight coefficients have been determined for these criteria. The results of this study served as a basis for the Preliminary National Standard of the Russian Federation “Best Available Technologies. Automated Systems of Continuous Monitoring and Accounting of Emissions of Harmful (Polluting) Substances from Thermal Power Plants into the Atmospheric Air. Basic Requirements,” which was developed by the Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, in cooperation with the Council of Power Producers and Strategic Electric Power Investors Association and the All-Russia Research Institute for Materials and Technology Standardization.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S0040601517100056</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-6015 |
ispartof | Thermal engineering, 2017, Vol.64 (10), p.738-744 |
issn | 0040-6015 1555-6301 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1940234255 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Accounting Colleges & universities Electric power plants Emission analysis Emissions Engineering Engineering Thermodynamics Environmental impact Environmental monitoring Environmental Protection Gas analysis Heat and Mass Transfer Industrial plant emissions Materials selection Mathematical analysis Multiple criterion Pollution monitoring Power plants Research facilities Standardization Systems analysis Thermoelectricity |
title | Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A50%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recommendations%20on%20the%20choice%20of%20gas%20analysis%20equipment%20for%20systems%20of%20continuous%20monitoring%20and%20accounting%20of%20emissions%20from%20thermal%20power%20plants&rft.jtitle=Thermal%20engineering&rft.au=Kondrat%E2%80%99eva,%20O.%20E.&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=744&rft.pages=738-744&rft.issn=0040-6015&rft.eissn=1555-6301&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0040601517100056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1940234255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2366-c0ab19b406b1e7cbccb2a5ff0669b27357c5f0616e913ad64b0f458e76abc3573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940234255&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |