Loading…

Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants

According to Federal Law no. 219-FZ, dated July 21, 2014, all enterprises that have a significant negative impact on the environment shall continuously monitor and account emissions of harmful substances into the atmospheric air. The choice of measuring equipment that is included in continuous emiss...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Thermal engineering 2017, Vol.64 (10), p.738-744
Main Authors: Kondrat’eva, O. E., Roslyakov, P. V., Burdyukov, D. A., Khudolei, O. D., Loktionov, O. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 744
container_issue 10
container_start_page 738
container_title Thermal engineering
container_volume 64
creator Kondrat’eva, O. E.
Roslyakov, P. V.
Burdyukov, D. A.
Khudolei, O. D.
Loktionov, O. A.
description According to Federal Law no. 219-FZ, dated July 21, 2014, all enterprises that have a significant negative impact on the environment shall continuously monitor and account emissions of harmful substances into the atmospheric air. The choice of measuring equipment that is included in continuous emission monitoring and accounting systems (CEM&ASs) is a complex technical problem; in particular, its solution requires a comparative analysis of gas analysis systems; each of these systems has its advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the choice of gas analysis systems for CEM&ASs should be maximally objective and not depend on preferences of separate experts and specialists. The technique of choosing gas analysis equipment that was developed in previous years at Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI) has been analyzed and the applicability of the mathematical tool of a multiple criteria analysis to choose measuring equipment for the continuous emission monitoring and accounting system have been estimated. New approaches to the optimal choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of the continuous monitoring and accounting of harmful emissions from thermal power plants have been proposed, new criteria of evaluation of gas analysis systems have been introduced, and weight coefficients have been determined for these criteria. The results of this study served as a basis for the Preliminary National Standard of the Russian Federation “Best Available Technologies. Automated Systems of Continuous Monitoring and Accounting of Emissions of Harmful (Polluting) Substances from Thermal Power Plants into the Atmospheric Air. Basic Requirements,” which was developed by the Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, in cooperation with the Council of Power Producers and Strategic Electric Power Investors Association and the All-Russia Research Institute for Materials and Technology Standardization.
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S0040601517100056
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1940234255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1940234255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2366-c0ab19b406b1e7cbccb2a5ff0669b27357c5f0616e913ad64b0f458e76abc3573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gLuA62rSNqldyuAfCII_65JkkpkMTdLJbZF5DZ_YxHEhiKvL5XznXs5B6JySS0qr-uqVkJpwQhltKCGE8QM0o4yxgleEHqJZlousH6MTgE1a65qyGfp80So4p_1SjDZ4wMHjca2xWgerNA4GrwRg4UW_AwtYbyc7JHrEJkQMOxi1g0yp4EfrpzABdsHbMUTrV8m3xEKpMGVxlTntLMD3IxODy6-iEz0ewoeOeOiFH-EUHRnRgz77mXP0fnf7tngonp7vHxc3T4UqK84LRYSkrUypJdWNkkrJUjBjCOetLJuKNYqlhXLd0koseS2Jqdm1briQKqnVHF3s7w4xbCcNY7cJU0xJoaNtTcqqLhlLFN1TKgaAqE03ROtE3HWUdLn67k_1yVPuPTDkGnT8dflf0xfsXIjF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940234255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Kondrat’eva, O. E. ; Roslyakov, P. V. ; Burdyukov, D. A. ; Khudolei, O. D. ; Loktionov, O. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kondrat’eva, O. E. ; Roslyakov, P. V. ; Burdyukov, D. A. ; Khudolei, O. D. ; Loktionov, O. A.</creatorcontrib><description>According to Federal Law no. 219-FZ, dated July 21, 2014, all enterprises that have a significant negative impact on the environment shall continuously monitor and account emissions of harmful substances into the atmospheric air. The choice of measuring equipment that is included in continuous emission monitoring and accounting systems (CEM&amp;ASs) is a complex technical problem; in particular, its solution requires a comparative analysis of gas analysis systems; each of these systems has its advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the choice of gas analysis systems for CEM&amp;ASs should be maximally objective and not depend on preferences of separate experts and specialists. The technique of choosing gas analysis equipment that was developed in previous years at Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI) has been analyzed and the applicability of the mathematical tool of a multiple criteria analysis to choose measuring equipment for the continuous emission monitoring and accounting system have been estimated. New approaches to the optimal choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of the continuous monitoring and accounting of harmful emissions from thermal power plants have been proposed, new criteria of evaluation of gas analysis systems have been introduced, and weight coefficients have been determined for these criteria. The results of this study served as a basis for the Preliminary National Standard of the Russian Federation “Best Available Technologies. Automated Systems of Continuous Monitoring and Accounting of Emissions of Harmful (Polluting) Substances from Thermal Power Plants into the Atmospheric Air. Basic Requirements,” which was developed by the Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, in cooperation with the Council of Power Producers and Strategic Electric Power Investors Association and the All-Russia Research Institute for Materials and Technology Standardization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-6015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-6301</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0040601517100056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Electric power plants ; Emission analysis ; Emissions ; Engineering ; Engineering Thermodynamics ; Environmental impact ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Protection ; Gas analysis ; Heat and Mass Transfer ; Industrial plant emissions ; Materials selection ; Mathematical analysis ; Multiple criterion ; Pollution monitoring ; Power plants ; Research facilities ; Standardization ; Systems analysis ; Thermoelectricity</subject><ispartof>Thermal engineering, 2017, Vol.64 (10), p.738-744</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kondrat’eva, O. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roslyakov, P. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdyukov, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khudolei, O. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loktionov, O. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants</title><title>Thermal engineering</title><addtitle>Therm. Eng</addtitle><description>According to Federal Law no. 219-FZ, dated July 21, 2014, all enterprises that have a significant negative impact on the environment shall continuously monitor and account emissions of harmful substances into the atmospheric air. The choice of measuring equipment that is included in continuous emission monitoring and accounting systems (CEM&amp;ASs) is a complex technical problem; in particular, its solution requires a comparative analysis of gas analysis systems; each of these systems has its advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the choice of gas analysis systems for CEM&amp;ASs should be maximally objective and not depend on preferences of separate experts and specialists. The technique of choosing gas analysis equipment that was developed in previous years at Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI) has been analyzed and the applicability of the mathematical tool of a multiple criteria analysis to choose measuring equipment for the continuous emission monitoring and accounting system have been estimated. New approaches to the optimal choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of the continuous monitoring and accounting of harmful emissions from thermal power plants have been proposed, new criteria of evaluation of gas analysis systems have been introduced, and weight coefficients have been determined for these criteria. The results of this study served as a basis for the Preliminary National Standard of the Russian Federation “Best Available Technologies. Automated Systems of Continuous Monitoring and Accounting of Emissions of Harmful (Polluting) Substances from Thermal Power Plants into the Atmospheric Air. Basic Requirements,” which was developed by the Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, in cooperation with the Council of Power Producers and Strategic Electric Power Investors Association and the All-Russia Research Institute for Materials and Technology Standardization.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Electric power plants</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Protection</subject><subject>Gas analysis</subject><subject>Heat and Mass Transfer</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Pollution monitoring</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Thermoelectricity</subject><issn>0040-6015</issn><issn>1555-6301</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gLuA62rSNqldyuAfCII_65JkkpkMTdLJbZF5DZ_YxHEhiKvL5XznXs5B6JySS0qr-uqVkJpwQhltKCGE8QM0o4yxgleEHqJZlousH6MTgE1a65qyGfp80So4p_1SjDZ4wMHjca2xWgerNA4GrwRg4UW_AwtYbyc7JHrEJkQMOxi1g0yp4EfrpzABdsHbMUTrV8m3xEKpMGVxlTntLMD3IxODy6-iEz0ewoeOeOiFH-EUHRnRgz77mXP0fnf7tngonp7vHxc3T4UqK84LRYSkrUypJdWNkkrJUjBjCOetLJuKNYqlhXLd0koseS2Jqdm1briQKqnVHF3s7w4xbCcNY7cJU0xJoaNtTcqqLhlLFN1TKgaAqE03ROtE3HWUdLn67k_1yVPuPTDkGnT8dflf0xfsXIjF</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Kondrat’eva, O. E.</creator><creator>Roslyakov, P. V.</creator><creator>Burdyukov, D. A.</creator><creator>Khudolei, O. D.</creator><creator>Loktionov, O. A.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants</title><author>Kondrat’eva, O. E. ; Roslyakov, P. V. ; Burdyukov, D. A. ; Khudolei, O. D. ; Loktionov, O. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2366-c0ab19b406b1e7cbccb2a5ff0669b27357c5f0616e913ad64b0f458e76abc3573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Electric power plants</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Protection</topic><topic>Gas analysis</topic><topic>Heat and Mass Transfer</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Pollution monitoring</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Thermoelectricity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kondrat’eva, O. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roslyakov, P. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdyukov, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khudolei, O. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loktionov, O. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Thermal engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kondrat’eva, O. E.</au><au>Roslyakov, P. V.</au><au>Burdyukov, D. A.</au><au>Khudolei, O. D.</au><au>Loktionov, O. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants</atitle><jtitle>Thermal engineering</jtitle><stitle>Therm. Eng</stitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>744</epage><pages>738-744</pages><issn>0040-6015</issn><eissn>1555-6301</eissn><abstract>According to Federal Law no. 219-FZ, dated July 21, 2014, all enterprises that have a significant negative impact on the environment shall continuously monitor and account emissions of harmful substances into the atmospheric air. The choice of measuring equipment that is included in continuous emission monitoring and accounting systems (CEM&amp;ASs) is a complex technical problem; in particular, its solution requires a comparative analysis of gas analysis systems; each of these systems has its advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the choice of gas analysis systems for CEM&amp;ASs should be maximally objective and not depend on preferences of separate experts and specialists. The technique of choosing gas analysis equipment that was developed in previous years at Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI) has been analyzed and the applicability of the mathematical tool of a multiple criteria analysis to choose measuring equipment for the continuous emission monitoring and accounting system have been estimated. New approaches to the optimal choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of the continuous monitoring and accounting of harmful emissions from thermal power plants have been proposed, new criteria of evaluation of gas analysis systems have been introduced, and weight coefficients have been determined for these criteria. The results of this study served as a basis for the Preliminary National Standard of the Russian Federation “Best Available Technologies. Automated Systems of Continuous Monitoring and Accounting of Emissions of Harmful (Polluting) Substances from Thermal Power Plants into the Atmospheric Air. Basic Requirements,” which was developed by the Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, in cooperation with the Council of Power Producers and Strategic Electric Power Investors Association and the All-Russia Research Institute for Materials and Technology Standardization.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S0040601517100056</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-6015
ispartof Thermal engineering, 2017, Vol.64 (10), p.738-744
issn 0040-6015
1555-6301
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1940234255
source Springer Nature
subjects Accounting
Colleges & universities
Electric power plants
Emission analysis
Emissions
Engineering
Engineering Thermodynamics
Environmental impact
Environmental monitoring
Environmental Protection
Gas analysis
Heat and Mass Transfer
Industrial plant emissions
Materials selection
Mathematical analysis
Multiple criterion
Pollution monitoring
Power plants
Research facilities
Standardization
Systems analysis
Thermoelectricity
title Recommendations on the choice of gas analysis equipment for systems of continuous monitoring and accounting of emissions from thermal power plants
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A50%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recommendations%20on%20the%20choice%20of%20gas%20analysis%20equipment%20for%20systems%20of%20continuous%20monitoring%20and%20accounting%20of%20emissions%20from%20thermal%20power%20plants&rft.jtitle=Thermal%20engineering&rft.au=Kondrat%E2%80%99eva,%20O.%20E.&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=744&rft.pages=738-744&rft.issn=0040-6015&rft.eissn=1555-6301&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0040601517100056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1940234255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2366-c0ab19b406b1e7cbccb2a5ff0669b27357c5f0616e913ad64b0f458e76abc3573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940234255&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true