The Hollowing of American Public Administration

Effectively linking public administration theory to practical relevance has proven a difficult task. We argue, however, that the theory–practice conundrum is but a symptom of a more fundamental problem in public administration: the hollowing out of the field. Despite research advances, hollowing occ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American review of public administration 2017-10, Vol.47 (7), p.719-736
Main Authors: Durant, Robert F., Rosenbloom, David H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bureaucracy
Criticism
Efficiency
Fairness
Intellectuals
Narratives
Pillars
Public administration
Scaffolding
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Effectively linking public administration theory to practical relevance has proven a difficult task. We argue, however, that the theory–practice conundrum is but a symptom of a more fundamental problem in public administration: the hollowing out of the field. Despite research advances, hollowing occurs because of the field’s conceptually muddled and decontextualized normative pillars, problematic macrodynamic foundations, and imbalanced scaffolding for integrating its multiple research narratives and methodologies efficaciously for both scholars and practitioners. To illustrate our points, we first critique the logic and empirical basis of two major pillars of public administration: efficiency and social equity. We then show how and why the field also has problematic macrodynamic foundations due to its failure to incorporate important developments in cognate fields related to administrative history, contexts, and processes. We next offer a problem-centered organizational framework for the field to help address the scaffolding problem in public administration.
ISSN:0275-0740
1552-3357
DOI:10.1177/0275074015627218