Changing votes or changing voters? How candidates and election context swing voters and mobilize the base

• Published in: Electoral studies 2017-08, Vol.48, p.131-148
• Main Author: Hill, Seth J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bayesian analysis; Campaign expenditures; Campaign mobilization; Campaigns; Candidates; Elections; Electoral change; Expenditures; Hierarchical model; Influence; Legislatures; Political campaigns; Supporters; Swing voters; Voter turnout; Voters
• ISSN: 0261-3794; 1873-6890
• DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.06.001

To win elections, candidates attempt to mobilize supporters and persuade swing voters. With what magnitude each operates across American elections is not clear. I argue that the influence of swing voters should depend upon change in the candidates across elections and that the consequences of changes in composition should depend upon the relative balance of campaign expenditures. I estimate a Bayesian hierarchical model on Florida electoral data for house, governor, and senate contests. Swing voters contribute on average 4.1 percentage points to change in party vote shares, while change in turnout influences outcomes by 8.6 points. The effect of swing voters is increasing in the divergence between the Democrat and Republican candidates. Candidates increasingly benefit from the votes of occasional voters as the relative balance of campaign spending increases in their favor. More broadly, the effects of swing voters and turnout are not constant features of American elections, instead varying across time and space in ways related to candidates and context.