Loading…

How well do route survey areas represent landscapes at larger spatial extents? An analysis of land cover composition along Breeding Bird Survey routes

The occurrence of birds in a survey unit is partly determined by the habitat present. Moreover, some bird species preferentially avoid some land cover types and are attracted to others. As such, land cover composition within the 400 m survey areas along a Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) route clearly inf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 2017-08, Vol.119 (3), p.607-615
Main Authors: Veech, Joseph A, Pardieck, Keith L, Ziolkowski, David J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-8d50f9cdb6ec77ef9640bade312d7eb74cbc295731b8bc148eeab97cf3f47bba3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-8d50f9cdb6ec77ef9640bade312d7eb74cbc295731b8bc148eeab97cf3f47bba3
container_end_page 615
container_issue 3
container_start_page 607
container_title The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)
container_volume 119
creator Veech, Joseph A
Pardieck, Keith L
Ziolkowski, David J
description The occurrence of birds in a survey unit is partly determined by the habitat present. Moreover, some bird species preferentially avoid some land cover types and are attracted to others. As such, land cover composition within the 400 m survey areas along a Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) route clearly influences the species available to be detected. Ideally, to extend survey results to the larger landscape, land cover composition within the survey area should be similar to that at larger spatial extents defining the landscape. Such representativeness helps minimize possible roadside effects (bias), here defined as differences in bird species composition and abundance along a roadside as compared to a larger surrounding landscape. We used land cover data from the 2011 National Land Cover Database to examine representativeness of land cover composition along routes. Using ArcGIS, the percentages of each of 15 land cover types within 400 m buffers along 2,696 U.S. BBS routes were calculated and compared to percentages in 2 km, 5 km, and 10 km buffers surrounding each route. This assessment revealed that aquatic cover types and highly urbanized land tend to be slightly underrepresented in the survey areas. Two anthropogenic cover types (pasture/hay and cropland) may be slightly overrepresented in the survey areas. Over all cover types, 92% of the 2,696 routes exhibited “good” representativeness, with
doi_str_mv 10.1650/CONDOR-17-15.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1942220653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>90014242</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>90014242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-8d50f9cdb6ec77ef9640bade312d7eb74cbc295731b8bc148eeab97cf3f47bba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZYdkiS0pdl5uVqiUR5EqKvFYW7YzqVKlcfAkLf0RvheXILas7NGcO2MfQs45G_E0YdfTxfPd4iXgIuDJiB-QAc-icZDwMDskA8Y4C5I4DI_JCeKK-TqMwwH5mtkt3UJV0dxSZ7sWKHZuAzuqHCikDhoHCHVLK1XnaFQDSNW-cktwFBvVlqqi8Nl6Bm_opKaqVtUOS6S2-AlRYzceNXbdWCzb0nqksvWS3jqAvNxfSpfT137tzxvwlBwVqkI4-z2H5P3h_m06C-aLx6fpZB7oKE3bYJwnrMhMrlMwQkCRpTHTKoeIh7kALWKjTZglIuJ6rA2PxwBKZ8IUURELrVU0JJf93MbZjw6wlSvbOf8BlDzztkKWJpGnRj1lnEV0UMjGlWvldpIzuXcve_eSC8kTyX3gog-ssLXuj8689dhr9_2rvq9La2v4b9w3AHSTbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1942220653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How well do route survey areas represent landscapes at larger spatial extents? An analysis of land cover composition along Breeding Bird Survey routes</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Veech, Joseph A ; Pardieck, Keith L ; Ziolkowski, David J</creator><creatorcontrib>Veech, Joseph A ; Pardieck, Keith L ; Ziolkowski, David J</creatorcontrib><description>The occurrence of birds in a survey unit is partly determined by the habitat present. Moreover, some bird species preferentially avoid some land cover types and are attracted to others. As such, land cover composition within the 400 m survey areas along a Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) route clearly influences the species available to be detected. Ideally, to extend survey results to the larger landscape, land cover composition within the survey area should be similar to that at larger spatial extents defining the landscape. Such representativeness helps minimize possible roadside effects (bias), here defined as differences in bird species composition and abundance along a roadside as compared to a larger surrounding landscape. We used land cover data from the 2011 National Land Cover Database to examine representativeness of land cover composition along routes. Using ArcGIS, the percentages of each of 15 land cover types within 400 m buffers along 2,696 U.S. BBS routes were calculated and compared to percentages in 2 km, 5 km, and 10 km buffers surrounding each route. This assessment revealed that aquatic cover types and highly urbanized land tend to be slightly underrepresented in the survey areas. Two anthropogenic cover types (pasture/hay and cropland) may be slightly overrepresented in the survey areas. Over all cover types, 92% of the 2,696 routes exhibited “good” representativeness, with &lt;5 percentage points per cover type difference in proportional cover between the 400 m and 10 km buffers. This assessment further supports previous research indicating that any land-cover-based roadside bias in the bird data of the BBS is likely minimal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-5422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-17-15.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waco: The Cooper Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Agricultural land ; Animal breeding ; anthropogenic ; Anthropogenic factors ; Bias ; bird survey ; Birds ; Breeding ; Buffers ; conservation ; habitat ; Habitats ; Human influences ; Land cover ; Landscape ; Ornithology ; Pasture ; Polls &amp; surveys ; RESEARCH ARTICLE ; Routes ; Spatial analysis ; Species composition ; survey unit ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 2017-08, Vol.119 (3), p.607-615</ispartof><rights>2017 Cooper Ornithological Society.</rights><rights>2017 American Ornithological Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Ornithological Society Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-8d50f9cdb6ec77ef9640bade312d7eb74cbc295731b8bc148eeab97cf3f47bba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-8d50f9cdb6ec77ef9640bade312d7eb74cbc295731b8bc148eeab97cf3f47bba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90014242$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/90014242$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Veech, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardieck, Keith L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziolkowski, David J</creatorcontrib><title>How well do route survey areas represent landscapes at larger spatial extents? An analysis of land cover composition along Breeding Bird Survey routes</title><title>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</title><description>The occurrence of birds in a survey unit is partly determined by the habitat present. Moreover, some bird species preferentially avoid some land cover types and are attracted to others. As such, land cover composition within the 400 m survey areas along a Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) route clearly influences the species available to be detected. Ideally, to extend survey results to the larger landscape, land cover composition within the survey area should be similar to that at larger spatial extents defining the landscape. Such representativeness helps minimize possible roadside effects (bias), here defined as differences in bird species composition and abundance along a roadside as compared to a larger surrounding landscape. We used land cover data from the 2011 National Land Cover Database to examine representativeness of land cover composition along routes. Using ArcGIS, the percentages of each of 15 land cover types within 400 m buffers along 2,696 U.S. BBS routes were calculated and compared to percentages in 2 km, 5 km, and 10 km buffers surrounding each route. This assessment revealed that aquatic cover types and highly urbanized land tend to be slightly underrepresented in the survey areas. Two anthropogenic cover types (pasture/hay and cropland) may be slightly overrepresented in the survey areas. Over all cover types, 92% of the 2,696 routes exhibited “good” representativeness, with &lt;5 percentage points per cover type difference in proportional cover between the 400 m and 10 km buffers. This assessment further supports previous research indicating that any land-cover-based roadside bias in the bird data of the BBS is likely minimal.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>anthropogenic</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>bird survey</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>conservation</subject><subject>habitat</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><subject>Routes</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>survey unit</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0010-5422</issn><issn>1938-5129</issn><issn>2732-4621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZYdkiS0pdl5uVqiUR5EqKvFYW7YzqVKlcfAkLf0RvheXILas7NGcO2MfQs45G_E0YdfTxfPd4iXgIuDJiB-QAc-icZDwMDskA8Y4C5I4DI_JCeKK-TqMwwH5mtkt3UJV0dxSZ7sWKHZuAzuqHCikDhoHCHVLK1XnaFQDSNW-cktwFBvVlqqi8Nl6Bm_opKaqVtUOS6S2-AlRYzceNXbdWCzb0nqksvWS3jqAvNxfSpfT137tzxvwlBwVqkI4-z2H5P3h_m06C-aLx6fpZB7oKE3bYJwnrMhMrlMwQkCRpTHTKoeIh7kALWKjTZglIuJ6rA2PxwBKZ8IUURELrVU0JJf93MbZjw6wlSvbOf8BlDzztkKWJpGnRj1lnEV0UMjGlWvldpIzuXcve_eSC8kTyX3gog-ssLXuj8689dhr9_2rvq9La2v4b9w3AHSTbA</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Veech, Joseph A</creator><creator>Pardieck, Keith L</creator><creator>Ziolkowski, David J</creator><general>The Cooper Ornithological Society</general><general>Cooper Ornithological Society</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>How well do route survey areas represent landscapes at larger spatial extents? An analysis of land cover composition along Breeding Bird Survey routes</title><author>Veech, Joseph A ; Pardieck, Keith L ; Ziolkowski, David J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-8d50f9cdb6ec77ef9640bade312d7eb74cbc295731b8bc148eeab97cf3f47bba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>anthropogenic</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>bird survey</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>conservation</topic><topic>habitat</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>RESEARCH ARTICLE</topic><topic>Routes</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>survey unit</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Veech, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardieck, Keith L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziolkowski, David J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Veech, Joseph A</au><au>Pardieck, Keith L</au><au>Ziolkowski, David J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How well do route survey areas represent landscapes at larger spatial extents? An analysis of land cover composition along Breeding Bird Survey routes</atitle><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>615</epage><pages>607-615</pages><issn>0010-5422</issn><eissn>1938-5129</eissn><eissn>2732-4621</eissn><abstract>The occurrence of birds in a survey unit is partly determined by the habitat present. Moreover, some bird species preferentially avoid some land cover types and are attracted to others. As such, land cover composition within the 400 m survey areas along a Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) route clearly influences the species available to be detected. Ideally, to extend survey results to the larger landscape, land cover composition within the survey area should be similar to that at larger spatial extents defining the landscape. Such representativeness helps minimize possible roadside effects (bias), here defined as differences in bird species composition and abundance along a roadside as compared to a larger surrounding landscape. We used land cover data from the 2011 National Land Cover Database to examine representativeness of land cover composition along routes. Using ArcGIS, the percentages of each of 15 land cover types within 400 m buffers along 2,696 U.S. BBS routes were calculated and compared to percentages in 2 km, 5 km, and 10 km buffers surrounding each route. This assessment revealed that aquatic cover types and highly urbanized land tend to be slightly underrepresented in the survey areas. Two anthropogenic cover types (pasture/hay and cropland) may be slightly overrepresented in the survey areas. Over all cover types, 92% of the 2,696 routes exhibited “good” representativeness, with &lt;5 percentage points per cover type difference in proportional cover between the 400 m and 10 km buffers. This assessment further supports previous research indicating that any land-cover-based roadside bias in the bird data of the BBS is likely minimal.</abstract><cop>Waco</cop><pub>The Cooper Ornithological Society</pub><doi>10.1650/CONDOR-17-15.1</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-5422
ispartof The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 2017-08, Vol.119 (3), p.607-615
issn 0010-5422
1938-5129
2732-4621
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1942220653
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford Journals Online
subjects Abundance
Agricultural land
Animal breeding
anthropogenic
Anthropogenic factors
Bias
bird survey
Birds
Breeding
Buffers
conservation
habitat
Habitats
Human influences
Land cover
Landscape
Ornithology
Pasture
Polls & surveys
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Routes
Spatial analysis
Species composition
survey unit
Vegetation
title How well do route survey areas represent landscapes at larger spatial extents? An analysis of land cover composition along Breeding Bird Survey routes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A30%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20well%20do%20route%20survey%20areas%20represent%20landscapes%20at%20larger%20spatial%20extents?%20An%20analysis%20of%20land%20cover%20composition%20along%20Breeding%20Bird%20Survey%20routes&rft.jtitle=The%20Condor%20(Los%20Angeles,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Veech,%20Joseph%20A&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=615&rft.pages=607-615&rft.issn=0010-5422&rft.eissn=1938-5129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1650/CONDOR-17-15.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E90014242%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b366t-8d50f9cdb6ec77ef9640bade312d7eb74cbc295731b8bc148eeab97cf3f47bba3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1942220653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=90014242&rfr_iscdi=true