Loading…
Graphic Analysis of Genotype, Environment, Nitrogen Fertilizer, and Their Interactions on Spring Wheat Yield
Interest in growing hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in eastern Canada is increasing due to its potential returns relative to other small‐grain cereals and oilseed crops. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of year, site, genotype, N application, and their interact...
Saved in:
Published in: | Agronomy journal 2004-01, Vol.96 (1), p.169-180 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3520-79c55a3ebc9afd132a0369e81fe28c99f6316bd7cd7ae4cc3960aef6b47a28df3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3520-79c55a3ebc9afd132a0369e81fe28c99f6316bd7cd7ae4cc3960aef6b47a28df3 |
container_end_page | 180 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Ma, B. L. Yan, W. Dwyer, L. M. Frégeau‐Reid, J. Voldeng, H. D. Dion, Y. Nass, H. |
description | Interest in growing hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in eastern Canada is increasing due to its potential returns relative to other small‐grain cereals and oilseed crops. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of year, site, genotype, N application, and their interactions on the yield of hard red spring wheat (HRSW) and to demonstrate the application of the recently developed biplot methodology in visualizing agronomic research data. Ten HRSW cultivars were grown in five locations across three provinces from 1998 to 2000, constituting a total of 11 year–site combinations. In each environment, four levels of fertilizer N (50, 100, 150, and 200 kg ha−1) were applied. The N main effect, N × environment interaction, and N × genotype interaction were not significant. However, biplot analysis did reveal crossover N × environment interactions: Although higher N rates generally led to higher yield, the opposite was true in some environments. This was attributed to heavy Fusarium head blight (Fusarium graminearum Schwabe) and/or foliar diseases in these environments, which was exacerbated by higher N rates. The strong genotype × environment interactions were mainly associated with two cultivars that yielded well in most environments but very poorly in two environments in which Fusarium head blight was severe. This study thus highlighted the importance of Fusarium head blight resistance in HRSW production in eastern Canada. An environment × factor biplot was described for the first time, which was highly effective in revealing the interrelationship among environmental factors and in revealing the weather and soil patterns of the environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj2004.1690 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194502879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>551927241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3520-79c55a3ebc9afd132a0369e81fe28c99f6316bd7cd7ae4cc3960aef6b47a28df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWD_OXoPgrVvzsR_NSYrYVSktaEU8LdPspE3ZZmuyKvWvd9sKHj0NDO_9Zt4j5IKznuAyvoa5r91SMBb3eKrYAenwWCYRS-PkkHQYYyLiKhXH5CSEJWOcq5h3SJV7WC-spgMH1SbYQGtDc3R1s1ljl965T9tiV-iaLh3bxtdzdHSIvrGV_UbfpeBKOl2g9fTBNehBN7Z2LcXR57W3bk5fFwgNfbNYlWfkyEAV8Px3npKX4d309j4aTfKH28Eo0jIRLMqUThKQONMKTMmlACZThX1uUPS1UiaVPJ2VmS4zwFhrqVIGaNJZnIHol0aekss9d-3r9w8MTbGsP3wbMBRt6oSJfqZa0fVepH0dgkdTtP-uwG8Kzopto8Vfo8W20dZx9YuFoKEyHpy24c-WxDyTO_LNXvdlK9z8hy0G-aMY5E-T8eN2t7v0AyeLi7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194502879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Graphic Analysis of Genotype, Environment, Nitrogen Fertilizer, and Their Interactions on Spring Wheat Yield</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Ma, B. L. ; Yan, W. ; Dwyer, L. M. ; Frégeau‐Reid, J. ; Voldeng, H. D. ; Dion, Y. ; Nass, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, B. L. ; Yan, W. ; Dwyer, L. M. ; Frégeau‐Reid, J. ; Voldeng, H. D. ; Dion, Y. ; Nass, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Interest in growing hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in eastern Canada is increasing due to its potential returns relative to other small‐grain cereals and oilseed crops. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of year, site, genotype, N application, and their interactions on the yield of hard red spring wheat (HRSW) and to demonstrate the application of the recently developed biplot methodology in visualizing agronomic research data. Ten HRSW cultivars were grown in five locations across three provinces from 1998 to 2000, constituting a total of 11 year–site combinations. In each environment, four levels of fertilizer N (50, 100, 150, and 200 kg ha−1) were applied. The N main effect, N × environment interaction, and N × genotype interaction were not significant. However, biplot analysis did reveal crossover N × environment interactions: Although higher N rates generally led to higher yield, the opposite was true in some environments. This was attributed to heavy Fusarium head blight (Fusarium graminearum Schwabe) and/or foliar diseases in these environments, which was exacerbated by higher N rates. The strong genotype × environment interactions were mainly associated with two cultivars that yielded well in most environments but very poorly in two environments in which Fusarium head blight was severe. This study thus highlighted the importance of Fusarium head blight resistance in HRSW production in eastern Canada. An environment × factor biplot was described for the first time, which was highly effective in revealing the interrelationship among environmental factors and in revealing the weather and soil patterns of the environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004.1690</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Spring wheat</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2004-01, Vol.96 (1), p.169-180</ispartof><rights>American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3520-79c55a3ebc9afd132a0369e81fe28c99f6316bd7cd7ae4cc3960aef6b47a28df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3520-79c55a3ebc9afd132a0369e81fe28c99f6316bd7cd7ae4cc3960aef6b47a28df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4021,27921,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15417379$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, B. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frégeau‐Reid, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voldeng, H. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dion, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nass, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Graphic Analysis of Genotype, Environment, Nitrogen Fertilizer, and Their Interactions on Spring Wheat Yield</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Interest in growing hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in eastern Canada is increasing due to its potential returns relative to other small‐grain cereals and oilseed crops. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of year, site, genotype, N application, and their interactions on the yield of hard red spring wheat (HRSW) and to demonstrate the application of the recently developed biplot methodology in visualizing agronomic research data. Ten HRSW cultivars were grown in five locations across three provinces from 1998 to 2000, constituting a total of 11 year–site combinations. In each environment, four levels of fertilizer N (50, 100, 150, and 200 kg ha−1) were applied. The N main effect, N × environment interaction, and N × genotype interaction were not significant. However, biplot analysis did reveal crossover N × environment interactions: Although higher N rates generally led to higher yield, the opposite was true in some environments. This was attributed to heavy Fusarium head blight (Fusarium graminearum Schwabe) and/or foliar diseases in these environments, which was exacerbated by higher N rates. The strong genotype × environment interactions were mainly associated with two cultivars that yielded well in most environments but very poorly in two environments in which Fusarium head blight was severe. This study thus highlighted the importance of Fusarium head blight resistance in HRSW production in eastern Canada. An environment × factor biplot was described for the first time, which was highly effective in revealing the interrelationship among environmental factors and in revealing the weather and soil patterns of the environments.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Spring wheat</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWD_OXoPgrVvzsR_NSYrYVSktaEU8LdPspE3ZZmuyKvWvd9sKHj0NDO_9Zt4j5IKznuAyvoa5r91SMBb3eKrYAenwWCYRS-PkkHQYYyLiKhXH5CSEJWOcq5h3SJV7WC-spgMH1SbYQGtDc3R1s1ljl965T9tiV-iaLh3bxtdzdHSIvrGV_UbfpeBKOl2g9fTBNehBN7Z2LcXR57W3bk5fFwgNfbNYlWfkyEAV8Px3npKX4d309j4aTfKH28Eo0jIRLMqUThKQONMKTMmlACZThX1uUPS1UiaVPJ2VmS4zwFhrqVIGaNJZnIHol0aekss9d-3r9w8MTbGsP3wbMBRt6oSJfqZa0fVepH0dgkdTtP-uwG8Kzopto8Vfo8W20dZx9YuFoKEyHpy24c-WxDyTO_LNXvdlK9z8hy0G-aMY5E-T8eN2t7v0AyeLi7A</recordid><startdate>200401</startdate><enddate>200401</enddate><creator>Ma, B. L.</creator><creator>Yan, W.</creator><creator>Dwyer, L. M.</creator><creator>Frégeau‐Reid, J.</creator><creator>Voldeng, H. D.</creator><creator>Dion, Y.</creator><creator>Nass, H.</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200401</creationdate><title>Graphic Analysis of Genotype, Environment, Nitrogen Fertilizer, and Their Interactions on Spring Wheat Yield</title><author>Ma, B. L. ; Yan, W. ; Dwyer, L. M. ; Frégeau‐Reid, J. ; Voldeng, H. D. ; Dion, Y. ; Nass, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3520-79c55a3ebc9afd132a0369e81fe28c99f6316bd7cd7ae4cc3960aef6b47a28df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Spring wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, B. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frégeau‐Reid, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voldeng, H. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dion, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nass, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Homework Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, B. L.</au><au>Yan, W.</au><au>Dwyer, L. M.</au><au>Frégeau‐Reid, J.</au><au>Voldeng, H. D.</au><au>Dion, Y.</au><au>Nass, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Graphic Analysis of Genotype, Environment, Nitrogen Fertilizer, and Their Interactions on Spring Wheat Yield</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2004-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>169-180</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Interest in growing hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in eastern Canada is increasing due to its potential returns relative to other small‐grain cereals and oilseed crops. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of year, site, genotype, N application, and their interactions on the yield of hard red spring wheat (HRSW) and to demonstrate the application of the recently developed biplot methodology in visualizing agronomic research data. Ten HRSW cultivars were grown in five locations across three provinces from 1998 to 2000, constituting a total of 11 year–site combinations. In each environment, four levels of fertilizer N (50, 100, 150, and 200 kg ha−1) were applied. The N main effect, N × environment interaction, and N × genotype interaction were not significant. However, biplot analysis did reveal crossover N × environment interactions: Although higher N rates generally led to higher yield, the opposite was true in some environments. This was attributed to heavy Fusarium head blight (Fusarium graminearum Schwabe) and/or foliar diseases in these environments, which was exacerbated by higher N rates. The strong genotype × environment interactions were mainly associated with two cultivars that yielded well in most environments but very poorly in two environments in which Fusarium head blight was severe. This study thus highlighted the importance of Fusarium head blight resistance in HRSW production in eastern Canada. An environment × factor biplot was described for the first time, which was highly effective in revealing the interrelationship among environmental factors and in revealing the weather and soil patterns of the environments.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2004.1690</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 2004-01, Vol.96 (1), p.169-180 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_194502879 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Spring wheat |
title | Graphic Analysis of Genotype, Environment, Nitrogen Fertilizer, and Their Interactions on Spring Wheat Yield |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A40%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Graphic%20Analysis%20of%20Genotype,%20Environment,%20Nitrogen%20Fertilizer,%20and%20Their%20Interactions%20on%20Spring%20Wheat%20Yield&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Ma,%20B.%20L.&rft.date=2004-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=169-180&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2004.1690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E551927241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3520-79c55a3ebc9afd132a0369e81fe28c99f6316bd7cd7ae4cc3960aef6b47a28df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194502879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |