Loading…

Rhizoma Peanut Yield and Nutritive Value are Influenced by Harvest Technique and Timing

Rhizoma peanut (Arachis glabrata Benth.) is a warm‐season perennial forage legume adapted to the southern USA. The objectives of this study were to evaluate harvest technique and timing on dry matter (DM) yield, crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) concentr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agronomy journal 2007-11, Vol.99 (6), p.1559-1563
Main Authors: Butler, Twain J., Muir, James P., Islam, M. Anowarul, Bow, John R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3895-974f2fe185f9a1bac05b936c6677e9a6ad4fc5855f933f1dcceb5e5fd3c599c33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3895-974f2fe185f9a1bac05b936c6677e9a6ad4fc5855f933f1dcceb5e5fd3c599c33
container_end_page 1563
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1559
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 99
creator Butler, Twain J.
Muir, James P.
Islam, M. Anowarul
Bow, John R.
description Rhizoma peanut (Arachis glabrata Benth.) is a warm‐season perennial forage legume adapted to the southern USA. The objectives of this study were to evaluate harvest technique and timing on dry matter (DM) yield, crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) concentrations of rhizoma peanut. Two experiments (one without irrigation and one with irrigation) each with four replications were conducted during the 2004–2006 growing seasons (April–October) in north‐central Texas on a Windthorst fine sandy loam. Treatments consisted of manually clipping all plant material three times throughout the growing season at 5‐cm height with a July rest (5‐JR) or a September rest (5‐SR), four times throughout the season (June, July, September, October) at 10‐cm height, or manual harvesting (hand‐plucking) all leaves and growing tips to ground level four times throughout the season. Annual rhizoma peanut DM yield for the irrigated experiment (4710 to 10870 kg DM ha−1) was greater than the nonirrigated experiment (2750 to 9300 kg ha−1). In both experiments, the 5‐JR treatment reduced rhizoma peanut DM yield in the third year by 29 to 37% compared with the hand‐plucked and the 5‐SR treatments. Harvest timing or technique did affect nutritive value although these differences were small, ranging from 186 to 204 g CP kg−1, 280 to 313 g ADF kg−1, and 57 to 65 g ADL kg−1. These data indicate that rhizoma peanut had high nutritive value regardless of treatment and maintained greater DM yield if harvested by hand‐plucking or at a 5‐cm height with a September rest.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2007.0035
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194538149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1470715891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3895-974f2fe185f9a1bac05b936c6677e9a6ad4fc5855f933f1dcceb5e5fd3c599c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9PwjAcxRujiYievTYmHgftum7ryRCi_AgBQ1Djaem6FkpGh-3A4F9vJyQcPbXp9_Pe-_YBcI9RJ8Qk6vKlrcw6RCjpIEToBWjhiNAAxRG9BC2EUBhgFofX4Ma5NUIYswi3wMd8pX-qDYevkptdDT-1LAvITQGnu9rqWu8lfOflTkJuJRwZ5a9GyALmBzjkdi9dDRdSrIz-ahivW-iNNstbcKV46eTd6WyDt5fnRX8YTGaDUb83CQRJGQ1YEqlQSZxSxTjOuUA0ZyQWcZwkkvGYF5ESNKV-TIjChRAyp5KqggjKmCCkDR6Ovltb-Q1cna2rnTU-MvMfpCTFEfNQ9wgJWzlnpcq2Vm-4PWQYZU152bm8rCnPKx5PttwJXirLjdDuLGNpQkKaeu7pyH3rUh7-s816g3HYG8xn03Hz9pf0C_FJg8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194538149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rhizoma Peanut Yield and Nutritive Value are Influenced by Harvest Technique and Timing</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Butler, Twain J. ; Muir, James P. ; Islam, M. Anowarul ; Bow, John R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Butler, Twain J. ; Muir, James P. ; Islam, M. Anowarul ; Bow, John R.</creatorcontrib><description>Rhizoma peanut (Arachis glabrata Benth.) is a warm‐season perennial forage legume adapted to the southern USA. The objectives of this study were to evaluate harvest technique and timing on dry matter (DM) yield, crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) concentrations of rhizoma peanut. Two experiments (one without irrigation and one with irrigation) each with four replications were conducted during the 2004–2006 growing seasons (April–October) in north‐central Texas on a Windthorst fine sandy loam. Treatments consisted of manually clipping all plant material three times throughout the growing season at 5‐cm height with a July rest (5‐JR) or a September rest (5‐SR), four times throughout the season (June, July, September, October) at 10‐cm height, or manual harvesting (hand‐plucking) all leaves and growing tips to ground level four times throughout the season. Annual rhizoma peanut DM yield for the irrigated experiment (4710 to 10870 kg DM ha−1) was greater than the nonirrigated experiment (2750 to 9300 kg ha−1). In both experiments, the 5‐JR treatment reduced rhizoma peanut DM yield in the third year by 29 to 37% compared with the hand‐plucked and the 5‐SR treatments. Harvest timing or technique did affect nutritive value although these differences were small, ranging from 186 to 204 g CP kg−1, 280 to 313 g ADF kg−1, and 57 to 65 g ADL kg−1. These data indicate that rhizoma peanut had high nutritive value regardless of treatment and maintained greater DM yield if harvested by hand‐plucking or at a 5‐cm height with a September rest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0035</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Nutritive value</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2007-11, Vol.99 (6), p.1559-1563</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Nov/Dec 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3895-974f2fe185f9a1bac05b936c6677e9a6ad4fc5855f933f1dcceb5e5fd3c599c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3895-974f2fe185f9a1bac05b936c6677e9a6ad4fc5855f933f1dcceb5e5fd3c599c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19873258$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butler, Twain J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, M. Anowarul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bow, John R.</creatorcontrib><title>Rhizoma Peanut Yield and Nutritive Value are Influenced by Harvest Technique and Timing</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Rhizoma peanut (Arachis glabrata Benth.) is a warm‐season perennial forage legume adapted to the southern USA. The objectives of this study were to evaluate harvest technique and timing on dry matter (DM) yield, crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) concentrations of rhizoma peanut. Two experiments (one without irrigation and one with irrigation) each with four replications were conducted during the 2004–2006 growing seasons (April–October) in north‐central Texas on a Windthorst fine sandy loam. Treatments consisted of manually clipping all plant material three times throughout the growing season at 5‐cm height with a July rest (5‐JR) or a September rest (5‐SR), four times throughout the season (June, July, September, October) at 10‐cm height, or manual harvesting (hand‐plucking) all leaves and growing tips to ground level four times throughout the season. Annual rhizoma peanut DM yield for the irrigated experiment (4710 to 10870 kg DM ha−1) was greater than the nonirrigated experiment (2750 to 9300 kg ha−1). In both experiments, the 5‐JR treatment reduced rhizoma peanut DM yield in the third year by 29 to 37% compared with the hand‐plucked and the 5‐SR treatments. Harvest timing or technique did affect nutritive value although these differences were small, ranging from 186 to 204 g CP kg−1, 280 to 313 g ADF kg−1, and 57 to 65 g ADL kg−1. These data indicate that rhizoma peanut had high nutritive value regardless of treatment and maintained greater DM yield if harvested by hand‐plucking or at a 5‐cm height with a September rest.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Nutritive value</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9PwjAcxRujiYievTYmHgftum7ryRCi_AgBQ1Djaem6FkpGh-3A4F9vJyQcPbXp9_Pe-_YBcI9RJ8Qk6vKlrcw6RCjpIEToBWjhiNAAxRG9BC2EUBhgFofX4Ma5NUIYswi3wMd8pX-qDYevkptdDT-1LAvITQGnu9rqWu8lfOflTkJuJRwZ5a9GyALmBzjkdi9dDRdSrIz-ahivW-iNNstbcKV46eTd6WyDt5fnRX8YTGaDUb83CQRJGQ1YEqlQSZxSxTjOuUA0ZyQWcZwkkvGYF5ESNKV-TIjChRAyp5KqggjKmCCkDR6Ovltb-Q1cna2rnTU-MvMfpCTFEfNQ9wgJWzlnpcq2Vm-4PWQYZU152bm8rCnPKx5PttwJXirLjdDuLGNpQkKaeu7pyH3rUh7-s816g3HYG8xn03Hz9pf0C_FJg8A</recordid><startdate>200711</startdate><enddate>200711</enddate><creator>Butler, Twain J.</creator><creator>Muir, James P.</creator><creator>Islam, M. Anowarul</creator><creator>Bow, John R.</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200711</creationdate><title>Rhizoma Peanut Yield and Nutritive Value are Influenced by Harvest Technique and Timing</title><author>Butler, Twain J. ; Muir, James P. ; Islam, M. Anowarul ; Bow, John R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3895-974f2fe185f9a1bac05b936c6677e9a6ad4fc5855f933f1dcceb5e5fd3c599c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Nutritive value</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butler, Twain J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, M. Anowarul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bow, John R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butler, Twain J.</au><au>Muir, James P.</au><au>Islam, M. Anowarul</au><au>Bow, John R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rhizoma Peanut Yield and Nutritive Value are Influenced by Harvest Technique and Timing</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2007-11</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1559</spage><epage>1563</epage><pages>1559-1563</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Rhizoma peanut (Arachis glabrata Benth.) is a warm‐season perennial forage legume adapted to the southern USA. The objectives of this study were to evaluate harvest technique and timing on dry matter (DM) yield, crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) concentrations of rhizoma peanut. Two experiments (one without irrigation and one with irrigation) each with four replications were conducted during the 2004–2006 growing seasons (April–October) in north‐central Texas on a Windthorst fine sandy loam. Treatments consisted of manually clipping all plant material three times throughout the growing season at 5‐cm height with a July rest (5‐JR) or a September rest (5‐SR), four times throughout the season (June, July, September, October) at 10‐cm height, or manual harvesting (hand‐plucking) all leaves and growing tips to ground level four times throughout the season. Annual rhizoma peanut DM yield for the irrigated experiment (4710 to 10870 kg DM ha−1) was greater than the nonirrigated experiment (2750 to 9300 kg ha−1). In both experiments, the 5‐JR treatment reduced rhizoma peanut DM yield in the third year by 29 to 37% compared with the hand‐plucked and the 5‐SR treatments. Harvest timing or technique did affect nutritive value although these differences were small, ranging from 186 to 204 g CP kg−1, 280 to 313 g ADF kg−1, and 57 to 65 g ADL kg−1. These data indicate that rhizoma peanut had high nutritive value regardless of treatment and maintained greater DM yield if harvested by hand‐plucking or at a 5‐cm height with a September rest.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2007.0035</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2007-11, Vol.99 (6), p.1559-1563
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194538149
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Nutritive value
title Rhizoma Peanut Yield and Nutritive Value are Influenced by Harvest Technique and Timing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A53%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rhizoma%20Peanut%20Yield%20and%20Nutritive%20Value%20are%20Influenced%20by%20Harvest%20Technique%20and%20Timing&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Butler,%20Twain%20J.&rft.date=2007-11&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1559&rft.epage=1563&rft.pages=1559-1563&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2007.0035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1470715891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3895-974f2fe185f9a1bac05b936c6677e9a6ad4fc5855f933f1dcceb5e5fd3c599c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194538149&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true