Review 2 -- No Title

Edmund Burke, in rejecting the idea that a member of Parliament should allow "instructions" from his constituents to dictate his decisions, observed that "government and legislation are matters of reason and judgment. What sort of reason is that in which the determination preceded the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public Choice (1986-1998) 1998, Vol.96 (1-2), p.210
Main Author: Garrett, Elizabeth
Format: Review
Language:English
Subjects:
Campaign contributions
Competition
Direct democracy
Essays
Hypotheses
Interest groups
Mayors
Politics
Term limitations
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 210
container_title Public Choice (1986-1998)
container_volume 96
creator Garrett, Elizabeth
description Edmund Burke, in rejecting the idea that a member of Parliament should allow "instructions" from his constituents to dictate his decisions, observed that "government and legislation are matters of reason and judgment. What sort of reason is that in which the determination preceded the discussion?" It is the sort of reason (or lack thereof) that lies behind the decisions of nearly half the states that have imposed limitations on the terms of their state legislators. In virtually all these cases, term limits were imposed through the instruments of direct democracy, and, during the campaigns, opponents and...
format review
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194616863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>618058111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_1946168633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDU31jU3NDBkYeA0MDCx0DW1MLLkYOAqLs4yMDAwNrMw5WQQCUoty0wtVzBS0NVV8MtXCMksyUnlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4Q0sTM0MzCzNjY6IUAQB7JigP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype><pqid>194616863</pqid></control><display><type>review</type><title>Review 2 -- No Title</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>ABI/INFORM Archive</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Garrett, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Edmund Burke, in rejecting the idea that a member of Parliament should allow "instructions" from his constituents to dictate his decisions, observed that "government and legislation are matters of reason and judgment. What sort of reason is that in which the determination preceded the discussion?" It is the sort of reason (or lack thereof) that lies behind the decisions of nearly half the states that have imposed limitations on the terms of their state legislators. In virtually all these cases, term limits were imposed through the instruments of direct democracy, and, during the campaigns, opponents and...</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leiden: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Campaign contributions ; Competition ; Direct democracy ; Essays ; Hypotheses ; Interest groups ; Mayors ; Politics ; Term limitations</subject><ispartof>Public Choice (1986-1998), 1998, Vol.96 (1-2), p.210</ispartof><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers Jul 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/194616863?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,780,784,792,11688,11906,21387,21394,21395,33611,33985,34530,36050,36060,43733,43948,44115,44361,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Review 2 -- No Title</title><title>Public Choice (1986-1998)</title><description>Edmund Burke, in rejecting the idea that a member of Parliament should allow "instructions" from his constituents to dictate his decisions, observed that "government and legislation are matters of reason and judgment. What sort of reason is that in which the determination preceded the discussion?" It is the sort of reason (or lack thereof) that lies behind the decisions of nearly half the states that have imposed limitations on the terms of their state legislators. In virtually all these cases, term limits were imposed through the instruments of direct democracy, and, during the campaigns, opponents and...</description><subject>Campaign contributions</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Direct democracy</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Mayors</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Term limitations</subject><issn>0048-5829</issn><issn>1573-7101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0A</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDU31jU3NDBkYeA0MDCx0DW1MLLkYOAqLs4yMDAwNrMw5WQQCUoty0wtVzBS0NVV8MtXCMksyUnlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4Q0sTM0MzCzNjY6IUAQB7JigP</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Garrett, Elizabeth</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>Review 2 -- No Title</title><author>Garrett, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_1946168633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Campaign contributions</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Direct democracy</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Mayors</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Term limitations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Archive</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garrett, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Review 2 -- No Title</atitle><jtitle>Public Choice (1986-1998)</jtitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>210</spage><pages>210-</pages><issn>0048-5829</issn><eissn>1573-7101</eissn><abstract>Edmund Burke, in rejecting the idea that a member of Parliament should allow "instructions" from his constituents to dictate his decisions, observed that "government and legislation are matters of reason and judgment. What sort of reason is that in which the determination preceded the discussion?" It is the sort of reason (or lack thereof) that lies behind the decisions of nearly half the states that have imposed limitations on the terms of their state legislators. In virtually all these cases, term limits were imposed through the instruments of direct democracy, and, during the campaigns, opponents and...</abstract><cop>Leiden</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5829
ispartof Public Choice (1986-1998), 1998, Vol.96 (1-2), p.210
issn 0048-5829
1573-7101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194616863
source EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM global; ABI/INFORM Archive; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Sociology Collection; Springer Link
subjects Campaign contributions
Competition
Direct democracy
Essays
Hypotheses
Interest groups
Mayors
Politics
Term limitations
title Review 2 -- No Title
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A06%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%202%20--%20No%20Title&rft.jtitle=Public%20Choice%20(1986-1998)&rft.au=Garrett,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=210&rft.pages=210-&rft.issn=0048-5829&rft.eissn=1573-7101&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E618058111%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_1946168633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194616863&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true