Court Intervention in Pupil Discipline Implications and Comment: GOSS v. LOPEZ WOOD v. STRICKLAND POST-GOSS CASES STATE PROVISIONS FOR STUDENT SUSPENSION AND EXPULSION IMPLICATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS NOTES

Within the past quarter century, the organization and management of schooling has come under closer judicial review. The traditional notion that schooling, particularly for elementary and secondary pupils, is a local matter of little concern to the judiciary has given way to expanding interventions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills) 1979-11, Vol.23 (2), p.169
Main Author: Hazard, William R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Constitutional law
Discipline
Due process of law
Elementary school students
Federal court decisions
First Amendment-US
Intervention
Judicial reviews
School boards
School discipline
School districts
School superintendents
State court decisions
Student rights
Students
Supreme Court decisions
Teachers
Topic and comment
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Within the past quarter century, the organization and management of schooling has come under closer judicial review. The traditional notion that schooling, particularly for elementary and secondary pupils, is a local matter of little concern to the judiciary has given way to expanding interventions by state and federal courts.1 Except for cases involving rather dull topics such as tax rates, bond issues, school district boundaries, and occasional teacher/board conflicts, the courts rarely dealt with...
ISSN:0002-7642
1552-3381