Loading…

The Delisting Bias in CRSP's Nasdaq Data and Its Implications for the Size Effect

We investigate the bias in CRSP's Nasdaq data due to missing returns for delisted stocks. We find that the missing returns are large and negative on average, and that delisted stocks experience a substantial decrease in liquidity. We estimate that using a corrected return of -55 percent for mis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of finance (New York) 1999-12, Vol.54 (6), p.2361-2379
Main Authors: Shumway, Tyler, Warther, Vincent A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4312-44e56c14142b931646b5a8b4555fd5a7a40c6855f66f35933ae3f7b972a02f0b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4312-44e56c14142b931646b5a8b4555fd5a7a40c6855f66f35933ae3f7b972a02f0b3
container_end_page 2379
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2361
container_title The Journal of finance (New York)
container_volume 54
creator Shumway, Tyler
Warther, Vincent A.
description We investigate the bias in CRSP's Nasdaq data due to missing returns for delisted stocks. We find that the missing returns are large and negative on average, and that delisted stocks experience a substantial decrease in liquidity. We estimate that using a corrected return of -55 percent for missing performance-related delisting returns corrects the bias. We revisit previous work which finds a size effect among Nasdaq stocks. After correcting for the delisting bias, there is no evidence that there ever was a size effect on Nasdaq. Our results are inconsistent with most risk-based explanations of the size effect.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/0022-1082.00192
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194717928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>797998</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>797998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4312-44e56c14142b931646b5a8b4555fd5a7a40c6855f66f35933ae3f7b972a02f0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEqUwM7BYLEwpfrseIaWlqJRXEaPlpDa4tEmxg3j8ehKCunIXy_q-c20dAA4x6uF6ThEiJMGoT3oIYUW2QAdzhhJBBN4GnU26C_ZiXKBmOO-Au9mLhQO79LHyxTM89yZCX8D0_uH2JMKpiXPzBgemMtAUcziuIhyv1kufm8qXRYSuDLCqNzz4bwsvnLN5tQ92nFlGe_B3dsHj8GKWXiaTm9E4PZskOaOYJIxZLnLMMCOZolgwkXHTzxjn3M25kYahXPTrixCOckWpsdTJTEliEHEoo11w3O5dh_Lt3cZKL8r3UNRPaqyYxFKRfl06bUt5KGMM1ul18CsTvjRGutGmGzG6EaN_tdUEa4kPv7Rf_9X11c1w3GJHLbaIVRk2mFRSqeYbSZvWmu3nJjXhVQtJJddP05FOp9d4Im9TregPk3ODUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194717928</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Delisting Bias in CRSP's Nasdaq Data and Its Implications for the Size Effect</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Shumway, Tyler ; Warther, Vincent A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shumway, Tyler ; Warther, Vincent A.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigate the bias in CRSP's Nasdaq data due to missing returns for delisted stocks. We find that the missing returns are large and negative on average, and that delisted stocks experience a substantial decrease in liquidity. We estimate that using a corrected return of -55 percent for missing performance-related delisting returns corrects the bias. We revisit previous work which finds a size effect among Nasdaq stocks. After correcting for the delisting bias, there is no evidence that there ever was a size effect on Nasdaq. Our results are inconsistent with most risk-based explanations of the size effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00192</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLFIAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Arithmetic mean ; Bias ; Common stock ; Estimation bias ; Financial portfolios ; Impact analysis ; Nasdaq Composite Index ; NASDAQ trading ; Research biases ; Security prices ; Shorter Papers ; Statistical analysis ; Stock exchanges ; Stock market delistings ; Stock prices ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of finance (New York), 1999-12, Vol.54 (6), p.2361-2379</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 The American Finance Association</rights><rights>1999 the American Finance Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Dec 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4312-44e56c14142b931646b5a8b4555fd5a7a40c6855f66f35933ae3f7b972a02f0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4312-44e56c14142b931646b5a8b4555fd5a7a40c6855f66f35933ae3f7b972a02f0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/797998$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/797998$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,58237,58470</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shumway, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warther, Vincent A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Delisting Bias in CRSP's Nasdaq Data and Its Implications for the Size Effect</title><title>The Journal of finance (New York)</title><description>We investigate the bias in CRSP's Nasdaq data due to missing returns for delisted stocks. We find that the missing returns are large and negative on average, and that delisted stocks experience a substantial decrease in liquidity. We estimate that using a corrected return of -55 percent for missing performance-related delisting returns corrects the bias. We revisit previous work which finds a size effect among Nasdaq stocks. After correcting for the delisting bias, there is no evidence that there ever was a size effect on Nasdaq. Our results are inconsistent with most risk-based explanations of the size effect.</description><subject>Arithmetic mean</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Common stock</subject><subject>Estimation bias</subject><subject>Financial portfolios</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Nasdaq Composite Index</subject><subject>NASDAQ trading</subject><subject>Research biases</subject><subject>Security prices</subject><subject>Shorter Papers</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Stock market delistings</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-1082</issn><issn>1540-6261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEqUwM7BYLEwpfrseIaWlqJRXEaPlpDa4tEmxg3j8ehKCunIXy_q-c20dAA4x6uF6ThEiJMGoT3oIYUW2QAdzhhJBBN4GnU26C_ZiXKBmOO-Au9mLhQO79LHyxTM89yZCX8D0_uH2JMKpiXPzBgemMtAUcziuIhyv1kufm8qXRYSuDLCqNzz4bwsvnLN5tQ92nFlGe_B3dsHj8GKWXiaTm9E4PZskOaOYJIxZLnLMMCOZolgwkXHTzxjn3M25kYahXPTrixCOckWpsdTJTEliEHEoo11w3O5dh_Lt3cZKL8r3UNRPaqyYxFKRfl06bUt5KGMM1ul18CsTvjRGutGmGzG6EaN_tdUEa4kPv7Rf_9X11c1w3GJHLbaIVRk2mFRSqeYbSZvWmu3nJjXhVQtJJddP05FOp9d4Im9TregPk3ODUQ</recordid><startdate>199912</startdate><enddate>199912</enddate><creator>Shumway, Tyler</creator><creator>Warther, Vincent A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers for the American Finance Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199912</creationdate><title>The Delisting Bias in CRSP's Nasdaq Data and Its Implications for the Size Effect</title><author>Shumway, Tyler ; Warther, Vincent A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4312-44e56c14142b931646b5a8b4555fd5a7a40c6855f66f35933ae3f7b972a02f0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Arithmetic mean</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Common stock</topic><topic>Estimation bias</topic><topic>Financial portfolios</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Nasdaq Composite Index</topic><topic>NASDAQ trading</topic><topic>Research biases</topic><topic>Security prices</topic><topic>Shorter Papers</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Stock market delistings</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shumway, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warther, Vincent A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shumway, Tyler</au><au>Warther, Vincent A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Delisting Bias in CRSP's Nasdaq Data and Its Implications for the Size Effect</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle><date>1999-12</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2361</spage><epage>2379</epage><pages>2361-2379</pages><issn>0022-1082</issn><eissn>1540-6261</eissn><coden>JLFIAN</coden><abstract>We investigate the bias in CRSP's Nasdaq data due to missing returns for delisted stocks. We find that the missing returns are large and negative on average, and that delisted stocks experience a substantial decrease in liquidity. We estimate that using a corrected return of -55 percent for missing performance-related delisting returns corrects the bias. We revisit previous work which finds a size effect among Nasdaq stocks. After correcting for the delisting bias, there is no evidence that there ever was a size effect on Nasdaq. Our results are inconsistent with most risk-based explanations of the size effect.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/0022-1082.00192</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1082
ispartof The Journal of finance (New York), 1999-12, Vol.54 (6), p.2361-2379
issn 0022-1082
1540-6261
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194717928
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; JSTOR
subjects Arithmetic mean
Bias
Common stock
Estimation bias
Financial portfolios
Impact analysis
Nasdaq Composite Index
NASDAQ trading
Research biases
Security prices
Shorter Papers
Statistical analysis
Stock exchanges
Stock market delistings
Stock prices
Studies
title The Delisting Bias in CRSP's Nasdaq Data and Its Implications for the Size Effect
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A49%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Delisting%20Bias%20in%20CRSP's%20Nasdaq%20Data%20and%20Its%20Implications%20for%20the%20Size%20Effect&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20finance%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Shumway,%20Tyler&rft.date=1999-12&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2361&rft.epage=2379&rft.pages=2361-2379&rft.issn=0022-1082&rft.eissn=1540-6261&rft.coden=JLFIAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/0022-1082.00192&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E797998%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4312-44e56c14142b931646b5a8b4555fd5a7a40c6855f66f35933ae3f7b972a02f0b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194717928&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=797998&rfr_iscdi=true