Loading…

Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation

We find that institutional ownership concentration is positively related to the pay-for-performance sensitivity of executive compensation and negatively related to the level of compensation, even after controlling for firm size, industry, investment opportunities, and performance. These results sugg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of finance (New York) 2003-12, Vol.58 (6), p.2351-2374
Main Authors: Hartzell, Jay C., Starks, Laura T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5968-aff60c608b4d08e7e22388d6ce9586f60e83568b81a35824b89ab246fd1fe3cd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5968-aff60c608b4d08e7e22388d6ce9586f60e83568b81a35824b89ab246fd1fe3cd3
container_end_page 2374
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2351
container_title The Journal of finance (New York)
container_volume 58
creator Hartzell, Jay C.
Starks, Laura T.
description We find that institutional ownership concentration is positively related to the pay-for-performance sensitivity of executive compensation and negatively related to the level of compensation, even after controlling for firm size, industry, investment opportunities, and performance. These results suggest that the institutions serve a monitoring role in mitigating the agency problem between shareholders and managers. Additionally, we find that clientele effects exist among institutions for firms with certain compensation structures, suggesting that institutions also influence compensation structures through their preferences.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00608.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194720001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3648196</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3648196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5968-aff60c608b4d08e7e22388d6ce9586f60e83568b81a35824b89ab246fd1fe3cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_wEPx3voladL04EHGNjvGJqjoLaRtCq1bO5Nudv_e1MrO5pLA-z3h_R6EPAwBhpDfVwFmIficcBwQABoAcBBBd4ZGp-AcjQAI8TEIcomurK2gP4yNEElq25btvi2bWm28pD5o2zbGeqrOvWmnM5cctDdptjtdW9WPXaOLQm2svvm7x-htNn2dPPnL9TyZPC59xWIufFUUHDLXJQ1zEDrShFAhcp7pmAnuMi0o4yIVWFEmSJiKWKUk5EWOC02znI7R3fDvzjRfe1dLVs3euJZW4jiM3LKA3ZAYhjLTWGt0IXem3CpzlBhkL0hWsvcgew-yFyR_BcnOoQ8D-l1u9PHfnFysZ4l7Of524Kve2ImnPBQ45i72h7i0re5OsTKfkkc0YvJ9NZfPs4_ZakFfJKE_YAiD2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194720001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hartzell, Jay C. ; Starks, Laura T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartzell, Jay C. ; Starks, Laura T.</creatorcontrib><description>We find that institutional ownership concentration is positively related to the pay-for-performance sensitivity of executive compensation and negatively related to the level of compensation, even after controlling for firm size, industry, investment opportunities, and performance. These results suggest that the institutions serve a monitoring role in mitigating the agency problem between shareholders and managers. Additionally, we find that clientele effects exist among institutions for firms with certain compensation structures, suggesting that institutions also influence compensation structures through their preferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00608.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLFIAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Agency theory ; Business management ; Chief executive officers ; Executive compensation ; Incentive pay ; Institutional investments ; Investment strategies ; Investors ; Market capitalization ; Pay for performance ; Shareholder relations ; Shareholders ; Stock prices ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of finance (New York), 2003-12, Vol.58 (6), p.2351-2374</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 The American Finance Association</rights><rights>2003 the American Finance Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Dec 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5968-aff60c608b4d08e7e22388d6ce9586f60e83568b81a35824b89ab246fd1fe3cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5968-aff60c608b4d08e7e22388d6ce9586f60e83568b81a35824b89ab246fd1fe3cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3648196$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3648196$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartzell, Jay C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starks, Laura T.</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation</title><title>The Journal of finance (New York)</title><description>We find that institutional ownership concentration is positively related to the pay-for-performance sensitivity of executive compensation and negatively related to the level of compensation, even after controlling for firm size, industry, investment opportunities, and performance. These results suggest that the institutions serve a monitoring role in mitigating the agency problem between shareholders and managers. Additionally, we find that clientele effects exist among institutions for firms with certain compensation structures, suggesting that institutions also influence compensation structures through their preferences.</description><subject>Agency theory</subject><subject>Business management</subject><subject>Chief executive officers</subject><subject>Executive compensation</subject><subject>Incentive pay</subject><subject>Institutional investments</subject><subject>Investment strategies</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Market capitalization</subject><subject>Pay for performance</subject><subject>Shareholder relations</subject><subject>Shareholders</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-1082</issn><issn>1540-6261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_wEPx3voladL04EHGNjvGJqjoLaRtCq1bO5Nudv_e1MrO5pLA-z3h_R6EPAwBhpDfVwFmIficcBwQABoAcBBBd4ZGp-AcjQAI8TEIcomurK2gP4yNEElq25btvi2bWm28pD5o2zbGeqrOvWmnM5cctDdptjtdW9WPXaOLQm2svvm7x-htNn2dPPnL9TyZPC59xWIufFUUHDLXJQ1zEDrShFAhcp7pmAnuMi0o4yIVWFEmSJiKWKUk5EWOC02znI7R3fDvzjRfe1dLVs3euJZW4jiM3LKA3ZAYhjLTWGt0IXem3CpzlBhkL0hWsvcgew-yFyR_BcnOoQ8D-l1u9PHfnFysZ4l7Of524Kve2ImnPBQ45i72h7i0re5OsTKfkkc0YvJ9NZfPs4_ZakFfJKE_YAiD2Q</recordid><startdate>200312</startdate><enddate>200312</enddate><creator>Hartzell, Jay C.</creator><creator>Starks, Laura T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200312</creationdate><title>Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation</title><author>Hartzell, Jay C. ; Starks, Laura T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5968-aff60c608b4d08e7e22388d6ce9586f60e83568b81a35824b89ab246fd1fe3cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Agency theory</topic><topic>Business management</topic><topic>Chief executive officers</topic><topic>Executive compensation</topic><topic>Incentive pay</topic><topic>Institutional investments</topic><topic>Investment strategies</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Market capitalization</topic><topic>Pay for performance</topic><topic>Shareholder relations</topic><topic>Shareholders</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartzell, Jay C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starks, Laura T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartzell, Jay C.</au><au>Starks, Laura T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle><date>2003-12</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2351</spage><epage>2374</epage><pages>2351-2374</pages><issn>0022-1082</issn><eissn>1540-6261</eissn><coden>JLFIAN</coden><abstract>We find that institutional ownership concentration is positively related to the pay-for-performance sensitivity of executive compensation and negatively related to the level of compensation, even after controlling for firm size, industry, investment opportunities, and performance. These results suggest that the institutions serve a monitoring role in mitigating the agency problem between shareholders and managers. Additionally, we find that clientele effects exist among institutions for firms with certain compensation structures, suggesting that institutions also influence compensation structures through their preferences.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00608.x</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1082
ispartof The Journal of finance (New York), 2003-12, Vol.58 (6), p.2351-2374
issn 0022-1082
1540-6261
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194720001
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Agency theory
Business management
Chief executive officers
Executive compensation
Incentive pay
Institutional investments
Investment strategies
Investors
Market capitalization
Pay for performance
Shareholder relations
Shareholders
Stock prices
Studies
title Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T20%3A24%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20Investors%20and%20Executive%20Compensation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20finance%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Hartzell,%20Jay%20C.&rft.date=2003-12&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2351&rft.epage=2374&rft.pages=2351-2374&rft.issn=0022-1082&rft.eissn=1540-6261&rft.coden=JLFIAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00608.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3648196%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5968-aff60c608b4d08e7e22388d6ce9586f60e83568b81a35824b89ab246fd1fe3cd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194720001&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3648196&rfr_iscdi=true