Comparative study of complete tender offers and partial acquisitions

This paper compares and contrasts complete tender offers with partial acquisitions to assess the benefits derived from delisting and the elimination of agency costs associated with minority shareholders. The sample comprises 160 successful tender offers consummated on the Toronto Stock Exchange from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of banking & finance 1993-12, Vol.17 (6), p.1097-1110
Main Authors: Amoako-Adu, Ben, Smith, Brian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acquisitions & mergers
Buyout
Comparative studies
Complete tender offers
Economic models
Partial acquisitions
Rates of return
Statistical analysis
Stockholders
Tender offers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-b169a43fc4ff2b3f34378c36f138b1d178b8b3f41654737d212ffc88773a5e413
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-b169a43fc4ff2b3f34378c36f138b1d178b8b3f41654737d212ffc88773a5e413
container_end_page 1110
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1097
container_title Journal of banking & finance
container_volume 17
creator Amoako-Adu, Ben
Smith, Brian
description This paper compares and contrasts complete tender offers with partial acquisitions to assess the benefits derived from delisting and the elimination of agency costs associated with minority shareholders. The sample comprises 160 successful tender offers consummated on the Toronto Stock Exchange from 1977 to 1989. The empirical evidence indicates that, after controlling for other factors, target shareholders receive significantly higher returns in complete tender offers compared to partial acquisitions. On the announcement day, target shareholders of complete tender offers gain 21.90% while those of partial acquisitions gain 12.80%. The results also show that cash offers increase returns in complete tender offers. There is weak evidence that the gains to target shareholders in partial acquisitions are positively related to increases in bidder ownership. Further analysis indicates that there is no significant difference in target shareholder gains for a subsample of going private transactions compared to buyouts by outside shareholders.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0378-4266(93)90015-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194897883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0378426693900156</els_id><sourcerecordid>1153864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-b169a43fc4ff2b3f34378c36f138b1d178b8b3f41654737d212ffc88773a5e413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1rGzEQFaWFumn_QQ9Lc0kOm-ysZH1cAsH5BEMv7VlotSMqY-9uJNngf5_ZOuTWCkYjHu-9GT3GvkNzBQ3I64YrXYtWygvDL03TwLKWH9gCtGpryVX7kS3eKZ_Zl5w3DR0NfMHuVuNucsmVeMAql31_rMZQeQK3WLAqOPSYCAqYcuWGviJyiW5bOf-yjzmWOA75K_sU3Dbjt7d-xn4_3P9aPdXrn4_Pq9t17YU2pe5AGid48CKEtuOBC1rKcxmA6w56ULrTBAuQS6G46ltoQ_BaK8XdEgXwM_bj5Dul8WWPudjNuE8DjbRgaITSmhPp_J-k1rRg5q8TS5xYPo05Jwx2SnHn0tFCY-dQ7ZyYnROzhtu_oVpJsvVJlnBC_65BxE0X4uDswXIHiq7j_DAk5S5SSapphhqjLAAN-VN2ZHdzskNK7RAx2ewjDh77mNAX24_x__u8AnvGlfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292190008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study of complete tender offers and partial acquisitions</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier SD Backfile Business</source><source>Elsevier SD Backfile Economics</source><creator>Amoako-Adu, Ben ; Smith, Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Amoako-Adu, Ben ; Smith, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>This paper compares and contrasts complete tender offers with partial acquisitions to assess the benefits derived from delisting and the elimination of agency costs associated with minority shareholders. The sample comprises 160 successful tender offers consummated on the Toronto Stock Exchange from 1977 to 1989. The empirical evidence indicates that, after controlling for other factors, target shareholders receive significantly higher returns in complete tender offers compared to partial acquisitions. On the announcement day, target shareholders of complete tender offers gain 21.90% while those of partial acquisitions gain 12.80%. The results also show that cash offers increase returns in complete tender offers. There is weak evidence that the gains to target shareholders in partial acquisitions are positively related to increases in bidder ownership. Further analysis indicates that there is no significant difference in target shareholder gains for a subsample of going private transactions compared to buyouts by outside shareholders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0378-4266(93)90015-6</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBFIDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers ; Buyout ; Comparative studies ; Complete tender offers ; Economic models ; Partial acquisitions ; Rates of return ; Statistical analysis ; Stockholders ; Tender offers</subject><ispartof>Journal of banking &amp; finance, 1993-12, Vol.17 (6), p.1097-1110</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Dec 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-b169a43fc4ff2b3f34378c36f138b1d178b8b3f41654737d212ffc88773a5e413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-b169a43fc4ff2b3f34378c36f138b1d178b8b3f41654737d212ffc88773a5e413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378426693900156$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejbfina/v_3a17_3ay_3a1993_3ai_3a6_3ap_3a1097-1110.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amoako-Adu, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Brian</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study of complete tender offers and partial acquisitions</title><title>Journal of banking &amp; finance</title><description>This paper compares and contrasts complete tender offers with partial acquisitions to assess the benefits derived from delisting and the elimination of agency costs associated with minority shareholders. The sample comprises 160 successful tender offers consummated on the Toronto Stock Exchange from 1977 to 1989. The empirical evidence indicates that, after controlling for other factors, target shareholders receive significantly higher returns in complete tender offers compared to partial acquisitions. On the announcement day, target shareholders of complete tender offers gain 21.90% while those of partial acquisitions gain 12.80%. The results also show that cash offers increase returns in complete tender offers. There is weak evidence that the gains to target shareholders in partial acquisitions are positively related to increases in bidder ownership. Further analysis indicates that there is no significant difference in target shareholder gains for a subsample of going private transactions compared to buyouts by outside shareholders.</description><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</subject><subject>Buyout</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Complete tender offers</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Partial acquisitions</subject><subject>Rates of return</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Tender offers</subject><issn>0378-4266</issn><issn>1872-6372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1rGzEQFaWFumn_QQ9Lc0kOm-ysZH1cAsH5BEMv7VlotSMqY-9uJNngf5_ZOuTWCkYjHu-9GT3GvkNzBQ3I64YrXYtWygvDL03TwLKWH9gCtGpryVX7kS3eKZ_Zl5w3DR0NfMHuVuNucsmVeMAql31_rMZQeQK3WLAqOPSYCAqYcuWGviJyiW5bOf-yjzmWOA75K_sU3Dbjt7d-xn4_3P9aPdXrn4_Pq9t17YU2pe5AGid48CKEtuOBC1rKcxmA6w56ULrTBAuQS6G46ltoQ_BaK8XdEgXwM_bj5Dul8WWPudjNuE8DjbRgaITSmhPp_J-k1rRg5q8TS5xYPo05Jwx2SnHn0tFCY-dQ7ZyYnROzhtu_oVpJsvVJlnBC_65BxE0X4uDswXIHiq7j_DAk5S5SSapphhqjLAAN-VN2ZHdzskNK7RAx2ewjDh77mNAX24_x__u8AnvGlfA</recordid><startdate>19931201</startdate><enddate>19931201</enddate><creator>Amoako-Adu, Ben</creator><creator>Smith, Brian</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>North-Holland Pub. Co</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19931201</creationdate><title>Comparative study of complete tender offers and partial acquisitions</title><author>Amoako-Adu, Ben ; Smith, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-b169a43fc4ff2b3f34378c36f138b1d178b8b3f41654737d212ffc88773a5e413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</topic><topic>Buyout</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Complete tender offers</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Partial acquisitions</topic><topic>Rates of return</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Tender offers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amoako-Adu, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of banking &amp; finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amoako-Adu, Ben</au><au>Smith, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study of complete tender offers and partial acquisitions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of banking &amp; finance</jtitle><date>1993-12-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1097</spage><epage>1110</epage><pages>1097-1110</pages><issn>0378-4266</issn><eissn>1872-6372</eissn><coden>JBFIDO</coden><abstract>This paper compares and contrasts complete tender offers with partial acquisitions to assess the benefits derived from delisting and the elimination of agency costs associated with minority shareholders. The sample comprises 160 successful tender offers consummated on the Toronto Stock Exchange from 1977 to 1989. The empirical evidence indicates that, after controlling for other factors, target shareholders receive significantly higher returns in complete tender offers compared to partial acquisitions. On the announcement day, target shareholders of complete tender offers gain 21.90% while those of partial acquisitions gain 12.80%. The results also show that cash offers increase returns in complete tender offers. There is weak evidence that the gains to target shareholders in partial acquisitions are positively related to increases in bidder ownership. Further analysis indicates that there is no significant difference in target shareholder gains for a subsample of going private transactions compared to buyouts by outside shareholders.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0378-4266(93)90015-6</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4266
ispartof Journal of banking & finance, 1993-12, Vol.17 (6), p.1097-1110
issn 0378-4266
1872-6372
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194897883
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier SD Backfile Business; Elsevier SD Backfile Economics
subjects Acquisitions & mergers
Buyout
Comparative studies
Complete tender offers
Economic models
Partial acquisitions
Rates of return
Statistical analysis
Stockholders
Tender offers
title Comparative study of complete tender offers and partial acquisitions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-06T04%3A06%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20of%20complete%20tender%20offers%20and%20partial%20acquisitions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20banking%20&%20finance&rft.au=Amoako-Adu,%20Ben&rft.date=1993-12-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1097&rft.epage=1110&rft.pages=1097-1110&rft.issn=0378-4266&rft.eissn=1872-6372&rft.coden=JBFIDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0378-4266(93)90015-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1153864%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-b169a43fc4ff2b3f34378c36f138b1d178b8b3f41654737d212ffc88773a5e413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292190008&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true