Axiologies: Past and Present Concepts of Literary Value

Verdicts concerning a work’s worth, “good,” “bad,” or “great,” vary wildly at any point and change radically over time. Much depends on what didactic or aesthetic rules are imposed and what modes of reading hold sway. Many critics see the purpose of literature as didactic; others subscribe to the pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Modern language quarterly (Seattle) 2017-06, Vol.78 (2), p.139-172
Main Author: Hume, Robert D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aesthetics
Analysis
Criticism
Didacticism
Hume, David (1711-1776)
Judgment
Literary Criticism
Literary Theory
Literature
Literature and Literary Studies
Methods
Morality
Subjectivity
Time
Values
Values (Philosophy)
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Verdicts concerning a work’s worth, “good,” “bad,” or “great,” vary wildly at any point and change radically over time. Much depends on what didactic or aesthetic rules are imposed and what modes of reading hold sway. Many critics see the purpose of literature as didactic; others subscribe to the principle of art for art’s sake. We need to know whether we are debating a text or disputing the evaluative criteria applicable to it. We need to ask how certain we are of what the author meant to accomplish. Henry Fielding and David Hume remind us that a range of judgments is unavoidable: people differ, and so do aesthetic and moral preferences. So if subjectivity is inescapable, we should accept chaotic diversity in a spirit of courteous toleration.
ISSN:0026-7929
1527-1943
DOI:10.1215/00267929-3812585