Loading…

The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning

Typically, the scientific method in science classrooms takes the form of discrete, ordered steps meant to guide students' inquiry. In this paper, we examine how focusing on the scientific method as discrete steps affects students' inquiry and teachers' perceptions thereof. To do so, w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science education (Salem, Mass.) Mass.), 2010-01, Vol.94 (1), p.29-47
Main Authors: Tang, Xiaowei, Coffey, Janet E., Elby, Andy, Levin, Daniel M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-e0fd74a0ed619af9b37748886efbdf12148fb551432c1223a8746558537b77323
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-e0fd74a0ed619af9b37748886efbdf12148fb551432c1223a8746558537b77323
container_end_page 47
container_issue 1
container_start_page 29
container_title Science education (Salem, Mass.)
container_volume 94
creator Tang, Xiaowei
Coffey, Janet E.
Elby, Andy
Levin, Daniel M.
description Typically, the scientific method in science classrooms takes the form of discrete, ordered steps meant to guide students' inquiry. In this paper, we examine how focusing on the scientific method as discrete steps affects students' inquiry and teachers' perceptions thereof. To do so, we study a ninth‐grade environmental science class in which students first reviewed a typical version of the scientific method, then brainstormed about which sites on school grounds could be good earthworm habitats and how to test their ideas. Our discourse analysis explores the dynamics between the “steps” of the scientific method and students' engagement in more authentic scientific inquiry. We argue that focusing on the scientific method as discrete steps can distract students from their ongoing, productive inquiry and can also draw teachers' attention away from students' productive inquiry. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 94:29–47, 2010
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sce.20366
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194919556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ871954</ericid><sourcerecordid>1920715241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-e0fd74a0ed619af9b37748886efbdf12148fb551432c1223a8746558537b77323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPAjEUhRujiYgu3LuYuHMx0Mf0Me4MQXwQMRGjcdOUmVaK2IF2iPLvrYwSN65u7rnfPSc5ABwj2EEQ4m4odAdDwtgOaCGYixQT_rwLWjBqqSCY7YODEGYQIkQxboHReKqTUFjtamtskbzrelqViXLlX9W65cr69Xky1i7YyoWoJLVWxdS61w0818q7uByCPaPmQR_9zDZ4vOyPe1fpcDS47l0M04JQylINTckzBXXJUK5MPiGcZ0IIps2kNAijTJgJpSgjuEAYEyV4xigVlPAJ5wSTNjhtfBe-Wq50qOWsWnkXIyXKsxzlMSVCZw1U-CoEr41cePuu_FoiKL_rkrEuuakrsicNq70ttlz_RvDolcVztzl_2Lle_-8jH3r9X8O0-bCh1p_bD-XfJOOEU_l0N5BDcptTds_lC_kCuLOC-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194919556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning</title><source>Wiley</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Tang, Xiaowei ; Coffey, Janet E. ; Elby, Andy ; Levin, Daniel M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Xiaowei ; Coffey, Janet E. ; Elby, Andy ; Levin, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><description>Typically, the scientific method in science classrooms takes the form of discrete, ordered steps meant to guide students' inquiry. In this paper, we examine how focusing on the scientific method as discrete steps affects students' inquiry and teachers' perceptions thereof. To do so, we study a ninth‐grade environmental science class in which students first reviewed a typical version of the scientific method, then brainstormed about which sites on school grounds could be good earthworm habitats and how to test their ideas. Our discourse analysis explores the dynamics between the “steps” of the scientific method and students' engagement in more authentic scientific inquiry. We argue that focusing on the scientific method as discrete steps can distract students from their ongoing, productive inquiry and can also draw teachers' attention away from students' productive inquiry. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 94:29–47, 2010</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-237X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sce.20366</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SEDUAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Aptitude Treatment Interaction ; Brainstorming ; Classroom Environment ; Discourse Analysis ; Ecology ; Educational Practices ; Environmental Education ; Grade 9 ; Inquiry ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Learner Engagement ; Middle school education ; Middle school students ; Protocol Materials ; Science education ; Scientific method ; Scientific Methodology ; Teaching Methods ; United States (Mid Atlantic States)</subject><ispartof>Science education (Salem, Mass.), 2010-01, Vol.94 (1), p.29-47</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Jan 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-e0fd74a0ed619af9b37748886efbdf12148fb551432c1223a8746558537b77323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-e0fd74a0ed619af9b37748886efbdf12148fb551432c1223a8746558537b77323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ871954$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elby, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><title>The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning</title><title>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Sci. Ed</addtitle><description>Typically, the scientific method in science classrooms takes the form of discrete, ordered steps meant to guide students' inquiry. In this paper, we examine how focusing on the scientific method as discrete steps affects students' inquiry and teachers' perceptions thereof. To do so, we study a ninth‐grade environmental science class in which students first reviewed a typical version of the scientific method, then brainstormed about which sites on school grounds could be good earthworm habitats and how to test their ideas. Our discourse analysis explores the dynamics between the “steps” of the scientific method and students' engagement in more authentic scientific inquiry. We argue that focusing on the scientific method as discrete steps can distract students from their ongoing, productive inquiry and can also draw teachers' attention away from students' productive inquiry. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 94:29–47, 2010</description><subject>Aptitude Treatment Interaction</subject><subject>Brainstorming</subject><subject>Classroom Environment</subject><subject>Discourse Analysis</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Environmental Education</subject><subject>Grade 9</subject><subject>Inquiry</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Middle school education</subject><subject>Middle school students</subject><subject>Protocol Materials</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Scientific method</subject><subject>Scientific Methodology</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>United States (Mid Atlantic States)</subject><issn>0036-8326</issn><issn>1098-237X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPAjEUhRujiYgu3LuYuHMx0Mf0Me4MQXwQMRGjcdOUmVaK2IF2iPLvrYwSN65u7rnfPSc5ABwj2EEQ4m4odAdDwtgOaCGYixQT_rwLWjBqqSCY7YODEGYQIkQxboHReKqTUFjtamtskbzrelqViXLlX9W65cr69Xky1i7YyoWoJLVWxdS61w0818q7uByCPaPmQR_9zDZ4vOyPe1fpcDS47l0M04JQylINTckzBXXJUK5MPiGcZ0IIps2kNAijTJgJpSgjuEAYEyV4xigVlPAJ5wSTNjhtfBe-Wq50qOWsWnkXIyXKsxzlMSVCZw1U-CoEr41cePuu_FoiKL_rkrEuuakrsicNq70ttlz_RvDolcVztzl_2Lle_-8jH3r9X8O0-bCh1p_bD-XfJOOEU_l0N5BDcptTds_lC_kCuLOC-Q</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Tang, Xiaowei</creator><creator>Coffey, Janet E.</creator><creator>Elby, Andy</creator><creator>Levin, Daniel M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning</title><author>Tang, Xiaowei ; Coffey, Janet E. ; Elby, Andy ; Levin, Daniel M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-e0fd74a0ed619af9b37748886efbdf12148fb551432c1223a8746558537b77323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aptitude Treatment Interaction</topic><topic>Brainstorming</topic><topic>Classroom Environment</topic><topic>Discourse Analysis</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Environmental Education</topic><topic>Grade 9</topic><topic>Inquiry</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Middle school education</topic><topic>Middle school students</topic><topic>Protocol Materials</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Scientific method</topic><topic>Scientific Methodology</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>United States (Mid Atlantic States)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elby, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Xiaowei</au><au>Coffey, Janet E.</au><au>Elby, Andy</au><au>Levin, Daniel M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ871954</ericid><atitle>The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning</atitle><jtitle>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Sci. Ed</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>29-47</pages><issn>0036-8326</issn><eissn>1098-237X</eissn><coden>SEDUAV</coden><abstract>Typically, the scientific method in science classrooms takes the form of discrete, ordered steps meant to guide students' inquiry. In this paper, we examine how focusing on the scientific method as discrete steps affects students' inquiry and teachers' perceptions thereof. To do so, we study a ninth‐grade environmental science class in which students first reviewed a typical version of the scientific method, then brainstormed about which sites on school grounds could be good earthworm habitats and how to test their ideas. Our discourse analysis explores the dynamics between the “steps” of the scientific method and students' engagement in more authentic scientific inquiry. We argue that focusing on the scientific method as discrete steps can distract students from their ongoing, productive inquiry and can also draw teachers' attention away from students' productive inquiry. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 94:29–47, 2010</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/sce.20366</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-8326
ispartof Science education (Salem, Mass.), 2010-01, Vol.94 (1), p.29-47
issn 0036-8326
1098-237X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194919556
source Wiley; ERIC
subjects Aptitude Treatment Interaction
Brainstorming
Classroom Environment
Discourse Analysis
Ecology
Educational Practices
Environmental Education
Grade 9
Inquiry
Instructional Effectiveness
Learner Engagement
Middle school education
Middle school students
Protocol Materials
Science education
Scientific method
Scientific Methodology
Teaching Methods
United States (Mid Atlantic States)
title The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A20%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20scientific%20method%20and%20scientific%20inquiry:%20Tensions%20in%20teaching%20and%20learning&rft.jtitle=Science%20education%20(Salem,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Tang,%20Xiaowei&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=29-47&rft.issn=0036-8326&rft.eissn=1098-237X&rft.coden=SEDUAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sce.20366&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1920715241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-e0fd74a0ed619af9b37748886efbdf12148fb551432c1223a8746558537b77323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194919556&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ871954&rfr_iscdi=true