Loading…

Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices

Through a case study approach, the state of science education in an urban elementary school was examined in detail. Observations made from the perspective of a science education specialist, an educational psychologist, and an expert elementary teacher were triangulated to provide a set of perspectiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science education (Salem, Mass.) Mass.), 2001-03, Vol.85 (2), p.89-110
Main Authors: King, Ken, Shumow, Lee, Lietz, Stephanie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-d6068fe3c350d32d56ef984ca8f5a7afb07d863930991ed7767f99e956e1f8cd3
container_end_page 110
container_issue 2
container_start_page 89
container_title Science education (Salem, Mass.)
container_volume 85
creator King, Ken
Shumow, Lee
Lietz, Stephanie
description Through a case study approach, the state of science education in an urban elementary school was examined in detail. Observations made from the perspective of a science education specialist, an educational psychologist, and an expert elementary teacher were triangulated to provide a set of perspectives from which elementary science instruction could be examined. Findings revealed that teachers were more poorly prepared than had been anticipated, both in terms of science content knowledge and instructional skills, but also with respect to the quality of classroom pedagogical and management skills. Particularly significant, from a science education perspective, was the inconsistency between how they perceived their teaching practice (a "hands-on", inquiry-based approach) and the investigator-observed expository nature of the lessons. Lessons were typically expository in nature, with little higher-level interaction of significance. Implications for practice and the associated needs for staff development among urban elementary teachers is discussed within the context of these findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<89::AID-SCE10>3.0.CO;2-H
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194938457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ620571</ericid><sourcerecordid>69043131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-d6068fe3c350d32d56ef984ca8f5a7afb07d863930991ed7767f99e956e1f8cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFvEzEQhVcIJELhDyAOFuJADxvGdtZrB4RUbUPTUjVIBcHNcrxjxWWzG-xdlf57HLZKLxy42NLMm2_evCwTFKYUgL2joGTOePnjLQOgwI9lMWcfpJrPT85P8-tqQeEjn8K0Wr1n-fJRNjkMPM4mAFzkkjPxNHsW400C0IKxSba5th5biwTrwZredy3xLTEtGcI6vdjgFtvehDsS7abrmjmpTEQS-6H2GEnnSI_GbjCQNTYeXUyzNbGNiTF03ZbsgrG9txifZ0-caSK-uP-Psm-fFl-rZX65OjuvTi5zO-MU8lqAkA655QXUnNWFQKfkzBrpClMat4ayloIrDkpRrMtSlE4pVElHnbQ1P8pej9xd6H4NGHt90w2hTSs1VTPF5awok-hqFNnQJaPo9C74bbpSU9D7sPU-O73PTo9ha1lopqXSOoWt_4atuQZdrVJ5mYBv7reaaE3jgmmtjw9UWnAlIMlejTIM3h66iwvBoChpan8Z27e-wbv_9_QvS2MhIfMR6WOPvw9IE35qUfKy0N-vzvQFiFMqJdOfk_7lqK_97iEVkfxTxv8AoWu8ZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194938457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>King, Ken ; Shumow, Lee ; Lietz, Stephanie</creator><creatorcontrib>King, Ken ; Shumow, Lee ; Lietz, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><description>Through a case study approach, the state of science education in an urban elementary school was examined in detail. Observations made from the perspective of a science education specialist, an educational psychologist, and an expert elementary teacher were triangulated to provide a set of perspectives from which elementary science instruction could be examined. Findings revealed that teachers were more poorly prepared than had been anticipated, both in terms of science content knowledge and instructional skills, but also with respect to the quality of classroom pedagogical and management skills. Particularly significant, from a science education perspective, was the inconsistency between how they perceived their teaching practice (a "hands-on", inquiry-based approach) and the investigator-observed expository nature of the lessons. Lessons were typically expository in nature, with little higher-level interaction of significance. Implications for practice and the associated needs for staff development among urban elementary teachers is discussed within the context of these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-237X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2&lt;89::AID-SCE10&gt;3.0.CO;2-H</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SEDUAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Case Studies ; Classroom Techniques ; Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods ; Educational sciences ; Elementary Education ; Elementary schools ; Exact and natural sciences ; Lehrer ; Lehrerforschung ; Primarbereich ; Sachunterricht ; Science education ; Science Instruction ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teachers ; Teaching methods ; Unterrichtsanalyse ; Unterrichtsbeobachtung ; Unterrichtsgestaltung ; Unterrichtsmethode ; Unterrichtsstil ; Urban Education ; Urban Education Studies ; Values</subject><ispartof>Science education (Salem, Mass.), 2001-03, Vol.85 (2), p.89-110</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Mar 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-d6068fe3c350d32d56ef984ca8f5a7afb07d863930991ed7767f99e956e1f8cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=615312$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ620571$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1153960$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shumow, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lietz, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><title>Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices</title><title>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Sci. Ed</addtitle><description>Through a case study approach, the state of science education in an urban elementary school was examined in detail. Observations made from the perspective of a science education specialist, an educational psychologist, and an expert elementary teacher were triangulated to provide a set of perspectives from which elementary science instruction could be examined. Findings revealed that teachers were more poorly prepared than had been anticipated, both in terms of science content knowledge and instructional skills, but also with respect to the quality of classroom pedagogical and management skills. Particularly significant, from a science education perspective, was the inconsistency between how they perceived their teaching practice (a "hands-on", inquiry-based approach) and the investigator-observed expository nature of the lessons. Lessons were typically expository in nature, with little higher-level interaction of significance. Implications for practice and the associated needs for staff development among urban elementary teachers is discussed within the context of these findings.</description><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Classroom Techniques</subject><subject>Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>Exact and natural sciences</subject><subject>Lehrer</subject><subject>Lehrerforschung</subject><subject>Primarbereich</subject><subject>Sachunterricht</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Unterrichtsanalyse</subject><subject>Unterrichtsbeobachtung</subject><subject>Unterrichtsgestaltung</subject><subject>Unterrichtsmethode</subject><subject>Unterrichtsstil</subject><subject>Urban Education</subject><subject>Urban Education Studies</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0036-8326</issn><issn>1098-237X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFvEzEQhVcIJELhDyAOFuJADxvGdtZrB4RUbUPTUjVIBcHNcrxjxWWzG-xdlf57HLZKLxy42NLMm2_evCwTFKYUgL2joGTOePnjLQOgwI9lMWcfpJrPT85P8-tqQeEjn8K0Wr1n-fJRNjkMPM4mAFzkkjPxNHsW400C0IKxSba5th5biwTrwZredy3xLTEtGcI6vdjgFtvehDsS7abrmjmpTEQS-6H2GEnnSI_GbjCQNTYeXUyzNbGNiTF03ZbsgrG9txifZ0-caSK-uP-Psm-fFl-rZX65OjuvTi5zO-MU8lqAkA655QXUnNWFQKfkzBrpClMat4ayloIrDkpRrMtSlE4pVElHnbQ1P8pej9xd6H4NGHt90w2hTSs1VTPF5awok-hqFNnQJaPo9C74bbpSU9D7sPU-O73PTo9ha1lopqXSOoWt_4atuQZdrVJ5mYBv7reaaE3jgmmtjw9UWnAlIMlejTIM3h66iwvBoChpan8Z27e-wbv_9_QvS2MhIfMR6WOPvw9IE35qUfKy0N-vzvQFiFMqJdOfk_7lqK_97iEVkfxTxv8AoWu8ZQ</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>King, Ken</creator><creator>Shumow, Lee</creator><creator>Lietz, Stephanie</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices</title><author>King, Ken ; Shumow, Lee ; Lietz, Stephanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-d6068fe3c350d32d56ef984ca8f5a7afb07d863930991ed7767f99e956e1f8cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Classroom Techniques</topic><topic>Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>Exact and natural sciences</topic><topic>Lehrer</topic><topic>Lehrerforschung</topic><topic>Primarbereich</topic><topic>Sachunterricht</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Unterrichtsanalyse</topic><topic>Unterrichtsbeobachtung</topic><topic>Unterrichtsgestaltung</topic><topic>Unterrichtsmethode</topic><topic>Unterrichtsstil</topic><topic>Urban Education</topic><topic>Urban Education Studies</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shumow, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lietz, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, Ken</au><au>Shumow, Lee</au><au>Lietz, Stephanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ620571</ericid><atitle>Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices</atitle><jtitle>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Sci. Ed</addtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>89-110</pages><issn>0036-8326</issn><eissn>1098-237X</eissn><coden>SEDUAV</coden><abstract>Through a case study approach, the state of science education in an urban elementary school was examined in detail. Observations made from the perspective of a science education specialist, an educational psychologist, and an expert elementary teacher were triangulated to provide a set of perspectives from which elementary science instruction could be examined. Findings revealed that teachers were more poorly prepared than had been anticipated, both in terms of science content knowledge and instructional skills, but also with respect to the quality of classroom pedagogical and management skills. Particularly significant, from a science education perspective, was the inconsistency between how they perceived their teaching practice (a "hands-on", inquiry-based approach) and the investigator-observed expository nature of the lessons. Lessons were typically expository in nature, with little higher-level interaction of significance. Implications for practice and the associated needs for staff development among urban elementary teachers is discussed within the context of these findings.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2&lt;89::AID-SCE10&gt;3.0.CO;2-H</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-8326
ispartof Science education (Salem, Mass.), 2001-03, Vol.85 (2), p.89-110
issn 0036-8326
1098-237X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194938457
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC
subjects Case Studies
Classroom Techniques
Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods
Educational sciences
Elementary Education
Elementary schools
Exact and natural sciences
Lehrer
Lehrerforschung
Primarbereich
Sachunterricht
Science education
Science Instruction
Teacher Attitudes
Teachers
Teaching methods
Unterrichtsanalyse
Unterrichtsbeobachtung
Unterrichtsgestaltung
Unterrichtsmethode
Unterrichtsstil
Urban Education
Urban Education Studies
Values
title Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A49%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Science%20education%20in%20an%20urban%20elementary%20school:%20Case%20studies%20of%20teacher%20beliefs%20and%20classroom%20practices&rft.jtitle=Science%20education%20(Salem,%20Mass.)&rft.au=King,%20Ken&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=89-110&rft.issn=0036-8326&rft.eissn=1098-237X&rft.coden=SEDUAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2%3C89::AID-SCE10%3E3.0.CO;2-H&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69043131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-d6068fe3c350d32d56ef984ca8f5a7afb07d863930991ed7767f99e956e1f8cd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194938457&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ620571&rfr_iscdi=true