Loading…
Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices
Through a case study approach, the state of science education in an urban elementary school was examined in detail. Observations made from the perspective of a science education specialist, an educational psychologist, and an expert elementary teacher were triangulated to provide a set of perspectiv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Science education (Salem, Mass.) Mass.), 2001-03, Vol.85 (2), p.89-110 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-d6068fe3c350d32d56ef984ca8f5a7afb07d863930991ed7767f99e956e1f8cd3 |
container_end_page | 110 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Science education (Salem, Mass.) |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | King, Ken Shumow, Lee Lietz, Stephanie |
description | Through a case study approach, the state of science education in an urban elementary school was examined in detail. Observations made from the perspective of a science education specialist, an educational psychologist, and an expert elementary teacher were triangulated to provide a set of perspectives from which elementary science instruction could be examined. Findings revealed that teachers were more poorly prepared than had been anticipated, both in terms of science content knowledge and instructional skills, but also with respect to the quality of classroom pedagogical and management skills. Particularly significant, from a science education perspective, was the inconsistency between how they perceived their teaching practice (a "hands-on", inquiry-based approach) and the investigator-observed expository nature of the lessons. Lessons were typically expository in nature, with little higher-level interaction of significance. Implications for practice and the associated needs for staff development among urban elementary teachers is discussed within the context of these findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<89::AID-SCE10>3.0.CO;2-H |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194938457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ620571</ericid><sourcerecordid>69043131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-d6068fe3c350d32d56ef984ca8f5a7afb07d863930991ed7767f99e956e1f8cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFvEzEQhVcIJELhDyAOFuJADxvGdtZrB4RUbUPTUjVIBcHNcrxjxWWzG-xdlf57HLZKLxy42NLMm2_evCwTFKYUgL2joGTOePnjLQOgwI9lMWcfpJrPT85P8-tqQeEjn8K0Wr1n-fJRNjkMPM4mAFzkkjPxNHsW400C0IKxSba5th5biwTrwZredy3xLTEtGcI6vdjgFtvehDsS7abrmjmpTEQS-6H2GEnnSI_GbjCQNTYeXUyzNbGNiTF03ZbsgrG9txifZ0-caSK-uP-Psm-fFl-rZX65OjuvTi5zO-MU8lqAkA655QXUnNWFQKfkzBrpClMat4ayloIrDkpRrMtSlE4pVElHnbQ1P8pej9xd6H4NGHt90w2hTSs1VTPF5awok-hqFNnQJaPo9C74bbpSU9D7sPU-O73PTo9ha1lopqXSOoWt_4atuQZdrVJ5mYBv7reaaE3jgmmtjw9UWnAlIMlejTIM3h66iwvBoChpan8Z27e-wbv_9_QvS2MhIfMR6WOPvw9IE35qUfKy0N-vzvQFiFMqJdOfk_7lqK_97iEVkfxTxv8AoWu8ZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194938457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>King, Ken ; Shumow, Lee ; Lietz, Stephanie</creator><creatorcontrib>King, Ken ; Shumow, Lee ; Lietz, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><description>Through a case study approach, the state of science education in an urban elementary school was examined in detail. Observations made from the perspective of a science education specialist, an educational psychologist, and an expert elementary teacher were triangulated to provide a set of perspectives from which elementary science instruction could be examined. Findings revealed that teachers were more poorly prepared than had been anticipated, both in terms of science content knowledge and instructional skills, but also with respect to the quality of classroom pedagogical and management skills. Particularly significant, from a science education perspective, was the inconsistency between how they perceived their teaching practice (a "hands-on", inquiry-based approach) and the investigator-observed expository nature of the lessons. Lessons were typically expository in nature, with little higher-level interaction of significance. Implications for practice and the associated needs for staff development among urban elementary teachers is discussed within the context of these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-237X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<89::AID-SCE10>3.0.CO;2-H</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SEDUAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Case Studies ; Classroom Techniques ; Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods ; Educational sciences ; Elementary Education ; Elementary schools ; Exact and natural sciences ; Lehrer ; Lehrerforschung ; Primarbereich ; Sachunterricht ; Science education ; Science Instruction ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teachers ; Teaching methods ; Unterrichtsanalyse ; Unterrichtsbeobachtung ; Unterrichtsgestaltung ; Unterrichtsmethode ; Unterrichtsstil ; Urban Education ; Urban Education Studies ; Values</subject><ispartof>Science education (Salem, Mass.), 2001-03, Vol.85 (2), p.89-110</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Mar 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-d6068fe3c350d32d56ef984ca8f5a7afb07d863930991ed7767f99e956e1f8cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=615312$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ620571$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1153960$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shumow, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lietz, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><title>Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices</title><title>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Sci. Ed</addtitle><description>Through a case study approach, the state of science education in an urban elementary school was examined in detail. Observations made from the perspective of a science education specialist, an educational psychologist, and an expert elementary teacher were triangulated to provide a set of perspectives from which elementary science instruction could be examined. Findings revealed that teachers were more poorly prepared than had been anticipated, both in terms of science content knowledge and instructional skills, but also with respect to the quality of classroom pedagogical and management skills. Particularly significant, from a science education perspective, was the inconsistency between how they perceived their teaching practice (a "hands-on", inquiry-based approach) and the investigator-observed expository nature of the lessons. Lessons were typically expository in nature, with little higher-level interaction of significance. Implications for practice and the associated needs for staff development among urban elementary teachers is discussed within the context of these findings.</description><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Classroom Techniques</subject><subject>Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>Exact and natural sciences</subject><subject>Lehrer</subject><subject>Lehrerforschung</subject><subject>Primarbereich</subject><subject>Sachunterricht</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Unterrichtsanalyse</subject><subject>Unterrichtsbeobachtung</subject><subject>Unterrichtsgestaltung</subject><subject>Unterrichtsmethode</subject><subject>Unterrichtsstil</subject><subject>Urban Education</subject><subject>Urban Education Studies</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0036-8326</issn><issn>1098-237X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFvEzEQhVcIJELhDyAOFuJADxvGdtZrB4RUbUPTUjVIBcHNcrxjxWWzG-xdlf57HLZKLxy42NLMm2_evCwTFKYUgL2joGTOePnjLQOgwI9lMWcfpJrPT85P8-tqQeEjn8K0Wr1n-fJRNjkMPM4mAFzkkjPxNHsW400C0IKxSba5th5biwTrwZredy3xLTEtGcI6vdjgFtvehDsS7abrmjmpTEQS-6H2GEnnSI_GbjCQNTYeXUyzNbGNiTF03ZbsgrG9txifZ0-caSK-uP-Psm-fFl-rZX65OjuvTi5zO-MU8lqAkA655QXUnNWFQKfkzBrpClMat4ayloIrDkpRrMtSlE4pVElHnbQ1P8pej9xd6H4NGHt90w2hTSs1VTPF5awok-hqFNnQJaPo9C74bbpSU9D7sPU-O73PTo9ha1lopqXSOoWt_4atuQZdrVJ5mYBv7reaaE3jgmmtjw9UWnAlIMlejTIM3h66iwvBoChpan8Z27e-wbv_9_QvS2MhIfMR6WOPvw9IE35qUfKy0N-vzvQFiFMqJdOfk_7lqK_97iEVkfxTxv8AoWu8ZQ</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>King, Ken</creator><creator>Shumow, Lee</creator><creator>Lietz, Stephanie</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices</title><author>King, Ken ; Shumow, Lee ; Lietz, Stephanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-d6068fe3c350d32d56ef984ca8f5a7afb07d863930991ed7767f99e956e1f8cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Classroom Techniques</topic><topic>Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>Exact and natural sciences</topic><topic>Lehrer</topic><topic>Lehrerforschung</topic><topic>Primarbereich</topic><topic>Sachunterricht</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Unterrichtsanalyse</topic><topic>Unterrichtsbeobachtung</topic><topic>Unterrichtsgestaltung</topic><topic>Unterrichtsmethode</topic><topic>Unterrichtsstil</topic><topic>Urban Education</topic><topic>Urban Education Studies</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shumow, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lietz, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, Ken</au><au>Shumow, Lee</au><au>Lietz, Stephanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ620571</ericid><atitle>Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices</atitle><jtitle>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Sci. Ed</addtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>89-110</pages><issn>0036-8326</issn><eissn>1098-237X</eissn><coden>SEDUAV</coden><abstract>Through a case study approach, the state of science education in an urban elementary school was examined in detail. Observations made from the perspective of a science education specialist, an educational psychologist, and an expert elementary teacher were triangulated to provide a set of perspectives from which elementary science instruction could be examined. Findings revealed that teachers were more poorly prepared than had been anticipated, both in terms of science content knowledge and instructional skills, but also with respect to the quality of classroom pedagogical and management skills. Particularly significant, from a science education perspective, was the inconsistency between how they perceived their teaching practice (a "hands-on", inquiry-based approach) and the investigator-observed expository nature of the lessons. Lessons were typically expository in nature, with little higher-level interaction of significance. Implications for practice and the associated needs for staff development among urban elementary teachers is discussed within the context of these findings.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<89::AID-SCE10>3.0.CO;2-H</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-8326 |
ispartof | Science education (Salem, Mass.), 2001-03, Vol.85 (2), p.89-110 |
issn | 0036-8326 1098-237X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_194938457 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC |
subjects | Case Studies Classroom Techniques Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods Educational sciences Elementary Education Elementary schools Exact and natural sciences Lehrer Lehrerforschung Primarbereich Sachunterricht Science education Science Instruction Teacher Attitudes Teachers Teaching methods Unterrichtsanalyse Unterrichtsbeobachtung Unterrichtsgestaltung Unterrichtsmethode Unterrichtsstil Urban Education Urban Education Studies Values |
title | Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A49%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Science%20education%20in%20an%20urban%20elementary%20school:%20Case%20studies%20of%20teacher%20beliefs%20and%20classroom%20practices&rft.jtitle=Science%20education%20(Salem,%20Mass.)&rft.au=King,%20Ken&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=89-110&rft.issn=0036-8326&rft.eissn=1098-237X&rft.coden=SEDUAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2%3C89::AID-SCE10%3E3.0.CO;2-H&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69043131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-d6068fe3c350d32d56ef984ca8f5a7afb07d863930991ed7767f99e956e1f8cd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194938457&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ620571&rfr_iscdi=true |