Electoral Competitiveness and Turnout in British Elections, 1964–2010

Analyzing the British Election Study from 1964 to 2010, we examine the influence of electoral context on turnout, focusing on the closeness of elections in terms of lagged seat and constituency-level winning margins. Using cross-classified multilevel models to account for individual and contextual f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Political science research and methods 2017-10, Vol.5 (4), p.775-794
Main Authors: Vowles, Jack, Katz, Gabriel, Stevens, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Age
Competition
Constituents
Elections
International relations
Life cycles
Original Articles
Participation
Political behavior
Political science
Politics
Public opinion
Respondents
Time series
Voter behavior
Voter turnout
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-8ebf54541fa3e48d29794645ed6fb3a003a979a85981b5b3b5e6c30a1b8e08ff3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-8ebf54541fa3e48d29794645ed6fb3a003a979a85981b5b3b5e6c30a1b8e08ff3
container_end_page 794
container_issue 4
container_start_page 775
container_title Political science research and methods
container_volume 5
creator Vowles, Jack
Katz, Gabriel
Stevens, Daniel
description Analyzing the British Election Study from 1964 to 2010, we examine the influence of electoral context on turnout, focusing on the closeness of elections in terms of lagged seat and constituency-level winning margins. Using cross-classified multilevel models to account for individual and contextual factors and disentangle life cycle, cohort- and election-specific effects, we find that closeness strongly affects voting behavior, particularly among new electors. Widening seat margins in British elections over the last decades have had a persistent impact on turnout. Respondents who faced less competitive environments when young are more likely to abstain in subsequent elections than those reaching voting age after close-fought races. We conclude that variations in competitiveness have had both short- and long-term effects on turnout.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/psrm.2015.67
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1950005702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_psrm_2015_67</cupid><sourcerecordid>1950005702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-8ebf54541fa3e48d29794645ed6fb3a003a979a85981b5b3b5e6c30a1b8e08ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUMFOwzAMjRBITGM3PiAS17U4bZImR5jGQJrEZZyjpE2h09qUpEPixj_wh3wJKZsQB3yxZT-_Zz-ELgmkBEhx3QffphkQlvLiBE0yoDIRVMjT37qAczQLYQsxJDAu6QStljtbDs7rHV64trdDMzRvtrMhYN1VeLP3ndsPuOnwrY-j8IJ_FhrXhTkmktOvj88oChforNa7YGfHPEVPd8vN4j5ZP64eFjfrpMwKGBJhTc0oo6TWuaWiymQhKafMVrw2uQbIdexowaQghpncMMvLHDQxwoKo63yKrg68vXevexsGtXXxxiipiGTxMVZAFlHzA6r0LgRva9X7ptX-XRFQo1tqdEuNbileRHh6hOvW-KZ6tn9Y_1v4BplGa_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1950005702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electoral Competitiveness and Turnout in British Elections, 1964–2010</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press:Jisc Collections:Cambridge University Press Read and Publish Agreement 2021-24 (Reading list)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Vowles, Jack ; Katz, Gabriel ; Stevens, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Vowles, Jack ; Katz, Gabriel ; Stevens, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Analyzing the British Election Study from 1964 to 2010, we examine the influence of electoral context on turnout, focusing on the closeness of elections in terms of lagged seat and constituency-level winning margins. Using cross-classified multilevel models to account for individual and contextual factors and disentangle life cycle, cohort- and election-specific effects, we find that closeness strongly affects voting behavior, particularly among new electors. Widening seat margins in British elections over the last decades have had a persistent impact on turnout. Respondents who faced less competitive environments when young are more likely to abstain in subsequent elections than those reaching voting age after close-fought races. We conclude that variations in competitiveness have had both short- and long-term effects on turnout.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-8470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2015.67</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Age ; Competition ; Constituents ; Elections ; International relations ; Life cycles ; Original Articles ; Participation ; Political behavior ; Political science ; Politics ; Public opinion ; Respondents ; Time series ; Voter behavior ; Voter turnout</subject><ispartof>Political science research and methods, 2017-10, Vol.5 (4), p.775-794</ispartof><rights>The European Political Science Association 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-8ebf54541fa3e48d29794645ed6fb3a003a979a85981b5b3b5e6c30a1b8e08ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-8ebf54541fa3e48d29794645ed6fb3a003a979a85981b5b3b5e6c30a1b8e08ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1950005702/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1950005702?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21387,21394,27924,27925,33611,33985,43733,43948,72960,74221,74468</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vowles, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Electoral Competitiveness and Turnout in British Elections, 1964–2010</title><title>Political science research and methods</title><addtitle>PSRM</addtitle><description>Analyzing the British Election Study from 1964 to 2010, we examine the influence of electoral context on turnout, focusing on the closeness of elections in terms of lagged seat and constituency-level winning margins. Using cross-classified multilevel models to account for individual and contextual factors and disentangle life cycle, cohort- and election-specific effects, we find that closeness strongly affects voting behavior, particularly among new electors. Widening seat margins in British elections over the last decades have had a persistent impact on turnout. Respondents who faced less competitive environments when young are more likely to abstain in subsequent elections than those reaching voting age after close-fought races. We conclude that variations in competitiveness have had both short- and long-term effects on turnout.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voter turnout</subject><issn>2049-8470</issn><issn>2049-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNptUMFOwzAMjRBITGM3PiAS17U4bZImR5jGQJrEZZyjpE2h09qUpEPixj_wh3wJKZsQB3yxZT-_Zz-ELgmkBEhx3QffphkQlvLiBE0yoDIRVMjT37qAczQLYQsxJDAu6QStljtbDs7rHV64trdDMzRvtrMhYN1VeLP3ndsPuOnwrY-j8IJ_FhrXhTkmktOvj88oChforNa7YGfHPEVPd8vN4j5ZP64eFjfrpMwKGBJhTc0oo6TWuaWiymQhKafMVrw2uQbIdexowaQghpncMMvLHDQxwoKo63yKrg68vXevexsGtXXxxiipiGTxMVZAFlHzA6r0LgRva9X7ptX-XRFQo1tqdEuNbileRHh6hOvW-KZ6tn9Y_1v4BplGa_M</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Vowles, Jack</creator><creator>Katz, Gabriel</creator><creator>Stevens, Daniel</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Electoral Competitiveness and Turnout in British Elections, 1964–2010</title><author>Vowles, Jack ; Katz, Gabriel ; Stevens, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-8ebf54541fa3e48d29794645ed6fb3a003a979a85981b5b3b5e6c30a1b8e08ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voter turnout</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vowles, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vowles, Jack</au><au>Katz, Gabriel</au><au>Stevens, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electoral Competitiveness and Turnout in British Elections, 1964–2010</atitle><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle><addtitle>PSRM</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>775</spage><epage>794</epage><pages>775-794</pages><issn>2049-8470</issn><eissn>2049-8489</eissn><abstract>Analyzing the British Election Study from 1964 to 2010, we examine the influence of electoral context on turnout, focusing on the closeness of elections in terms of lagged seat and constituency-level winning margins. Using cross-classified multilevel models to account for individual and contextual factors and disentangle life cycle, cohort- and election-specific effects, we find that closeness strongly affects voting behavior, particularly among new electors. Widening seat margins in British elections over the last decades have had a persistent impact on turnout. Respondents who faced less competitive environments when young are more likely to abstain in subsequent elections than those reaching voting age after close-fought races. We conclude that variations in competitiveness have had both short- and long-term effects on turnout.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/psrm.2015.67</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-8470
ispartof Political science research and methods, 2017-10, Vol.5 (4), p.775-794
issn 2049-8470
2049-8489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1950005702
source Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Cambridge University Press:Jisc Collections:Cambridge University Press Read and Publish Agreement 2021-24 (Reading list); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Age
Competition
Constituents
Elections
International relations
Life cycles
Original Articles
Participation
Political behavior
Political science
Politics
Public opinion
Respondents
Time series
Voter behavior
Voter turnout
title Electoral Competitiveness and Turnout in British Elections, 1964–2010
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A58%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electoral%20Competitiveness%20and%20Turnout%20in%20British%20Elections,%201964%E2%80%932010&rft.jtitle=Political%20science%20research%20and%20methods&rft.au=Vowles,%20Jack&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=775&rft.epage=794&rft.pages=775-794&rft.issn=2049-8470&rft.eissn=2049-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/psrm.2015.67&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1950005702%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-8ebf54541fa3e48d29794645ed6fb3a003a979a85981b5b3b5e6c30a1b8e08ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1950005702&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_psrm_2015_67&rfr_iscdi=true