Loading…
Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?
The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clou...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 2017-09, Vol.57 (5), p.512-518 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3 |
container_end_page | 518 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 512 |
container_title | Geomagnetism and Aeronomy |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Nikolaeva, N. S. Yermolaev, Yu. I. Lodkina, I. G. Yermolaev, M. Yu |
description | The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clouds (MCs) and Ejecta. We recently showed that the description of relationships between interplanetary conditions and
Dst
and
Dst
* indices with the modified formula by Burton et al. gives an ~50% higher efficiency of storm generation by Sheath and CIR than that by ICME. Many function couplings (FCs) between different interplanetary parameters and the magnetosphere state have been suggested in the literature; however, they have not been analyzed for different solar wind types. In this work, we study the generation efficiency of the main phase of a storm by different solar wind streams with the use of 12 FCs on the basis of OMNI data for 1976–2000. The results show that the Sheath has the highest efficiency for most FCs, and MC is the least efficient, and this result corresponds to our previous results. The reliability of the results and possible causes of differences for different FCs and solar wind types are to be studied further. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1134/S0016793217050152 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1950594857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1950594857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6Au4Dr0Xsnk2SyEJH6hIILFdwNyUxSp7STMYlI_96UuhDE1b2cJxxCThHOEVl18QyAQipWogQOyMs9MkHOeSEq_rZPJlu62PKH5CjGJQADznFCLm-8jXStF4NNfUtj8mFNF3awQafeD7Szox06mr_0bmn0Kx3oV5-RtBnt1TE5cHoV7cnPnZLXu9uX2UMxf7p_nF3Pi5ahSIVBkCU4pYXCjonWOAvCGV0726GpawNV2wlVSSWQSYDWqQyAlGgqUzvDpuRslzsG__FpY2qW_jMMubJBxYGrquYyq3CnaoOPMVjXjKFf67BpEJrtSs2flbKn3Hli1g4LG34l_2v6BhUXaCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1950594857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Nikolaeva, N. S. ; Yermolaev, Yu. I. ; Lodkina, I. G. ; Yermolaev, M. Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Nikolaeva, N. S. ; Yermolaev, Yu. I. ; Lodkina, I. G. ; Yermolaev, M. Yu</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clouds (MCs) and Ejecta. We recently showed that the description of relationships between interplanetary conditions and
Dst
and
Dst
* indices with the modified formula by Burton et al. gives an ~50% higher efficiency of storm generation by Sheath and CIR than that by ICME. Many function couplings (FCs) between different interplanetary parameters and the magnetosphere state have been suggested in the literature; however, they have not been analyzed for different solar wind types. In this work, we study the generation efficiency of the main phase of a storm by different solar wind streams with the use of 12 FCs on the basis of OMNI data for 1976–2000. The results show that the Sheath has the highest efficiency for most FCs, and MC is the least efficient, and this result corresponds to our previous results. The reliability of the results and possible causes of differences for different FCs and solar wind types are to be studied further.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-645X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0016-7940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0016793217050152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Coronal mass ejection ; Corotating Interaction Regions (CIR) ; Couplings ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Efficiency ; Ejecta ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Magnetic clouds ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic storms ; Magnetosphere ; Magnetospheres ; Sheaths ; Solar corona ; Solar energy ; Solar wind ; Storms ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2017-09, Vol.57 (5), p.512-518</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017</rights><rights>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nikolaeva, N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yermolaev, Yu. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodkina, I. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yermolaev, M. Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?</title><title>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy</title><addtitle>Geomagn. Aeron</addtitle><description>The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clouds (MCs) and Ejecta. We recently showed that the description of relationships between interplanetary conditions and
Dst
and
Dst
* indices with the modified formula by Burton et al. gives an ~50% higher efficiency of storm generation by Sheath and CIR than that by ICME. Many function couplings (FCs) between different interplanetary parameters and the magnetosphere state have been suggested in the literature; however, they have not been analyzed for different solar wind types. In this work, we study the generation efficiency of the main phase of a storm by different solar wind streams with the use of 12 FCs on the basis of OMNI data for 1976–2000. The results show that the Sheath has the highest efficiency for most FCs, and MC is the least efficient, and this result corresponds to our previous results. The reliability of the results and possible causes of differences for different FCs and solar wind types are to be studied further.</description><subject>Coronal mass ejection</subject><subject>Corotating Interaction Regions (CIR)</subject><subject>Couplings</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Ejecta</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Magnetic clouds</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic storms</subject><subject>Magnetosphere</subject><subject>Magnetospheres</subject><subject>Sheaths</subject><subject>Solar corona</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar wind</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0016-7932</issn><issn>1555-645X</issn><issn>0016-7940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6Au4Dr0Xsnk2SyEJH6hIILFdwNyUxSp7STMYlI_96UuhDE1b2cJxxCThHOEVl18QyAQipWogQOyMs9MkHOeSEq_rZPJlu62PKH5CjGJQADznFCLm-8jXStF4NNfUtj8mFNF3awQafeD7Szox06mr_0bmn0Kx3oV5-RtBnt1TE5cHoV7cnPnZLXu9uX2UMxf7p_nF3Pi5ahSIVBkCU4pYXCjonWOAvCGV0726GpawNV2wlVSSWQSYDWqQyAlGgqUzvDpuRslzsG__FpY2qW_jMMubJBxYGrquYyq3CnaoOPMVjXjKFf67BpEJrtSs2flbKn3Hli1g4LG34l_2v6BhUXaCY</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Nikolaeva, N. S.</creator><creator>Yermolaev, Yu. I.</creator><creator>Lodkina, I. G.</creator><creator>Yermolaev, M. Yu</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?</title><author>Nikolaeva, N. S. ; Yermolaev, Yu. I. ; Lodkina, I. G. ; Yermolaev, M. Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Coronal mass ejection</topic><topic>Corotating Interaction Regions (CIR)</topic><topic>Couplings</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Ejecta</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Magnetic clouds</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic storms</topic><topic>Magnetosphere</topic><topic>Magnetospheres</topic><topic>Sheaths</topic><topic>Solar corona</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar wind</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nikolaeva, N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yermolaev, Yu. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodkina, I. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yermolaev, M. Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nikolaeva, N. S.</au><au>Yermolaev, Yu. I.</au><au>Lodkina, I. G.</au><au>Yermolaev, M. Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?</atitle><jtitle>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy</jtitle><stitle>Geomagn. Aeron</stitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>512-518</pages><issn>0016-7932</issn><eissn>1555-645X</eissn><eissn>0016-7940</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clouds (MCs) and Ejecta. We recently showed that the description of relationships between interplanetary conditions and
Dst
and
Dst
* indices with the modified formula by Burton et al. gives an ~50% higher efficiency of storm generation by Sheath and CIR than that by ICME. Many function couplings (FCs) between different interplanetary parameters and the magnetosphere state have been suggested in the literature; however, they have not been analyzed for different solar wind types. In this work, we study the generation efficiency of the main phase of a storm by different solar wind streams with the use of 12 FCs on the basis of OMNI data for 1976–2000. The results show that the Sheath has the highest efficiency for most FCs, and MC is the least efficient, and this result corresponds to our previous results. The reliability of the results and possible causes of differences for different FCs and solar wind types are to be studied further.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S0016793217050152</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-7932 |
ispartof | Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2017-09, Vol.57 (5), p.512-518 |
issn | 0016-7932 1555-645X 0016-7940 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1950594857 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Coronal mass ejection Corotating Interaction Regions (CIR) Couplings Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Efficiency Ejecta Geophysics/Geodesy Magnetic clouds Magnetic fields Magnetic storms Magnetosphere Magnetospheres Sheaths Solar corona Solar energy Solar wind Storms Wind |
title | Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A24%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20magnetic%20storm%20generation%20depend%20on%20the%20solar%20wind%20type?&rft.jtitle=Geomagnetism%20and%20Aeronomy&rft.au=Nikolaeva,%20N.%20S.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=512-518&rft.issn=0016-7932&rft.eissn=1555-645X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0016793217050152&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1950594857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1950594857&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |