Loading…

Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?

The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 2017-09, Vol.57 (5), p.512-518
Main Authors: Nikolaeva, N. S., Yermolaev, Yu. I., Lodkina, I. G., Yermolaev, M. Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3
container_end_page 518
container_issue 5
container_start_page 512
container_title Geomagnetism and Aeronomy
container_volume 57
creator Nikolaeva, N. S.
Yermolaev, Yu. I.
Lodkina, I. G.
Yermolaev, M. Yu
description The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clouds (MCs) and Ejecta. We recently showed that the description of relationships between interplanetary conditions and Dst and Dst * indices with the modified formula by Burton et al. gives an ~50% higher efficiency of storm generation by Sheath and CIR than that by ICME. Many function couplings (FCs) between different interplanetary parameters and the magnetosphere state have been suggested in the literature; however, they have not been analyzed for different solar wind types. In this work, we study the generation efficiency of the main phase of a storm by different solar wind streams with the use of 12 FCs on the basis of OMNI data for 1976–2000. The results show that the Sheath has the highest efficiency for most FCs, and MC is the least efficient, and this result corresponds to our previous results. The reliability of the results and possible causes of differences for different FCs and solar wind types are to be studied further.
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S0016793217050152
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1950594857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1950594857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6Au4Dr0Xsnk2SyEJH6hIILFdwNyUxSp7STMYlI_96UuhDE1b2cJxxCThHOEVl18QyAQipWogQOyMs9MkHOeSEq_rZPJlu62PKH5CjGJQADznFCLm-8jXStF4NNfUtj8mFNF3awQafeD7Szox06mr_0bmn0Kx3oV5-RtBnt1TE5cHoV7cnPnZLXu9uX2UMxf7p_nF3Pi5ahSIVBkCU4pYXCjonWOAvCGV0726GpawNV2wlVSSWQSYDWqQyAlGgqUzvDpuRslzsG__FpY2qW_jMMubJBxYGrquYyq3CnaoOPMVjXjKFf67BpEJrtSs2flbKn3Hli1g4LG34l_2v6BhUXaCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1950594857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Nikolaeva, N. S. ; Yermolaev, Yu. I. ; Lodkina, I. G. ; Yermolaev, M. Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Nikolaeva, N. S. ; Yermolaev, Yu. I. ; Lodkina, I. G. ; Yermolaev, M. Yu</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clouds (MCs) and Ejecta. We recently showed that the description of relationships between interplanetary conditions and Dst and Dst * indices with the modified formula by Burton et al. gives an ~50% higher efficiency of storm generation by Sheath and CIR than that by ICME. Many function couplings (FCs) between different interplanetary parameters and the magnetosphere state have been suggested in the literature; however, they have not been analyzed for different solar wind types. In this work, we study the generation efficiency of the main phase of a storm by different solar wind streams with the use of 12 FCs on the basis of OMNI data for 1976–2000. The results show that the Sheath has the highest efficiency for most FCs, and MC is the least efficient, and this result corresponds to our previous results. The reliability of the results and possible causes of differences for different FCs and solar wind types are to be studied further.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-645X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0016-7940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0016793217050152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Coronal mass ejection ; Corotating Interaction Regions (CIR) ; Couplings ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Efficiency ; Ejecta ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Magnetic clouds ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic storms ; Magnetosphere ; Magnetospheres ; Sheaths ; Solar corona ; Solar energy ; Solar wind ; Storms ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2017-09, Vol.57 (5), p.512-518</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017</rights><rights>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nikolaeva, N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yermolaev, Yu. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodkina, I. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yermolaev, M. Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?</title><title>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy</title><addtitle>Geomagn. Aeron</addtitle><description>The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clouds (MCs) and Ejecta. We recently showed that the description of relationships between interplanetary conditions and Dst and Dst * indices with the modified formula by Burton et al. gives an ~50% higher efficiency of storm generation by Sheath and CIR than that by ICME. Many function couplings (FCs) between different interplanetary parameters and the magnetosphere state have been suggested in the literature; however, they have not been analyzed for different solar wind types. In this work, we study the generation efficiency of the main phase of a storm by different solar wind streams with the use of 12 FCs on the basis of OMNI data for 1976–2000. The results show that the Sheath has the highest efficiency for most FCs, and MC is the least efficient, and this result corresponds to our previous results. The reliability of the results and possible causes of differences for different FCs and solar wind types are to be studied further.</description><subject>Coronal mass ejection</subject><subject>Corotating Interaction Regions (CIR)</subject><subject>Couplings</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Ejecta</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Magnetic clouds</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic storms</subject><subject>Magnetosphere</subject><subject>Magnetospheres</subject><subject>Sheaths</subject><subject>Solar corona</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar wind</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0016-7932</issn><issn>1555-645X</issn><issn>0016-7940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6Au4Dr0Xsnk2SyEJH6hIILFdwNyUxSp7STMYlI_96UuhDE1b2cJxxCThHOEVl18QyAQipWogQOyMs9MkHOeSEq_rZPJlu62PKH5CjGJQADznFCLm-8jXStF4NNfUtj8mFNF3awQafeD7Szox06mr_0bmn0Kx3oV5-RtBnt1TE5cHoV7cnPnZLXu9uX2UMxf7p_nF3Pi5ahSIVBkCU4pYXCjonWOAvCGV0726GpawNV2wlVSSWQSYDWqQyAlGgqUzvDpuRslzsG__FpY2qW_jMMubJBxYGrquYyq3CnaoOPMVjXjKFf67BpEJrtSs2flbKn3Hli1g4LG34l_2v6BhUXaCY</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Nikolaeva, N. S.</creator><creator>Yermolaev, Yu. I.</creator><creator>Lodkina, I. G.</creator><creator>Yermolaev, M. Yu</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?</title><author>Nikolaeva, N. S. ; Yermolaev, Yu. I. ; Lodkina, I. G. ; Yermolaev, M. Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Coronal mass ejection</topic><topic>Corotating Interaction Regions (CIR)</topic><topic>Couplings</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Ejecta</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Magnetic clouds</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic storms</topic><topic>Magnetosphere</topic><topic>Magnetospheres</topic><topic>Sheaths</topic><topic>Solar corona</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar wind</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nikolaeva, N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yermolaev, Yu. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodkina, I. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yermolaev, M. Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nikolaeva, N. S.</au><au>Yermolaev, Yu. I.</au><au>Lodkina, I. G.</au><au>Yermolaev, M. Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?</atitle><jtitle>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy</jtitle><stitle>Geomagn. Aeron</stitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>512-518</pages><issn>0016-7932</issn><eissn>1555-645X</eissn><eissn>0016-7940</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this work is to draw the reader’s attention to the problem of possible differences in the generation of magnetic storms by different large-scale solar wind types: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), Sheaths, and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including magnetic clouds (MCs) and Ejecta. We recently showed that the description of relationships between interplanetary conditions and Dst and Dst * indices with the modified formula by Burton et al. gives an ~50% higher efficiency of storm generation by Sheath and CIR than that by ICME. Many function couplings (FCs) between different interplanetary parameters and the magnetosphere state have been suggested in the literature; however, they have not been analyzed for different solar wind types. In this work, we study the generation efficiency of the main phase of a storm by different solar wind streams with the use of 12 FCs on the basis of OMNI data for 1976–2000. The results show that the Sheath has the highest efficiency for most FCs, and MC is the least efficient, and this result corresponds to our previous results. The reliability of the results and possible causes of differences for different FCs and solar wind types are to be studied further.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S0016793217050152</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7932
ispartof Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2017-09, Vol.57 (5), p.512-518
issn 0016-7932
1555-645X
0016-7940
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1950594857
source Springer Nature
subjects Coronal mass ejection
Corotating Interaction Regions (CIR)
Couplings
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Efficiency
Ejecta
Geophysics/Geodesy
Magnetic clouds
Magnetic fields
Magnetic storms
Magnetosphere
Magnetospheres
Sheaths
Solar corona
Solar energy
Solar wind
Storms
Wind
title Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A24%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20magnetic%20storm%20generation%20depend%20on%20the%20solar%20wind%20type?&rft.jtitle=Geomagnetism%20and%20Aeronomy&rft.au=Nikolaeva,%20N.%20S.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=512-518&rft.issn=0016-7932&rft.eissn=1555-645X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0016793217050152&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1950594857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b10720f9a691d36cbfe06fba8fed1b88b04cd69479613700cf94cd0771b4b8fb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1950594857&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true