Loading…
THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA
According to statistics, the brown bear and gray wolf populations have decreased after the Second World War due to their intense control.According to recent data provided by the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests (MMAP, 2016a), the population size of the most common game species is given in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo 2017-09, Vol.63 (3), p.147-153 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 153 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Mihai ENESCU, Cristian HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin |
description | According to statistics, the brown bear and gray wolf populations have decreased after the Second World War due to their intense control.According to recent data provided by the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests (MMAP, 2016a), the population size of the most common game species is given in Table 1.According to currently valid legislation (Government Emergency Ordinance no. 1/2017 and Government Decision no. 20/2017), the central public authority responsible for game management is the Ministry of Waters and Forests, through the Directorate of Forestry and Hunting Control.According to recent reports of the Romanian National Institute of Statistics (NIS, 2008-2015), the annual contribution of hunting products to the turnover of the forestry units is usually less than 1% (Table 3). |
doi_str_mv | 10.17707/AgricultForest.63.3.15 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1952387375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1952387375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1255-74e1a25070edc42ebb6d89bc87ae93209ae45b85a4d3920a0a7ebc6e87da93f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkNFKwzAUhoMoOHTPYMDr1qRJmuay1nYrbIl0qeCNIW0z2Zh2ptuFb2_nvPHc_Bz4_nPgA-AOoxBzjvhD-u437XF3KHrvhkMYk5CEmF2ACU4QCgQV0SWYIMZowBgX12A6DFs0DqeIIDwBb3qewzxTUi3LDI6pq_Kx1qWSUBVwXktdyhl8rtRTnekV1AqeCrqupHrJqxNz2gtV5StdvcJaliNVSlipZSrL9BZcre1ucNO_vAF1ketsHizUrMzSRdDiiLGAU4dtxBBHrmtp5Jom7hLRtAm3TpAICesoaxJmaUdEhCyy3DVt7BLeWUHWlNyA-_Pdve-_jqMJs-2P_nN8abBgEUk44Wyk-JlqfT8M3q3N3m8-rP82GJlfn-a_TxMTQwxm5AeL92VS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1952387375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian ; HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</creator><creatorcontrib>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian ; HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</creatorcontrib><description>According to statistics, the brown bear and gray wolf populations have decreased after the Second World War due to their intense control.According to recent data provided by the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests (MMAP, 2016a), the population size of the most common game species is given in Table 1.According to currently valid legislation (Government Emergency Ordinance no. 1/2017 and Government Decision no. 20/2017), the central public authority responsible for game management is the Ministry of Waters and Forests, through the Directorate of Forestry and Hunting Control.According to recent reports of the Romanian National Institute of Statistics (NIS, 2008-2015), the annual contribution of hunting products to the turnover of the forestry units is usually less than 1% (Table 3).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0554-5579</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1800-9492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17707/AgricultForest.63.3.15</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Titograd: University of Montenegro, Biotechnical Faculty</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal populations ; Bears ; Canis lupus ; Community ; Economic impact ; Ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forest products ; Forestry ; Hunting ; Infrastructure ; Legislation ; Livestock ; Population number ; Rural areas ; Rural development ; Ursus arctos ; Wolves ; Wood</subject><ispartof>Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo, 2017-09, Vol.63 (3), p.147-153</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Montenegro, Biotechnical Faculty 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1952387375/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1952387375?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</creatorcontrib><title>THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA</title><title>Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo</title><description>According to statistics, the brown bear and gray wolf populations have decreased after the Second World War due to their intense control.According to recent data provided by the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests (MMAP, 2016a), the population size of the most common game species is given in Table 1.According to currently valid legislation (Government Emergency Ordinance no. 1/2017 and Government Decision no. 20/2017), the central public authority responsible for game management is the Ministry of Waters and Forests, through the Directorate of Forestry and Hunting Control.According to recent reports of the Romanian National Institute of Statistics (NIS, 2008-2015), the annual contribution of hunting products to the turnover of the forestry units is usually less than 1% (Table 3).</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Bears</subject><subject>Canis lupus</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest products</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>Ursus arctos</subject><subject>Wolves</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>0554-5579</issn><issn>1800-9492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkNFKwzAUhoMoOHTPYMDr1qRJmuay1nYrbIl0qeCNIW0z2Zh2ptuFb2_nvPHc_Bz4_nPgA-AOoxBzjvhD-u437XF3KHrvhkMYk5CEmF2ACU4QCgQV0SWYIMZowBgX12A6DFs0DqeIIDwBb3qewzxTUi3LDI6pq_Kx1qWSUBVwXktdyhl8rtRTnekV1AqeCrqupHrJqxNz2gtV5StdvcJaliNVSlipZSrL9BZcre1ucNO_vAF1ketsHizUrMzSRdDiiLGAU4dtxBBHrmtp5Jom7hLRtAm3TpAICesoaxJmaUdEhCyy3DVt7BLeWUHWlNyA-_Pdve-_jqMJs-2P_nN8abBgEUk44Wyk-JlqfT8M3q3N3m8-rP82GJlfn-a_TxMTQwxm5AeL92VS</recordid><startdate>20170930</startdate><enddate>20170930</enddate><creator>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian</creator><creator>HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</creator><general>University of Montenegro, Biotechnical Faculty</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170930</creationdate><title>THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA</title><author>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian ; HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1255-74e1a25070edc42ebb6d89bc87ae93209ae45b85a4d3920a0a7ebc6e87da93f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Bears</topic><topic>Canis lupus</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest products</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>Ursus arctos</topic><topic>Wolves</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian</au><au>HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA</atitle><jtitle>Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo</jtitle><date>2017-09-30</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>147-153</pages><issn>0554-5579</issn><eissn>1800-9492</eissn><abstract>According to statistics, the brown bear and gray wolf populations have decreased after the Second World War due to their intense control.According to recent data provided by the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests (MMAP, 2016a), the population size of the most common game species is given in Table 1.According to currently valid legislation (Government Emergency Ordinance no. 1/2017 and Government Decision no. 20/2017), the central public authority responsible for game management is the Ministry of Waters and Forests, through the Directorate of Forestry and Hunting Control.According to recent reports of the Romanian National Institute of Statistics (NIS, 2008-2015), the annual contribution of hunting products to the turnover of the forestry units is usually less than 1% (Table 3).</abstract><cop>Titograd</cop><pub>University of Montenegro, Biotechnical Faculty</pub><doi>10.17707/AgricultForest.63.3.15</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0554-5579 |
ispartof | Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo, 2017-09, Vol.63 (3), p.147-153 |
issn | 0554-5579 1800-9492 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1952387375 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal populations Bears Canis lupus Community Economic impact Ecosystems Forest management Forest products Forestry Hunting Infrastructure Legislation Livestock Population number Rural areas Rural development Ursus arctos Wolves Wood |
title | THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A40%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20ECONOMIC%20CONTRIBUTION%20OF%20HUNTING%20PRODUCTS%20TO%20THE%20TURNOVER%20OF%20THE%20FORESTRY%20UNITS%20IN%20ROMANIA&rft.jtitle=Poljoprivreda%20i%20%C5%A1umarstvo&rft.au=Mihai%20ENESCU,%20Cristian&rft.date=2017-09-30&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=147-153&rft.issn=0554-5579&rft.eissn=1800-9492&rft_id=info:doi/10.17707/AgricultForest.63.3.15&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1952387375%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1255-74e1a25070edc42ebb6d89bc87ae93209ae45b85a4d3920a0a7ebc6e87da93f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1952387375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |