Loading…

THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA

According to statistics, the brown bear and gray wolf populations have decreased after the Second World War due to their intense control.According to recent data provided by the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests (MMAP, 2016a), the population size of the most common game species is given in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo 2017-09, Vol.63 (3), p.147-153
Main Authors: Mihai ENESCU, Cristian, HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 153
container_issue 3
container_start_page 147
container_title Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo
container_volume 63
creator Mihai ENESCU, Cristian
HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin
description According to statistics, the brown bear and gray wolf populations have decreased after the Second World War due to their intense control.According to recent data provided by the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests (MMAP, 2016a), the population size of the most common game species is given in Table 1.According to currently valid legislation (Government Emergency Ordinance no. 1/2017 and Government Decision no. 20/2017), the central public authority responsible for game management is the Ministry of Waters and Forests, through the Directorate of Forestry and Hunting Control.According to recent reports of the Romanian National Institute of Statistics (NIS, 2008-2015), the annual contribution of hunting products to the turnover of the forestry units is usually less than 1% (Table 3).
doi_str_mv 10.17707/AgricultForest.63.3.15
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1952387375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1952387375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1255-74e1a25070edc42ebb6d89bc87ae93209ae45b85a4d3920a0a7ebc6e87da93f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkNFKwzAUhoMoOHTPYMDr1qRJmuay1nYrbIl0qeCNIW0z2Zh2ptuFb2_nvPHc_Bz4_nPgA-AOoxBzjvhD-u437XF3KHrvhkMYk5CEmF2ACU4QCgQV0SWYIMZowBgX12A6DFs0DqeIIDwBb3qewzxTUi3LDI6pq_Kx1qWSUBVwXktdyhl8rtRTnekV1AqeCrqupHrJqxNz2gtV5StdvcJaliNVSlipZSrL9BZcre1ucNO_vAF1ketsHizUrMzSRdDiiLGAU4dtxBBHrmtp5Jom7hLRtAm3TpAICesoaxJmaUdEhCyy3DVt7BLeWUHWlNyA-_Pdve-_jqMJs-2P_nN8abBgEUk44Wyk-JlqfT8M3q3N3m8-rP82GJlfn-a_TxMTQwxm5AeL92VS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1952387375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian ; HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</creator><creatorcontrib>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian ; HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</creatorcontrib><description>According to statistics, the brown bear and gray wolf populations have decreased after the Second World War due to their intense control.According to recent data provided by the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests (MMAP, 2016a), the population size of the most common game species is given in Table 1.According to currently valid legislation (Government Emergency Ordinance no. 1/2017 and Government Decision no. 20/2017), the central public authority responsible for game management is the Ministry of Waters and Forests, through the Directorate of Forestry and Hunting Control.According to recent reports of the Romanian National Institute of Statistics (NIS, 2008-2015), the annual contribution of hunting products to the turnover of the forestry units is usually less than 1% (Table 3).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0554-5579</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1800-9492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17707/AgricultForest.63.3.15</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Titograd: University of Montenegro, Biotechnical Faculty</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal populations ; Bears ; Canis lupus ; Community ; Economic impact ; Ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forest products ; Forestry ; Hunting ; Infrastructure ; Legislation ; Livestock ; Population number ; Rural areas ; Rural development ; Ursus arctos ; Wolves ; Wood</subject><ispartof>Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo, 2017-09, Vol.63 (3), p.147-153</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Montenegro, Biotechnical Faculty 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1952387375/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1952387375?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</creatorcontrib><title>THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA</title><title>Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo</title><description>According to statistics, the brown bear and gray wolf populations have decreased after the Second World War due to their intense control.According to recent data provided by the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests (MMAP, 2016a), the population size of the most common game species is given in Table 1.According to currently valid legislation (Government Emergency Ordinance no. 1/2017 and Government Decision no. 20/2017), the central public authority responsible for game management is the Ministry of Waters and Forests, through the Directorate of Forestry and Hunting Control.According to recent reports of the Romanian National Institute of Statistics (NIS, 2008-2015), the annual contribution of hunting products to the turnover of the forestry units is usually less than 1% (Table 3).</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Bears</subject><subject>Canis lupus</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest products</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>Ursus arctos</subject><subject>Wolves</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>0554-5579</issn><issn>1800-9492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkNFKwzAUhoMoOHTPYMDr1qRJmuay1nYrbIl0qeCNIW0z2Zh2ptuFb2_nvPHc_Bz4_nPgA-AOoxBzjvhD-u437XF3KHrvhkMYk5CEmF2ACU4QCgQV0SWYIMZowBgX12A6DFs0DqeIIDwBb3qewzxTUi3LDI6pq_Kx1qWSUBVwXktdyhl8rtRTnekV1AqeCrqupHrJqxNz2gtV5StdvcJaliNVSlipZSrL9BZcre1ucNO_vAF1ketsHizUrMzSRdDiiLGAU4dtxBBHrmtp5Jom7hLRtAm3TpAICesoaxJmaUdEhCyy3DVt7BLeWUHWlNyA-_Pdve-_jqMJs-2P_nN8abBgEUk44Wyk-JlqfT8M3q3N3m8-rP82GJlfn-a_TxMTQwxm5AeL92VS</recordid><startdate>20170930</startdate><enddate>20170930</enddate><creator>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian</creator><creator>HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</creator><general>University of Montenegro, Biotechnical Faculty</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170930</creationdate><title>THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA</title><author>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian ; HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1255-74e1a25070edc42ebb6d89bc87ae93209ae45b85a4d3920a0a7ebc6e87da93f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Bears</topic><topic>Canis lupus</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest products</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>Ursus arctos</topic><topic>Wolves</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mihai ENESCU, Cristian</au><au>HALALISAN, Aureliu-Florin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA</atitle><jtitle>Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo</jtitle><date>2017-09-30</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>147-153</pages><issn>0554-5579</issn><eissn>1800-9492</eissn><abstract>According to statistics, the brown bear and gray wolf populations have decreased after the Second World War due to their intense control.According to recent data provided by the Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forests (MMAP, 2016a), the population size of the most common game species is given in Table 1.According to currently valid legislation (Government Emergency Ordinance no. 1/2017 and Government Decision no. 20/2017), the central public authority responsible for game management is the Ministry of Waters and Forests, through the Directorate of Forestry and Hunting Control.According to recent reports of the Romanian National Institute of Statistics (NIS, 2008-2015), the annual contribution of hunting products to the turnover of the forestry units is usually less than 1% (Table 3).</abstract><cop>Titograd</cop><pub>University of Montenegro, Biotechnical Faculty</pub><doi>10.17707/AgricultForest.63.3.15</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0554-5579
ispartof Poljoprivreda i šumarstvo, 2017-09, Vol.63 (3), p.147-153
issn 0554-5579
1800-9492
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1952387375
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Animal behavior
Animal populations
Bears
Canis lupus
Community
Economic impact
Ecosystems
Forest management
Forest products
Forestry
Hunting
Infrastructure
Legislation
Livestock
Population number
Rural areas
Rural development
Ursus arctos
Wolves
Wood
title THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF HUNTING PRODUCTS TO THE TURNOVER OF THE FORESTRY UNITS IN ROMANIA
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A40%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20ECONOMIC%20CONTRIBUTION%20OF%20HUNTING%20PRODUCTS%20TO%20THE%20TURNOVER%20OF%20THE%20FORESTRY%20UNITS%20IN%20ROMANIA&rft.jtitle=Poljoprivreda%20i%20%C5%A1umarstvo&rft.au=Mihai%20ENESCU,%20Cristian&rft.date=2017-09-30&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=147-153&rft.issn=0554-5579&rft.eissn=1800-9492&rft_id=info:doi/10.17707/AgricultForest.63.3.15&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1952387375%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1255-74e1a25070edc42ebb6d89bc87ae93209ae45b85a4d3920a0a7ebc6e87da93f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1952387375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true