Loading…

Regional drivers of clutch loss reveal important trade-offs for beach-nesting birds

Coastal birds are critical ecosystem constituents on sandy shores, yet are threatened by depressed reproductive success resulting from direct and indirect anthropogenic and natural pressures. Few studies examine clutch fate across the wide range of environments experienced by birds; instead, most fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ preprints 2016-08
Main Authors: Maslo, Brooke, Schlacher, Thomas A, Weston, Mike A, Huijbers, Chantal M, Anderson, Chris, Gilby, Ben L, Olds, Andrew D, Connolly, Rod M, Schoeman, David S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title PeerJ preprints
container_volume
creator Maslo, Brooke
Schlacher, Thomas A
Weston, Mike A
Huijbers, Chantal M
Anderson, Chris
Gilby, Ben L
Olds, Andrew D
Connolly, Rod M
Schoeman, David S
description Coastal birds are critical ecosystem constituents on sandy shores, yet are threatened by depressed reproductive success resulting from direct and indirect anthropogenic and natural pressures. Few studies examine clutch fate across the wide range of environments experienced by birds; instead, most focus at the small site scale. We examine survival of model shorebird clutches as an index of true clutch survival at a regional scale (~ 200 km), encompassing a variety of geomorphologies, predator communities, and human use regimes in southeast Queensland, Australia. Of the 132 model nests deployed and monitored with cameras, 45 (34%) survived the experimental exposure period. Thirty-five (27%) were lost to flooding, 32 (24%) were depredated, 9 (7%) buried by sand, 7 (5%) destroyed by people, 3 (2%) failed by unknown causes, and 1 (0.1%) was destroyed by a dog. Clutch fate differed substantially among regions, particularly with respect to losses from flooding and predation. ‘Topographic’ exposure was the main driver of mortality of nests placed close to the drift line near the base of dunes, which were lost to waves (particularly during storms) and to a lesser extent depredation. Predators determined the fate of clutches not lost to waves, with the depredation probability largely influenced by region. Depredation probability declined as nests were backed by higher dunes and were placed closer to vegetation. This study emphasizes the scale at which clutch fate and survival varies within a regional context, the prominence of corvids as egg predators, the significant role of flooding as a source of nest loss, and the multiple trade-offs faced by beach-nesting birds and those that manage them.
doi_str_mv 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2370v1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1953812884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1953812884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p761-d98d5df928a4ec0c484468e83aa817d2e64c2878e9ea519f71b22269544538ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tqwzAUREWh0JDmF4qga7mWLOuxLKEvCATa7IMsXSU2rqVKtr-_gnY1ixkOcxB6oHUlmZJPESANVUwQUz_NuWKNrFd6gzaMCkm04s0d2uU81HVNWSuY1Bv09QmXPkxmxC71K6SMg8d2XGZ7xWPIGSdYobT9dwxpNtOM52QckOB9xj4k3IGxVzJBnvvpgrs-uXyPbr0ZM-z-c4tOry-n_Ts5HN8-9s8HEqWgxGnlWuc1U4aDrS1XnAsFqjFGUekYCG6LlQINpqXaS9oxxoRuOW8bBdBs0eMfNqbws5QD5yEsqajkM9VlQpkqyr_6n1UC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1953812884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional drivers of clutch loss reveal important trade-offs for beach-nesting birds</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Maslo, Brooke ; Schlacher, Thomas A ; Weston, Mike A ; Huijbers, Chantal M ; Anderson, Chris ; Gilby, Ben L ; Olds, Andrew D ; Connolly, Rod M ; Schoeman, David S</creator><creatorcontrib>Maslo, Brooke ; Schlacher, Thomas A ; Weston, Mike A ; Huijbers, Chantal M ; Anderson, Chris ; Gilby, Ben L ; Olds, Andrew D ; Connolly, Rod M ; Schoeman, David S</creatorcontrib><description>Coastal birds are critical ecosystem constituents on sandy shores, yet are threatened by depressed reproductive success resulting from direct and indirect anthropogenic and natural pressures. Few studies examine clutch fate across the wide range of environments experienced by birds; instead, most focus at the small site scale. We examine survival of model shorebird clutches as an index of true clutch survival at a regional scale (~ 200 km), encompassing a variety of geomorphologies, predator communities, and human use regimes in southeast Queensland, Australia. Of the 132 model nests deployed and monitored with cameras, 45 (34%) survived the experimental exposure period. Thirty-five (27%) were lost to flooding, 32 (24%) were depredated, 9 (7%) buried by sand, 7 (5%) destroyed by people, 3 (2%) failed by unknown causes, and 1 (0.1%) was destroyed by a dog. Clutch fate differed substantially among regions, particularly with respect to losses from flooding and predation. ‘Topographic’ exposure was the main driver of mortality of nests placed close to the drift line near the base of dunes, which were lost to waves (particularly during storms) and to a lesser extent depredation. Predators determined the fate of clutches not lost to waves, with the depredation probability largely influenced by region. Depredation probability declined as nests were backed by higher dunes and were placed closer to vegetation. This study emphasizes the scale at which clutch fate and survival varies within a regional context, the prominence of corvids as egg predators, the significant role of flooding as a source of nest loss, and the multiple trade-offs faced by beach-nesting birds and those that manage them.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2167-9843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2370v1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego: PeerJ, Inc</publisher><subject>Beaches ; Breeding success ; Cameras ; Dunes ; Flooding ; Floods ; Nests ; Predation ; Predators ; Shores ; Survival</subject><ispartof>PeerJ preprints, 2016-08</ispartof><rights>2016 Maslo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1953812884?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maslo, Brooke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlacher, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weston, Mike A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huijbers, Chantal M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilby, Ben L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olds, Andrew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Rod M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoeman, David S</creatorcontrib><title>Regional drivers of clutch loss reveal important trade-offs for beach-nesting birds</title><title>PeerJ preprints</title><description>Coastal birds are critical ecosystem constituents on sandy shores, yet are threatened by depressed reproductive success resulting from direct and indirect anthropogenic and natural pressures. Few studies examine clutch fate across the wide range of environments experienced by birds; instead, most focus at the small site scale. We examine survival of model shorebird clutches as an index of true clutch survival at a regional scale (~ 200 km), encompassing a variety of geomorphologies, predator communities, and human use regimes in southeast Queensland, Australia. Of the 132 model nests deployed and monitored with cameras, 45 (34%) survived the experimental exposure period. Thirty-five (27%) were lost to flooding, 32 (24%) were depredated, 9 (7%) buried by sand, 7 (5%) destroyed by people, 3 (2%) failed by unknown causes, and 1 (0.1%) was destroyed by a dog. Clutch fate differed substantially among regions, particularly with respect to losses from flooding and predation. ‘Topographic’ exposure was the main driver of mortality of nests placed close to the drift line near the base of dunes, which were lost to waves (particularly during storms) and to a lesser extent depredation. Predators determined the fate of clutches not lost to waves, with the depredation probability largely influenced by region. Depredation probability declined as nests were backed by higher dunes and were placed closer to vegetation. This study emphasizes the scale at which clutch fate and survival varies within a regional context, the prominence of corvids as egg predators, the significant role of flooding as a source of nest loss, and the multiple trade-offs faced by beach-nesting birds and those that manage them.</description><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Dunes</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Shores</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>2167-9843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tqwzAUREWh0JDmF4qga7mWLOuxLKEvCATa7IMsXSU2rqVKtr-_gnY1ixkOcxB6oHUlmZJPESANVUwQUz_NuWKNrFd6gzaMCkm04s0d2uU81HVNWSuY1Bv09QmXPkxmxC71K6SMg8d2XGZ7xWPIGSdYobT9dwxpNtOM52QckOB9xj4k3IGxVzJBnvvpgrs-uXyPbr0ZM-z-c4tOry-n_Ts5HN8-9s8HEqWgxGnlWuc1U4aDrS1XnAsFqjFGUekYCG6LlQINpqXaS9oxxoRuOW8bBdBs0eMfNqbws5QD5yEsqajkM9VlQpkqyr_6n1UC</recordid><startdate>20160824</startdate><enddate>20160824</enddate><creator>Maslo, Brooke</creator><creator>Schlacher, Thomas A</creator><creator>Weston, Mike A</creator><creator>Huijbers, Chantal M</creator><creator>Anderson, Chris</creator><creator>Gilby, Ben L</creator><creator>Olds, Andrew D</creator><creator>Connolly, Rod M</creator><creator>Schoeman, David S</creator><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160824</creationdate><title>Regional drivers of clutch loss reveal important trade-offs for beach-nesting birds</title><author>Maslo, Brooke ; Schlacher, Thomas A ; Weston, Mike A ; Huijbers, Chantal M ; Anderson, Chris ; Gilby, Ben L ; Olds, Andrew D ; Connolly, Rod M ; Schoeman, David S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p761-d98d5df928a4ec0c484468e83aa817d2e64c2878e9ea519f71b22269544538ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Dunes</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Shores</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maslo, Brooke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlacher, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weston, Mike A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huijbers, Chantal M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilby, Ben L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olds, Andrew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Rod M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoeman, David S</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>PeerJ preprints</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maslo, Brooke</au><au>Schlacher, Thomas A</au><au>Weston, Mike A</au><au>Huijbers, Chantal M</au><au>Anderson, Chris</au><au>Gilby, Ben L</au><au>Olds, Andrew D</au><au>Connolly, Rod M</au><au>Schoeman, David S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional drivers of clutch loss reveal important trade-offs for beach-nesting birds</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ preprints</jtitle><date>2016-08-24</date><risdate>2016</risdate><eissn>2167-9843</eissn><abstract>Coastal birds are critical ecosystem constituents on sandy shores, yet are threatened by depressed reproductive success resulting from direct and indirect anthropogenic and natural pressures. Few studies examine clutch fate across the wide range of environments experienced by birds; instead, most focus at the small site scale. We examine survival of model shorebird clutches as an index of true clutch survival at a regional scale (~ 200 km), encompassing a variety of geomorphologies, predator communities, and human use regimes in southeast Queensland, Australia. Of the 132 model nests deployed and monitored with cameras, 45 (34%) survived the experimental exposure period. Thirty-five (27%) were lost to flooding, 32 (24%) were depredated, 9 (7%) buried by sand, 7 (5%) destroyed by people, 3 (2%) failed by unknown causes, and 1 (0.1%) was destroyed by a dog. Clutch fate differed substantially among regions, particularly with respect to losses from flooding and predation. ‘Topographic’ exposure was the main driver of mortality of nests placed close to the drift line near the base of dunes, which were lost to waves (particularly during storms) and to a lesser extent depredation. Predators determined the fate of clutches not lost to waves, with the depredation probability largely influenced by region. Depredation probability declined as nests were backed by higher dunes and were placed closer to vegetation. This study emphasizes the scale at which clutch fate and survival varies within a regional context, the prominence of corvids as egg predators, the significant role of flooding as a source of nest loss, and the multiple trade-offs faced by beach-nesting birds and those that manage them.</abstract><cop>San Diego</cop><pub>PeerJ, Inc</pub><doi>10.7287/peerj.preprints.2370v1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2167-9843
ispartof PeerJ preprints, 2016-08
issn 2167-9843
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1953812884
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Beaches
Breeding success
Cameras
Dunes
Flooding
Floods
Nests
Predation
Predators
Shores
Survival
title Regional drivers of clutch loss reveal important trade-offs for beach-nesting birds
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A53%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20drivers%20of%20clutch%20loss%20reveal%20important%20trade-offs%20for%20beach-nesting%20birds&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20preprints&rft.au=Maslo,%20Brooke&rft.date=2016-08-24&rft.eissn=2167-9843&rft_id=info:doi/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2370v1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1953812884%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p761-d98d5df928a4ec0c484468e83aa817d2e64c2878e9ea519f71b22269544538ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1953812884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true