Tax Law Complexity: The Impact of Style

This study examines the impact of two facets of income tax law complexity-text and content complexity-to determine the effect of variation in style on professional tasks. The research results deal with the effectiveness of standard readability tests for profes sional readers, as well as how our tax...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of business communication (1973) 1992-09, Vol.29 (4), p.383-400
Main Authors: Martindale, Bobbie Cook, Koch, Bruce S., Karlinsky, Stewart S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Audiences
Experiments
Hypotheses
Impacts
Income tax returns
Insurance policies
Law
Legal documents
Professionals
Readability
Readability Formulas
Reading comprehension
Reading Tests
Studies
Tax legislation
Tax services
Validity
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-e168299376332fefe45c701714bfe279baad89baaa21a67835a44c07cb6f7cbc3
cites
container_end_page 400
container_issue 4
container_start_page 383
container_title The Journal of business communication (1973)
container_volume 29
creator Martindale, Bobbie Cook
Koch, Bruce S.
Karlinsky, Stewart S.
description This study examines the impact of two facets of income tax law complexity-text and content complexity-to determine the effect of variation in style on professional tasks. The research results deal with the effectiveness of standard readability tests for profes sional readers, as well as how our tax laws should be drafted. The study shows that text presentation style magnifies the complexity of difficult tax law concepts. Also, results indicate that the Reading Complexity Evaluation Index is a better measure for technical writing than standard readability tests currently used by industry and government agencies.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/002194369202900405
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_195701319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_002194369202900405</sage_id><sourcerecordid>571562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-e168299376332fefe45c701714bfe279baad89baaa21a67835a44c07cb6f7cbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81Lw0AQxRdRMFYvHj0V77Ezs1_ZowStQsBLPS-bdVdaWhOzKbb_vQnxIIiX92D4vTc8xm4Q7hC1XgAQGsGVISADIECesAylpFzIgk5ZNgL5SJyzi5Q2AONBZex65Q7zyn3Ny2bXbsNh3R8v2Vl02xSufnzGXh8fVuVTXr0sn8v7KvdEps8DqoKM4VpxTjHEIKTXgBpFHQNpUzv3VozqCJ3SBZdOCA_a1yoO4vmM3U69bdd87kPq7abZdx_DS4tGDlUczQDRBPmuSakL0bbdeue6o0Ww43T7d_oQWkyh5N7Dr9b_E9-iT1Yc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195701319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tax Law Complexity: The Impact of Style</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012</source><creator>Martindale, Bobbie Cook ; Koch, Bruce S. ; Karlinsky, Stewart S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martindale, Bobbie Cook ; Koch, Bruce S. ; Karlinsky, Stewart S.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the impact of two facets of income tax law complexity-text and content complexity-to determine the effect of variation in style on professional tasks. The research results deal with the effectiveness of standard readability tests for profes sional readers, as well as how our tax laws should be drafted. The study shows that text presentation style magnifies the complexity of difficult tax law concepts. Also, results indicate that the Reading Complexity Evaluation Index is a better measure for technical writing than standard readability tests currently used by industry and government agencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9436</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2329-4884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4582</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-4892</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/002194369202900405</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBCOAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Audiences ; Experiments ; Hypotheses ; Impacts ; Income tax returns ; Insurance policies ; Law ; Legal documents ; Professionals ; Readability ; Readability Formulas ; Reading comprehension ; Reading Tests ; Studies ; Tax legislation ; Tax services ; Validity</subject><ispartof>The Journal of business communication (1973), 1992-09, Vol.29 (4), p.383-400</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association for Business Communication 1992</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-e168299376332fefe45c701714bfe279baad89baaa21a67835a44c07cb6f7cbc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/002194369202900405$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002194369202900405$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21824,27901,27902,45058,45446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martindale, Bobbie Cook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Bruce S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlinsky, Stewart S.</creatorcontrib><title>Tax Law Complexity: The Impact of Style</title><title>The Journal of business communication (1973)</title><description>This study examines the impact of two facets of income tax law complexity-text and content complexity-to determine the effect of variation in style on professional tasks. The research results deal with the effectiveness of standard readability tests for profes sional readers, as well as how our tax laws should be drafted. The study shows that text presentation style magnifies the complexity of difficult tax law concepts. Also, results indicate that the Reading Complexity Evaluation Index is a better measure for technical writing than standard readability tests currently used by industry and government agencies.</description><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Impacts</subject><subject>Income tax returns</subject><subject>Insurance policies</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legal documents</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Readability</subject><subject>Readability Formulas</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax legislation</subject><subject>Tax services</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0021-9436</issn><issn>2329-4884</issn><issn>1552-4582</issn><issn>2329-4892</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81Lw0AQxRdRMFYvHj0V77Ezs1_ZowStQsBLPS-bdVdaWhOzKbb_vQnxIIiX92D4vTc8xm4Q7hC1XgAQGsGVISADIECesAylpFzIgk5ZNgL5SJyzi5Q2AONBZex65Q7zyn3Ny2bXbsNh3R8v2Vl02xSufnzGXh8fVuVTXr0sn8v7KvdEps8DqoKM4VpxTjHEIKTXgBpFHQNpUzv3VozqCJ3SBZdOCA_a1yoO4vmM3U69bdd87kPq7abZdx_DS4tGDlUczQDRBPmuSakL0bbdeue6o0Ww43T7d_oQWkyh5N7Dr9b_E9-iT1Yc</recordid><startdate>199209</startdate><enddate>199209</enddate><creator>Martindale, Bobbie Cook</creator><creator>Koch, Bruce S.</creator><creator>Karlinsky, Stewart S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199209</creationdate><title>Tax Law Complexity</title><author>Martindale, Bobbie Cook ; Koch, Bruce S. ; Karlinsky, Stewart S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-e168299376332fefe45c701714bfe279baad89baaa21a67835a44c07cb6f7cbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Impacts</topic><topic>Income tax returns</topic><topic>Insurance policies</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legal documents</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Readability</topic><topic>Readability Formulas</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax legislation</topic><topic>Tax services</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martindale, Bobbie Cook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Bruce S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlinsky, Stewart S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of business communication (1973)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martindale, Bobbie Cook</au><au>Koch, Bruce S.</au><au>Karlinsky, Stewart S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tax Law Complexity: The Impact of Style</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of business communication (1973)</jtitle><date>1992-09</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>383-400</pages><issn>0021-9436</issn><issn>2329-4884</issn><eissn>1552-4582</eissn><eissn>2329-4892</eissn><coden>JBCOAO</coden><abstract>This study examines the impact of two facets of income tax law complexity-text and content complexity-to determine the effect of variation in style on professional tasks. The research results deal with the effectiveness of standard readability tests for profes sional readers, as well as how our tax laws should be drafted. The study shows that text presentation style magnifies the complexity of difficult tax law concepts. Also, results indicate that the Reading Complexity Evaluation Index is a better measure for technical writing than standard readability tests currently used by industry and government agencies.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/002194369202900405</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9436
ispartof The Journal of business communication (1973), 1992-09, Vol.29 (4), p.383-400
issn 0021-9436
2329-4884
1552-4582
2329-4892
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_195701319
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012
subjects Audiences
Experiments
Hypotheses
Impacts
Income tax returns
Insurance policies
Law
Legal documents
Professionals
Readability
Readability Formulas
Reading comprehension
Reading Tests
Studies
Tax legislation
Tax services
Validity
title Tax Law Complexity: The Impact of Style
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T00%3A47%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tax%20Law%20Complexity:%20The%20Impact%20of%20Style&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20business%20communication%20(1973)&rft.au=Martindale,%20Bobbie%20Cook&rft.date=1992-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=383-400&rft.issn=0021-9436&rft.eissn=1552-4582&rft.coden=JBCOAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/002194369202900405&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E571562%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-e168299376332fefe45c701714bfe279baad89baaa21a67835a44c07cb6f7cbc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195701319&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_002194369202900405&rfr_iscdi=true