Loading…
ITQs, Firm Dynamics and Wealth Distribution: Does Full Tradability Increase Inequality?
Concerns over the re-distributive effects of individual transferable quotas (ITQ’s) have led to restrictions on their tradability. We consider a general equilibrium model with firm dynamics to evaluate the redistributive impact of changing the tradability of ITQs. A change in tradability would happe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental & resource economics 2017-10, Vol.68 (2), p.249-273 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-92dd01f0f873a520ceb38a3a3fc5472ceba105761c15ac872b2ccc7d3c21dcc13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-92dd01f0f873a520ceb38a3a3fc5472ceba105761c15ac872b2ccc7d3c21dcc13 |
container_end_page | 273 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 249 |
container_title | Environmental & resource economics |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Da-Rocha, José-María Sempere, Jaume |
description | Concerns over the re-distributive effects of individual transferable quotas (ITQ’s) have led to restrictions on their tradability. We consider a general equilibrium model with firm dynamics to evaluate the redistributive impact of changing the tradability of ITQs. A change in tradability would happen, for example, if permits are allowed to be traded as a separate asset from ownership of an active firm. If the property right is associated with ownership of an active firm, the permit can be leased in each period but it is not possible to exit the industry and keep the right. However, allowing the permits to be traded as a separate asset has two effects. First, it leads to a greater concentration of production in the industry. Second, it directly converts a non-tradable asset into a tradable one, and this is equivalent to giving a lump sum transfer to all firms. The first effect implies a concentration in revenues, while the second implies a redistribution of wealth. We calibrate our model to match the observed increase in revenue inequality in the Northeast Multispecies (Groundfish) U.S. Fishery. We show that although observed revenue inequality—measured by the Gini coefficient—increases by 12 %, wealth inequality is reduced by 40 %. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10640-016-0017-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1957703868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1957703868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-92dd01f0f873a520ceb38a3a3fc5472ceba105761c15ac872b2ccc7d3c21dcc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfwFvAq9HnSZqm9SLinA4GIkx2DGmaakbXbkl72Le3ox68eHpe-L_Aj5BrhDsEUPcRIU2AAaYMABUTJ2SCUgmGEvgpmUDOE5YmKZyTixg3AJCrJJ2Q9WL1EW_p3IctnR0as_U2UtOUdO1M3X3TmY9d8EXf-bZ5oLPWRTrv65qugilN4WvfHeiiscGZ6IbF7Xtz_D1ekrPK1NFd_c4p-Zy_rJ7f2PL9dfH8tGQ24UnHcl6WgBVUmRJGcrCuEJkRRlRWJooPp0GQKkWL0thM8YJba1UpLMfSWhRTcjPm7kK7713s9KbtQzNUasylUiCyNBtUOKpsaGMMrtK74LcmHDSCPvLTIz898NNHfloMHj564qBtvlz4k_yv6QeSJnJb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957703868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ITQs, Firm Dynamics and Wealth Distribution: Does Full Tradability Increase Inequality?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Da-Rocha, José-María ; Sempere, Jaume</creator><creatorcontrib>Da-Rocha, José-María ; Sempere, Jaume</creatorcontrib><description>Concerns over the re-distributive effects of individual transferable quotas (ITQ’s) have led to restrictions on their tradability. We consider a general equilibrium model with firm dynamics to evaluate the redistributive impact of changing the tradability of ITQs. A change in tradability would happen, for example, if permits are allowed to be traded as a separate asset from ownership of an active firm. If the property right is associated with ownership of an active firm, the permit can be leased in each period but it is not possible to exit the industry and keep the right. However, allowing the permits to be traded as a separate asset has two effects. First, it leads to a greater concentration of production in the industry. Second, it directly converts a non-tradable asset into a tradable one, and this is equivalent to giving a lump sum transfer to all firms. The first effect implies a concentration in revenues, while the second implies a redistribution of wealth. We calibrate our model to match the observed increase in revenue inequality in the Northeast Multispecies (Groundfish) U.S. Fishery. We show that although observed revenue inequality—measured by the Gini coefficient—increases by 12 %, wealth inequality is reduced by 40 %.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-6460</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10640-016-0017-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Assets ; Economic inequality ; Economic models ; Economic Policy ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice ; Environmental Management ; Equilibrium ; Fisheries ; Inequality ; Ownership ; Property ; Quotas ; Redistribution ; Revenue ; Wealth distribution</subject><ispartof>Environmental & resource economics, 2017-10, Vol.68 (2), p.249-273</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Environmental and Resource Economics is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-92dd01f0f873a520ceb38a3a3fc5472ceba105761c15ac872b2ccc7d3c21dcc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-92dd01f0f873a520ceb38a3a3fc5472ceba105761c15ac872b2ccc7d3c21dcc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1957703868/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1957703868?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11666,12825,27900,27901,33199,36036,44338,74864</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Da-Rocha, José-María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sempere, Jaume</creatorcontrib><title>ITQs, Firm Dynamics and Wealth Distribution: Does Full Tradability Increase Inequality?</title><title>Environmental & resource economics</title><addtitle>Environ Resource Econ</addtitle><description>Concerns over the re-distributive effects of individual transferable quotas (ITQ’s) have led to restrictions on their tradability. We consider a general equilibrium model with firm dynamics to evaluate the redistributive impact of changing the tradability of ITQs. A change in tradability would happen, for example, if permits are allowed to be traded as a separate asset from ownership of an active firm. If the property right is associated with ownership of an active firm, the permit can be leased in each period but it is not possible to exit the industry and keep the right. However, allowing the permits to be traded as a separate asset has two effects. First, it leads to a greater concentration of production in the industry. Second, it directly converts a non-tradable asset into a tradable one, and this is equivalent to giving a lump sum transfer to all firms. The first effect implies a concentration in revenues, while the second implies a redistribution of wealth. We calibrate our model to match the observed increase in revenue inequality in the Northeast Multispecies (Groundfish) U.S. Fishery. We show that although observed revenue inequality—measured by the Gini coefficient—increases by 12 %, wealth inequality is reduced by 40 %.</description><subject>Assets</subject><subject>Economic inequality</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Property</subject><subject>Quotas</subject><subject>Redistribution</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Wealth distribution</subject><issn>0924-6460</issn><issn>1573-1502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfwFvAq9HnSZqm9SLinA4GIkx2DGmaakbXbkl72Le3ox68eHpe-L_Aj5BrhDsEUPcRIU2AAaYMABUTJ2SCUgmGEvgpmUDOE5YmKZyTixg3AJCrJJ2Q9WL1EW_p3IctnR0as_U2UtOUdO1M3X3TmY9d8EXf-bZ5oLPWRTrv65qugilN4WvfHeiiscGZ6IbF7Xtz_D1ekrPK1NFd_c4p-Zy_rJ7f2PL9dfH8tGQ24UnHcl6WgBVUmRJGcrCuEJkRRlRWJooPp0GQKkWL0thM8YJba1UpLMfSWhRTcjPm7kK7713s9KbtQzNUasylUiCyNBtUOKpsaGMMrtK74LcmHDSCPvLTIz898NNHfloMHj564qBtvlz4k_yv6QeSJnJb</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Da-Rocha, José-María</creator><creator>Sempere, Jaume</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>ITQs, Firm Dynamics and Wealth Distribution: Does Full Tradability Increase Inequality?</title><author>Da-Rocha, José-María ; Sempere, Jaume</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-92dd01f0f873a520ceb38a3a3fc5472ceba105761c15ac872b2ccc7d3c21dcc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Assets</topic><topic>Economic inequality</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Property</topic><topic>Quotas</topic><topic>Redistribution</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Wealth distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Da-Rocha, José-María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sempere, Jaume</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental & resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Da-Rocha, José-María</au><au>Sempere, Jaume</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ITQs, Firm Dynamics and Wealth Distribution: Does Full Tradability Increase Inequality?</atitle><jtitle>Environmental & resource economics</jtitle><stitle>Environ Resource Econ</stitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>249-273</pages><issn>0924-6460</issn><eissn>1573-1502</eissn><abstract>Concerns over the re-distributive effects of individual transferable quotas (ITQ’s) have led to restrictions on their tradability. We consider a general equilibrium model with firm dynamics to evaluate the redistributive impact of changing the tradability of ITQs. A change in tradability would happen, for example, if permits are allowed to be traded as a separate asset from ownership of an active firm. If the property right is associated with ownership of an active firm, the permit can be leased in each period but it is not possible to exit the industry and keep the right. However, allowing the permits to be traded as a separate asset has two effects. First, it leads to a greater concentration of production in the industry. Second, it directly converts a non-tradable asset into a tradable one, and this is equivalent to giving a lump sum transfer to all firms. The first effect implies a concentration in revenues, while the second implies a redistribution of wealth. We calibrate our model to match the observed increase in revenue inequality in the Northeast Multispecies (Groundfish) U.S. Fishery. We show that although observed revenue inequality—measured by the Gini coefficient—increases by 12 %, wealth inequality is reduced by 40 %.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10640-016-0017-3</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0924-6460 |
ispartof | Environmental & resource economics, 2017-10, Vol.68 (2), p.249-273 |
issn | 0924-6460 1573-1502 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1957703868 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link |
subjects | Assets Economic inequality Economic models Economic Policy Economics Economics and Finance Environmental Economics Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice Environmental Management Equilibrium Fisheries Inequality Ownership Property Quotas Redistribution Revenue Wealth distribution |
title | ITQs, Firm Dynamics and Wealth Distribution: Does Full Tradability Increase Inequality? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T05%3A43%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ITQs,%20Firm%20Dynamics%20and%20Wealth%20Distribution:%20Does%20Full%20Tradability%20Increase%20Inequality?&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20&%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Da-Rocha,%20Jos%C3%A9-Mar%C3%ADa&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=249-273&rft.issn=0924-6460&rft.eissn=1573-1502&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10640-016-0017-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1957703868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-92dd01f0f873a520ceb38a3a3fc5472ceba105761c15ac872b2ccc7d3c21dcc13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957703868&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |