TCT-642 Drug-Coated Balloon Indirect Treatment Comparison: IN.PACT™ versus Lutonix™ in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease

An adjusted indirect comparison (AIC) was carried out by comparing the risk estimates from the head-to-head meta-analyses of IN.PACT™ vs plain balloon angioplasty (PTA) and LUTONIX™ vs PTA. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency, all-cause mortality, thrombosis and major adverse even...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2017-10, Vol.70 (18), p.B283-B283
Main Authors: Niazi, Khusrow, Manda, Bharati, LeReun, Corinne, Strachan, LIesl
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Angioplasty
Cardiology
Medical treatment
Mortality
Thrombosis
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An adjusted indirect comparison (AIC) was carried out by comparing the risk estimates from the head-to-head meta-analyses of IN.PACT™ vs plain balloon angioplasty (PTA) and LUTONIX™ vs PTA. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency, all-cause mortality, thrombosis and major adverse events (MAEs) at 12 months were included.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.891