Loading…
The cost of stratospheric climate engineering revisited
Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) has been receiving increasing attention as a possible option for climate engineering. Its direct cost is perceived to be low, which has implications for international governance of this emerging technology. Here, we critically synthesize previous estimates of th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change 2017-12, Vol.22 (8), p.1207-1228 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c5778c4a4158fcffd5c7ffd95a22925bc0b7b28e0b89a647c57c417b6dc76f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c5778c4a4158fcffd5c7ffd95a22925bc0b7b28e0b89a647c57c417b6dc76f3 |
container_end_page | 1228 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1207 |
container_title | Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Moriyama, Ryo Sugiyama, Masahiro Kurosawa, Atsushi Masuda, Kooiti Tsuzuki, Kazuhiro Ishimoto, Yuki |
description | Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) has been receiving increasing attention as a possible option for climate engineering. Its direct cost is perceived to be low, which has implications for international governance of this emerging technology. Here, we critically synthesize previous estimates of the underlying parameters and examine the total costs of SAI. It is evident that there have been inconsistencies in some assumptions and the application of overly optimistic parameter values in previous studies, which have led to an overall underestimation of the cost of aircraft-based SAI with sulfate aerosols. The annual cost of SAI to achieve cooling of 2 W/m
2
could reach US$10 billion with newly designed aircraft, which contrasts with the oft-quoted estimate of “a few billion dollars.” If existing aircraft were used, the cost would be expected to increase further. An SAI operation would be a large-scale engineering undertaking, possibly requiring a fleet of approximately 1,000 aircraft, because of the required high altitude of the injection. Therefore, because of its significance, a more thorough investigation of the engineering aspects of SAI and the associated uncertainties is warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11027-016-9723-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1959258696</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1959258696</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c5778c4a4158fcffd5c7ffd95a22925bc0b7b28e0b89a647c57c417b6dc76f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAczSTbL6OUvyCggd7D7vZpN1Sd9ckFfbfm7IevHiZGcL7vpN5ELoFeg-UqocEQJkiFCQxinEynaEFCMUJCCPPy8w1EMa1vERXKe0ppRwELJDa7Dx2Q8p4CDjlWOchjTsfO4fdofuss8e-33a9L0_9Fkf_3aUu-_YaXYT6kPzNb1-ij-enzeqVrN9f3laPa-K4Zpk4oZR2VV2B0MGF0AqnSjWiZsww0TjaqIZpTxttalmponcVqEa2TsnAl-huTh3j8HX0Kdv9cIx9WWjBiBKgpZFFBbPKxSGl6IMdY_l6nCxQe6JjZzq20LEnOnYqHjZ70ng6zMc_yf-afgC-bWhe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1959258696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The cost of stratospheric climate engineering revisited</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Moriyama, Ryo ; Sugiyama, Masahiro ; Kurosawa, Atsushi ; Masuda, Kooiti ; Tsuzuki, Kazuhiro ; Ishimoto, Yuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Moriyama, Ryo ; Sugiyama, Masahiro ; Kurosawa, Atsushi ; Masuda, Kooiti ; Tsuzuki, Kazuhiro ; Ishimoto, Yuki</creatorcontrib><description>Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) has been receiving increasing attention as a possible option for climate engineering. Its direct cost is perceived to be low, which has implications for international governance of this emerging technology. Here, we critically synthesize previous estimates of the underlying parameters and examine the total costs of SAI. It is evident that there have been inconsistencies in some assumptions and the application of overly optimistic parameter values in previous studies, which have led to an overall underestimation of the cost of aircraft-based SAI with sulfate aerosols. The annual cost of SAI to achieve cooling of 2 W/m
2
could reach US$10 billion with newly designed aircraft, which contrasts with the oft-quoted estimate of “a few billion dollars.” If existing aircraft were used, the cost would be expected to increase further. An SAI operation would be a large-scale engineering undertaking, possibly requiring a fleet of approximately 1,000 aircraft, because of the required high altitude of the injection. Therefore, because of its significance, a more thorough investigation of the engineering aspects of SAI and the associated uncertainties is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1381-2386</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11027-016-9723-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Aircraft ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Climate ; Climate Change Management and Policy ; Costs ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Engineering ; Environmental Management ; Geoengineering ; Governance ; High altitude ; Injection ; Original Article ; Parameter estimation ; Sulfates</subject><ispartof>Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 2017-12, Vol.22 (8), p.1207-1228</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c5778c4a4158fcffd5c7ffd95a22925bc0b7b28e0b89a647c57c417b6dc76f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c5778c4a4158fcffd5c7ffd95a22925bc0b7b28e0b89a647c57c417b6dc76f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1959258696/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1959258696?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moriyama, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosawa, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masuda, Kooiti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuzuki, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishimoto, Yuki</creatorcontrib><title>The cost of stratospheric climate engineering revisited</title><title>Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change</title><addtitle>Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change</addtitle><description>Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) has been receiving increasing attention as a possible option for climate engineering. Its direct cost is perceived to be low, which has implications for international governance of this emerging technology. Here, we critically synthesize previous estimates of the underlying parameters and examine the total costs of SAI. It is evident that there have been inconsistencies in some assumptions and the application of overly optimistic parameter values in previous studies, which have led to an overall underestimation of the cost of aircraft-based SAI with sulfate aerosols. The annual cost of SAI to achieve cooling of 2 W/m
2
could reach US$10 billion with newly designed aircraft, which contrasts with the oft-quoted estimate of “a few billion dollars.” If existing aircraft were used, the cost would be expected to increase further. An SAI operation would be a large-scale engineering undertaking, possibly requiring a fleet of approximately 1,000 aircraft, because of the required high altitude of the injection. Therefore, because of its significance, a more thorough investigation of the engineering aspects of SAI and the associated uncertainties is warranted.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate Change Management and Policy</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Geoengineering</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>High altitude</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><issn>1381-2386</issn><issn>1573-1596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAczSTbL6OUvyCggd7D7vZpN1Sd9ckFfbfm7IevHiZGcL7vpN5ELoFeg-UqocEQJkiFCQxinEynaEFCMUJCCPPy8w1EMa1vERXKe0ppRwELJDa7Dx2Q8p4CDjlWOchjTsfO4fdofuss8e-33a9L0_9Fkf_3aUu-_YaXYT6kPzNb1-ij-enzeqVrN9f3laPa-K4Zpk4oZR2VV2B0MGF0AqnSjWiZsww0TjaqIZpTxttalmponcVqEa2TsnAl-huTh3j8HX0Kdv9cIx9WWjBiBKgpZFFBbPKxSGl6IMdY_l6nCxQe6JjZzq20LEnOnYqHjZ70ng6zMc_yf-afgC-bWhe</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Moriyama, Ryo</creator><creator>Sugiyama, Masahiro</creator><creator>Kurosawa, Atsushi</creator><creator>Masuda, Kooiti</creator><creator>Tsuzuki, Kazuhiro</creator><creator>Ishimoto, Yuki</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>The cost of stratospheric climate engineering revisited</title><author>Moriyama, Ryo ; Sugiyama, Masahiro ; Kurosawa, Atsushi ; Masuda, Kooiti ; Tsuzuki, Kazuhiro ; Ishimoto, Yuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c5778c4a4158fcffd5c7ffd95a22925bc0b7b28e0b89a647c57c417b6dc76f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate Change Management and Policy</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Geoengineering</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>High altitude</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moriyama, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosawa, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masuda, Kooiti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuzuki, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishimoto, Yuki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moriyama, Ryo</au><au>Sugiyama, Masahiro</au><au>Kurosawa, Atsushi</au><au>Masuda, Kooiti</au><au>Tsuzuki, Kazuhiro</au><au>Ishimoto, Yuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The cost of stratospheric climate engineering revisited</atitle><jtitle>Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change</jtitle><stitle>Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change</stitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1207</spage><epage>1228</epage><pages>1207-1228</pages><issn>1381-2386</issn><eissn>1573-1596</eissn><abstract>Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) has been receiving increasing attention as a possible option for climate engineering. Its direct cost is perceived to be low, which has implications for international governance of this emerging technology. Here, we critically synthesize previous estimates of the underlying parameters and examine the total costs of SAI. It is evident that there have been inconsistencies in some assumptions and the application of overly optimistic parameter values in previous studies, which have led to an overall underestimation of the cost of aircraft-based SAI with sulfate aerosols. The annual cost of SAI to achieve cooling of 2 W/m
2
could reach US$10 billion with newly designed aircraft, which contrasts with the oft-quoted estimate of “a few billion dollars.” If existing aircraft were used, the cost would be expected to increase further. An SAI operation would be a large-scale engineering undertaking, possibly requiring a fleet of approximately 1,000 aircraft, because of the required high altitude of the injection. Therefore, because of its significance, a more thorough investigation of the engineering aspects of SAI and the associated uncertainties is warranted.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11027-016-9723-y</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1381-2386 |
ispartof | Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 2017-12, Vol.22 (8), p.1207-1228 |
issn | 1381-2386 1573-1596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1959258696 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Springer Nature |
subjects | Aerosols Aircraft Atmospheric Sciences Climate Climate Change Management and Policy Costs Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Engineering Environmental Management Geoengineering Governance High altitude Injection Original Article Parameter estimation Sulfates |
title | The cost of stratospheric climate engineering revisited |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A58%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20cost%20of%20stratospheric%20climate%20engineering%20revisited&rft.jtitle=Mitigation%20and%20adaptation%20strategies%20for%20global%20change&rft.au=Moriyama,%20Ryo&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1207&rft.epage=1228&rft.pages=1207-1228&rft.issn=1381-2386&rft.eissn=1573-1596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11027-016-9723-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1959258696%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c5778c4a4158fcffd5c7ffd95a22925bc0b7b28e0b89a647c57c417b6dc76f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1959258696&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |