Loading…
Cooperative considerations for a mobile resource that transcends property boundaries
There are environmental advantages to the commercial harvesting of kangaroo over domestic stock. Kangaroo, however, are able to jump fences and move among properties with ease. Consequently, questions of ownership and the equitable distribution of profits arise. We model a cooperative where two neig...
Saved in:
Published in: | Natural resource modeling 2017-11, Vol.30 (4), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2908-a11ae7f0c9ed99e93669af32318cd500e92af52d626cf617c7aa4beb1986f6843 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Natural resource modeling |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Alrashidi, Mohammed E. Hearne, John W. McArthur, Lynne Zorzan, Claudio |
description | There are environmental advantages to the commercial harvesting of kangaroo over domestic stock. Kangaroo, however, are able to jump fences and move among properties with ease. Consequently, questions of ownership and the equitable distribution of profits arise. We model a cooperative where two neighboring ranches experience rainfall equally but asynchronously each year. A kangaroo population roams freely among the properties to graze. Through harvesting, the population can be regarded as constant. In a cooperative, the location at which harvesting occurs is irrelevant but significant differences in the consumption of resources will affect the profit sharing arrangements between the property owners. Results indicate that the resources consumed on each property with the same total primary production may differ depending on the timing of rainfall. On average, however, the population consumption on each property is independent of the intra‐annual differences in rainfall distribution and hence primary production.
Recommendations for Resource Managers
The mobile nature of kangaroos should not be an impediment to their sustainable utilization for commercial purposes.
Spatial differences in the timing of the first rainfall in a season will affect the time a roving kangaroo population spends at each location. Hence in a cooperative these differences will affect the contribution of each ranch to the total secondary production of the cooperative.
Over the long term if there is no mean difference in the start of the rainfall season between two ranches then the annual fluctuations in this difference will not affect the contribution of each ranch to the cooperative enterprise.
For the purpose of distributing profits, a cooperative should focus attention on any differences in the longer‐term primary production of each property. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nrm.12138 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1960517805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1960517805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2908-a11ae7f0c9ed99e93669af32318cd500e92af52d626cf617c7aa4beb1986f6843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw4B9E4sShW9w2aXJEE1_SAAmNc5Smjui0NSNpQfv3ZCtXfLEtPbZfv4RcA5tBinkXtjPIoZAnZAKqUFlVlvyUTJhULJO84ufkIsY1Y1ByxSdktfB-h8H07TdS67vYNscuVdT5QA3d-rrdIA0Y_RAs0v7T9LQPposWuybSXTgs6Pe09kPXmNBivCRnzmwiXv3lKfl4uF8tnrLl2-Pz4m6Z2VwxmRkAg5VjVmGjFKpCCGVckRcgbcMZQ5Ubx_NG5MI6AZWtjClrrEFJ4YQsiym5GfcmDV8Dxl6vk8YundSgBONQScYTdTtSNvgYAzq9C-3WhL0Gpg-m6WSaPpqW2PnI_qSf9_-D-vX9ZZz4BfQfb4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1960517805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cooperative considerations for a mobile resource that transcends property boundaries</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><creator>Alrashidi, Mohammed E. ; Hearne, John W. ; McArthur, Lynne ; Zorzan, Claudio</creator><creatorcontrib>Alrashidi, Mohammed E. ; Hearne, John W. ; McArthur, Lynne ; Zorzan, Claudio</creatorcontrib><description>There are environmental advantages to the commercial harvesting of kangaroo over domestic stock. Kangaroo, however, are able to jump fences and move among properties with ease. Consequently, questions of ownership and the equitable distribution of profits arise. We model a cooperative where two neighboring ranches experience rainfall equally but asynchronously each year. A kangaroo population roams freely among the properties to graze. Through harvesting, the population can be regarded as constant. In a cooperative, the location at which harvesting occurs is irrelevant but significant differences in the consumption of resources will affect the profit sharing arrangements between the property owners. Results indicate that the resources consumed on each property with the same total primary production may differ depending on the timing of rainfall. On average, however, the population consumption on each property is independent of the intra‐annual differences in rainfall distribution and hence primary production.
Recommendations for Resource Managers
The mobile nature of kangaroos should not be an impediment to their sustainable utilization for commercial purposes.
Spatial differences in the timing of the first rainfall in a season will affect the time a roving kangaroo population spends at each location. Hence in a cooperative these differences will affect the contribution of each ranch to the total secondary production of the cooperative.
Over the long term if there is no mean difference in the start of the rainfall season between two ranches then the annual fluctuations in this difference will not affect the contribution of each ranch to the cooperative enterprise.
For the purpose of distributing profits, a cooperative should focus attention on any differences in the longer‐term primary production of each property.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-8575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-7445</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nrm.12138</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Annual rainfall ; cooperative enterprise ; Distributing ; Harvesting ; ideal free distribution ; kangaroo harvesting ; mobile resource ; Population ; Primary production ; Profits ; Property boundaries ; Rainfall ; Rainfall distribution ; Ranches ; Secondary production ; semiarid rangelands ; Spatial distribution</subject><ispartof>Natural resource modeling, 2017-11, Vol.30 (4), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2908-a11ae7f0c9ed99e93669af32318cd500e92af52d626cf617c7aa4beb1986f6843</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7831-8156</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alrashidi, Mohammed E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hearne, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArthur, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorzan, Claudio</creatorcontrib><title>Cooperative considerations for a mobile resource that transcends property boundaries</title><title>Natural resource modeling</title><description>There are environmental advantages to the commercial harvesting of kangaroo over domestic stock. Kangaroo, however, are able to jump fences and move among properties with ease. Consequently, questions of ownership and the equitable distribution of profits arise. We model a cooperative where two neighboring ranches experience rainfall equally but asynchronously each year. A kangaroo population roams freely among the properties to graze. Through harvesting, the population can be regarded as constant. In a cooperative, the location at which harvesting occurs is irrelevant but significant differences in the consumption of resources will affect the profit sharing arrangements between the property owners. Results indicate that the resources consumed on each property with the same total primary production may differ depending on the timing of rainfall. On average, however, the population consumption on each property is independent of the intra‐annual differences in rainfall distribution and hence primary production.
Recommendations for Resource Managers
The mobile nature of kangaroos should not be an impediment to their sustainable utilization for commercial purposes.
Spatial differences in the timing of the first rainfall in a season will affect the time a roving kangaroo population spends at each location. Hence in a cooperative these differences will affect the contribution of each ranch to the total secondary production of the cooperative.
Over the long term if there is no mean difference in the start of the rainfall season between two ranches then the annual fluctuations in this difference will not affect the contribution of each ranch to the cooperative enterprise.
For the purpose of distributing profits, a cooperative should focus attention on any differences in the longer‐term primary production of each property.</description><subject>Annual rainfall</subject><subject>cooperative enterprise</subject><subject>Distributing</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>ideal free distribution</subject><subject>kangaroo harvesting</subject><subject>mobile resource</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Property boundaries</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall distribution</subject><subject>Ranches</subject><subject>Secondary production</subject><subject>semiarid rangelands</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><issn>0890-8575</issn><issn>1939-7445</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw4B9E4sShW9w2aXJEE1_SAAmNc5Smjui0NSNpQfv3ZCtXfLEtPbZfv4RcA5tBinkXtjPIoZAnZAKqUFlVlvyUTJhULJO84ufkIsY1Y1ByxSdktfB-h8H07TdS67vYNscuVdT5QA3d-rrdIA0Y_RAs0v7T9LQPposWuybSXTgs6Pe09kPXmNBivCRnzmwiXv3lKfl4uF8tnrLl2-Pz4m6Z2VwxmRkAg5VjVmGjFKpCCGVckRcgbcMZQ5Ubx_NG5MI6AZWtjClrrEFJ4YQsiym5GfcmDV8Dxl6vk8YundSgBONQScYTdTtSNvgYAzq9C-3WhL0Gpg-m6WSaPpqW2PnI_qSf9_-D-vX9ZZz4BfQfb4Q</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Alrashidi, Mohammed E.</creator><creator>Hearne, John W.</creator><creator>McArthur, Lynne</creator><creator>Zorzan, Claudio</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-8156</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Cooperative considerations for a mobile resource that transcends property boundaries</title><author>Alrashidi, Mohammed E. ; Hearne, John W. ; McArthur, Lynne ; Zorzan, Claudio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2908-a11ae7f0c9ed99e93669af32318cd500e92af52d626cf617c7aa4beb1986f6843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Annual rainfall</topic><topic>cooperative enterprise</topic><topic>Distributing</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>ideal free distribution</topic><topic>kangaroo harvesting</topic><topic>mobile resource</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Property boundaries</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall distribution</topic><topic>Ranches</topic><topic>Secondary production</topic><topic>semiarid rangelands</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alrashidi, Mohammed E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hearne, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArthur, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorzan, Claudio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural resource modeling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alrashidi, Mohammed E.</au><au>Hearne, John W.</au><au>McArthur, Lynne</au><au>Zorzan, Claudio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cooperative considerations for a mobile resource that transcends property boundaries</atitle><jtitle>Natural resource modeling</jtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0890-8575</issn><eissn>1939-7445</eissn><abstract>There are environmental advantages to the commercial harvesting of kangaroo over domestic stock. Kangaroo, however, are able to jump fences and move among properties with ease. Consequently, questions of ownership and the equitable distribution of profits arise. We model a cooperative where two neighboring ranches experience rainfall equally but asynchronously each year. A kangaroo population roams freely among the properties to graze. Through harvesting, the population can be regarded as constant. In a cooperative, the location at which harvesting occurs is irrelevant but significant differences in the consumption of resources will affect the profit sharing arrangements between the property owners. Results indicate that the resources consumed on each property with the same total primary production may differ depending on the timing of rainfall. On average, however, the population consumption on each property is independent of the intra‐annual differences in rainfall distribution and hence primary production.
Recommendations for Resource Managers
The mobile nature of kangaroos should not be an impediment to their sustainable utilization for commercial purposes.
Spatial differences in the timing of the first rainfall in a season will affect the time a roving kangaroo population spends at each location. Hence in a cooperative these differences will affect the contribution of each ranch to the total secondary production of the cooperative.
Over the long term if there is no mean difference in the start of the rainfall season between two ranches then the annual fluctuations in this difference will not affect the contribution of each ranch to the cooperative enterprise.
For the purpose of distributing profits, a cooperative should focus attention on any differences in the longer‐term primary production of each property.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/nrm.12138</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-8156</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-8575 |
ispartof | Natural resource modeling, 2017-11, Vol.30 (4), p.n/a |
issn | 0890-8575 1939-7445 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1960517805 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty |
subjects | Annual rainfall cooperative enterprise Distributing Harvesting ideal free distribution kangaroo harvesting mobile resource Population Primary production Profits Property boundaries Rainfall Rainfall distribution Ranches Secondary production semiarid rangelands Spatial distribution |
title | Cooperative considerations for a mobile resource that transcends property boundaries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A56%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cooperative%20considerations%20for%20a%20mobile%20resource%20that%20transcends%20property%20boundaries&rft.jtitle=Natural%20resource%20modeling&rft.au=Alrashidi,%20Mohammed%20E.&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0890-8575&rft.eissn=1939-7445&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nrm.12138&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1960517805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2908-a11ae7f0c9ed99e93669af32318cd500e92af52d626cf617c7aa4beb1986f6843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1960517805&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |