Probability Discounting and Cardiovascular Risk: The Effect of Side-Effect Severity and Framing

An expectation of healthcare delivery is that patients can make informed decisions about whether and how to treat chronic health conditions. Decisions are complex because treatment is not always 100% effective and side effects can occur without a beneficial outcome. It is important, therefore, to un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Psychological record 2017-06, Vol.67 (2), p.169-179
Main Authors: Asgarova, Rana, Macaskill, Anne C., Robinson, Brian J., Hunt, Maree J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Cardiovascular diseases
Chronic illnesses
Discounting
Frame analysis
Headaches
Health behavior
Health care
Health care delivery
Heart attacks
Heart Disorders
Heart health
Hyperbolic discounting
Medical Services
Medical treatment
Original Article
Probability
Psychological aspects
Psychological research
Psychology
Severity
Side effects
Stroke
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An expectation of healthcare delivery is that patients can make informed decisions about whether and how to treat chronic health conditions. Decisions are complex because treatment is not always 100% effective and side effects can occur without a beneficial outcome. It is important, therefore, to understand the drivers of individual choices about whether to accept a treatment, particularly, how people respond to the probabilities of being well or unwell with or without the treatment. The current project investigated this using a probability discounting framework. Participants indicated whether they would take a drug that reduced their chance of having a heart attack or a stroke from a baseline probability that varied across trials. We told participants that they would always experience a side effect and manipulated its severity (i.e. either frequent headaches or persistent cold hands and feet). We also manipulated whether probabilities were framed negatively—in terms of heart attack or stroke—or positively—in terms of continued good heart health. We observed systematic discounting as a function of probability of heart attack or stroke without treatment. Discounting was shallower when the side effect was less severe. There was no significant effect of framing at the group level. Overall, probability discounting offers a useful approach to investigating the drivers of decisions about whether to accept medical treatment.
ISSN:0033-2933
2163-3452
DOI:10.1007/s40732-017-0243-2