Loading…

Women and Gender in 1917

This paper argues for greater integration of considerations of women and gender in the history of the 1917 Russian Revolutions. Two key issues have long been discussed by historians: the spontaneity/consciousness paradigm, and the role of class in the revolution. Neither has been adequately analyzed...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Slavic review 2017, Vol.76 (3), p.694-702
Main Author:	Ruthchild, Rochelle Goldberg
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	20th century Bibliographic literature Bolshevism Citizenship Civil rights Classism Consciousness Equal rights Equality Female employees Gender Gender relations Historians History Intelligentsia Local elections Political activism Political parties Politics Revolutions Russian history Social classes Spontaneity Voting rights Women Womens suffrage Workers Working class
Citations:	Items that this one cites Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-104834879ecfb83f5262433f6485f00a28260d8b90be9b23fdf9a5e12e4b8e033
cites	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-104834879ecfb83f5262433f6485f00a28260d8b90be9b23fdf9a5e12e4b8e033
container_end_page	702
container_issue	3
container_start_page	694
container_title	Slavic review
container_volume	76
creator	Ruthchild, Rochelle Goldberg
description	This paper argues for greater integration of considerations of women and gender in the history of the 1917 Russian Revolutions. Two key issues have long been discussed by historians: the spontaneity/consciousness paradigm, and the role of class in the revolution. Neither has been adequately analyzed in relation to gender. Women's suffrage has been largely neglected despite the fact that it was a significant issue throughout the year and represented a pioneering advance won by a countrywide coalition of women and men from the working class and intelligentsia, and from almost all political parties. In this centennial year, accounts of the Revolution remain one-dimensional; women remain the other.
doi_str_mv	10.1017/slr.2017.177
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1963532233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_slr_2017_177</cupid><jstor_id>26565175</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26565175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-104834879ecfb83f5262433f6485f00a28260d8b90be9b23fdf9a5e12e4b8e033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj89Lw0AQhRdRMFZvHrwIAa8mzs7sz6OUWoWCF8XjkjS70tAmdTc9-N-b0iIePM2D-XiPj7FrDiUHrh_SOpY4hpJrfcIyJJSF1kacsgyAdKG0tufsIqUWAKy0KmM3H_3Gd3nVNfncd42P-arLueX6kp2Fap381fFO2PvT7G36XCxe5y_Tx0WxJIVDwUEYEkZbvwy1oSBRoSAKShgZACo0qKAxtYXa2xopNMFW0nP0ojYeiCbs7tC7jf3XzqfBtf0uduOk41aRJETaU_cHahn7lKIPbhtXmyp-Ow5u7-5Gd7d3d6P7iN8e8DYNffxlUUkluZbjvzzWVZs6rppP_2f1v8IfusphLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1963532233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women and Gender in 1917</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Ruthchild, Rochelle Goldberg</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruthchild, Rochelle Goldberg</creatorcontrib><description>This paper argues for greater integration of considerations of women and gender in the history of the 1917 Russian Revolutions. Two key issues have long been discussed by historians: the spontaneity/consciousness paradigm, and the role of class in the revolution. Neither has been adequately analyzed in relation to gender. Women's suffrage has been largely neglected despite the fact that it was a significant issue throughout the year and represented a pioneering advance won by a countrywide coalition of women and men from the working class and intelligentsia, and from almost all political parties. In this centennial year, accounts of the Revolution remain one-dimensional; women remain the other.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-6779</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-7784</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/slr.2017.177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>20th century ; Bibliographic literature ; Bolshevism ; Citizenship ; Civil rights ; Classism ; Consciousness ; Equal rights ; Equality ; Female employees ; Gender ; Gender relations ; Historians ; History ; Intelligentsia ; Local elections ; Political activism ; Political parties ; Politics ; Revolutions ; Russian history ; Social classes ; Spontaneity ; Voting rights ; Women ; Womens suffrage ; Workers ; Working class</subject><ispartof>Slavic review, 2017, Vol.76 (3), p.694-702</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 2017</rights><rights>2017 Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-104834879ecfb83f5262433f6485f00a28260d8b90be9b23fdf9a5e12e4b8e033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-104834879ecfb83f5262433f6485f00a28260d8b90be9b23fdf9a5e12e4b8e033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26565175$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0037677917001772/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,12845,12847,27344,27923,27924,27925,33223,33774,58238,58471,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruthchild, Rochelle Goldberg</creatorcontrib><title>Women and Gender in 1917</title><title>Slavic review</title><addtitle>Slavic rev</addtitle><description>This paper argues for greater integration of considerations of women and gender in the history of the 1917 Russian Revolutions. Two key issues have long been discussed by historians: the spontaneity/consciousness paradigm, and the role of class in the revolution. Neither has been adequately analyzed in relation to gender. Women's suffrage has been largely neglected despite the fact that it was a significant issue throughout the year and represented a pioneering advance won by a countrywide coalition of women and men from the working class and intelligentsia, and from almost all political parties. In this centennial year, accounts of the Revolution remain one-dimensional; women remain the other.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Bibliographic literature</subject><subject>Bolshevism</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Classism</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Female employees</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender relations</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Intelligentsia</subject><subject>Local elections</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Revolutions</subject><subject>Russian history</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Spontaneity</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens suffrage</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Working class</subject><issn>0037-6779</issn><issn>2325-7784</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNptj89Lw0AQhRdRMFZvHrwIAa8mzs7sz6OUWoWCF8XjkjS70tAmdTc9-N-b0iIePM2D-XiPj7FrDiUHrh_SOpY4hpJrfcIyJJSF1kacsgyAdKG0tufsIqUWAKy0KmM3H_3Gd3nVNfncd42P-arLueX6kp2Fap381fFO2PvT7G36XCxe5y_Tx0WxJIVDwUEYEkZbvwy1oSBRoSAKShgZACo0qKAxtYXa2xopNMFW0nP0ojYeiCbs7tC7jf3XzqfBtf0uduOk41aRJETaU_cHahn7lKIPbhtXmyp-Ow5u7-5Gd7d3d6P7iN8e8DYNffxlUUkluZbjvzzWVZs6rppP_2f1v8IfusphLA</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Ruthchild, Rochelle Goldberg</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Women and Gender in 1917</title><author>Ruthchild, Rochelle Goldberg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-104834879ecfb83f5262433f6485f00a28260d8b90be9b23fdf9a5e12e4b8e033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Bibliographic literature</topic><topic>Bolshevism</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Classism</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Female employees</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender relations</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Intelligentsia</topic><topic>Local elections</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Revolutions</topic><topic>Russian history</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Spontaneity</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens suffrage</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Working class</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruthchild, Rochelle Goldberg</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Slavic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruthchild, Rochelle Goldberg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women and Gender in 1917</atitle><jtitle>Slavic review</jtitle><addtitle>Slavic rev</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>694</spage><epage>702</epage><pages>694-702</pages><issn>0037-6779</issn><eissn>2325-7784</eissn><abstract>This paper argues for greater integration of considerations of women and gender in the history of the 1917 Russian Revolutions. Two key issues have long been discussed by historians: the spontaneity/consciousness paradigm, and the role of class in the revolution. Neither has been adequately analyzed in relation to gender. Women's suffrage has been largely neglected despite the fact that it was a significant issue throughout the year and represented a pioneering advance won by a countrywide coalition of women and men from the working class and intelligentsia, and from almost all political parties. In this centennial year, accounts of the Revolution remain one-dimensional; women remain the other.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/slr.2017.177</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0037-6779
ispartof	Slavic review, 2017, Vol.76 (3), p.694-702
issn	0037-6779 2325-7784
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_1963532233
source	International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR
subjects	20th century Bibliographic literature Bolshevism Citizenship Civil rights Classism Consciousness Equal rights Equality Female employees Gender Gender relations Historians History Intelligentsia Local elections Political activism Political parties Politics Revolutions Russian history Social classes Spontaneity Voting rights Women Womens suffrage Workers Working class
title	Women and Gender in 1917
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A17%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women%20and%20Gender%20in%201917&rft.jtitle=Slavic%20review&rft.au=Ruthchild,%20Rochelle%20Goldberg&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=694&rft.epage=702&rft.pages=694-702&rft.issn=0037-6779&rft.eissn=2325-7784&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/slr.2017.177&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26565175%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-104834879ecfb83f5262433f6485f00a28260d8b90be9b23fdf9a5e12e4b8e033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1963532233&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_slr_2017_177&rft_jstor_id=26565175&rfr_iscdi=true