On the estimation of stock-market reaction to corporate layoff announcements

This study investigates the stock-market reaction to layoff announcements where more than 1000 workers are affected. We employ a dummy variable regression (DVR) version of the market model and compare the results obtained using ordinary least squares (OLS) versus exponential GARCH (EGARCH), and valu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of financial economics 2004, Vol.13 (4), p.357-370
Main Authors: Hahn, TeWhan, Reyes, Mario G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dummy variable regression
Economic theory
EGARCH
G14
G34
Layoffs
Parameter estimation
Regression analysis
Stock exchanges
Stock prices
Studies
Time-varying volatility
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study investigates the stock-market reaction to layoff announcements where more than 1000 workers are affected. We employ a dummy variable regression (DVR) version of the market model and compare the results obtained using ordinary least squares (OLS) versus exponential GARCH (EGARCH), and value-weighted (VW) versus equally weighted (EW) market index. We find that the stock market responds negatively to layoffs attributed to low demand. We also find that contrary to prior research, the market reacts positively to restructuring-related layoffs on the announcement date. This pattern of market reaction is observed regardless of the market index used or the parameter estimation methods employed, although the empirical results indicate that using EGARCH/VW market index tends to generate fewer statistically significant test results and smaller (in the absolute size of the cumulative) abnormal returns (ARs). Taken together, our study provides additional support for the claim that studies of stock-market reaction to corporate events must account for the time variation in return volatility. Ignoring these could result in erroneous inferences.
ISSN:1058-3300
1873-5924
DOI:10.1016/j.rfe.2003.12.004