Loading…
Dating the exhumation of a metamorphic dome: geological evidence for pre-Eocene unroofing of the Niğde Massif (Central Anatolia, Turkey)
The timing of exhumation of metamorphic rocks and granitoids of the Niğde metamorphic dome, at the southern tip of the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex, is a matter of debate. According to some authors, the metamorphic rocks are overlain nonconformably by a sedimentary sequence of late Maastric...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geological magazine 2002-09, Vol.139 (5), p.559-576 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The timing of exhumation of metamorphic rocks and granitoids of the Niğde metamorphic
dome, at the southern tip of the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex, is a matter of debate.
According to some authors, the metamorphic rocks are overlain nonconformably by a sedimentary
sequence of late Maastrichtian to Late Palaeocene age. In contrast, other authors recently argued that
the Niğde dome represents an extensional core complex of Oligocene–Early Miocene age, finally
unroofed during late Miocene times. On the one hand, the results of our study contradict the latter
interpretation. A sedimentary sequence of earliest Eocene to early Middle Eocene age nonconformably
overlies the high-grade rocks of the Niğde dome on its southeastern flank. Pebbles from the
metamorphic rocks are ubiquitous in the conglomerates of this sequence. As a result, the Niğde metamorphic
rocks must have reached the surface before Eocene times, or at the very beginning of the
Eocene at the latest. The Üçkapılı granite, whose crystallization age has been inferred to be Early
Miocene, has intruded the metamorphic complex during exhumation. The granite is also found as
pebbles within the conglomerates of the Eocene sedimentary sequence and, thus, is actually older than
the Eocene. Apatite fission track dates of 12–11 Ma across the Niğde dome do not indicate that the
metamorphic rocks were still on their way to the surface at that time; instead, they must reflect a later
event, which is most probably heating during late Neogene magmatism. Lastly, there is no ductile-then-brittle extensional detachment in the two areas where it has been invoked, that is, on the western
and southern flanks of the dome. An extensional detachment nevertheless exists at the top of the
Niğde dome, best documented in its northern part, where the detachment fault superposes a superficial
unit made up of massive ophiolitic rocks onto the high-grade metamorphic sequence. Field
evidence indicates that this detachment developed before Eocene times. On the other hand, our
observations do not confirm the nonconformity of the sedimentary sequence dated as late
Maastrichtian–Late Palaeocene onto the Niğde high-grade rocks. Field relations show either a tectonic
contact between the two, or the direct nonconformity of the Eocene sediments onto the metamorphic
rocks. The lack of coarse clasts originating from the Niğde high-grade rocks within the
Maastrichtian–Palaeocene sequence further suggests that the metamorphic dome did |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-7568 1469-5081 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0016756802006751 |