Pillaging the Tombs of Noncanonical Texts: Technical Writing and the Evolution of English Style

Contrary to literary historians, humanist influences did not produce modern English prose style. Instead, technical or utilitarian discourse is inextricable from the development of modern English prose style. Modern English resulted from written text shaped by five factors: (a) brevity induced from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of business and technical communication 2004-04, Vol.18 (2), p.165-197
Main Author: Tebeaux, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
English language
Historians
Historical analysis
Humanism
Language
Middle class
Protestantism
Studies
Syntax
Technical communication
Utilitarianism
Writing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Contrary to literary historians, humanist influences did not produce modern English prose style. Instead, technical or utilitarian discourse is inextricable from the development of modern English prose style. Modern English resulted from written text shaped by five factors: (a) brevity induced from accounting/administrative format; (b) aural/oral-based text, written to be heard and seen, that produced conversational style; (c) persistence of indigenous subject-verb-object syntax found in the earliest English documents; (d) a growing Renaissance book market of literate middle-class readers responding to speech-based prose; and (e) English scriptural renditions of the late Renaissance that associated colloquial speech with Protestantism. Of all writing produced before 1700, only a small amount was humanistic; the bulk was utilitarian. The Royal Society’s demand for “plain English” prevailed because the call for precise language by these early scientists reflected the indigenous nature of a plain English that had surfaced as early as 900.
ISSN:1050-6519
1552-4574
DOI:10.1177/1050651903260738