Camera steered mechanical weed control in sugar beet, maize and soybean

• Published in: Precision agriculture 2018-08, Vol.19 (4), p.708-720
• Main Authors: Kunz, Christoph, Weber, Jonas F., Peteinatos, Gerassimos G., Sökefeld, Markus, Gerhards, Roland
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural production; Agriculture; Aquatic birds; Aquatic plants; Atmospheric Sciences; Berberis vulgaris; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Cameras; Chemistry and Earth Sciences; Chenopodium album; Computer Science; Corn; Crop damage; Crop yield; Effectiveness; Feet; Field tests; Glycine max; Grain; Herbicides; Life Sciences; Physics; Plants (botany); Polygonum convolvulus; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry; Selectivity; Side effects; Soil Science & Conservation; Soybeans; Sprays; Statistics for Engineering; Sugar; Thlaspi arvense; Waterfowl; Weed control; Weeds; Zea mays
• ISSN: 1385-2256; 1573-1618
• DOI: 10.1007/s11119-017-9551-4

In sugar beet, maize and soybean, weeds are usually controlled by herbicides uniformly applied across the whole field. Due to restrictions in herbicide use and negative side effects, mechanical weeding plays a major role in integrated weed management (IWM). In 2015 and 2016, eight field experiments were conducted to test the efficacy of an OEM Claas 3-D stereo camera ® in combination with an Einböck Row-Guard ® hoe for controlling weeds. Ducks-foot blades in the inter-row were combined with four different mechanical intra-row weeding elements in sugar beet, maize and soybean and a band sprayer in sugar beet. Average weed densities in the untreated control plots were from 12 to 153 plants m −2 with Chenopodium album , Polygonum convolvulus , Thlapsi arvense being the most abundant weed species. Camera steered hoeing resulted in 78% weed control efficacy compared to 65% using machine hoeing with manual guidance. Mechanical intra-row elements controlled up to 79% of the weeds in the crop rows. Those elements did not cause significant crop damage except for the treatment with a rotary harrow in maize in 2016. Weed control efficacy was highest in the herbicide treatments with almost 100% followed by herbicide band-applications combined with inter-row hoeing. Mechanical weed control treatments increased white sugar yield by 39%, maize biomass yield by 43% and soybean grain yield by 58% compared to the untreated control in both years. However, yield increase was again higher with chemical weed control. In conclusion, camera guided weed hoeing has improved efficacy and selectivity of mechanical weed control in sugar beet, maize and soybean.