Loading…
A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended"
In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Philosophical studies 2003-01, Vol.112 (1), p.69-91 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 91 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 69 |
| container_title | Philosophical studies |
| container_volume | 112 |
| creator | DJUKIC, George POPESCU, Vladimir B |
| description | In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptual time-gap. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1023/a:1022538609397 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196637760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4321327</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4321327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j192t-8f51b6407c3c7e934e6d069402352c207f99b340262245f34ee8078873be94c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jr1rwzAUxEVpoWnauUsHEyid3D7p6TNbcD8h0CWdjeJIqU1iu5Iz5L-PQkKHx_G4H3dHyD2FZwoMX-w0CROoJRg06oKMqFCYg9Z4SUYASHNNqbwmNzE2ACCN4CMynWVFqIf6b-eyzmdz266j3T7FbLL4dVm6LuyPxqzvnQ11u85enXftyq0mt-TK2010d2cdk5_3t0Xxmc-_P76K2TxvqGFDrr2gS8lBVVgpZ5A7uUrlPG0WrGKgvDFLTK9kjAuffKdBaa1w6QyvGI7J5JTbhy7NjEPZdLvQpsqSGilRKQkJejxDNlZ244NtqzqWfai3NuxLypUQWhy5hxPXxKEL_z5HRpEpPABFelt2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196637760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended"</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>DJUKIC, George ; POPESCU, Vladimir B</creator><creatorcontrib>DJUKIC, George ; POPESCU, Vladimir B</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptual time-gap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8116</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/a:1022538609397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Apples ; Central nervous system ; Cosmology; matter, space, time ; General points ; Hallucination ; Hallucinations ; History of science and technology ; Instantiation ; Intrinsic properties ; Legal objections ; Mental imagery ; Ontological pluralism ; Ontology ; Perceptual experiences ; Philosophical object ; Physical sciences and techniques ; Sense datum theory ; Time</subject><ispartof>Philosophical studies, 2003-01, Vol.112 (1), p.69-91</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4321327$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/196637760?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4021,12859,27921,27922,27923,34773,44198,58236,58469,62659,62660,62675</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14755850$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DJUKIC, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POPESCU, Vladimir B</creatorcontrib><title>A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended"</title><title>Philosophical studies</title><description>In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptual time-gap.</description><subject>Apples</subject><subject>Central nervous system</subject><subject>Cosmology; matter, space, time</subject><subject>General points</subject><subject>Hallucination</subject><subject>Hallucinations</subject><subject>History of science and technology</subject><subject>Instantiation</subject><subject>Intrinsic properties</subject><subject>Legal objections</subject><subject>Mental imagery</subject><subject>Ontological pluralism</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Perceptual experiences</subject><subject>Philosophical object</subject><subject>Physical sciences and techniques</subject><subject>Sense datum theory</subject><subject>Time</subject><issn>0031-8116</issn><issn>1573-0883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jr1rwzAUxEVpoWnauUsHEyid3D7p6TNbcD8h0CWdjeJIqU1iu5Iz5L-PQkKHx_G4H3dHyD2FZwoMX-w0CROoJRg06oKMqFCYg9Z4SUYASHNNqbwmNzE2ACCN4CMynWVFqIf6b-eyzmdz266j3T7FbLL4dVm6LuyPxqzvnQ11u85enXftyq0mt-TK2010d2cdk5_3t0Xxmc-_P76K2TxvqGFDrr2gS8lBVVgpZ5A7uUrlPG0WrGKgvDFLTK9kjAuffKdBaa1w6QyvGI7J5JTbhy7NjEPZdLvQpsqSGilRKQkJejxDNlZ244NtqzqWfai3NuxLypUQWhy5hxPXxKEL_z5HRpEpPABFelt2</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>DJUKIC, George</creator><creator>POPESCU, Vladimir B</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Sringer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended"</title><author>DJUKIC, George ; POPESCU, Vladimir B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j192t-8f51b6407c3c7e934e6d069402352c207f99b340262245f34ee8078873be94c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Apples</topic><topic>Central nervous system</topic><topic>Cosmology; matter, space, time</topic><topic>General points</topic><topic>Hallucination</topic><topic>Hallucinations</topic><topic>History of science and technology</topic><topic>Instantiation</topic><topic>Intrinsic properties</topic><topic>Legal objections</topic><topic>Mental imagery</topic><topic>Ontological pluralism</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Perceptual experiences</topic><topic>Philosophical object</topic><topic>Physical sciences and techniques</topic><topic>Sense datum theory</topic><topic>Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DJUKIC, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POPESCU, Vladimir B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Philosophical studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DJUKIC, George</au><au>POPESCU, Vladimir B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended"</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical studies</jtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>69-91</pages><issn>0031-8116</issn><eissn>1573-0883</eissn><abstract>In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptual time-gap.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1023/a:1022538609397</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0031-8116 |
| ispartof | Philosophical studies, 2003-01, Vol.112 (1), p.69-91 |
| issn | 0031-8116 1573-0883 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_196637760 |
| source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Art, Design and Architecture Collection; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Springer Nature; ProQuest One Literature |
| subjects | Apples Central nervous system Cosmology matter, space, time General points Hallucination Hallucinations History of science and technology Instantiation Intrinsic properties Legal objections Mental imagery Ontological pluralism Ontology Perceptual experiences Philosophical object Physical sciences and techniques Sense datum theory Time |
| title | A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended" |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A41%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Critique%20of%20Langsam's%20%22The%20Theory%20of%20Appearing%20Defended%22&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20studies&rft.au=DJUKIC,%20George&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=69-91&rft.issn=0031-8116&rft.eissn=1573-0883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/a:1022538609397&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4321327%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j192t-8f51b6407c3c7e934e6d069402352c207f99b340262245f34ee8078873be94c23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196637760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4321327&rfr_iscdi=true |