Loading…
Most Frequently Cited Sources, Articles, and Authors in Industrial-Organizational Psychology Textbooks: Implications for the Science–Practice Divide, Scholarly Impact, and the Future of the Field
Most future industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology practitioners and researchers initially enroll in an introductory I-O psychology course during their junior or senior year of undergraduate studies, making introductory textbooks their first in-depth exposure to the field and an important kn...
Saved in:
Published in: | Industrial and organizational psychology 2017-12, Vol.10 (4), p.507-557 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8663f3f6b9f1c7c2e983f610c24af6792f33628537fff7e3f990e5c3c2648f4a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8663f3f6b9f1c7c2e983f610c24af6792f33628537fff7e3f990e5c3c2648f4a3 |
container_end_page | 557 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 507 |
container_title | Industrial and organizational psychology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Aguinis, Herman Ramani, Ravi S. Campbell, P. Knight Bernal-Turnes, Paloma Drewry, Josiah M. Edgerton, Brett T. |
description | Most future industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology practitioners and researchers initially enroll in an introductory I-O psychology course during their junior or senior year of undergraduate studies, making introductory textbooks their first in-depth exposure to the field and an important knowledge base. We reviewed and analyzed the 6,654 unique items (e.g., journal articles, book chapters) published in 1,682 unique sources (e.g., scholarly journals, edited books, popular press publications) and authored by 8,603 unique individuals cited in six popular I-O psychology textbooks. Results showed that 39% of the top-cited sources are not traditional academic peer-reviewed journals, 77% of the top-cited articles were published in cross-disciplinary journals, and 58% of the top-cited authors are affiliated with business schools and not psychology departments. These results suggest that the science–practice divide in I-O psychology may develop later—perhaps after graduates obtain employment as either practitioners or researchers. Also, results suggest I-O psychology is closer to business and management than social psychology and psychology in general. We discuss additional implications for the science–practice divide, how to define and measure scholarly impact, and the future of I-O psychology as a field, including the movement of I-O psychologists to business schools and the sustainability of I-O psychology programs in psychology departments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/iop.2017.69 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1966817892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_iop_2017_69</cupid><sourcerecordid>1966817892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8663f3f6b9f1c7c2e983f610c24af6792f33628537fff7e3f990e5c3c2648f4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUtOwzAQhiMEEs8VF7DEkqbEdurE7KpCoRKISi3ryHXGrUsaF9tBlBV34ExchJPg0gqxYOV_NN88PH8UneKkjROcXWizbJMg2ozvRAc466QxT2m6-6sJ248OnZsnCaMkSQ-iz3vjPOpbeG6g9tUK9bSHEo1MYyW4Fupar2W1VqIuUbfxM2Md0jUa1GXjvNWiih_sVNT6TXhtalGhoVvJmanMdIXG8Oonxjy5SzRYLCstfxiHlLHIzwCNpIZawtf7x9AKGSYButIvuoRWSIUewoaNQmXIbRZYF_Ub31hARm0iDVV5HO0pUTk42b5H0WP_ety7je8ebga97l0sCec-zhmjiio24QrLTBLgeYhwIkkqFMs4UZQykndoppTKgCrOE-hIKglLc5UKehSdbfourQkHc76Yh0OFT7sCc8ZynOWcBOp8Q0lrnLOgiqXVC2FXBU6KtU9F8KlY-1QwHuh4S4vFxOpyCn-a_sN_A5kNmXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1966817892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Most Frequently Cited Sources, Articles, and Authors in Industrial-Organizational Psychology Textbooks: Implications for the Science–Practice Divide, Scholarly Impact, and the Future of the Field</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Aguinis, Herman ; Ramani, Ravi S. ; Campbell, P. Knight ; Bernal-Turnes, Paloma ; Drewry, Josiah M. ; Edgerton, Brett T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aguinis, Herman ; Ramani, Ravi S. ; Campbell, P. Knight ; Bernal-Turnes, Paloma ; Drewry, Josiah M. ; Edgerton, Brett T.</creatorcontrib><description>Most future industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology practitioners and researchers initially enroll in an introductory I-O psychology course during their junior or senior year of undergraduate studies, making introductory textbooks their first in-depth exposure to the field and an important knowledge base. We reviewed and analyzed the 6,654 unique items (e.g., journal articles, book chapters) published in 1,682 unique sources (e.g., scholarly journals, edited books, popular press publications) and authored by 8,603 unique individuals cited in six popular I-O psychology textbooks. Results showed that 39% of the top-cited sources are not traditional academic peer-reviewed journals, 77% of the top-cited articles were published in cross-disciplinary journals, and 58% of the top-cited authors are affiliated with business schools and not psychology departments. These results suggest that the science–practice divide in I-O psychology may develop later—perhaps after graduates obtain employment as either practitioners or researchers. Also, results suggest I-O psychology is closer to business and management than social psychology and psychology in general. We discuss additional implications for the science–practice divide, how to define and measure scholarly impact, and the future of I-O psychology as a field, including the movement of I-O psychologists to business schools and the sustainability of I-O psychology programs in psychology departments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-9426</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-9434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/iop.2017.69</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Business schools ; Citations ; Focal Article ; Psychologists ; Psychology ; Research methodology ; Researchers ; Science ; Textbooks</subject><ispartof>Industrial and organizational psychology, 2017-12, Vol.10 (4), p.507-557</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8663f3f6b9f1c7c2e983f610c24af6792f33628537fff7e3f990e5c3c2648f4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8663f3f6b9f1c7c2e983f610c24af6792f33628537fff7e3f990e5c3c2648f4a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1966817892/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1966817892?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,72960,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aguinis, Herman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramani, Ravi S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, P. Knight</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernal-Turnes, Paloma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drewry, Josiah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgerton, Brett T.</creatorcontrib><title>Most Frequently Cited Sources, Articles, and Authors in Industrial-Organizational Psychology Textbooks: Implications for the Science–Practice Divide, Scholarly Impact, and the Future of the Field</title><title>Industrial and organizational psychology</title><addtitle>Ind. Organ. Psychol</addtitle><description>Most future industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology practitioners and researchers initially enroll in an introductory I-O psychology course during their junior or senior year of undergraduate studies, making introductory textbooks their first in-depth exposure to the field and an important knowledge base. We reviewed and analyzed the 6,654 unique items (e.g., journal articles, book chapters) published in 1,682 unique sources (e.g., scholarly journals, edited books, popular press publications) and authored by 8,603 unique individuals cited in six popular I-O psychology textbooks. Results showed that 39% of the top-cited sources are not traditional academic peer-reviewed journals, 77% of the top-cited articles were published in cross-disciplinary journals, and 58% of the top-cited authors are affiliated with business schools and not psychology departments. These results suggest that the science–practice divide in I-O psychology may develop later—perhaps after graduates obtain employment as either practitioners or researchers. Also, results suggest I-O psychology is closer to business and management than social psychology and psychology in general. We discuss additional implications for the science–practice divide, how to define and measure scholarly impact, and the future of I-O psychology as a field, including the movement of I-O psychologists to business schools and the sustainability of I-O psychology programs in psychology departments.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Business schools</subject><subject>Citations</subject><subject>Focal Article</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><issn>1754-9426</issn><issn>1754-9434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUtOwzAQhiMEEs8VF7DEkqbEdurE7KpCoRKISi3ryHXGrUsaF9tBlBV34ExchJPg0gqxYOV_NN88PH8UneKkjROcXWizbJMg2ozvRAc466QxT2m6-6sJ248OnZsnCaMkSQ-iz3vjPOpbeG6g9tUK9bSHEo1MYyW4Fupar2W1VqIuUbfxM2Md0jUa1GXjvNWiih_sVNT6TXhtalGhoVvJmanMdIXG8Oonxjy5SzRYLCstfxiHlLHIzwCNpIZawtf7x9AKGSYButIvuoRWSIUewoaNQmXIbRZYF_Ub31hARm0iDVV5HO0pUTk42b5H0WP_ety7je8ebga97l0sCec-zhmjiio24QrLTBLgeYhwIkkqFMs4UZQykndoppTKgCrOE-hIKglLc5UKehSdbfourQkHc76Yh0OFT7sCc8ZynOWcBOp8Q0lrnLOgiqXVC2FXBU6KtU9F8KlY-1QwHuh4S4vFxOpyCn-a_sN_A5kNmXg</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Aguinis, Herman</creator><creator>Ramani, Ravi S.</creator><creator>Campbell, P. Knight</creator><creator>Bernal-Turnes, Paloma</creator><creator>Drewry, Josiah M.</creator><creator>Edgerton, Brett T.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Most Frequently Cited Sources, Articles, and Authors in Industrial-Organizational Psychology Textbooks: Implications for the Science–Practice Divide, Scholarly Impact, and the Future of the Field</title><author>Aguinis, Herman ; Ramani, Ravi S. ; Campbell, P. Knight ; Bernal-Turnes, Paloma ; Drewry, Josiah M. ; Edgerton, Brett T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8663f3f6b9f1c7c2e983f610c24af6792f33628537fff7e3f990e5c3c2648f4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Business schools</topic><topic>Citations</topic><topic>Focal Article</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aguinis, Herman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramani, Ravi S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, P. Knight</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernal-Turnes, Paloma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drewry, Josiah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgerton, Brett T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Industrial and organizational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aguinis, Herman</au><au>Ramani, Ravi S.</au><au>Campbell, P. Knight</au><au>Bernal-Turnes, Paloma</au><au>Drewry, Josiah M.</au><au>Edgerton, Brett T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Most Frequently Cited Sources, Articles, and Authors in Industrial-Organizational Psychology Textbooks: Implications for the Science–Practice Divide, Scholarly Impact, and the Future of the Field</atitle><jtitle>Industrial and organizational psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Ind. Organ. Psychol</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>507-557</pages><issn>1754-9426</issn><eissn>1754-9434</eissn><abstract>Most future industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology practitioners and researchers initially enroll in an introductory I-O psychology course during their junior or senior year of undergraduate studies, making introductory textbooks their first in-depth exposure to the field and an important knowledge base. We reviewed and analyzed the 6,654 unique items (e.g., journal articles, book chapters) published in 1,682 unique sources (e.g., scholarly journals, edited books, popular press publications) and authored by 8,603 unique individuals cited in six popular I-O psychology textbooks. Results showed that 39% of the top-cited sources are not traditional academic peer-reviewed journals, 77% of the top-cited articles were published in cross-disciplinary journals, and 58% of the top-cited authors are affiliated with business schools and not psychology departments. These results suggest that the science–practice divide in I-O psychology may develop later—perhaps after graduates obtain employment as either practitioners or researchers. Also, results suggest I-O psychology is closer to business and management than social psychology and psychology in general. We discuss additional implications for the science–practice divide, how to define and measure scholarly impact, and the future of I-O psychology as a field, including the movement of I-O psychologists to business schools and the sustainability of I-O psychology programs in psychology departments.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/iop.2017.69</doi><tpages>51</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1754-9426 |
ispartof | Industrial and organizational psychology, 2017-12, Vol.10 (4), p.507-557 |
issn | 1754-9426 1754-9434 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1966817892 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online; ABI/INFORM Global |
subjects | Bibliometrics Business schools Citations Focal Article Psychologists Psychology Research methodology Researchers Science Textbooks |
title | Most Frequently Cited Sources, Articles, and Authors in Industrial-Organizational Psychology Textbooks: Implications for the Science–Practice Divide, Scholarly Impact, and the Future of the Field |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A45%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Most%20Frequently%20Cited%20Sources,%20Articles,%20and%20Authors%20in%20Industrial-Organizational%20Psychology%20Textbooks:%20Implications%20for%20the%20Science%E2%80%93Practice%20Divide,%20Scholarly%20Impact,%20and%20the%20Future%20of%20the%20Field&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20and%20organizational%20psychology&rft.au=Aguinis,%20Herman&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=507-557&rft.issn=1754-9426&rft.eissn=1754-9434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/iop.2017.69&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1966817892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-8663f3f6b9f1c7c2e983f610c24af6792f33628537fff7e3f990e5c3c2648f4a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1966817892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_iop_2017_69&rfr_iscdi=true |