Beauty, a Road to the Truth

In this article I give a naturalistic-cum-formal analysis of the relation between beauty, empirical success, and truth. The analysis is based on the one hand on a hypothetical variant of the so-called 'mere-exposure effect' which has been more or less established in experimental psychology...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Synthese (Dordrecht) 2002-06, Vol.131 (3), p.291-328
Main Author: Kuipers, Theo A. F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aesthetic simplicity
Aesthetics
Approximation
Beauty
Counterexamples
Cultural values
Dissertations & theses
Empiricism
Epistemology. Philosophy of science. Theory of knowledge
Experimental psychology
Hands
Libraries
Logic
Musical aesthetics
Observational terms
Philosophers
Philosophy
Philosophy of science
Psychology
Realism
Revolutions
Scientists
Theory
Translation
Truth
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-2c08eb7cb13b3addfabfe2b71a1efb8284946462993ab29b39e08848735588453
cites
container_end_page 328
container_issue 3
container_start_page 291
container_title Synthese (Dordrecht)
container_volume 131
creator Kuipers, Theo A. F.
description In this article I give a naturalistic-cum-formal analysis of the relation between beauty, empirical success, and truth. The analysis is based on the one hand on a hypothetical variant of the so-called 'mere-exposure effect' which has been more or less established in experimental psychology regarding exposure-affect relationships in general and aesthetic appreciation in particular (Zajonc 1968; Temme 1983; Bornstein 1989; Ye 2000). On the other hand it is based on the formal theory of truthlikeness and truth approximation as presented in my "From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism" (2000). The analysis supports the findings of James McAllister in his beautiful "Beauty and Revolution in Science" (1996), by explaining and justifying them. First, scientists are essentially right in regarding aesthetic criteria useful for empirical progress and even for truth approximation, provided they conceive of them as less hard than empirical criteria. Second, the aesthetic criteria of the time, the 'aesthetic canon', may well be based on 'aesthetic induction' regarding nonempirical features of paradigms of successful theories which scientists have come to appreciate as beautiful. Third, aesthetic criteria can play a crucial, schismatic role in scientific revolutions. Since they may well be wrong, they may, in the hands of aesthetic conservatives, retard empirical progress and hence truth approximation, but this does not happen in the hands of aesthetically flexible, 'revolutionary' scientists.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1016188509393
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196697152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20117255</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20117255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-2c08eb7cb13b3addfabfe2b71a1efb8284946462993ab29b39e08848735588453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j0tLw0AUhQdRMFbXLkQIgjuj987NvNy1xRcUBKnrMJNMaENt6sxk0X9voMXVtzgf53AYu0Z4ROD0NH1GQIlaCzBk6IRlKBQVYGR5yjIAMoXSQp2zixg7AERZQsZuZt4Oaf-Q2_yrt02e-jytfL4MQ1pdsrPWbqK_OnLCvl9flvP3YvH59jGfLoqaI6SC16C9U7VDcmSbprWu9dwptOhbp7kuTSlLyY0h67hxZDxoXWpFQowUNGF3h95d6H8HH1PV9UPYjpMVGimNQsFH6f4o2VjbTRvstl7HahfWPzbsKySlBKEevduD18XUh_-cj4cVF4L-AB07UfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196697152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beauty, a Road to the Truth</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</source><creator>Kuipers, Theo A. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuipers, Theo A. F.</creatorcontrib><description>In this article I give a naturalistic-cum-formal analysis of the relation between beauty, empirical success, and truth. The analysis is based on the one hand on a hypothetical variant of the so-called 'mere-exposure effect' which has been more or less established in experimental psychology regarding exposure-affect relationships in general and aesthetic appreciation in particular (Zajonc 1968; Temme 1983; Bornstein 1989; Ye 2000). On the other hand it is based on the formal theory of truthlikeness and truth approximation as presented in my "From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism" (2000). The analysis supports the findings of James McAllister in his beautiful "Beauty and Revolution in Science" (1996), by explaining and justifying them. First, scientists are essentially right in regarding aesthetic criteria useful for empirical progress and even for truth approximation, provided they conceive of them as less hard than empirical criteria. Second, the aesthetic criteria of the time, the 'aesthetic canon', may well be based on 'aesthetic induction' regarding nonempirical features of paradigms of successful theories which scientists have come to appreciate as beautiful. Third, aesthetic criteria can play a crucial, schismatic role in scientific revolutions. Since they may well be wrong, they may, in the hands of aesthetic conservatives, retard empirical progress and hence truth approximation, but this does not happen in the hands of aesthetically flexible, 'revolutionary' scientists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1016188509393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Aesthetic simplicity ; Aesthetics ; Approximation ; Beauty ; Counterexamples ; Cultural values ; Dissertations &amp; theses ; Empiricism ; Epistemology. Philosophy of science. Theory of knowledge ; Experimental psychology ; Hands ; Libraries ; Logic ; Musical aesthetics ; Observational terms ; Philosophers ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of science ; Psychology ; Realism ; Revolutions ; Scientists ; Theory ; Translation ; Truth</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2002-06, Vol.131 (3), p.291-328</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-2c08eb7cb13b3addfabfe2b71a1efb8284946462993ab29b39e08848735588453</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/196697152/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/196697152?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12859,27922,27923,34773,44198,58236,58469,62659,62660,62675,73966,74498</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13775318$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuipers, Theo A. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Beauty, a Road to the Truth</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><description>In this article I give a naturalistic-cum-formal analysis of the relation between beauty, empirical success, and truth. The analysis is based on the one hand on a hypothetical variant of the so-called 'mere-exposure effect' which has been more or less established in experimental psychology regarding exposure-affect relationships in general and aesthetic appreciation in particular (Zajonc 1968; Temme 1983; Bornstein 1989; Ye 2000). On the other hand it is based on the formal theory of truthlikeness and truth approximation as presented in my "From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism" (2000). The analysis supports the findings of James McAllister in his beautiful "Beauty and Revolution in Science" (1996), by explaining and justifying them. First, scientists are essentially right in regarding aesthetic criteria useful for empirical progress and even for truth approximation, provided they conceive of them as less hard than empirical criteria. Second, the aesthetic criteria of the time, the 'aesthetic canon', may well be based on 'aesthetic induction' regarding nonempirical features of paradigms of successful theories which scientists have come to appreciate as beautiful. Third, aesthetic criteria can play a crucial, schismatic role in scientific revolutions. Since they may well be wrong, they may, in the hands of aesthetic conservatives, retard empirical progress and hence truth approximation, but this does not happen in the hands of aesthetically flexible, 'revolutionary' scientists.</description><subject>Aesthetic simplicity</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Beauty</subject><subject>Counterexamples</subject><subject>Cultural values</subject><subject>Dissertations &amp; theses</subject><subject>Empiricism</subject><subject>Epistemology. Philosophy of science. Theory of knowledge</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Hands</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Musical aesthetics</subject><subject>Observational terms</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of science</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Revolutions</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Truth</subject><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j0tLw0AUhQdRMFbXLkQIgjuj987NvNy1xRcUBKnrMJNMaENt6sxk0X9voMXVtzgf53AYu0Z4ROD0NH1GQIlaCzBk6IRlKBQVYGR5yjIAMoXSQp2zixg7AERZQsZuZt4Oaf-Q2_yrt02e-jytfL4MQ1pdsrPWbqK_OnLCvl9flvP3YvH59jGfLoqaI6SC16C9U7VDcmSbprWu9dwptOhbp7kuTSlLyY0h67hxZDxoXWpFQowUNGF3h95d6H8HH1PV9UPYjpMVGimNQsFH6f4o2VjbTRvstl7HahfWPzbsKySlBKEevduD18XUh_-cj4cVF4L-AB07UfQ</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>Kuipers, Theo A. F.</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>Beauty, a Road to the Truth</title><author>Kuipers, Theo A. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-2c08eb7cb13b3addfabfe2b71a1efb8284946462993ab29b39e08848735588453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aesthetic simplicity</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Beauty</topic><topic>Counterexamples</topic><topic>Cultural values</topic><topic>Dissertations &amp; theses</topic><topic>Empiricism</topic><topic>Epistemology. Philosophy of science. Theory of knowledge</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Hands</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Musical aesthetics</topic><topic>Observational terms</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of science</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Revolutions</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Truth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuipers, Theo A. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuipers, Theo A. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beauty, a Road to the Truth</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>291-328</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>In this article I give a naturalistic-cum-formal analysis of the relation between beauty, empirical success, and truth. The analysis is based on the one hand on a hypothetical variant of the so-called 'mere-exposure effect' which has been more or less established in experimental psychology regarding exposure-affect relationships in general and aesthetic appreciation in particular (Zajonc 1968; Temme 1983; Bornstein 1989; Ye 2000). On the other hand it is based on the formal theory of truthlikeness and truth approximation as presented in my "From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism" (2000). The analysis supports the findings of James McAllister in his beautiful "Beauty and Revolution in Science" (1996), by explaining and justifying them. First, scientists are essentially right in regarding aesthetic criteria useful for empirical progress and even for truth approximation, provided they conceive of them as less hard than empirical criteria. Second, the aesthetic criteria of the time, the 'aesthetic canon', may well be based on 'aesthetic induction' regarding nonempirical features of paradigms of successful theories which scientists have come to appreciate as beautiful. Third, aesthetic criteria can play a crucial, schismatic role in scientific revolutions. Since they may well be wrong, they may, in the hands of aesthetic conservatives, retard empirical progress and hence truth approximation, but this does not happen in the hands of aesthetically flexible, 'revolutionary' scientists.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1016188509393</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-7857
ispartof Synthese (Dordrecht), 2002-06, Vol.131 (3), p.291-328
issn 0039-7857
1573-0964
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_196697152
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature; ProQuest One Literature; Art, Design & Architecture Collection
subjects Aesthetic simplicity
Aesthetics
Approximation
Beauty
Counterexamples
Cultural values
Dissertations & theses
Empiricism
Epistemology. Philosophy of science. Theory of knowledge
Experimental psychology
Hands
Libraries
Logic
Musical aesthetics
Observational terms
Philosophers
Philosophy
Philosophy of science
Psychology
Realism
Revolutions
Scientists
Theory
Translation
Truth
title Beauty, a Road to the Truth
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A09%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beauty,%20a%20Road%20to%20the%20Truth&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Kuipers,%20Theo%20A.%20F.&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=291-328&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1016188509393&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20117255%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-2c08eb7cb13b3addfabfe2b71a1efb8284946462993ab29b39e08848735588453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196697152&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20117255&rfr_iscdi=true