Loading…

Treaties, Human Rights, and Conditional Consent

Bradley and Goldsmith challenge the conventional academic wisdom concerning both the legality and desirability of reservations, understandings and declarations (RUDs) attached to human rights treaties. The RUDs, they argue, reflect a sensible accommodation of competing domestic and international con...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	University of Pennsylvania law review 2000-12, Vol.149 (2), p.399-468
Main Authors:	Bradley, Curtis A., Goldsmith, Jack L.
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Commercial treaties Consent Constitutional law Federalism Genocide Human rights International aspects International law International relations International relations-US Laws, regulations and rules Legal consent Reservations Torture Treaties United States Senate
Citations:	Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-aa29137e1edf45e1e1d3d8e4d8971eaeec0e3819108e0ca29d6feb67fc6787c83
cites
container_end_page	468
container_issue	2
container_start_page	399
container_title	University of Pennsylvania law review
container_volume	149
creator	Bradley, Curtis A. Goldsmith, Jack L.
description	Bradley and Goldsmith challenge the conventional academic wisdom concerning both the legality and desirability of reservations, understandings and declarations (RUDs) attached to human rights treaties. The RUDs, they argue, reflect a sensible accommodation of competing domestic and international considerations. They help bridge the political divide between isolationists who want to preserve the US's sovereign prerogatives, and internationalists who want the US to increase its involvement in international institutions.
doi_str_mv	10.2307/3312731
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196908563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A70639577</galeid><jstor_id>3312731</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A70639577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-aa29137e1edf45e1e1d3d8e4d8971eaeec0e3819108e0ca29d6feb67fc6787c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10c1KAzEQAOAgCtYqvkIRwUvXJpvdTXIspVqhIEg9h5jM1pTdpCbpwbc3pQU9VOYwP3wMA4PQLcGPJcVsQikpGSVnaEBEVRa8puwcDTCuSCEEZpfoKsYNxripiRigySqAShbieLTY9cqN3uz6M-VOOTOaeWdsst6pbl9HcOkaXbSqi3BzzEP0_jRfzRbF8vX5ZTZdFroiVSqUKgWhDAiYtqpzIoYaDpXhghFQABoD5UQQzAHrjE3TwkfDWt0wzjSnQ3R32LsN_msHMcmN34V8SJRENALzuqG_aK06kNa1PgWlexu1nDLcUFEzltH4BFqDg6A676C1efyXFyd4DgO91af8w8Hr4GMM0MptsL0K35JguX-IPD4ky_uD3MTkw7_sB5VZhMs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196908563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treaties, Human Rights, and Conditional Consent</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Nexis Advance UK (Federated Access)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Bradley, Curtis A. ; Goldsmith, Jack L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Curtis A. ; Goldsmith, Jack L.</creatorcontrib><description>Bradley and Goldsmith challenge the conventional academic wisdom concerning both the legality and desirability of reservations, understandings and declarations (RUDs) attached to human rights treaties. The RUDs, they argue, reflect a sensible accommodation of competing domestic and international considerations. They help bridge the political divide between isolationists who want to preserve the US's sovereign prerogatives, and internationalists who want the US to increase its involvement in international institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-9907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-8537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3312731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Law School</publisher><subject>Commercial treaties ; Consent ; Constitutional law ; Federalism ; Genocide ; Human rights ; International aspects ; International law ; International relations ; International relations-US ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legal consent ; Reservations ; Torture ; Treaties ; United States Senate</subject><ispartof>University of Pennsylvania law review, 2000-12, Vol.149 (2), p.399-468</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 The University of Pennsylvania Law Review</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 University of Pennsylvania, Law School</rights><rights>Copyright University of Pennsylvania Law School Dec 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-aa29137e1edf45e1e1d3d8e4d8971eaeec0e3819108e0ca29d6feb67fc6787c83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3312731$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3312731$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,58236,58469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Curtis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, Jack L.</creatorcontrib><title>Treaties, Human Rights, and Conditional Consent</title><title>University of Pennsylvania law review</title><description>Bradley and Goldsmith challenge the conventional academic wisdom concerning both the legality and desirability of reservations, understandings and declarations (RUDs) attached to human rights treaties. The RUDs, they argue, reflect a sensible accommodation of competing domestic and international considerations. They help bridge the political divide between isolationists who want to preserve the US's sovereign prerogatives, and internationalists who want the US to increase its involvement in international institutions.</description><subject>Commercial treaties</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Genocide</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>International aspects</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legal consent</subject><subject>Reservations</subject><subject>Torture</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>United States Senate</subject><issn>0041-9907</issn><issn>1942-8537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10c1KAzEQAOAgCtYqvkIRwUvXJpvdTXIspVqhIEg9h5jM1pTdpCbpwbc3pQU9VOYwP3wMA4PQLcGPJcVsQikpGSVnaEBEVRa8puwcDTCuSCEEZpfoKsYNxripiRigySqAShbieLTY9cqN3uz6M-VOOTOaeWdsst6pbl9HcOkaXbSqi3BzzEP0_jRfzRbF8vX5ZTZdFroiVSqUKgWhDAiYtqpzIoYaDpXhghFQABoD5UQQzAHrjE3TwkfDWt0wzjSnQ3R32LsN_msHMcmN34V8SJRENALzuqG_aK06kNa1PgWlexu1nDLcUFEzltH4BFqDg6A676C1efyXFyd4DgO91af8w8Hr4GMM0MptsL0K35JguX-IPD4ky_uD3MTkw7_sB5VZhMs</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>Bradley, Curtis A.</creator><creator>Goldsmith, Jack L.</creator><general>University of Pennsylvania Law School</general><general>University of Pennsylvania, Law School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>Treaties, Human Rights, and Conditional Consent</title><author>Bradley, Curtis A. ; Goldsmith, Jack L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-aa29137e1edf45e1e1d3d8e4d8971eaeec0e3819108e0ca29d6feb67fc6787c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Commercial treaties</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Genocide</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>International aspects</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legal consent</topic><topic>Reservations</topic><topic>Torture</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>United States Senate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Curtis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, Jack L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, Curtis A.</au><au>Goldsmith, Jack L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treaties, Human Rights, and Conditional Consent</atitle><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>468</epage><pages>399-468</pages><issn>0041-9907</issn><eissn>1942-8537</eissn><abstract>Bradley and Goldsmith challenge the conventional academic wisdom concerning both the legality and desirability of reservations, understandings and declarations (RUDs) attached to human rights treaties. The RUDs, they argue, reflect a sensible accommodation of competing domestic and international considerations. They help bridge the political divide between isolationists who want to preserve the US's sovereign prerogatives, and internationalists who want the US to increase its involvement in international institutions.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>University of Pennsylvania Law School</pub><doi>10.2307/3312731</doi><tpages>70</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0041-9907
ispartof	University of Pennsylvania law review, 2000-12, Vol.149 (2), p.399-468
issn	0041-9907 1942-8537
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_196908563
source	Business Source Ultimate; Nexis Advance UK (Federated Access); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects	Commercial treaties Consent Constitutional law Federalism Genocide Human rights International aspects International law International relations International relations-US Laws, regulations and rules Legal consent Reservations Torture Treaties United States Senate
title	Treaties, Human Rights, and Conditional Consent
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A35%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treaties,%20Human%20Rights,%20and%20Conditional%20Consent&rft.jtitle=University%20of%20Pennsylvania%20law%20review&rft.au=Bradley,%20Curtis%20A.&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=468&rft.pages=399-468&rft.issn=0041-9907&rft.eissn=1942-8537&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3312731&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA70639577%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-aa29137e1edf45e1e1d3d8e4d8971eaeec0e3819108e0ca29d6feb67fc6787c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196908563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A70639577&rft_jstor_id=3312731&rfr_iscdi=true