Loading…
Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like
The political control exercised through cost-benefit analysis and similar strategy-laden instruments allows one or more policymakers to force a competing policymaker to expend valuable, and limited resources. Indeed, the imposition of these instruments by a controlling political coalition can compro...
Saved in:
Published in: | University of Pennsylvania law review 2002-05, Vol.150 (5), p.1453-1472 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-fa60919a67e676a6c33f18e597e6362d54b9a5fc2ffbdd6bf4e36f19c02fb00a3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1472 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1453 |
container_title | University of Pennsylvania law review |
container_volume | 150 |
creator | Tiller, Emerson H. |
description | The political control exercised through cost-benefit analysis and similar strategy-laden instruments allows one or more policymakers to force a competing policymaker to expend valuable, and limited resources. Indeed, the imposition of these instruments by a controlling political coalition can compromise greatly, or even prevent, policies desired by a competing policymaking institution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3312944 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196916221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A87711185</galeid><jstor_id>3312944</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A87711185</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-fa60919a67e676a6c33f18e597e6362d54b9a5fc2ffbdd6bf4e36f19c02fb00a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10V1PwyAUBmBiNHFO418gxsQbq1BaOrzbFr-SJRqd1w2lh43ZlQlMs38vc0v0YoYLDuSB8HIQOqXkKmWkuGaMpiLL9lCHiixNejkr9lGHkIwmQpDiEB15PyOE8JyKDqpewNulU5AMpIcavwYnA0wMeGxaPJJfWLY1frbeBPMJsWhioWSDx1OwbnWDh9aHZAAtaBNwv5XNyhv_cyhMATfmHY7RgZaNh5Pt3EVvd7fj4UMyerp_HPZHiWI9GhItORFUSF4AL7jkijFNe5CLuGY8rfOsEjLXKtW6qmte6QwY11QokuqKEMm66Gxz78LZjyX4UM5isvgiX1LBBeVpSn_RRDZQmlbbGFjNjVdlv1cUlNL4YV10uQNNYkgnG7uOGrf_8mQHj6OGuVG7_MXGK2e9d6DLhTNz6VYlJeW6h-W2h1Geb-TMB-v-Zd-AbpdC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196916221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like</title><source>Nexis UK</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Tiller, Emerson H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Emerson H.</creatorcontrib><description>The political control exercised through cost-benefit analysis and similar strategy-laden instruments allows one or more policymakers to force a competing policymaker to expend valuable, and limited resources. Indeed, the imposition of these instruments by a controlling political coalition can compromise greatly, or even prevent, policies desired by a competing policymaking institution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-9907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-8537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3312944</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Law School</publisher><subject>Administrative agencies ; Analysis ; Benefit cost analysis ; Commentaries ; Cost benefit analysis ; Cost control ; Court costs ; Economic policy ; Judges ; Judicial system ; Law and economics ; Legislators ; Policy making ; Politics ; Powers and duties ; Regulatory legislation ; Statutory interpretation ; Statutory law ; Tillers</subject><ispartof>University of Pennsylvania law review, 2002-05, Vol.150 (5), p.1453-1472</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 The University of Pennsylvania Law Review</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 University of Pennsylvania, Law School</rights><rights>Copyright University of Pennsylvania Law School May 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-fa60919a67e676a6c33f18e597e6362d54b9a5fc2ffbdd6bf4e36f19c02fb00a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3312944$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3312944$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Emerson H.</creatorcontrib><title>Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like</title><title>University of Pennsylvania law review</title><description>The political control exercised through cost-benefit analysis and similar strategy-laden instruments allows one or more policymakers to force a competing policymaker to expend valuable, and limited resources. Indeed, the imposition of these instruments by a controlling political coalition can compromise greatly, or even prevent, policies desired by a competing policymaking institution.</description><subject>Administrative agencies</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Benefit cost analysis</subject><subject>Commentaries</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Court costs</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Judges</subject><subject>Judicial system</subject><subject>Law and economics</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Powers and duties</subject><subject>Regulatory legislation</subject><subject>Statutory interpretation</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>Tillers</subject><issn>0041-9907</issn><issn>1942-8537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10V1PwyAUBmBiNHFO418gxsQbq1BaOrzbFr-SJRqd1w2lh43ZlQlMs38vc0v0YoYLDuSB8HIQOqXkKmWkuGaMpiLL9lCHiixNejkr9lGHkIwmQpDiEB15PyOE8JyKDqpewNulU5AMpIcavwYnA0wMeGxaPJJfWLY1frbeBPMJsWhioWSDx1OwbnWDh9aHZAAtaBNwv5XNyhv_cyhMATfmHY7RgZaNh5Pt3EVvd7fj4UMyerp_HPZHiWI9GhItORFUSF4AL7jkijFNe5CLuGY8rfOsEjLXKtW6qmte6QwY11QokuqKEMm66Gxz78LZjyX4UM5isvgiX1LBBeVpSn_RRDZQmlbbGFjNjVdlv1cUlNL4YV10uQNNYkgnG7uOGrf_8mQHj6OGuVG7_MXGK2e9d6DLhTNz6VYlJeW6h-W2h1Geb-TMB-v-Zd-AbpdC</recordid><startdate>20020501</startdate><enddate>20020501</enddate><creator>Tiller, Emerson H.</creator><general>University of Pennsylvania Law School</general><general>University of Pennsylvania, Law School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020501</creationdate><title>Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like</title><author>Tiller, Emerson H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-fa60919a67e676a6c33f18e597e6362d54b9a5fc2ffbdd6bf4e36f19c02fb00a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Administrative agencies</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Benefit cost analysis</topic><topic>Commentaries</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Court costs</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Judges</topic><topic>Judicial system</topic><topic>Law and economics</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Powers and duties</topic><topic>Regulatory legislation</topic><topic>Statutory interpretation</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>Tillers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Emerson H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tiller, Emerson H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like</atitle><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle><date>2002-05-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1453</spage><epage>1472</epage><pages>1453-1472</pages><issn>0041-9907</issn><eissn>1942-8537</eissn><abstract>The political control exercised through cost-benefit analysis and similar strategy-laden instruments allows one or more policymakers to force a competing policymaker to expend valuable, and limited resources. Indeed, the imposition of these instruments by a controlling political coalition can compromise greatly, or even prevent, policies desired by a competing policymaking institution.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>University of Pennsylvania Law School</pub><doi>10.2307/3312944</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-9907 |
ispartof | University of Pennsylvania law review, 2002-05, Vol.150 (5), p.1453-1472 |
issn | 0041-9907 1942-8537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_196916221 |
source | Nexis UK; Business Source Ultimate; JSTOR Archival Journals |
subjects | Administrative agencies Analysis Benefit cost analysis Commentaries Cost benefit analysis Cost control Court costs Economic policy Judges Judicial system Law and economics Legislators Policy making Politics Powers and duties Regulatory legislation Statutory interpretation Statutory law Tillers |
title | Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A09%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resource-Based%20Strategies%20in%20Law%20and%20Positive%20Political%20Theory:%20Cost-Benefit%20Analysis%20and%20the%20like&rft.jtitle=University%20of%20Pennsylvania%20law%20review&rft.au=Tiller,%20Emerson%20H.&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1453&rft.epage=1472&rft.pages=1453-1472&rft.issn=0041-9907&rft.eissn=1942-8537&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3312944&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA87711185%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-fa60919a67e676a6c33f18e597e6362d54b9a5fc2ffbdd6bf4e36f19c02fb00a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196916221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A87711185&rft_jstor_id=3312944&rfr_iscdi=true |