Loading…

Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like

The political control exercised through cost-benefit analysis and similar strategy-laden instruments allows one or more policymakers to force a competing policymaker to expend valuable, and limited resources. Indeed, the imposition of these instruments by a controlling political coalition can compro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:University of Pennsylvania law review 2002-05, Vol.150 (5), p.1453-1472
Main Author: Tiller, Emerson H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-fa60919a67e676a6c33f18e597e6362d54b9a5fc2ffbdd6bf4e36f19c02fb00a3
cites
container_end_page 1472
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1453
container_title University of Pennsylvania law review
container_volume 150
creator Tiller, Emerson H.
description The political control exercised through cost-benefit analysis and similar strategy-laden instruments allows one or more policymakers to force a competing policymaker to expend valuable, and limited resources. Indeed, the imposition of these instruments by a controlling political coalition can compromise greatly, or even prevent, policies desired by a competing policymaking institution.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3312944
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196916221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A87711185</galeid><jstor_id>3312944</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A87711185</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-fa60919a67e676a6c33f18e597e6362d54b9a5fc2ffbdd6bf4e36f19c02fb00a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10V1PwyAUBmBiNHFO418gxsQbq1BaOrzbFr-SJRqd1w2lh43ZlQlMs38vc0v0YoYLDuSB8HIQOqXkKmWkuGaMpiLL9lCHiixNejkr9lGHkIwmQpDiEB15PyOE8JyKDqpewNulU5AMpIcavwYnA0wMeGxaPJJfWLY1frbeBPMJsWhioWSDx1OwbnWDh9aHZAAtaBNwv5XNyhv_cyhMATfmHY7RgZaNh5Pt3EVvd7fj4UMyerp_HPZHiWI9GhItORFUSF4AL7jkijFNe5CLuGY8rfOsEjLXKtW6qmte6QwY11QokuqKEMm66Gxz78LZjyX4UM5isvgiX1LBBeVpSn_RRDZQmlbbGFjNjVdlv1cUlNL4YV10uQNNYkgnG7uOGrf_8mQHj6OGuVG7_MXGK2e9d6DLhTNz6VYlJeW6h-W2h1Geb-TMB-v-Zd-AbpdC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196916221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like</title><source>Nexis UK</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Tiller, Emerson H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Emerson H.</creatorcontrib><description>The political control exercised through cost-benefit analysis and similar strategy-laden instruments allows one or more policymakers to force a competing policymaker to expend valuable, and limited resources. Indeed, the imposition of these instruments by a controlling political coalition can compromise greatly, or even prevent, policies desired by a competing policymaking institution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-9907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-8537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3312944</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Law School</publisher><subject>Administrative agencies ; Analysis ; Benefit cost analysis ; Commentaries ; Cost benefit analysis ; Cost control ; Court costs ; Economic policy ; Judges ; Judicial system ; Law and economics ; Legislators ; Policy making ; Politics ; Powers and duties ; Regulatory legislation ; Statutory interpretation ; Statutory law ; Tillers</subject><ispartof>University of Pennsylvania law review, 2002-05, Vol.150 (5), p.1453-1472</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 The University of Pennsylvania Law Review</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 University of Pennsylvania, Law School</rights><rights>Copyright University of Pennsylvania Law School May 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-fa60919a67e676a6c33f18e597e6362d54b9a5fc2ffbdd6bf4e36f19c02fb00a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3312944$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3312944$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Emerson H.</creatorcontrib><title>Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like</title><title>University of Pennsylvania law review</title><description>The political control exercised through cost-benefit analysis and similar strategy-laden instruments allows one or more policymakers to force a competing policymaker to expend valuable, and limited resources. Indeed, the imposition of these instruments by a controlling political coalition can compromise greatly, or even prevent, policies desired by a competing policymaking institution.</description><subject>Administrative agencies</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Benefit cost analysis</subject><subject>Commentaries</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Court costs</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Judges</subject><subject>Judicial system</subject><subject>Law and economics</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Powers and duties</subject><subject>Regulatory legislation</subject><subject>Statutory interpretation</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>Tillers</subject><issn>0041-9907</issn><issn>1942-8537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10V1PwyAUBmBiNHFO418gxsQbq1BaOrzbFr-SJRqd1w2lh43ZlQlMs38vc0v0YoYLDuSB8HIQOqXkKmWkuGaMpiLL9lCHiixNejkr9lGHkIwmQpDiEB15PyOE8JyKDqpewNulU5AMpIcavwYnA0wMeGxaPJJfWLY1frbeBPMJsWhioWSDx1OwbnWDh9aHZAAtaBNwv5XNyhv_cyhMATfmHY7RgZaNh5Pt3EVvd7fj4UMyerp_HPZHiWI9GhItORFUSF4AL7jkijFNe5CLuGY8rfOsEjLXKtW6qmte6QwY11QokuqKEMm66Gxz78LZjyX4UM5isvgiX1LBBeVpSn_RRDZQmlbbGFjNjVdlv1cUlNL4YV10uQNNYkgnG7uOGrf_8mQHj6OGuVG7_MXGK2e9d6DLhTNz6VYlJeW6h-W2h1Geb-TMB-v-Zd-AbpdC</recordid><startdate>20020501</startdate><enddate>20020501</enddate><creator>Tiller, Emerson H.</creator><general>University of Pennsylvania Law School</general><general>University of Pennsylvania, Law School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020501</creationdate><title>Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like</title><author>Tiller, Emerson H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-fa60919a67e676a6c33f18e597e6362d54b9a5fc2ffbdd6bf4e36f19c02fb00a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Administrative agencies</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Benefit cost analysis</topic><topic>Commentaries</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Court costs</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Judges</topic><topic>Judicial system</topic><topic>Law and economics</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Powers and duties</topic><topic>Regulatory legislation</topic><topic>Statutory interpretation</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>Tillers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Emerson H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tiller, Emerson H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like</atitle><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle><date>2002-05-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1453</spage><epage>1472</epage><pages>1453-1472</pages><issn>0041-9907</issn><eissn>1942-8537</eissn><abstract>The political control exercised through cost-benefit analysis and similar strategy-laden instruments allows one or more policymakers to force a competing policymaker to expend valuable, and limited resources. Indeed, the imposition of these instruments by a controlling political coalition can compromise greatly, or even prevent, policies desired by a competing policymaking institution.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>University of Pennsylvania Law School</pub><doi>10.2307/3312944</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-9907
ispartof University of Pennsylvania law review, 2002-05, Vol.150 (5), p.1453-1472
issn 0041-9907
1942-8537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_196916221
source Nexis UK; Business Source Ultimate; JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects Administrative agencies
Analysis
Benefit cost analysis
Commentaries
Cost benefit analysis
Cost control
Court costs
Economic policy
Judges
Judicial system
Law and economics
Legislators
Policy making
Politics
Powers and duties
Regulatory legislation
Statutory interpretation
Statutory law
Tillers
title Resource-Based Strategies in Law and Positive Political Theory: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the like
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A09%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resource-Based%20Strategies%20in%20Law%20and%20Positive%20Political%20Theory:%20Cost-Benefit%20Analysis%20and%20the%20like&rft.jtitle=University%20of%20Pennsylvania%20law%20review&rft.au=Tiller,%20Emerson%20H.&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1453&rft.epage=1472&rft.pages=1453-1472&rft.issn=0041-9907&rft.eissn=1942-8537&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3312944&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA87711185%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-fa60919a67e676a6c33f18e597e6362d54b9a5fc2ffbdd6bf4e36f19c02fb00a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196916221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A87711185&rft_jstor_id=3312944&rfr_iscdi=true