Loading…

Evaluation of an Organic Semiconductor as a Sensor of Volatilized Herbicides

The use of a ytterbium bisphthalocyanine Langmuir‐Blodgett film sensor for the study of the volatilization of the herbicides imazamethabenz‐methyl, tri‐allate, and terbutryn is evaluated. The dynamic response of the sensor to the herbicides is analyzed using a model that relates the response of an i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental quality 2000-09, Vol.29 (5), p.1470-1475
Main Authors: Álvarez‐Benedí, J., Souto, J., De Saja, J. A., Bolado, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1475
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1470
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 29
creator Álvarez‐Benedí, J.
Souto, J.
De Saja, J. A.
Bolado, S.
description The use of a ytterbium bisphthalocyanine Langmuir‐Blodgett film sensor for the study of the volatilization of the herbicides imazamethabenz‐methyl, tri‐allate, and terbutryn is evaluated. The dynamic response of the sensor to the herbicides is analyzed using a model that relates the response of an isotropic sensor to the total immobilized amount of a particular herbicide, accounting for the diffusion through the sensor and the adsorption of each herbicide in the sensor's film. Three model parameters are analyzed in the response of the sensor to a pulse in the concentration of herbicide, analyzing separately the sorption and desorption stages: the response time (τ), the adsorption isotherm linearity (1/n), and the linearity of the variation of the electrical conductivity of the sensor with the amount of sorbed herbicide (B). In the sorption stage, τ ranged from 174 to 341 s, 1/n ranged from 0.57 to 1.04, and B was within the interval from 1.54 to 2.4. The desorption stage required a longer time to be accomplished and thus is less useful for practical purposes. The model parameters are compared with semiqualitative analysis of the response curves in the sorption stage and the capabilities of these sensors in qualitative and quantitative analysis of volatilized herbicides are discussed. Based on the differences in the model parameters, the sensors offered promising results for identification purposes. The results also suggest applications in quantitative analysis, although further improvements in the methodology are required for that purpose.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900050013x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_197381183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>61034383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346X-a4468f11ca75f80c54a10bbc394f4a5d33986ae0c53609ae923a7b5c5f9228083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_YVE8bp187G724EGkWqVQxA8KHsJsmpWU7W6bdNX6683S4kUvBpLJzDwzL7yEnFMYMMrFxdysGAAMAETGBEsAWB7yECn_3CM9mvAsZuHZJ72OiTvokBx5Pw8IgyztkfHwHasW17apo6aMsI4m7g1rq6NHs7C6qWetXjcuQh9hKNU-_AP30lRhprJfZhaNjCustjPjj8lBiZU3J7vYJ883w6frUTye3N5dX41jzUU6jVGIVJaUasySUoJOBFIoCs1zUQpMZpznMkUTGjyFHE3OOGZFopMyZ0yC5H1yut27dM2qNX6t5k3r6iCpaJ5xSankAbrcQto13jtTqqWzC3QbRUF1_qmdf-pP_8L82U4EvcaqdFhr63-WSBAc0kC9bqkPW5nN_yTU_fCBdRe68xuY8m_GHYgi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197381183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of an Organic Semiconductor as a Sensor of Volatilized Herbicides</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Álvarez‐Benedí, J. ; Souto, J. ; De Saja, J. A. ; Bolado, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Álvarez‐Benedí, J. ; Souto, J. ; De Saja, J. A. ; Bolado, S.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of a ytterbium bisphthalocyanine Langmuir‐Blodgett film sensor for the study of the volatilization of the herbicides imazamethabenz‐methyl, tri‐allate, and terbutryn is evaluated. The dynamic response of the sensor to the herbicides is analyzed using a model that relates the response of an isotropic sensor to the total immobilized amount of a particular herbicide, accounting for the diffusion through the sensor and the adsorption of each herbicide in the sensor's film. Three model parameters are analyzed in the response of the sensor to a pulse in the concentration of herbicide, analyzing separately the sorption and desorption stages: the response time (τ), the adsorption isotherm linearity (1/n), and the linearity of the variation of the electrical conductivity of the sensor with the amount of sorbed herbicide (B). In the sorption stage, τ ranged from 174 to 341 s, 1/n ranged from 0.57 to 1.04, and B was within the interval from 1.54 to 2.4. The desorption stage required a longer time to be accomplished and thus is less useful for practical purposes. The model parameters are compared with semiqualitative analysis of the response curves in the sorption stage and the capabilities of these sensors in qualitative and quantitative analysis of volatilized herbicides are discussed. Based on the differences in the model parameters, the sensors offered promising results for identification purposes. The results also suggest applications in quantitative analysis, although further improvements in the methodology are required for that purpose.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900050013x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Exact sciences and technology ; Pollution</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2000-09, Vol.29 (5), p.1470-1475</ispartof><rights>2000 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Sep/Oct 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=804306$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Álvarez‐Benedí, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souto, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Saja, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolado, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of an Organic Semiconductor as a Sensor of Volatilized Herbicides</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><description>The use of a ytterbium bisphthalocyanine Langmuir‐Blodgett film sensor for the study of the volatilization of the herbicides imazamethabenz‐methyl, tri‐allate, and terbutryn is evaluated. The dynamic response of the sensor to the herbicides is analyzed using a model that relates the response of an isotropic sensor to the total immobilized amount of a particular herbicide, accounting for the diffusion through the sensor and the adsorption of each herbicide in the sensor's film. Three model parameters are analyzed in the response of the sensor to a pulse in the concentration of herbicide, analyzing separately the sorption and desorption stages: the response time (τ), the adsorption isotherm linearity (1/n), and the linearity of the variation of the electrical conductivity of the sensor with the amount of sorbed herbicide (B). In the sorption stage, τ ranged from 174 to 341 s, 1/n ranged from 0.57 to 1.04, and B was within the interval from 1.54 to 2.4. The desorption stage required a longer time to be accomplished and thus is less useful for practical purposes. The model parameters are compared with semiqualitative analysis of the response curves in the sorption stage and the capabilities of these sensors in qualitative and quantitative analysis of volatilized herbicides are discussed. Based on the differences in the model parameters, the sensors offered promising results for identification purposes. The results also suggest applications in quantitative analysis, although further improvements in the methodology are required for that purpose.</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_YVE8bp187G724EGkWqVQxA8KHsJsmpWU7W6bdNX6683S4kUvBpLJzDwzL7yEnFMYMMrFxdysGAAMAETGBEsAWB7yECn_3CM9mvAsZuHZJ72OiTvokBx5Pw8IgyztkfHwHasW17apo6aMsI4m7g1rq6NHs7C6qWetXjcuQh9hKNU-_AP30lRhprJfZhaNjCustjPjj8lBiZU3J7vYJ883w6frUTye3N5dX41jzUU6jVGIVJaUasySUoJOBFIoCs1zUQpMZpznMkUTGjyFHE3OOGZFopMyZ0yC5H1yut27dM2qNX6t5k3r6iCpaJ5xSankAbrcQto13jtTqqWzC3QbRUF1_qmdf-pP_8L82U4EvcaqdFhr63-WSBAc0kC9bqkPW5nN_yTU_fCBdRe68xuY8m_GHYgi</recordid><startdate>200009</startdate><enddate>200009</enddate><creator>Álvarez‐Benedí, J.</creator><creator>Souto, J.</creator><creator>De Saja, J. A.</creator><creator>Bolado, S.</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</general><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200009</creationdate><title>Evaluation of an Organic Semiconductor as a Sensor of Volatilized Herbicides</title><author>Álvarez‐Benedí, J. ; Souto, J. ; De Saja, J. A. ; Bolado, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346X-a4468f11ca75f80c54a10bbc394f4a5d33986ae0c53609ae923a7b5c5f9228083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Álvarez‐Benedí, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souto, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Saja, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolado, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Álvarez‐Benedí, J.</au><au>Souto, J.</au><au>De Saja, J. A.</au><au>Bolado, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of an Organic Semiconductor as a Sensor of Volatilized Herbicides</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><date>2000-09</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1470</spage><epage>1475</epage><pages>1470-1475</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>The use of a ytterbium bisphthalocyanine Langmuir‐Blodgett film sensor for the study of the volatilization of the herbicides imazamethabenz‐methyl, tri‐allate, and terbutryn is evaluated. The dynamic response of the sensor to the herbicides is analyzed using a model that relates the response of an isotropic sensor to the total immobilized amount of a particular herbicide, accounting for the diffusion through the sensor and the adsorption of each herbicide in the sensor's film. Three model parameters are analyzed in the response of the sensor to a pulse in the concentration of herbicide, analyzing separately the sorption and desorption stages: the response time (τ), the adsorption isotherm linearity (1/n), and the linearity of the variation of the electrical conductivity of the sensor with the amount of sorbed herbicide (B). In the sorption stage, τ ranged from 174 to 341 s, 1/n ranged from 0.57 to 1.04, and B was within the interval from 1.54 to 2.4. The desorption stage required a longer time to be accomplished and thus is less useful for practical purposes. The model parameters are compared with semiqualitative analysis of the response curves in the sorption stage and the capabilities of these sensors in qualitative and quantitative analysis of volatilized herbicides are discussed. Based on the differences in the model parameters, the sensors offered promising results for identification purposes. The results also suggest applications in quantitative analysis, although further improvements in the methodology are required for that purpose.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900050013x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2000-09, Vol.29 (5), p.1470-1475
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_197381183
source Wiley
subjects Analysis methods
Applied sciences
Atmospheric pollution
Exact sciences and technology
Pollution
title Evaluation of an Organic Semiconductor as a Sensor of Volatilized Herbicides
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A54%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20an%20Organic%20Semiconductor%20as%20a%20Sensor%20of%20Volatilized%20Herbicides&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=%C3%81lvarez%E2%80%90Bened%C3%AD,%20J.&rft.date=2000-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1470&rft.epage=1475&rft.pages=1470-1475&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900050013x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61034383%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346X-a4468f11ca75f80c54a10bbc394f4a5d33986ae0c53609ae923a7b5c5f9228083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197381183&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true