Loading…

Redefining property rights over collective land in the urban redevelopment of Shenzhen, China

Urban development in China is based on two types of land ownership, namely, state land owned by states and collective land owned by village collectives. Legally speaking, urban development must be based on state land. In practice, informal development based on collective land has played important ro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Land use policy 2017-12, Vol.69, p.485-493
Main Authors: Lai, Yani, Wang, Jiayuan, Lok, Waiming
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4f4a5a1c68542754b2b3359b581cd7ae3314382baaba9074a5ee35393e38760f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4f4a5a1c68542754b2b3359b581cd7ae3314382baaba9074a5ee35393e38760f3
container_end_page 493
container_issue
container_start_page 485
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 69
creator Lai, Yani
Wang, Jiayuan
Lok, Waiming
description Urban development in China is based on two types of land ownership, namely, state land owned by states and collective land owned by village collectives. Legally speaking, urban development must be based on state land. In practice, informal development based on collective land has played important roles in the rapid urbanization process over the past decades. Nonetheless, the vague property rights over collective land have led to inferior and suboptimal development outcomes in expansive urban areas. The redevelopment of collective land has become an important means to sustain urban development in an ongoing urbanization process. By adopting theoretical perspectives from New Institutional Economics, this study presents an integrated conceptual framework on the institutional arrangements of land property rights and transaction costs to understand the changes in land policies and their institutional implications for the redevelopment of collective land in Shenzhen, China. The findings reveal that the new policies have redefined the relationship among the government, village collectives, and real estate developers as well as their property rights over collective land. The change of institutional arrangements in land property rights has significantly reduced the transaction costs in the redevelopment process and effectively promoted land redevelopment activities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.046
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1975983876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837717304593</els_id><sourcerecordid>1975983876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4f4a5a1c68542754b2b3359b581cd7ae3314382baaba9074a5ee35393e38760f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-h4BbW5OmbZqlDr5AEHwsJaTt7TSlk9SkLYy_3pQRXLq43M05597zIYQpiSmh-XUX98rUk4fB9nFCKI-JiEmaH6EVLTiLMp6lx2hFkjyNCsb5KTrzviOE5IImK_T5CjU02mizxYOzA7hxj53etqPHdgaHK9v3UI16BrwcwtrgsQU8uVIZ7IJ5ht4OOzAjtg1-a8F8h7nCm1YbdY5OGtV7uPjda_Rxf_e-eYyeXx6eNjfPUcVEPkZpk6pM0SovsjQJ_5ZJyVgmyqygVc0VMEZTViSlUqUShAcxAMuYYMAKnpOGrdHlITdU-JrAj7KzkzPhpKSCZ6JYdEFVHFSVs947aOTg9E65vaRELjBlJ_9gygWmJEIGmMF6e7BCaDFrcNJXGkwFtXaBjqyt_j_kB4gIg30</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1975983876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Redefining property rights over collective land in the urban redevelopment of Shenzhen, China</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Lai, Yani ; Wang, Jiayuan ; Lok, Waiming</creator><creatorcontrib>Lai, Yani ; Wang, Jiayuan ; Lok, Waiming</creatorcontrib><description>Urban development in China is based on two types of land ownership, namely, state land owned by states and collective land owned by village collectives. Legally speaking, urban development must be based on state land. In practice, informal development based on collective land has played important roles in the rapid urbanization process over the past decades. Nonetheless, the vague property rights over collective land have led to inferior and suboptimal development outcomes in expansive urban areas. The redevelopment of collective land has become an important means to sustain urban development in an ongoing urbanization process. By adopting theoretical perspectives from New Institutional Economics, this study presents an integrated conceptual framework on the institutional arrangements of land property rights and transaction costs to understand the changes in land policies and their institutional implications for the redevelopment of collective land in Shenzhen, China. The findings reveal that the new policies have redefined the relationship among the government, village collectives, and real estate developers as well as their property rights over collective land. The change of institutional arrangements in land property rights has significantly reduced the transaction costs in the redevelopment process and effectively promoted land redevelopment activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>China ; Collective land ; Collectives ; Institutional analysis ; Land ownership ; Land use ; Land use policy ; Landowners ; Policies ; Property rights ; Real estate ; Redevelopment ; Transaction costs ; Urban areas ; Urban development ; Urban redevelopment ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2017-12, Vol.69, p.485-493</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4f4a5a1c68542754b2b3359b581cd7ae3314382baaba9074a5ee35393e38760f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4f4a5a1c68542754b2b3359b581cd7ae3314382baaba9074a5ee35393e38760f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lai, Yani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jiayuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lok, Waiming</creatorcontrib><title>Redefining property rights over collective land in the urban redevelopment of Shenzhen, China</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>Urban development in China is based on two types of land ownership, namely, state land owned by states and collective land owned by village collectives. Legally speaking, urban development must be based on state land. In practice, informal development based on collective land has played important roles in the rapid urbanization process over the past decades. Nonetheless, the vague property rights over collective land have led to inferior and suboptimal development outcomes in expansive urban areas. The redevelopment of collective land has become an important means to sustain urban development in an ongoing urbanization process. By adopting theoretical perspectives from New Institutional Economics, this study presents an integrated conceptual framework on the institutional arrangements of land property rights and transaction costs to understand the changes in land policies and their institutional implications for the redevelopment of collective land in Shenzhen, China. The findings reveal that the new policies have redefined the relationship among the government, village collectives, and real estate developers as well as their property rights over collective land. The change of institutional arrangements in land property rights has significantly reduced the transaction costs in the redevelopment process and effectively promoted land redevelopment activities.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Collective land</subject><subject>Collectives</subject><subject>Institutional analysis</subject><subject>Land ownership</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use policy</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Redevelopment</subject><subject>Transaction costs</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urban redevelopment</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-h4BbW5OmbZqlDr5AEHwsJaTt7TSlk9SkLYy_3pQRXLq43M05597zIYQpiSmh-XUX98rUk4fB9nFCKI-JiEmaH6EVLTiLMp6lx2hFkjyNCsb5KTrzviOE5IImK_T5CjU02mizxYOzA7hxj53etqPHdgaHK9v3UI16BrwcwtrgsQU8uVIZ7IJ5ht4OOzAjtg1-a8F8h7nCm1YbdY5OGtV7uPjda_Rxf_e-eYyeXx6eNjfPUcVEPkZpk6pM0SovsjQJ_5ZJyVgmyqygVc0VMEZTViSlUqUShAcxAMuYYMAKnpOGrdHlITdU-JrAj7KzkzPhpKSCZ6JYdEFVHFSVs947aOTg9E65vaRELjBlJ_9gygWmJEIGmMF6e7BCaDFrcNJXGkwFtXaBjqyt_j_kB4gIg30</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Lai, Yani</creator><creator>Wang, Jiayuan</creator><creator>Lok, Waiming</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Redefining property rights over collective land in the urban redevelopment of Shenzhen, China</title><author>Lai, Yani ; Wang, Jiayuan ; Lok, Waiming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4f4a5a1c68542754b2b3359b581cd7ae3314382baaba9074a5ee35393e38760f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Collective land</topic><topic>Collectives</topic><topic>Institutional analysis</topic><topic>Land ownership</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use policy</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Redevelopment</topic><topic>Transaction costs</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urban redevelopment</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lai, Yani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jiayuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lok, Waiming</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lai, Yani</au><au>Wang, Jiayuan</au><au>Lok, Waiming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Redefining property rights over collective land in the urban redevelopment of Shenzhen, China</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>69</volume><spage>485</spage><epage>493</epage><pages>485-493</pages><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>Urban development in China is based on two types of land ownership, namely, state land owned by states and collective land owned by village collectives. Legally speaking, urban development must be based on state land. In practice, informal development based on collective land has played important roles in the rapid urbanization process over the past decades. Nonetheless, the vague property rights over collective land have led to inferior and suboptimal development outcomes in expansive urban areas. The redevelopment of collective land has become an important means to sustain urban development in an ongoing urbanization process. By adopting theoretical perspectives from New Institutional Economics, this study presents an integrated conceptual framework on the institutional arrangements of land property rights and transaction costs to understand the changes in land policies and their institutional implications for the redevelopment of collective land in Shenzhen, China. The findings reveal that the new policies have redefined the relationship among the government, village collectives, and real estate developers as well as their property rights over collective land. The change of institutional arrangements in land property rights has significantly reduced the transaction costs in the redevelopment process and effectively promoted land redevelopment activities.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.046</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2017-12, Vol.69, p.485-493
issn 0264-8377
1873-5754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1975983876
source Elsevier; PAIS Index
subjects China
Collective land
Collectives
Institutional analysis
Land ownership
Land use
Land use policy
Landowners
Policies
Property rights
Real estate
Redevelopment
Transaction costs
Urban areas
Urban development
Urban redevelopment
Urbanization
title Redefining property rights over collective land in the urban redevelopment of Shenzhen, China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A48%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Redefining%20property%20rights%20over%20collective%20land%20in%20the%20urban%20redevelopment%20of%20Shenzhen,%20China&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Lai,%20Yani&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=69&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=493&rft.pages=485-493&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1975983876%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4f4a5a1c68542754b2b3359b581cd7ae3314382baaba9074a5ee35393e38760f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1975983876&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true