Gender, Sexuality, Asylum and European Human Rights

Asylum law functions through a dichotomy between an idealized notion of Europe as a site characterized by human rights, and non-European countries as sites of oppression. In most social sciences and humanities literature, this dichotomy is seen as legitimizing European dominance and exclusion of non...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Law and critique 2018-07, Vol.29 (2), p.221-239
Main Author: Spijkerboer, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ambiguity
Claims
Cultural Studies
Dominance
Education
European cultural groups
Gender
Gender Studies
Human Rights
Humanities
Law
Legal History
Oppression
Philosophy
Philosophy of Law
Political asylum
Refugees
Sexuality
Social sciences
Theories of Law
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Asylum law functions through a dichotomy between an idealized notion of Europe as a site characterized by human rights, and non-European countries as sites of oppression. In most social sciences and humanities literature, this dichotomy is seen as legitimizing European dominance and exclusion of non-Europeans. However, it is the same dichotomy which is used by asylum seekers to claim inclusion through the grant of asylum. Focusing on the inclusive potential of this exclusive dichotomy allows us to explore the ambiguities inherent in the dichotomy. In asylum claims based on persecution on account of gender and sexuality, it becomes evident that not all human rights are considered equally fundamental. In many cases, asylum seekers are required to renounce human rights in order to prevent persecution, for example by complying with patriarchal family norms. Even where this requirement is rejected, asylum law illustrates the ambiguous relation between Europe and human rights.
ISSN:0957-8536
1572-8617
DOI:10.1007/s10978-017-9219-2