Loading…
Spanish version of “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS)
Self-efficacy is a fruitful construct on psychological research, including the educational setting. The present study is focused on measuring the writing self-efficacy. Specifically, we translated into Spanish the “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS; Bruning, Dempsey, Kauffman, McKim, & Zumb...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anales de psicología (Murcia, Spain) Spain), 2018-01, Vol.34 (1), p.86 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-155c1950f441b87cabef1cf2b3852b57786d46aec13faf34a5dca4ff152b7ecc3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 86 |
container_title | Anales de psicología (Murcia, Spain) |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J. Sánchez-Iglesias, Iván Grande-de-Prado, Mario Oliván-Blázquez, Bárbara Martín-Peña, Javier Cancer-Lizaga, Pilar |
description | Self-efficacy is a fruitful construct on psychological research, including the educational setting. The present study is focused on measuring the writing self-efficacy. Specifically, we translated into Spanish the “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS; Bruning, Dempsey, Kauffman, McKim, & Zumbrunn, 2013) and assessed its psychometric properties on a sample of university students. Five hundred and twelve students (78% women, 22% men) from three different Spanish universities participated in our study. They filled a questionnaire that includes the Spanish version of SEWS, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Self-Efficacy for Writing. Results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis has shown that SEWS keep their dimensionality in the Spanish version (explained variance of 65.86%), being composed by Ideation (α = .90), writing Conventions (α = .89), and Self-regulation of writing (α = .90). The correlations with the General Self-Efficacy Scale are high, but higher with the Self-Efficacy for Writing, outlining that are measuring the same construct. We also found than men report higher values on the overall SEWS and two of its dimensions (Ideation and Conventions). Finally, we discuss the implications of these results, point out the main limitations of our study, and suggest further research avenues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.6018/analesps.34.1.264931 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1978280302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1978280302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-155c1950f441b87cabef1cf2b3852b57786d46aec13faf34a5dca4ff152b7ecc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1Kw0AcxBdRsFbfwEPAix4S978f2c1JpNQPKHiI0uOy2e5fU2oSd1Ohtz6IvlyfxEj1NIcZZpgfIedAs5yCvraNXfnYxYyLDDKWi4LDARlBXsiUsUIckhFlwNJCMX1MTmJcUsoVo3JEbsrONnV8Sz59iHXbJC0mu-1X6VeYThFrZ90mwTYk81D3dfOalG7Y2m2_k8tyOi-vTskR2lX0Z386Ji930-fJQzp7un-c3M5Sx3PRpyClg0JSFAIqrZytPIJDVnEtWSWV0vlC5NY74GiRCysXzgpEGFzlneNjcrHv7UL7sfaxN8t2HYbf0UChNNOUUzakxD7lQhtj8Gi6UL_bsDFAzS8q84_KcGHA7FHxH1DEX80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1978280302</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spanish version of “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS)</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J. ; Sánchez-Iglesias, Iván ; Grande-de-Prado, Mario ; Oliván-Blázquez, Bárbara ; Martín-Peña, Javier ; Cancer-Lizaga, Pilar</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J. ; Sánchez-Iglesias, Iván ; Grande-de-Prado, Mario ; Oliván-Blázquez, Bárbara ; Martín-Peña, Javier ; Cancer-Lizaga, Pilar</creatorcontrib><description>Self-efficacy is a fruitful construct on psychological research, including the educational setting. The present study is focused on measuring the writing self-efficacy. Specifically, we translated into Spanish the “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS; Bruning, Dempsey, Kauffman, McKim, & Zumbrunn, 2013) and assessed its psychometric properties on a sample of university students. Five hundred and twelve students (78% women, 22% men) from three different Spanish universities participated in our study. They filled a questionnaire that includes the Spanish version of SEWS, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Self-Efficacy for Writing. Results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis has shown that SEWS keep their dimensionality in the Spanish version (explained variance of 65.86%), being composed by Ideation (α = .90), writing Conventions (α = .89), and Self-regulation of writing (α = .90). The correlations with the General Self-Efficacy Scale are high, but higher with the Self-Efficacy for Writing, outlining that are measuring the same construct. We also found than men report higher values on the overall SEWS and two of its dimensions (Ideation and Conventions). Finally, we discuss the implications of these results, point out the main limitations of our study, and suggest further research avenues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0212-9728</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1695-2294</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6018/analesps.34.1.264931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Murcia: Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia</publisher><subject>Emotions ; Psychological research ; Quantitative psychology ; Self-efficacy ; University students ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Anales de psicología (Murcia, Spain), 2018-01, Vol.34 (1), p.86</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-155c1950f441b87cabef1cf2b3852b57786d46aec13faf34a5dca4ff152b7ecc3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-8640-4097</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1978280302?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Iglesias, Iván</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande-de-Prado, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliván-Blázquez, Bárbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Peña, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cancer-Lizaga, Pilar</creatorcontrib><title>Spanish version of “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS)</title><title>Anales de psicología (Murcia, Spain)</title><description>Self-efficacy is a fruitful construct on psychological research, including the educational setting. The present study is focused on measuring the writing self-efficacy. Specifically, we translated into Spanish the “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS; Bruning, Dempsey, Kauffman, McKim, & Zumbrunn, 2013) and assessed its psychometric properties on a sample of university students. Five hundred and twelve students (78% women, 22% men) from three different Spanish universities participated in our study. They filled a questionnaire that includes the Spanish version of SEWS, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Self-Efficacy for Writing. Results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis has shown that SEWS keep their dimensionality in the Spanish version (explained variance of 65.86%), being composed by Ideation (α = .90), writing Conventions (α = .89), and Self-regulation of writing (α = .90). The correlations with the General Self-Efficacy Scale are high, but higher with the Self-Efficacy for Writing, outlining that are measuring the same construct. We also found than men report higher values on the overall SEWS and two of its dimensions (Ideation and Conventions). Finally, we discuss the implications of these results, point out the main limitations of our study, and suggest further research avenues.</description><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Self-efficacy</subject><subject>University students</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0212-9728</issn><issn>1695-2294</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kM1Kw0AcxBdRsFbfwEPAix4S978f2c1JpNQPKHiI0uOy2e5fU2oSd1Ohtz6IvlyfxEj1NIcZZpgfIedAs5yCvraNXfnYxYyLDDKWi4LDARlBXsiUsUIckhFlwNJCMX1MTmJcUsoVo3JEbsrONnV8Sz59iHXbJC0mu-1X6VeYThFrZ90mwTYk81D3dfOalG7Y2m2_k8tyOi-vTskR2lX0Z386Ji930-fJQzp7un-c3M5Sx3PRpyClg0JSFAIqrZytPIJDVnEtWSWV0vlC5NY74GiRCysXzgpEGFzlneNjcrHv7UL7sfaxN8t2HYbf0UChNNOUUzakxD7lQhtj8Gi6UL_bsDFAzS8q84_KcGHA7FHxH1DEX80</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J.</creator><creator>Sánchez-Iglesias, Iván</creator><creator>Grande-de-Prado, Mario</creator><creator>Oliván-Blázquez, Bárbara</creator><creator>Martín-Peña, Javier</creator><creator>Cancer-Lizaga, Pilar</creator><general>Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-4097</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Spanish version of “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS)</title><author>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J. ; Sánchez-Iglesias, Iván ; Grande-de-Prado, Mario ; Oliván-Blázquez, Bárbara ; Martín-Peña, Javier ; Cancer-Lizaga, Pilar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-155c1950f441b87cabef1cf2b3852b57786d46aec13faf34a5dca4ff152b7ecc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Self-efficacy</topic><topic>University students</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Iglesias, Iván</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande-de-Prado, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliván-Blázquez, Bárbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Peña, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cancer-Lizaga, Pilar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America & Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Anales de psicología (Murcia, Spain)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J.</au><au>Sánchez-Iglesias, Iván</au><au>Grande-de-Prado, Mario</au><au>Oliván-Blázquez, Bárbara</au><au>Martín-Peña, Javier</au><au>Cancer-Lizaga, Pilar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spanish version of “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS)</atitle><jtitle>Anales de psicología (Murcia, Spain)</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>86</spage><pages>86-</pages><issn>0212-9728</issn><eissn>1695-2294</eissn><abstract>Self-efficacy is a fruitful construct on psychological research, including the educational setting. The present study is focused on measuring the writing self-efficacy. Specifically, we translated into Spanish the “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS; Bruning, Dempsey, Kauffman, McKim, & Zumbrunn, 2013) and assessed its psychometric properties on a sample of university students. Five hundred and twelve students (78% women, 22% men) from three different Spanish universities participated in our study. They filled a questionnaire that includes the Spanish version of SEWS, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Self-Efficacy for Writing. Results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis has shown that SEWS keep their dimensionality in the Spanish version (explained variance of 65.86%), being composed by Ideation (α = .90), writing Conventions (α = .89), and Self-regulation of writing (α = .90). The correlations with the General Self-Efficacy Scale are high, but higher with the Self-Efficacy for Writing, outlining that are measuring the same construct. We also found than men report higher values on the overall SEWS and two of its dimensions (Ideation and Conventions). Finally, we discuss the implications of these results, point out the main limitations of our study, and suggest further research avenues.</abstract><cop>Murcia</cop><pub>Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia</pub><doi>10.6018/analesps.34.1.264931</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-4097</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0212-9728 |
ispartof | Anales de psicología (Murcia, Spain), 2018-01, Vol.34 (1), p.86 |
issn | 0212-9728 1695-2294 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1978280302 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Emotions Psychological research Quantitative psychology Self-efficacy University students Writing |
title | Spanish version of “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A14%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spanish%20version%20of%20%E2%80%9CSelf-Efficacy%20for%20Writing%20Scale%E2%80%9D%20(SEWS)&rft.jtitle=Anales%20de%20psicolog%C3%ADa%20(Murcia,%20Spain)&rft.au=Ramos-Villagrasa,%20Pedro%20J.&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=86&rft.pages=86-&rft.issn=0212-9728&rft.eissn=1695-2294&rft_id=info:doi/10.6018/analesps.34.1.264931&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1978280302%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-155c1950f441b87cabef1cf2b3852b57786d46aec13faf34a5dca4ff152b7ecc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1978280302&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |