Loading…
Nietzsche’s Echo—A Dialogue with Thomas Altizer
Prophets provoke psychological unrest, especially when exposing accepted beliefs as profound deceptions. The biblical prophets exemplify such confrontation as do certain atheists ardently opposed to the images of God created by those seers. The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche dramatically ill...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of religion and health 2010-03, Vol.49 (1), p.118-137 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Prophets provoke psychological unrest, especially when exposing accepted beliefs as profound deceptions. The biblical prophets exemplify such confrontation as do certain atheists ardently opposed to the images of God created by those seers. The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche dramatically illustrates this type of counterforce to the Judeo-Christian tradition. His prophet Zarathustra is intended to be a model for the modern mind, one free of superstitions inflicted by antiquated religious dogma. Nietzsche’s credo “God is dead” served as a declaration for the nineteenth century. In the twentieth century, it became a theological diagnosis. As a “movement,” or “tenor,” the death of God or radical theology was spearheaded by Thomas Altizer, a well-published young professor center-staged during the turbulent 1960s. His work foreshadows a new strain of atheism currently represented by biologist Richard Dawkins (
2006
,
The God delusion
. New York: Houghton Mifflin), philosopher Daniel Dennett (
2006
,
Breaking the spell
. New York: Penquin), neuroscientist Sam Harris (
2004
,
The end of faith
. New York: W.W. Norton;
2008
,
Letter to a Christian nation
. New York: Vintage), journalist Christopher Hitchens (
2007
,
God is not great
. New York: Twelve), and mathematician John Allen Paulos (Paulos
2008
,
Irreligion
. New York: Hill & Wang). This twenty-first century crusade against belief in God is best understood as a psychodynamic ignited by Altizer’s Christian atheism. The present dialogue reflects that dynamic while the prologue and epilogue reveal evidence of Providence amidst claims of God’s demise in contemporary history. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4197 1573-6571 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10943-009-9239-9 |