NASA’s Quest for Human Spaceflight Popular Appeal

Objective. Analyze NASA’s efforts to “sell” both its mission and its successes from its origins in 1958 to the present. Methods. Use public opinion polling and qualitative sources to establish change over time. Results. Study suggests that NASA’s public support was less important than most have prev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social science quarterly 2017-12, Vol.98 (4), p.1216-1232
Main Author: Launius, Roger D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
General public
Moon
Original Articles
Predictions
Public opinion
Public opinion surveys
Qualitative research
Space launch services
Space technology
Supporters
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3563-7ff041f0d69dd7c6b7deafc1690abddc58bf6de4b24569f17aea76f86c702be63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3563-7ff041f0d69dd7c6b7deafc1690abddc58bf6de4b24569f17aea76f86c702be63
container_end_page 1232
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1216
container_title Social science quarterly
container_volume 98
creator Launius, Roger D.
description Objective. Analyze NASA’s efforts to “sell” both its mission and its successes from its origins in 1958 to the present. Methods. Use public opinion polling and qualitative sources to establish change over time. Results. Study suggests that NASA’s public support was less important than most have previously asserted, and that the overall activities of NASA have been advanced by a small base of supporters, challenged by a small group of opponents, and sustained by a larger number of people who accept a status quo in space exploration. Conclusion. A general public lack of support for expending many dollars on spaceflight has been a fundamental reality of NASA since its beginning. It is not changing, and probably not changeable, in the predictive future. Accordingly, NASA’s quest for human spaceflight’s popular appeal remains an elusive goal.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ssqu.12473
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1980072052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26612472</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26612472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3563-7ff041f0d69dd7c6b7deafc1690abddc58bf6de4b24569f17aea76f86c702be63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYv3oWANyF19k92k2MoaoWiltjzstnsakrapLsN0puv4ev5JCZGPTqXOcz3mxk-hM4xTHBX195v2wkmTNADNMIRg5ATKg7RCIDGIUsYPkYn3q8AgBEWjxB9SLP08_3DB4vW-F1gaxfM2rXaBFmjtLFV-fK6C57qpq2UC9KmMao6RUdWVd6c_fQxWt7ePE9n4fzx7n6azkNNI05DYS0wbKHgSVEIzXNRGGU15gmovCh0FOeWF4blhEU8sVgoowS3MdcCSG44HaPLYW_j6m3_nVzVrdt0JyVOYgBBICIddTVQ2tXeO2Nl48q1cnuJQfZSZC9FfkvpYDzAb2Vl9v-QMssWy9_MxZBZ-V3t_jKE835O6BdW4G5h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1980072052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>NASA’s Quest for Human Spaceflight Popular Appeal</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Launius, Roger D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Launius, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. Analyze NASA’s efforts to “sell” both its mission and its successes from its origins in 1958 to the present. Methods. Use public opinion polling and qualitative sources to establish change over time. Results. Study suggests that NASA’s public support was less important than most have previously asserted, and that the overall activities of NASA have been advanced by a small base of supporters, challenged by a small group of opponents, and sustained by a larger number of people who accept a status quo in space exploration. Conclusion. A general public lack of support for expending many dollars on spaceflight has been a fundamental reality of NASA since its beginning. It is not changing, and probably not changeable, in the predictive future. Accordingly, NASA’s quest for human spaceflight’s popular appeal remains an elusive goal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6237</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley (Variant)</publisher><subject>General public ; Moon ; Original Articles ; Predictions ; Public opinion ; Public opinion surveys ; Qualitative research ; Space launch services ; Space technology ; Supporters</subject><ispartof>Social science quarterly, 2017-12, Vol.98 (4), p.1216-1232</ispartof><rights>Published 2017</rights><rights>Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>2017 Southwestern Social Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3563-7ff041f0d69dd7c6b7deafc1690abddc58bf6de4b24569f17aea76f86c702be63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3563-7ff041f0d69dd7c6b7deafc1690abddc58bf6de4b24569f17aea76f86c702be63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26612472$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26612472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33202,33753,58216,58449</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Launius, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><title>NASA’s Quest for Human Spaceflight Popular Appeal</title><title>Social science quarterly</title><description>Objective. Analyze NASA’s efforts to “sell” both its mission and its successes from its origins in 1958 to the present. Methods. Use public opinion polling and qualitative sources to establish change over time. Results. Study suggests that NASA’s public support was less important than most have previously asserted, and that the overall activities of NASA have been advanced by a small base of supporters, challenged by a small group of opponents, and sustained by a larger number of people who accept a status quo in space exploration. Conclusion. A general public lack of support for expending many dollars on spaceflight has been a fundamental reality of NASA since its beginning. It is not changing, and probably not changeable, in the predictive future. Accordingly, NASA’s quest for human spaceflight’s popular appeal remains an elusive goal.</description><subject>General public</subject><subject>Moon</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Space launch services</subject><subject>Space technology</subject><subject>Supporters</subject><issn>0038-4941</issn><issn>1540-6237</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYv3oWANyF19k92k2MoaoWiltjzstnsakrapLsN0puv4ev5JCZGPTqXOcz3mxk-hM4xTHBX195v2wkmTNADNMIRg5ATKg7RCIDGIUsYPkYn3q8AgBEWjxB9SLP08_3DB4vW-F1gaxfM2rXaBFmjtLFV-fK6C57qpq2UC9KmMao6RUdWVd6c_fQxWt7ePE9n4fzx7n6azkNNI05DYS0wbKHgSVEIzXNRGGU15gmovCh0FOeWF4blhEU8sVgoowS3MdcCSG44HaPLYW_j6m3_nVzVrdt0JyVOYgBBICIddTVQ2tXeO2Nl48q1cnuJQfZSZC9FfkvpYDzAb2Vl9v-QMssWy9_MxZBZ-V3t_jKE835O6BdW4G5h</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Launius, Roger D.</creator><general>Wiley (Variant)</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>NASA’s Quest for Human Spaceflight Popular Appeal</title><author>Launius, Roger D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3563-7ff041f0d69dd7c6b7deafc1690abddc58bf6de4b24569f17aea76f86c702be63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>General public</topic><topic>Moon</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Space launch services</topic><topic>Space technology</topic><topic>Supporters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Launius, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Launius, Roger D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>NASA’s Quest for Human Spaceflight Popular Appeal</atitle><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1216</spage><epage>1232</epage><pages>1216-1232</pages><issn>0038-4941</issn><eissn>1540-6237</eissn><abstract>Objective. Analyze NASA’s efforts to “sell” both its mission and its successes from its origins in 1958 to the present. Methods. Use public opinion polling and qualitative sources to establish change over time. Results. Study suggests that NASA’s public support was less important than most have previously asserted, and that the overall activities of NASA have been advanced by a small base of supporters, challenged by a small group of opponents, and sustained by a larger number of people who accept a status quo in space exploration. Conclusion. A general public lack of support for expending many dollars on spaceflight has been a fundamental reality of NASA since its beginning. It is not changing, and probably not changeable, in the predictive future. Accordingly, NASA’s quest for human spaceflight’s popular appeal remains an elusive goal.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley (Variant)</pub><doi>10.1111/ssqu.12473</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-4941
ispartof Social science quarterly, 2017-12, Vol.98 (4), p.1216-1232
issn 0038-4941
1540-6237
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1980072052
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archival Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects General public
Moon
Original Articles
Predictions
Public opinion
Public opinion surveys
Qualitative research
Space launch services
Space technology
Supporters
title NASA’s Quest for Human Spaceflight Popular Appeal
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A20%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=NASA%E2%80%99s%20Quest%20for%20Human%20Spaceflight%20Popular%20Appeal&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20quarterly&rft.au=Launius,%20Roger%20D.&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1216&rft.epage=1232&rft.pages=1216-1232&rft.issn=0038-4941&rft.eissn=1540-6237&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ssqu.12473&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26612472%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3563-7ff041f0d69dd7c6b7deafc1690abddc58bf6de4b24569f17aea76f86c702be63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1980072052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26612472&rfr_iscdi=true