Loading…
Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement
Direct behavior ratings have been identified as a practical and feasible alternative to direct observation of behavior for monitoring behavioral progress. Despite the evidence of usability, there have been calls for further examination of direct behavior ratings using different behaviors and scales....
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of positive behavior interventions 2018-01, Vol.20 (1), p.31-42 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043 |
container_end_page | 42 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Journal of positive behavior interventions |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Bruhn, Allison Barron, Sheila Fernando, Josephine Balint-Langel, Kinga |
description | Direct behavior ratings have been identified as a practical and feasible alternative to direct observation of behavior for monitoring behavioral progress. Despite the evidence of usability, there have been calls for further examination of direct behavior ratings using different behaviors and scales. To this end, we examined the ratings of schoolwide behavioral expectations by teachers and outside observers, as well as direct observation of academic engagement by outside observers in upper elementary school language arts classrooms. Across sessions, correlations between raters (range r = .82–.91) and between measures (range r = .64–.98) were moderate to high; significant differences between raters existed when rating students identified with negative behavior (n = 12) as opposed to positive behavior (n = 12). Findings are discussed in terms of implications for research and practice, limitations of the study, and the necessity for further research and development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1098300717713441 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1980501102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1164254</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1098300717713441</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1980501102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UF1LwzAUDaLgnL77IgR8rt6btE3n29T6xUDw47mkabplrulMOp3_3oyKyMCney7n3Hs4h5BjhDNEIc4RRhkHEAEjj2PcIQNMeBbFQrDdgAMdbfh9cuD9HADSNMUBecvXnbaVsVPazTS9Nk6rjl7qmfwwraNPsgvUBR1bmq9lY2zYW0vbmj6rWdsuPk2lt9WeSlvRsZKVboyiuZ3KqW607Q7JXi0XXh_9zCF5vclfru6iyePt_dV4EikueBdVNS-BxbUoMS1rpjkkNcQKUi5lyRWOKqmZEjrjmUaWJYyNqjThIQ4vU4SYD8lp_3fp2veV9l0xb1fOBssCRxkkgAgsqKBXKdd673RdLJ1ppPsqEIpNpcV2peHkpD_Rzqhfef6AmMYs2RhHPe9D4j-m__37BvIdfjs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1980501102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement</title><source>ERIC</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Bruhn, Allison ; Barron, Sheila ; Fernando, Josephine ; Balint-Langel, Kinga</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruhn, Allison ; Barron, Sheila ; Fernando, Josephine ; Balint-Langel, Kinga</creatorcontrib><description>Direct behavior ratings have been identified as a practical and feasible alternative to direct observation of behavior for monitoring behavioral progress. Despite the evidence of usability, there have been calls for further examination of direct behavior ratings using different behaviors and scales. To this end, we examined the ratings of schoolwide behavioral expectations by teachers and outside observers, as well as direct observation of academic engagement by outside observers in upper elementary school language arts classrooms. Across sessions, correlations between raters (range r = .82–.91) and between measures (range r = .64–.98) were moderate to high; significant differences between raters existed when rating students identified with negative behavior (n = 12) as opposed to positive behavior (n = 12). Findings are discussed in terms of implications for research and practice, limitations of the study, and the necessity for further research and development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1098300717713441</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Behavior Problems ; Behavior Rating Scales ; Child Behavior ; Correlation ; Elementary School Students ; Interrater Reliability ; Language Arts ; Learner Engagement ; Observation ; Positive Behavior Supports ; Questionnaires ; R&D ; Research & development ; Screening Tests ; Statistical Analysis ; Student Behavior</subject><ispartof>Journal of positive behavior interventions, 2018-01, Vol.20 (1), p.31-42</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,79134</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1164254$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruhn, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barron, Sheila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balint-Langel, Kinga</creatorcontrib><title>Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement</title><title>Journal of positive behavior interventions</title><description>Direct behavior ratings have been identified as a practical and feasible alternative to direct observation of behavior for monitoring behavioral progress. Despite the evidence of usability, there have been calls for further examination of direct behavior ratings using different behaviors and scales. To this end, we examined the ratings of schoolwide behavioral expectations by teachers and outside observers, as well as direct observation of academic engagement by outside observers in upper elementary school language arts classrooms. Across sessions, correlations between raters (range r = .82–.91) and between measures (range r = .64–.98) were moderate to high; significant differences between raters existed when rating students identified with negative behavior (n = 12) as opposed to positive behavior (n = 12). Findings are discussed in terms of implications for research and practice, limitations of the study, and the necessity for further research and development.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Behavior Rating Scales</subject><subject>Child Behavior</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Interrater Reliability</subject><subject>Language Arts</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Positive Behavior Supports</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><issn>1098-3007</issn><issn>1538-4772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UF1LwzAUDaLgnL77IgR8rt6btE3n29T6xUDw47mkabplrulMOp3_3oyKyMCney7n3Hs4h5BjhDNEIc4RRhkHEAEjj2PcIQNMeBbFQrDdgAMdbfh9cuD9HADSNMUBecvXnbaVsVPazTS9Nk6rjl7qmfwwraNPsgvUBR1bmq9lY2zYW0vbmj6rWdsuPk2lt9WeSlvRsZKVboyiuZ3KqW607Q7JXi0XXh_9zCF5vclfru6iyePt_dV4EikueBdVNS-BxbUoMS1rpjkkNcQKUi5lyRWOKqmZEjrjmUaWJYyNqjThIQ4vU4SYD8lp_3fp2veV9l0xb1fOBssCRxkkgAgsqKBXKdd673RdLJ1ppPsqEIpNpcV2peHkpD_Rzqhfef6AmMYs2RhHPe9D4j-m__37BvIdfjs</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Bruhn, Allison</creator><creator>Barron, Sheila</creator><creator>Fernando, Josephine</creator><creator>Balint-Langel, Kinga</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement</title><author>Bruhn, Allison ; Barron, Sheila ; Fernando, Josephine ; Balint-Langel, Kinga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Behavior Rating Scales</topic><topic>Child Behavior</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Interrater Reliability</topic><topic>Language Arts</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Positive Behavior Supports</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruhn, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barron, Sheila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balint-Langel, Kinga</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of positive behavior interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruhn, Allison</au><au>Barron, Sheila</au><au>Fernando, Josephine</au><au>Balint-Langel, Kinga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1164254</ericid><atitle>Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of positive behavior interventions</jtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>31-42</pages><issn>1098-3007</issn><eissn>1538-4772</eissn><abstract>Direct behavior ratings have been identified as a practical and feasible alternative to direct observation of behavior for monitoring behavioral progress. Despite the evidence of usability, there have been calls for further examination of direct behavior ratings using different behaviors and scales. To this end, we examined the ratings of schoolwide behavioral expectations by teachers and outside observers, as well as direct observation of academic engagement by outside observers in upper elementary school language arts classrooms. Across sessions, correlations between raters (range r = .82–.91) and between measures (range r = .64–.98) were moderate to high; significant differences between raters existed when rating students identified with negative behavior (n = 12) as opposed to positive behavior (n = 12). Findings are discussed in terms of implications for research and practice, limitations of the study, and the necessity for further research and development.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1098300717713441</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-3007 |
ispartof | Journal of positive behavior interventions, 2018-01, Vol.20 (1), p.31-42 |
issn | 1098-3007 1538-4772 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1980501102 |
source | ERIC; SAGE |
subjects | Behavior Behavior Problems Behavior Rating Scales Child Behavior Correlation Elementary School Students Interrater Reliability Language Arts Learner Engagement Observation Positive Behavior Supports Questionnaires R&D Research & development Screening Tests Statistical Analysis Student Behavior |
title | Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A14%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extending%20the%20Direct%20Behavior%20Rating:%20An%20Examination%20of%20Schoolwide%20Behavior%20Ratings%20and%20Academic%20Engagement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20positive%20behavior%20interventions&rft.au=Bruhn,%20Allison&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=31-42&rft.issn=1098-3007&rft.eissn=1538-4772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1098300717713441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1980501102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1980501102&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1164254&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1098300717713441&rfr_iscdi=true |