Loading…

Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement

Direct behavior ratings have been identified as a practical and feasible alternative to direct observation of behavior for monitoring behavioral progress. Despite the evidence of usability, there have been calls for further examination of direct behavior ratings using different behaviors and scales....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of positive behavior interventions 2018-01, Vol.20 (1), p.31-42
Main Authors: Bruhn, Allison, Barron, Sheila, Fernando, Josephine, Balint-Langel, Kinga
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Journal of positive behavior interventions
container_volume 20
creator Bruhn, Allison
Barron, Sheila
Fernando, Josephine
Balint-Langel, Kinga
description Direct behavior ratings have been identified as a practical and feasible alternative to direct observation of behavior for monitoring behavioral progress. Despite the evidence of usability, there have been calls for further examination of direct behavior ratings using different behaviors and scales. To this end, we examined the ratings of schoolwide behavioral expectations by teachers and outside observers, as well as direct observation of academic engagement by outside observers in upper elementary school language arts classrooms. Across sessions, correlations between raters (range r = .82–.91) and between measures (range r = .64–.98) were moderate to high; significant differences between raters existed when rating students identified with negative behavior (n = 12) as opposed to positive behavior (n = 12). Findings are discussed in terms of implications for research and practice, limitations of the study, and the necessity for further research and development.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1098300717713441
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1980501102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1164254</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1098300717713441</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1980501102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UF1LwzAUDaLgnL77IgR8rt6btE3n29T6xUDw47mkabplrulMOp3_3oyKyMCney7n3Hs4h5BjhDNEIc4RRhkHEAEjj2PcIQNMeBbFQrDdgAMdbfh9cuD9HADSNMUBecvXnbaVsVPazTS9Nk6rjl7qmfwwraNPsgvUBR1bmq9lY2zYW0vbmj6rWdsuPk2lt9WeSlvRsZKVboyiuZ3KqW607Q7JXi0XXh_9zCF5vclfru6iyePt_dV4EikueBdVNS-BxbUoMS1rpjkkNcQKUi5lyRWOKqmZEjrjmUaWJYyNqjThIQ4vU4SYD8lp_3fp2veV9l0xb1fOBssCRxkkgAgsqKBXKdd673RdLJ1ppPsqEIpNpcV2peHkpD_Rzqhfef6AmMYs2RhHPe9D4j-m__37BvIdfjs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1980501102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement</title><source>ERIC</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Bruhn, Allison ; Barron, Sheila ; Fernando, Josephine ; Balint-Langel, Kinga</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruhn, Allison ; Barron, Sheila ; Fernando, Josephine ; Balint-Langel, Kinga</creatorcontrib><description>Direct behavior ratings have been identified as a practical and feasible alternative to direct observation of behavior for monitoring behavioral progress. Despite the evidence of usability, there have been calls for further examination of direct behavior ratings using different behaviors and scales. To this end, we examined the ratings of schoolwide behavioral expectations by teachers and outside observers, as well as direct observation of academic engagement by outside observers in upper elementary school language arts classrooms. Across sessions, correlations between raters (range r = .82–.91) and between measures (range r = .64–.98) were moderate to high; significant differences between raters existed when rating students identified with negative behavior (n = 12) as opposed to positive behavior (n = 12). Findings are discussed in terms of implications for research and practice, limitations of the study, and the necessity for further research and development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1098300717713441</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Behavior Problems ; Behavior Rating Scales ; Child Behavior ; Correlation ; Elementary School Students ; Interrater Reliability ; Language Arts ; Learner Engagement ; Observation ; Positive Behavior Supports ; Questionnaires ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Screening Tests ; Statistical Analysis ; Student Behavior</subject><ispartof>Journal of positive behavior interventions, 2018-01, Vol.20 (1), p.31-42</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,79134</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1164254$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruhn, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barron, Sheila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balint-Langel, Kinga</creatorcontrib><title>Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement</title><title>Journal of positive behavior interventions</title><description>Direct behavior ratings have been identified as a practical and feasible alternative to direct observation of behavior for monitoring behavioral progress. Despite the evidence of usability, there have been calls for further examination of direct behavior ratings using different behaviors and scales. To this end, we examined the ratings of schoolwide behavioral expectations by teachers and outside observers, as well as direct observation of academic engagement by outside observers in upper elementary school language arts classrooms. Across sessions, correlations between raters (range r = .82–.91) and between measures (range r = .64–.98) were moderate to high; significant differences between raters existed when rating students identified with negative behavior (n = 12) as opposed to positive behavior (n = 12). Findings are discussed in terms of implications for research and practice, limitations of the study, and the necessity for further research and development.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Behavior Rating Scales</subject><subject>Child Behavior</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Interrater Reliability</subject><subject>Language Arts</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Positive Behavior Supports</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><issn>1098-3007</issn><issn>1538-4772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UF1LwzAUDaLgnL77IgR8rt6btE3n29T6xUDw47mkabplrulMOp3_3oyKyMCney7n3Hs4h5BjhDNEIc4RRhkHEAEjj2PcIQNMeBbFQrDdgAMdbfh9cuD9HADSNMUBecvXnbaVsVPazTS9Nk6rjl7qmfwwraNPsgvUBR1bmq9lY2zYW0vbmj6rWdsuPk2lt9WeSlvRsZKVboyiuZ3KqW607Q7JXi0XXh_9zCF5vclfru6iyePt_dV4EikueBdVNS-BxbUoMS1rpjkkNcQKUi5lyRWOKqmZEjrjmUaWJYyNqjThIQ4vU4SYD8lp_3fp2veV9l0xb1fOBssCRxkkgAgsqKBXKdd673RdLJ1ppPsqEIpNpcV2peHkpD_Rzqhfef6AmMYs2RhHPe9D4j-m__37BvIdfjs</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Bruhn, Allison</creator><creator>Barron, Sheila</creator><creator>Fernando, Josephine</creator><creator>Balint-Langel, Kinga</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement</title><author>Bruhn, Allison ; Barron, Sheila ; Fernando, Josephine ; Balint-Langel, Kinga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Behavior Rating Scales</topic><topic>Child Behavior</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Interrater Reliability</topic><topic>Language Arts</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Positive Behavior Supports</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruhn, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barron, Sheila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balint-Langel, Kinga</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of positive behavior interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruhn, Allison</au><au>Barron, Sheila</au><au>Fernando, Josephine</au><au>Balint-Langel, Kinga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1164254</ericid><atitle>Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of positive behavior interventions</jtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>31-42</pages><issn>1098-3007</issn><eissn>1538-4772</eissn><abstract>Direct behavior ratings have been identified as a practical and feasible alternative to direct observation of behavior for monitoring behavioral progress. Despite the evidence of usability, there have been calls for further examination of direct behavior ratings using different behaviors and scales. To this end, we examined the ratings of schoolwide behavioral expectations by teachers and outside observers, as well as direct observation of academic engagement by outside observers in upper elementary school language arts classrooms. Across sessions, correlations between raters (range r = .82–.91) and between measures (range r = .64–.98) were moderate to high; significant differences between raters existed when rating students identified with negative behavior (n = 12) as opposed to positive behavior (n = 12). Findings are discussed in terms of implications for research and practice, limitations of the study, and the necessity for further research and development.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1098300717713441</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3007
ispartof Journal of positive behavior interventions, 2018-01, Vol.20 (1), p.31-42
issn 1098-3007
1538-4772
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1980501102
source ERIC; SAGE
subjects Behavior
Behavior Problems
Behavior Rating Scales
Child Behavior
Correlation
Elementary School Students
Interrater Reliability
Language Arts
Learner Engagement
Observation
Positive Behavior Supports
Questionnaires
R&D
Research & development
Screening Tests
Statistical Analysis
Student Behavior
title Extending the Direct Behavior Rating: An Examination of Schoolwide Behavior Ratings and Academic Engagement
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A14%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extending%20the%20Direct%20Behavior%20Rating:%20An%20Examination%20of%20Schoolwide%20Behavior%20Ratings%20and%20Academic%20Engagement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20positive%20behavior%20interventions&rft.au=Bruhn,%20Allison&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=31-42&rft.issn=1098-3007&rft.eissn=1538-4772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1098300717713441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1980501102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df3b024f7b16bf2e305f04c063aab3c19dae2c7e838e1285229d6536613b61043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1980501102&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1164254&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1098300717713441&rfr_iscdi=true