Loading…
Selection of hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios for regional combined hurricane wind and flood loss estimation
This paper presents a new methodology for selecting hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios (with similar return periods) for estimating the regional losses due to combined hurricane wind and flood. An in-house stochastic hurricane simulation program was used to simulate 50,000 years of full-track syn...
Saved in:
Published in: | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2018-03, Vol.91 (2), p.671-696 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-cd7cd4c25e28aa004d67bf0b98761714db627d7ae3fe5ede6d7f85609e07a3673 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-cd7cd4c25e28aa004d67bf0b98761714db627d7ae3fe5ede6d7f85609e07a3673 |
container_end_page | 696 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 671 |
container_title | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Pei, Bin Pang, Weichiang Testik, Firat Y. Ravichandran, Nadarajah Liu, Fangqian |
description | This paper presents a new methodology for selecting hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios (with similar return periods) for estimating the regional losses due to combined hurricane wind and flood. An in-house stochastic hurricane simulation program was used to simulate 50,000 years of full-track synthetic hurricanes. A wind field model along with a boundary layer model was utilized to compute the surface wind speeds. As illustrative examples, the SLOSH (Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes) model was employed to calculate the corresponding flood elevations for two loss estimation domains (Charleston Peninsula, South Carolina and Miami Beach, Florida) with each of them divided into census blocks. The peak wind speeds and maximum flood elevations at the centroids of respective census blocks were utilized to determine the joint mean recurrence intervals (MRIs) of individual hurricane events. For regional loss estimation purpose, the joint MRIs of hurricanes were weighted by the population of every census block. A hurricane selection procedure was developed to select hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios with a joint MRI of 100 years. Three hurricane ensembles, selected based on only wind speeds, only flood elevations, and joint wind speeds and flood elevations, were imported into the HAZUS-MH (Hazards US Multi-Hazards) program to perform combined wind and flood loss estimations. The results indicate that hurricane selection using either only wind speeds or only flood elevations can overestimate the combined losses. The different characteristics of the selected hurricane scenarios for the two loss estimation domains are also discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11069-017-3149-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1980687141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1980687141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-cd7cd4c25e28aa004d67bf0b98761714db627d7ae3fe5ede6d7f85609e07a3673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AdfRmHsnMUoovKLhQwV3IJDftlGnSJlPE_npT6sKNi8vdnO-cwyHkmsMtB5B3iXMQLQMuWcmrlu1PyITXsmTQVHBKJtAWnEEJn-fkIqUVAOeiaCdk-4YDmrEPngZHl3qvo2Um-NSnEf1Il7sYe6M90mTQ69iHRF2INOIiM3qgJqy73qP9o_zqvaU6nxtCsHQIKVFMY7_Wh5xLcub0kPDq90_Jx-PD--yZzV-fXmb3c2bKRozMWGlsZYoai0ZrgMoK2Tno2kYKLnllO1FIKzWWDmu0KKx0TS2gRZC6FLKckpuj7yaG7S7nq1XYxVw5Kd42IJpswrOKH1Um5poRndrEXDR-Kw7qsKw6LqvysuqwrNpnpjgyKWv9AuMf53-hHy8CfwI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1980687141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selection of hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios for regional combined hurricane wind and flood loss estimation</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Pei, Bin ; Pang, Weichiang ; Testik, Firat Y. ; Ravichandran, Nadarajah ; Liu, Fangqian</creator><creatorcontrib>Pei, Bin ; Pang, Weichiang ; Testik, Firat Y. ; Ravichandran, Nadarajah ; Liu, Fangqian</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a new methodology for selecting hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios (with similar return periods) for estimating the regional losses due to combined hurricane wind and flood. An in-house stochastic hurricane simulation program was used to simulate 50,000 years of full-track synthetic hurricanes. A wind field model along with a boundary layer model was utilized to compute the surface wind speeds. As illustrative examples, the SLOSH (Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes) model was employed to calculate the corresponding flood elevations for two loss estimation domains (Charleston Peninsula, South Carolina and Miami Beach, Florida) with each of them divided into census blocks. The peak wind speeds and maximum flood elevations at the centroids of respective census blocks were utilized to determine the joint mean recurrence intervals (MRIs) of individual hurricane events. For regional loss estimation purpose, the joint MRIs of hurricanes were weighted by the population of every census block. A hurricane selection procedure was developed to select hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios with a joint MRI of 100 years. Three hurricane ensembles, selected based on only wind speeds, only flood elevations, and joint wind speeds and flood elevations, were imported into the HAZUS-MH (Hazards US Multi-Hazards) program to perform combined wind and flood loss estimations. The results indicate that hurricane selection using either only wind speeds or only flood elevations can overestimate the combined losses. The different characteristics of the selected hurricane scenarios for the two loss estimation domains are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-017-3149-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Boundary layer models ; Boundary layers ; Census ; Censuses ; Centroids ; Civil Engineering ; Computer simulation ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Management ; Flood insurance ; Floods ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hazards ; Hurricane tracking ; Hurricane winds ; Hurricanes ; Hydrogeology ; Lakes ; Natural Hazards ; Original Paper ; Stochasticity ; Surface wind ; Surges ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2018-03, Vol.91 (2), p.671-696</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Natural Hazards is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-cd7cd4c25e28aa004d67bf0b98761714db627d7ae3fe5ede6d7f85609e07a3673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-cd7cd4c25e28aa004d67bf0b98761714db627d7ae3fe5ede6d7f85609e07a3673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4237-3599</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pei, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Weichiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testik, Firat Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravichandran, Nadarajah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fangqian</creatorcontrib><title>Selection of hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios for regional combined hurricane wind and flood loss estimation</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>This paper presents a new methodology for selecting hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios (with similar return periods) for estimating the regional losses due to combined hurricane wind and flood. An in-house stochastic hurricane simulation program was used to simulate 50,000 years of full-track synthetic hurricanes. A wind field model along with a boundary layer model was utilized to compute the surface wind speeds. As illustrative examples, the SLOSH (Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes) model was employed to calculate the corresponding flood elevations for two loss estimation domains (Charleston Peninsula, South Carolina and Miami Beach, Florida) with each of them divided into census blocks. The peak wind speeds and maximum flood elevations at the centroids of respective census blocks were utilized to determine the joint mean recurrence intervals (MRIs) of individual hurricane events. For regional loss estimation purpose, the joint MRIs of hurricanes were weighted by the population of every census block. A hurricane selection procedure was developed to select hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios with a joint MRI of 100 years. Three hurricane ensembles, selected based on only wind speeds, only flood elevations, and joint wind speeds and flood elevations, were imported into the HAZUS-MH (Hazards US Multi-Hazards) program to perform combined wind and flood loss estimations. The results indicate that hurricane selection using either only wind speeds or only flood elevations can overestimate the combined losses. The different characteristics of the selected hurricane scenarios for the two loss estimation domains are also discussed.</description><subject>Boundary layer models</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Census</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Centroids</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Flood insurance</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Hurricane tracking</subject><subject>Hurricane winds</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>Surface wind</subject><subject>Surges</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AdfRmHsnMUoovKLhQwV3IJDftlGnSJlPE_npT6sKNi8vdnO-cwyHkmsMtB5B3iXMQLQMuWcmrlu1PyITXsmTQVHBKJtAWnEEJn-fkIqUVAOeiaCdk-4YDmrEPngZHl3qvo2Um-NSnEf1Il7sYe6M90mTQ69iHRF2INOIiM3qgJqy73qP9o_zqvaU6nxtCsHQIKVFMY7_Wh5xLcub0kPDq90_Jx-PD--yZzV-fXmb3c2bKRozMWGlsZYoai0ZrgMoK2Tno2kYKLnllO1FIKzWWDmu0KKx0TS2gRZC6FLKckpuj7yaG7S7nq1XYxVw5Kd42IJpswrOKH1Um5poRndrEXDR-Kw7qsKw6LqvysuqwrNpnpjgyKWv9AuMf53-hHy8CfwI</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Pei, Bin</creator><creator>Pang, Weichiang</creator><creator>Testik, Firat Y.</creator><creator>Ravichandran, Nadarajah</creator><creator>Liu, Fangqian</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4237-3599</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Selection of hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios for regional combined hurricane wind and flood loss estimation</title><author>Pei, Bin ; Pang, Weichiang ; Testik, Firat Y. ; Ravichandran, Nadarajah ; Liu, Fangqian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-cd7cd4c25e28aa004d67bf0b98761714db627d7ae3fe5ede6d7f85609e07a3673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Boundary layer models</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Census</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Centroids</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Flood insurance</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Hurricane tracking</topic><topic>Hurricane winds</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>Surface wind</topic><topic>Surges</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pei, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Weichiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testik, Firat Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravichandran, Nadarajah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fangqian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pei, Bin</au><au>Pang, Weichiang</au><au>Testik, Firat Y.</au><au>Ravichandran, Nadarajah</au><au>Liu, Fangqian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selection of hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios for regional combined hurricane wind and flood loss estimation</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>671</spage><epage>696</epage><pages>671-696</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>This paper presents a new methodology for selecting hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios (with similar return periods) for estimating the regional losses due to combined hurricane wind and flood. An in-house stochastic hurricane simulation program was used to simulate 50,000 years of full-track synthetic hurricanes. A wind field model along with a boundary layer model was utilized to compute the surface wind speeds. As illustrative examples, the SLOSH (Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes) model was employed to calculate the corresponding flood elevations for two loss estimation domains (Charleston Peninsula, South Carolina and Miami Beach, Florida) with each of them divided into census blocks. The peak wind speeds and maximum flood elevations at the centroids of respective census blocks were utilized to determine the joint mean recurrence intervals (MRIs) of individual hurricane events. For regional loss estimation purpose, the joint MRIs of hurricanes were weighted by the population of every census block. A hurricane selection procedure was developed to select hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios with a joint MRI of 100 years. Three hurricane ensembles, selected based on only wind speeds, only flood elevations, and joint wind speeds and flood elevations, were imported into the HAZUS-MH (Hazards US Multi-Hazards) program to perform combined wind and flood loss estimations. The results indicate that hurricane selection using either only wind speeds or only flood elevations can overestimate the combined losses. The different characteristics of the selected hurricane scenarios for the two loss estimation domains are also discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-017-3149-z</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4237-3599</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-030X |
ispartof | Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2018-03, Vol.91 (2), p.671-696 |
issn | 0921-030X 1573-0840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1980687141 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Boundary layer models Boundary layers Census Censuses Centroids Civil Engineering Computer simulation Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Environmental Management Flood insurance Floods Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hazards Hurricane tracking Hurricane winds Hurricanes Hydrogeology Lakes Natural Hazards Original Paper Stochasticity Surface wind Surges Wind speed |
title | Selection of hazard-consistent hurricane scenarios for regional combined hurricane wind and flood loss estimation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A22%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selection%20of%20hazard-consistent%20hurricane%20scenarios%20for%20regional%20combined%20hurricane%20wind%20and%20flood%20loss%20estimation&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Pei,%20Bin&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=696&rft.pages=671-696&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-017-3149-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1980687141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-cd7cd4c25e28aa004d67bf0b98761714db627d7ae3fe5ede6d7f85609e07a3673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1980687141&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |