States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non‐adoption of a Refugee Quota System

Building on Moravcsik's Liberal Intergovernmentalism, I offer an explanation of the non‐decision on permanent EU refugee quotas. Some traditionally influential Member States in EU asylum politics, such as Germany, Austria and Sweden, received large numbers of refugees and faced strong domestic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of common market studies 2018-01, Vol.56 (1), p.44-62
Main Author: Zaun, Natascha
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Incentives
Interdependence
Intergovernmentalism
liberal Intergovernmentalism
Political asylum
Political parties
Populism
Quotas
refugee crisis
Refugees
responsibility‐sharing
Right wing politics
Voters
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Building on Moravcsik's Liberal Intergovernmentalism, I offer an explanation of the non‐decision on permanent EU refugee quotas. Some traditionally influential Member States in EU asylum politics, such as Germany, Austria and Sweden, received large numbers of refugees and faced strong domestic pressures to engage other Member States in responsibility‐sharing. Yet, governments of Member States with small application numbers (among whom several Eastern European governments were particularly vocal) had incentives to undercut responsibility‐sharing to avoid similar pressures. Having a better alternative to the potentially negotiated agreement, these governments successfully blocked the introduction of permanent refugee quotas. Besides explaining the absence of an effective response to one of the root causes of the asylum crisis (unequal strains) through asymmetrical interdependence, the article further develops Liberal Intergovernmentalist arguments and shows how national electorates influence positions taken by governments at the EU level when they are mobilized by right‐wing populist parties.
ISSN:0021-9886
1468-5965
DOI:10.1111/jcms.12663