Loading…

States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non‐adoption of a Refugee Quota System

Building on Moravcsik's Liberal Intergovernmentalism, I offer an explanation of the non‐decision on permanent EU refugee quotas. Some traditionally influential Member States in EU asylum politics, such as Germany, Austria and Sweden, received large numbers of refugees and faced strong domestic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of common market studies 2018-01, Vol.56 (1), p.44-62
Main Author: Zaun, Natascha
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4943-fa297dc62bb7725b1399b2b3973b0bcad7d7b77815a0a37370cf8b61c84300943
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4943-fa297dc62bb7725b1399b2b3973b0bcad7d7b77815a0a37370cf8b61c84300943
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 44
container_title Journal of common market studies
container_volume 56
creator Zaun, Natascha
description Building on Moravcsik's Liberal Intergovernmentalism, I offer an explanation of the non‐decision on permanent EU refugee quotas. Some traditionally influential Member States in EU asylum politics, such as Germany, Austria and Sweden, received large numbers of refugees and faced strong domestic pressures to engage other Member States in responsibility‐sharing. Yet, governments of Member States with small application numbers (among whom several Eastern European governments were particularly vocal) had incentives to undercut responsibility‐sharing to avoid similar pressures. Having a better alternative to the potentially negotiated agreement, these governments successfully blocked the introduction of permanent refugee quotas. Besides explaining the absence of an effective response to one of the root causes of the asylum crisis (unequal strains) through asymmetrical interdependence, the article further develops Liberal Intergovernmentalist arguments and shows how national electorates influence positions taken by governments at the EU level when they are mobilized by right‐wing populist parties.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jcms.12663
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1980909337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1980909337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4943-fa297dc62bb7725b1399b2b3973b0bcad7d7b77815a0a37370cf8b61c84300943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4QSW2CGl2HESx-xQVQqo_JauLdtxiksSh9gRZMcROCMnISWsmc2MNN97T3oAHGM0wf2cbVTpJjhMErIDRjhK0iBmSbwLRgiFOGBpmuyDA-c2CCEco3gEsqUXXjsoHJz3x6vWtW4cNBWcreCF64q2hA-2MN4odw5nH3UhTGWqNfQvGt7Z6vvzS2S29sZW0OZQwCedt2ut4WNrvYDLznldHoK9XBROH_3tMVhdzp6nV8Hifn49vVgEKmIRCXIRMpqpJJSS0jCWmDAmQ0kYJRJJJTKa0f6T4lggQSihSOWpTLBKI4JQ7zAGJ4Nv3di3VjvPN7Ztqj6SY5YihhjpZWNwOlCqsc41Oud1Y0rRdBwjvm2Rb1vkvy32MB7gd1Po7h-S30xvl4PmB1dodOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1980909337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non‐adoption of a Refugee Quota System</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Zaun, Natascha</creator><creatorcontrib>Zaun, Natascha</creatorcontrib><description>Building on Moravcsik's Liberal Intergovernmentalism, I offer an explanation of the non‐decision on permanent EU refugee quotas. Some traditionally influential Member States in EU asylum politics, such as Germany, Austria and Sweden, received large numbers of refugees and faced strong domestic pressures to engage other Member States in responsibility‐sharing. Yet, governments of Member States with small application numbers (among whom several Eastern European governments were particularly vocal) had incentives to undercut responsibility‐sharing to avoid similar pressures. Having a better alternative to the potentially negotiated agreement, these governments successfully blocked the introduction of permanent refugee quotas. Besides explaining the absence of an effective response to one of the root causes of the asylum crisis (unequal strains) through asymmetrical interdependence, the article further develops Liberal Intergovernmentalist arguments and shows how national electorates influence positions taken by governments at the EU level when they are mobilized by right‐wing populist parties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Incentives ; Interdependence ; Intergovernmentalism ; liberal Intergovernmentalism ; Political asylum ; Political parties ; Populism ; Quotas ; refugee crisis ; Refugees ; responsibility‐sharing ; Right wing politics ; Voters</subject><ispartof>Journal of common market studies, 2018-01, Vol.56 (1), p.44-62</ispartof><rights>2017 University Association for Contemporary European Studies and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 University Association for Contemporary European Studies and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4943-fa297dc62bb7725b1399b2b3973b0bcad7d7b77815a0a37370cf8b61c84300943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4943-fa297dc62bb7725b1399b2b3973b0bcad7d7b77815a0a37370cf8b61c84300943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zaun, Natascha</creatorcontrib><title>States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non‐adoption of a Refugee Quota System</title><title>Journal of common market studies</title><description>Building on Moravcsik's Liberal Intergovernmentalism, I offer an explanation of the non‐decision on permanent EU refugee quotas. Some traditionally influential Member States in EU asylum politics, such as Germany, Austria and Sweden, received large numbers of refugees and faced strong domestic pressures to engage other Member States in responsibility‐sharing. Yet, governments of Member States with small application numbers (among whom several Eastern European governments were particularly vocal) had incentives to undercut responsibility‐sharing to avoid similar pressures. Having a better alternative to the potentially negotiated agreement, these governments successfully blocked the introduction of permanent refugee quotas. Besides explaining the absence of an effective response to one of the root causes of the asylum crisis (unequal strains) through asymmetrical interdependence, the article further develops Liberal Intergovernmentalist arguments and shows how national electorates influence positions taken by governments at the EU level when they are mobilized by right‐wing populist parties.</description><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Interdependence</subject><subject>Intergovernmentalism</subject><subject>liberal Intergovernmentalism</subject><subject>Political asylum</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Quotas</subject><subject>refugee crisis</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>responsibility‐sharing</subject><subject>Right wing politics</subject><subject>Voters</subject><issn>0021-9886</issn><issn>1468-5965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4QSW2CGl2HESx-xQVQqo_JauLdtxiksSh9gRZMcROCMnISWsmc2MNN97T3oAHGM0wf2cbVTpJjhMErIDRjhK0iBmSbwLRgiFOGBpmuyDA-c2CCEco3gEsqUXXjsoHJz3x6vWtW4cNBWcreCF64q2hA-2MN4odw5nH3UhTGWqNfQvGt7Z6vvzS2S29sZW0OZQwCedt2ut4WNrvYDLznldHoK9XBROH_3tMVhdzp6nV8Hifn49vVgEKmIRCXIRMpqpJJSS0jCWmDAmQ0kYJRJJJTKa0f6T4lggQSihSOWpTLBKI4JQ7zAGJ4Nv3di3VjvPN7Ztqj6SY5YihhjpZWNwOlCqsc41Oud1Y0rRdBwjvm2Rb1vkvy32MB7gd1Po7h-S30xvl4PmB1dodOU</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Zaun, Natascha</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non‐adoption of a Refugee Quota System</title><author>Zaun, Natascha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4943-fa297dc62bb7725b1399b2b3973b0bcad7d7b77815a0a37370cf8b61c84300943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Interdependence</topic><topic>Intergovernmentalism</topic><topic>liberal Intergovernmentalism</topic><topic>Political asylum</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Quotas</topic><topic>refugee crisis</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>responsibility‐sharing</topic><topic>Right wing politics</topic><topic>Voters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zaun, Natascha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zaun, Natascha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non‐adoption of a Refugee Quota System</atitle><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>44-62</pages><issn>0021-9886</issn><eissn>1468-5965</eissn><abstract>Building on Moravcsik's Liberal Intergovernmentalism, I offer an explanation of the non‐decision on permanent EU refugee quotas. Some traditionally influential Member States in EU asylum politics, such as Germany, Austria and Sweden, received large numbers of refugees and faced strong domestic pressures to engage other Member States in responsibility‐sharing. Yet, governments of Member States with small application numbers (among whom several Eastern European governments were particularly vocal) had incentives to undercut responsibility‐sharing to avoid similar pressures. Having a better alternative to the potentially negotiated agreement, these governments successfully blocked the introduction of permanent refugee quotas. Besides explaining the absence of an effective response to one of the root causes of the asylum crisis (unequal strains) through asymmetrical interdependence, the article further develops Liberal Intergovernmentalist arguments and shows how national electorates influence positions taken by governments at the EU level when they are mobilized by right‐wing populist parties.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jcms.12663</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9886
ispartof Journal of common market studies, 2018-01, Vol.56 (1), p.44-62
issn 0021-9886
1468-5965
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1980909337
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Incentives
Interdependence
Intergovernmentalism
liberal Intergovernmentalism
Political asylum
Political parties
Populism
Quotas
refugee crisis
Refugees
responsibility‐sharing
Right wing politics
Voters
title States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non‐adoption of a Refugee Quota System
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A01%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=States%20as%20Gatekeepers%20in%20EU%20Asylum%20Politics:%20Explaining%20the%20Non%E2%80%90adoption%20of%20a%20Refugee%20Quota%20System&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20common%20market%20studies&rft.au=Zaun,%20Natascha&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=44-62&rft.issn=0021-9886&rft.eissn=1468-5965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jcms.12663&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1980909337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4943-fa297dc62bb7725b1399b2b3973b0bcad7d7b77815a0a37370cf8b61c84300943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1980909337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true