Post-Award Experience in International Commercial Arbitration

Those involved in international arbitration often wonder what happens after the case is completed. Is there voluntary compliance with the award? Or is there a court battle over enforcement of the award? And if so, how often do the parties end up in court post-award? Since there is no unified system...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dispute resolution journal 2005-02, Vol.60 (1), p.94
Main Authors: Naimark, Richard W, Keer, Stephanie E
Format: Magazinearticle
Language:English
Subjects:
Arbitration
Bankruptcy
Compliance
Enforcement
International
Polls & surveys
Questionnaires
Settlements & damages
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 94
container_title Dispute resolution journal
container_volume 60
creator Naimark, Richard W
Keer, Stephanie E
description Those involved in international arbitration often wonder what happens after the case is completed. Is there voluntary compliance with the award? Or is there a court battle over enforcement of the award? And if so, how often do the parties end up in court post-award? Since there is no unified system of tracking what happens after an arbitration award is issued, no one can be sure what the post-award landscape looks like. This article is the first attempt to gather data about this subject. It reports on the experience of a number of actual participants in international arbitration who responded to a survey designed from a flow chart which mapped out a variety of post-award "tracks" the case might take. The tracks were based on a number of discussions with attorneys specializing in international commercial arbitration and represented an attempt to look at the "real world" post-award experience of parties to arbitration.
format magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198098144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>830102771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_1980981443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjU31jUzMItgYeA0NDA30bUwNDDlYOAqLs4yMDA0MjA04GSwDcgvLtF1LE8sSlFwrShILcpMzUtOVcjMU_DMK0ktykssyczPS8xRcM7PzU0tSs4EMh2LkjJLisASPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQcnNNcTZQ7egKL-wNLW4JD4rvxRoSE5xvKGlhYGlhaGJiTFRigAY8Tkf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>198098144</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Post-Award Experience in International Commercial Arbitration</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Naimark, Richard W ; Keer, Stephanie E</creator><creatorcontrib>Naimark, Richard W ; Keer, Stephanie E</creatorcontrib><description>Those involved in international arbitration often wonder what happens after the case is completed. Is there voluntary compliance with the award? Or is there a court battle over enforcement of the award? And if so, how often do the parties end up in court post-award? Since there is no unified system of tracking what happens after an arbitration award is issued, no one can be sure what the post-award landscape looks like. This article is the first attempt to gather data about this subject. It reports on the experience of a number of actual participants in international arbitration who responded to a survey designed from a flow chart which mapped out a variety of post-award "tracks" the case might take. The tracks were based on a number of discussions with attorneys specializing in international commercial arbitration and represented an attempt to look at the "real world" post-award experience of parties to arbitration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-8105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2573-606X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Arbitration Association</publisher><subject>Arbitration ; Bankruptcy ; Compliance ; Enforcement ; International ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Questionnaires ; Settlements &amp; damages</subject><ispartof>Dispute resolution journal, 2005-02, Vol.60 (1), p.94</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Arbitration Association Feb-Apr 2005</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/198098144/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/198098144?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,11688,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naimark, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keer, Stephanie E</creatorcontrib><title>Post-Award Experience in International Commercial Arbitration</title><title>Dispute resolution journal</title><description>Those involved in international arbitration often wonder what happens after the case is completed. Is there voluntary compliance with the award? Or is there a court battle over enforcement of the award? And if so, how often do the parties end up in court post-award? Since there is no unified system of tracking what happens after an arbitration award is issued, no one can be sure what the post-award landscape looks like. This article is the first attempt to gather data about this subject. It reports on the experience of a number of actual participants in international arbitration who responded to a survey designed from a flow chart which mapped out a variety of post-award "tracks" the case might take. The tracks were based on a number of discussions with attorneys specializing in international commercial arbitration and represented an attempt to look at the "real world" post-award experience of parties to arbitration.</description><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Settlements &amp; damages</subject><issn>1074-8105</issn><issn>2573-606X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjU31jUzMItgYeA0NDA30bUwNDDlYOAqLs4yMDA0MjA04GSwDcgvLtF1LE8sSlFwrShILcpMzUtOVcjMU_DMK0ktykssyczPS8xRcM7PzU0tSs4EMh2LkjJLisASPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQcnNNcTZQ7egKL-wNLW4JD4rvxRoSE5xvKGlhYGlhaGJiTFRigAY8Tkf</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>Naimark, Richard W</creator><creator>Keer, Stephanie E</creator><general>American Arbitration Association</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>Post-Award Experience in International Commercial Arbitration</title><author>Naimark, Richard W ; Keer, Stephanie E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_1980981443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Settlements &amp; damages</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naimark, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keer, Stephanie E</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health Management Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Dispute resolution journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naimark, Richard W</au><au>Keer, Stephanie E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Post-Award Experience in International Commercial Arbitration</atitle><jtitle>Dispute resolution journal</jtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>94</spage><pages>94-</pages><issn>1074-8105</issn><eissn>2573-606X</eissn><abstract>Those involved in international arbitration often wonder what happens after the case is completed. Is there voluntary compliance with the award? Or is there a court battle over enforcement of the award? And if so, how often do the parties end up in court post-award? Since there is no unified system of tracking what happens after an arbitration award is issued, no one can be sure what the post-award landscape looks like. This article is the first attempt to gather data about this subject. It reports on the experience of a number of actual participants in international arbitration who responded to a survey designed from a flow chart which mapped out a variety of post-award "tracks" the case might take. The tracks were based on a number of discussions with attorneys specializing in international commercial arbitration and represented an attempt to look at the "real world" post-award experience of parties to arbitration.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Arbitration Association</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1074-8105
ispartof Dispute resolution journal, 2005-02, Vol.60 (1), p.94
issn 1074-8105
2573-606X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_198098144
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM global; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arbitration
Bankruptcy
Compliance
Enforcement
International
Polls & surveys
Questionnaires
Settlements & damages
title Post-Award Experience in International Commercial Arbitration
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T01%3A52%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Post-Award%20Experience%20in%20International%20Commercial%20Arbitration&rft.jtitle=Dispute%20resolution%20journal&rft.au=Naimark,%20Richard%20W&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=94&rft.pages=94-&rft.issn=1074-8105&rft.eissn=2573-606X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E830102771%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_1980981443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198098144&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true