Loading…
Test-retest reliability and validity of a motion capture (MOCAP) system for measuring thoracic and lumbar spinal curvatures and sacral inclination in the sagittal plane
To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of the MOCAP system for measuring spinal sagittal thoracic and lumbar curvatures and sacral inclination in a standing posture. Twenty-five male adults were evaluated on lateral standing radiographs. The thoracic and lumbar curvatures were calculat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation 2017, Vol.30 (6), p.1319-1325 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-834e8d9f31462093b499f4d1ba8efd0250a9b221242cd926cbad5fa3a9be7a9d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-834e8d9f31462093b499f4d1ba8efd0250a9b221242cd926cbad5fa3a9be7a9d3 |
container_end_page | 1325 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1319 |
container_title | Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Muyor, José M Arrabal-Campos, Francisco M Martínez-Aparicio, Carmen Sánchez-Crespo, Antonia Villa-Pérez, Manuel |
description | To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of the MOCAP system for measuring spinal sagittal thoracic and lumbar curvatures and sacral inclination in a standing posture.
Twenty-five male adults were evaluated on lateral standing radiographs. The thoracic and lumbar curvatures were calculated by Harrison's posterior tangent method. The sacral inclination was defined as the angle between the tangent line of the sacral and vertical plane. In addition, MOCAP was used to calculate the spinal curvatures and sacral inclination.
The thoracic and lumbar spine and sacral inclination demonstrated excellent reliability, with mean ICCs levels greater than 0.980 and low CVs (mean: 2.15%). Systematic biases were not significant and were very near 0, and the mean standard errors were 0.257∘. ANOVA of the radiographic and MOCAP measures did not report any statistically significant differences in the comparisons. The systematic biases and mean random errors were lower than 1∘, with CVs lower than 5% and mean ICCs higher than 0.90 between sessions.
The MOCAP system delivered consistently reliable and valid results for standing curvatures compared with a radiographic technique. This system could be used with confidence in research and clinical environments for sagittal spinal curvature measurements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3233/BMR-169750 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1981118023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1981118023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-834e8d9f31462093b499f4d1ba8efd0250a9b221242cd926cbad5fa3a9be7a9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kclKBDEQhoMo7hcfQAJeVGjN0ktyHAc3cBgRPTfVSVojvZmkhXkjH9PMjHr0VEn9X_4K9SN0RMkFZ5xfXs2eEprLIiMbaJeKQiQ5Z-lmPJOMJ4KyYgftef9OCMmJyLbRDpM0S1le7KKvZ-ND4kyIBTvTWKhsY8MCQ6fxJzRWLy99jQG3fbB9hxUMYXQGn87m08njGfYLH0yL697h1oAfne1ecXjrHSirVjbN2FbgsB9sBw1Wo_uEpYNfiR6Ui13bqSbKqwm2i-9NVF5tCFEbGujMAdqqofHm8Kfuo5eb6-fpXfIwv72fTh4SxVgWEsFTI7SsOU1zRiSvUinrVNMKhKk1YRkBWTFGWcqUlixXFeisBh67pgCp-T46WfsOrv8Y41bK93508eO-pFJQSgWJO_-fIjnPKV9S52tKud57Z-pycLYFtygpKZfRlTG6ch1dhI9_LMeqNfoP_c2KfwP3IpXZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1980636133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Test-retest reliability and validity of a motion capture (MOCAP) system for measuring thoracic and lumbar spinal curvatures and sacral inclination in the sagittal plane</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>Muyor, José M ; Arrabal-Campos, Francisco M ; Martínez-Aparicio, Carmen ; Sánchez-Crespo, Antonia ; Villa-Pérez, Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Muyor, José M ; Arrabal-Campos, Francisco M ; Martínez-Aparicio, Carmen ; Sánchez-Crespo, Antonia ; Villa-Pérez, Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of the MOCAP system for measuring spinal sagittal thoracic and lumbar curvatures and sacral inclination in a standing posture.
Twenty-five male adults were evaluated on lateral standing radiographs. The thoracic and lumbar curvatures were calculated by Harrison's posterior tangent method. The sacral inclination was defined as the angle between the tangent line of the sacral and vertical plane. In addition, MOCAP was used to calculate the spinal curvatures and sacral inclination.
The thoracic and lumbar spine and sacral inclination demonstrated excellent reliability, with mean ICCs levels greater than 0.980 and low CVs (mean: 2.15%). Systematic biases were not significant and were very near 0, and the mean standard errors were 0.257∘. ANOVA of the radiographic and MOCAP measures did not report any statistically significant differences in the comparisons. The systematic biases and mean random errors were lower than 1∘, with CVs lower than 5% and mean ICCs higher than 0.90 between sessions.
The MOCAP system delivered consistently reliable and valid results for standing curvatures compared with a radiographic technique. This system could be used with confidence in research and clinical environments for sagittal spinal curvature measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-6324</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3233/BMR-169750</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29154267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: IOS Press BV</publisher><subject>Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology ; Male ; Posture ; Posture - physiology ; Radiography ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sacrum ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Spinal Curvatures - diagnosis ; Spinal Curvatures - physiopathology ; Spine (lumbar) ; Statistical analysis ; Thoracic Vertebrae - physiopathology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation, 2017, Vol.30 (6), p.1319-1325</ispartof><rights>Copyright IOS Press BV 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-834e8d9f31462093b499f4d1ba8efd0250a9b221242cd926cbad5fa3a9be7a9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-834e8d9f31462093b499f4d1ba8efd0250a9b221242cd926cbad5fa3a9be7a9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4021,27921,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29154267$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muyor, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrabal-Campos, Francisco M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Aparicio, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Crespo, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villa-Pérez, Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Test-retest reliability and validity of a motion capture (MOCAP) system for measuring thoracic and lumbar spinal curvatures and sacral inclination in the sagittal plane</title><title>Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil</addtitle><description>To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of the MOCAP system for measuring spinal sagittal thoracic and lumbar curvatures and sacral inclination in a standing posture.
Twenty-five male adults were evaluated on lateral standing radiographs. The thoracic and lumbar curvatures were calculated by Harrison's posterior tangent method. The sacral inclination was defined as the angle between the tangent line of the sacral and vertical plane. In addition, MOCAP was used to calculate the spinal curvatures and sacral inclination.
The thoracic and lumbar spine and sacral inclination demonstrated excellent reliability, with mean ICCs levels greater than 0.980 and low CVs (mean: 2.15%). Systematic biases were not significant and were very near 0, and the mean standard errors were 0.257∘. ANOVA of the radiographic and MOCAP measures did not report any statistically significant differences in the comparisons. The systematic biases and mean random errors were lower than 1∘, with CVs lower than 5% and mean ICCs higher than 0.90 between sessions.
The MOCAP system delivered consistently reliable and valid results for standing curvatures compared with a radiographic technique. This system could be used with confidence in research and clinical environments for sagittal spinal curvature measurements.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sacrum</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Spinal Curvatures - diagnosis</subject><subject>Spinal Curvatures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spine (lumbar)</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - physiopathology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-8127</issn><issn>1878-6324</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kclKBDEQhoMo7hcfQAJeVGjN0ktyHAc3cBgRPTfVSVojvZmkhXkjH9PMjHr0VEn9X_4K9SN0RMkFZ5xfXs2eEprLIiMbaJeKQiQ5Z-lmPJOMJ4KyYgftef9OCMmJyLbRDpM0S1le7KKvZ-ND4kyIBTvTWKhsY8MCQ6fxJzRWLy99jQG3fbB9hxUMYXQGn87m08njGfYLH0yL697h1oAfne1ecXjrHSirVjbN2FbgsB9sBw1Wo_uEpYNfiR6Ui13bqSbKqwm2i-9NVF5tCFEbGujMAdqqofHm8Kfuo5eb6-fpXfIwv72fTh4SxVgWEsFTI7SsOU1zRiSvUinrVNMKhKk1YRkBWTFGWcqUlixXFeisBh67pgCp-T46WfsOrv8Y41bK93508eO-pFJQSgWJO_-fIjnPKV9S52tKud57Z-pycLYFtygpKZfRlTG6ch1dhI9_LMeqNfoP_c2KfwP3IpXZ</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Muyor, José M</creator><creator>Arrabal-Campos, Francisco M</creator><creator>Martínez-Aparicio, Carmen</creator><creator>Sánchez-Crespo, Antonia</creator><creator>Villa-Pérez, Manuel</creator><general>IOS Press BV</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Test-retest reliability and validity of a motion capture (MOCAP) system for measuring thoracic and lumbar spinal curvatures and sacral inclination in the sagittal plane</title><author>Muyor, José M ; Arrabal-Campos, Francisco M ; Martínez-Aparicio, Carmen ; Sánchez-Crespo, Antonia ; Villa-Pérez, Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-834e8d9f31462093b499f4d1ba8efd0250a9b221242cd926cbad5fa3a9be7a9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sacrum</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Spinal Curvatures - diagnosis</topic><topic>Spinal Curvatures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spine (lumbar)</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - physiopathology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muyor, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrabal-Campos, Francisco M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Aparicio, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Crespo, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villa-Pérez, Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muyor, José M</au><au>Arrabal-Campos, Francisco M</au><au>Martínez-Aparicio, Carmen</au><au>Sánchez-Crespo, Antonia</au><au>Villa-Pérez, Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Test-retest reliability and validity of a motion capture (MOCAP) system for measuring thoracic and lumbar spinal curvatures and sacral inclination in the sagittal plane</atitle><jtitle>Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1319</spage><epage>1325</epage><pages>1319-1325</pages><issn>1053-8127</issn><eissn>1878-6324</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of the MOCAP system for measuring spinal sagittal thoracic and lumbar curvatures and sacral inclination in a standing posture.
Twenty-five male adults were evaluated on lateral standing radiographs. The thoracic and lumbar curvatures were calculated by Harrison's posterior tangent method. The sacral inclination was defined as the angle between the tangent line of the sacral and vertical plane. In addition, MOCAP was used to calculate the spinal curvatures and sacral inclination.
The thoracic and lumbar spine and sacral inclination demonstrated excellent reliability, with mean ICCs levels greater than 0.980 and low CVs (mean: 2.15%). Systematic biases were not significant and were very near 0, and the mean standard errors were 0.257∘. ANOVA of the radiographic and MOCAP measures did not report any statistically significant differences in the comparisons. The systematic biases and mean random errors were lower than 1∘, with CVs lower than 5% and mean ICCs higher than 0.90 between sessions.
The MOCAP system delivered consistently reliable and valid results for standing curvatures compared with a radiographic technique. This system could be used with confidence in research and clinical environments for sagittal spinal curvature measurements.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>IOS Press BV</pub><pmid>29154267</pmid><doi>10.3233/BMR-169750</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-8127 |
ispartof | Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation, 2017, Vol.30 (6), p.1319-1325 |
issn | 1053-8127 1878-6324 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1981118023 |
source | EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text |
subjects | Humans Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology Male Posture Posture - physiology Radiography Reproducibility of Results Sacrum Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Spinal Curvatures - diagnosis Spinal Curvatures - physiopathology Spine (lumbar) Statistical analysis Thoracic Vertebrae - physiopathology Young Adult |
title | Test-retest reliability and validity of a motion capture (MOCAP) system for measuring thoracic and lumbar spinal curvatures and sacral inclination in the sagittal plane |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A03%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Test-retest%20reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20a%20motion%20capture%20(MOCAP)%20system%20for%20measuring%20thoracic%20and%20lumbar%20spinal%20curvatures%20and%20sacral%20inclination%20in%20the%20sagittal%20plane&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20back%20and%20musculoskeletal%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Muyor,%20Jos%C3%A9%20M&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1319&rft.epage=1325&rft.pages=1319-1325&rft.issn=1053-8127&rft.eissn=1878-6324&rft_id=info:doi/10.3233/BMR-169750&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1981118023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-834e8d9f31462093b499f4d1ba8efd0250a9b221242cd926cbad5fa3a9be7a9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1980636133&rft_id=info:pmid/29154267&rfr_iscdi=true |