The "Bannatyne" Recategorization Assessment Procedure: Is It Valid for Individual Diagnosis of LD Children?

The WISC-R subtest scores of 159 black LD children of low socioeconomic status were recategorized into Spatial (Sp), Conceptual (C), and Sequential (Sq) scales as recommended by Bannatyne (1974). As a group, the sample displayed the classic Sp > C > Sq pattern. However, only 18 of the subjects...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Learning disability quarterly 1986-08, Vol.9 (3), p.208-213
Main Authors: Dundon, William D., Sewell, Trevor E., Manni, John L., Goldstein, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Black people
Child psychology
Children
Children with disabilities
Educational evaluation
Educational programs
Intelligence quotient
Learning disabilities
Low income groups
Mathematics
Mathematics tests
Medical diagnosis
Public schools
Socioeconomic status
Wechsler scales
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e6f6963d9f3810e16c26c488ed61f9b8547be3a1471ad76c953b1deaac4c67f63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e6f6963d9f3810e16c26c488ed61f9b8547be3a1471ad76c953b1deaac4c67f63
container_end_page 213
container_issue 3
container_start_page 208
container_title Learning disability quarterly
container_volume 9
creator Dundon, William D.
Sewell, Trevor E.
Manni, John L.
Goldstein, David
description The WISC-R subtest scores of 159 black LD children of low socioeconomic status were recategorized into Spatial (Sp), Conceptual (C), and Sequential (Sq) scales as recommended by Bannatyne (1974). As a group, the sample displayed the classic Sp > C > Sq pattern. However, only 18 of the subjects (11.3%) were identified in accordance with the requirement that the differences between categories be statistically reliable for each individual. This subgroup was matched with LD controls not demonstrating the "Bannatyne" pattern. Analyses of longitudinal reading and math scores revealed no differences between groups. It was concluded that the diagnostic utility of the "Bannatyne" pattern is questionable.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1510466
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1981297784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1510466</jstor_id><sage_id>10.2307_1510466</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1510466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e6f6963d9f3810e16c26c488ed61f9b8547be3a1471ad76c953b1deaac4c67f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LwzAYh4MoOKf4FcIUPFWbpktaLzI3_xQGikzxVrLk7ZZZk5mkwvz0dmwHL_O9vJeH5wcPQqckvkxozK9In8QpY3uokxCWRZSz933UiTklUZ5m_BAdeb-I26N50kEfkzng3q0wRoSVgR5-ASkCzKzTPyJoa_DAe_D-E0zAz85KUI2Da1x4XAT8JmqtcGUdLozS31o1osYjLWbGeu2xrfB4hIdzXSsH5uYYHVSi9nCy_V30en83GT5G46eHYjgYR5JSHiJgFcsZVXlFMxIDYTJhMs0yUIxU-TTrp3wKVJCUE6E4k3mfTokCIWQqGa8Y7aKzjXfp7FcDPpQL2zjTTpYkz0iSc56l_1JJW4owztauiw0lnfXeQVUunf4UblWSuFz3Lre9W_J8Q3oxgz-uXdjCB-t22n4BPFCGxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1294816766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The "Bannatyne" Recategorization Assessment Procedure: Is It Valid for Individual Diagnosis of LD Children?</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><creator>Dundon, William D. ; Sewell, Trevor E. ; Manni, John L. ; Goldstein, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Dundon, William D. ; Sewell, Trevor E. ; Manni, John L. ; Goldstein, David</creatorcontrib><description>The WISC-R subtest scores of 159 black LD children of low socioeconomic status were recategorized into Spatial (Sp), Conceptual (C), and Sequential (Sq) scales as recommended by Bannatyne (1974). As a group, the sample displayed the classic Sp &gt; C &gt; Sq pattern. However, only 18 of the subjects (11.3%) were identified in accordance with the requirement that the differences between categories be statistically reliable for each individual. This subgroup was matched with LD controls not demonstrating the "Bannatyne" pattern. Analyses of longitudinal reading and math scores revealed no differences between groups. It was concluded that the diagnostic utility of the "Bannatyne" pattern is questionable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-9487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-376X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1510466</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Council for Learning Disabilities</publisher><subject>Black people ; Child psychology ; Children ; Children with disabilities ; Educational evaluation ; Educational programs ; Intelligence quotient ; Learning disabilities ; Low income groups ; Mathematics ; Mathematics tests ; Medical diagnosis ; Public schools ; Socioeconomic status ; Wechsler scales</subject><ispartof>Learning disability quarterly, 1986-08, Vol.9 (3), p.208-213</ispartof><rights>1986 Council for Learning Disabilities</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e6f6963d9f3810e16c26c488ed61f9b8547be3a1471ad76c953b1deaac4c67f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e6f6963d9f3810e16c26c488ed61f9b8547be3a1471ad76c953b1deaac4c67f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1510466$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1510466$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dundon, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sewell, Trevor E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manni, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, David</creatorcontrib><title>The "Bannatyne" Recategorization Assessment Procedure: Is It Valid for Individual Diagnosis of LD Children?</title><title>Learning disability quarterly</title><description>The WISC-R subtest scores of 159 black LD children of low socioeconomic status were recategorized into Spatial (Sp), Conceptual (C), and Sequential (Sq) scales as recommended by Bannatyne (1974). As a group, the sample displayed the classic Sp &gt; C &gt; Sq pattern. However, only 18 of the subjects (11.3%) were identified in accordance with the requirement that the differences between categories be statistically reliable for each individual. This subgroup was matched with LD controls not demonstrating the "Bannatyne" pattern. Analyses of longitudinal reading and math scores revealed no differences between groups. It was concluded that the diagnostic utility of the "Bannatyne" pattern is questionable.</description><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Child psychology</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children with disabilities</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Educational programs</subject><subject>Intelligence quotient</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics tests</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Public schools</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Wechsler scales</subject><issn>0731-9487</issn><issn>2168-376X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LwzAYh4MoOKf4FcIUPFWbpktaLzI3_xQGikzxVrLk7ZZZk5mkwvz0dmwHL_O9vJeH5wcPQqckvkxozK9In8QpY3uokxCWRZSz933UiTklUZ5m_BAdeb-I26N50kEfkzng3q0wRoSVgR5-ASkCzKzTPyJoa_DAe_D-E0zAz85KUI2Da1x4XAT8JmqtcGUdLozS31o1osYjLWbGeu2xrfB4hIdzXSsH5uYYHVSi9nCy_V30en83GT5G46eHYjgYR5JSHiJgFcsZVXlFMxIDYTJhMs0yUIxU-TTrp3wKVJCUE6E4k3mfTokCIWQqGa8Y7aKzjXfp7FcDPpQL2zjTTpYkz0iSc56l_1JJW4owztauiw0lnfXeQVUunf4UblWSuFz3Lre9W_J8Q3oxgz-uXdjCB-t22n4BPFCGxQ</recordid><startdate>198608</startdate><enddate>198608</enddate><creator>Dundon, William D.</creator><creator>Sewell, Trevor E.</creator><creator>Manni, John L.</creator><creator>Goldstein, David</creator><general>Council for Learning Disabilities</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>The Division</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JHMDA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198608</creationdate><title>The "Bannatyne" Recategorization Assessment Procedure: Is It Valid for Individual Diagnosis of LD Children?</title><author>Dundon, William D. ; Sewell, Trevor E. ; Manni, John L. ; Goldstein, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e6f6963d9f3810e16c26c488ed61f9b8547be3a1471ad76c953b1deaac4c67f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Child psychology</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children with disabilities</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Educational programs</topic><topic>Intelligence quotient</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics tests</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Public schools</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Wechsler scales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dundon, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sewell, Trevor E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manni, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 31</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Learning disability quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dundon, William D.</au><au>Sewell, Trevor E.</au><au>Manni, John L.</au><au>Goldstein, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The "Bannatyne" Recategorization Assessment Procedure: Is It Valid for Individual Diagnosis of LD Children?</atitle><jtitle>Learning disability quarterly</jtitle><date>1986-08</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>208</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>208-213</pages><issn>0731-9487</issn><eissn>2168-376X</eissn><abstract>The WISC-R subtest scores of 159 black LD children of low socioeconomic status were recategorized into Spatial (Sp), Conceptual (C), and Sequential (Sq) scales as recommended by Bannatyne (1974). As a group, the sample displayed the classic Sp &gt; C &gt; Sq pattern. However, only 18 of the subjects (11.3%) were identified in accordance with the requirement that the differences between categories be statistically reliable for each individual. This subgroup was matched with LD controls not demonstrating the "Bannatyne" pattern. Analyses of longitudinal reading and math scores revealed no differences between groups. It was concluded that the diagnostic utility of the "Bannatyne" pattern is questionable.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Council for Learning Disabilities</pub><doi>10.2307/1510466</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0731-9487
ispartof Learning disability quarterly, 1986-08, Vol.9 (3), p.208-213
issn 0731-9487
2168-376X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1981297784
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】
subjects Black people
Child psychology
Children
Children with disabilities
Educational evaluation
Educational programs
Intelligence quotient
Learning disabilities
Low income groups
Mathematics
Mathematics tests
Medical diagnosis
Public schools
Socioeconomic status
Wechsler scales
title The "Bannatyne" Recategorization Assessment Procedure: Is It Valid for Individual Diagnosis of LD Children?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A57%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%22Bannatyne%22%20Recategorization%20Assessment%20Procedure:%20Is%20It%20Valid%20for%20Individual%20Diagnosis%20of%20LD%20Children?&rft.jtitle=Learning%20disability%20quarterly&rft.au=Dundon,%20William%20D.&rft.date=1986-08&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=208&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=208-213&rft.issn=0731-9487&rft.eissn=2168-376X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1510466&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1510466%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-e6f6963d9f3810e16c26c488ed61f9b8547be3a1471ad76c953b1deaac4c67f63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1294816766&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1510466&rft_sage_id=10.2307_1510466&rfr_iscdi=true