Fracture mechanisms of Al/steel resistance spot welds in coach peel and cross tension testing

In Al/steel resistance spot welding, increasing welding current helped to reduce generation of dendritic grains and shrinkage, and increasing welding time tended to reduce shrinkage but promoted the transition of grains from preferable columnar to dendritic. Iron phase, existing between the Fe2Al5 f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of materials processing technology 2018-02, Vol.252, p.348-361
Main Authors: Chen, Nannan, Wang, Hui-Ping, Carlson, Blair E, Sigler, David R., Wang, Min
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bearing capacity
Bearing strength
Coach peel test
Crack propagation
Cross tension test
Deformation mechanisms
Dissimilar materials
Fracture mechanics
Fracture mechanism
Grains
Intermetallic compound
Load carrying capacity
Mechanical properties
Peel tests
Resistance spot welding
Resistance spot welds
Shrinkage
Spot welds
Studies
Tension tests
Thickness
Weld microstructure
Welded joints
Welding
Welding current
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In Al/steel resistance spot welding, increasing welding current helped to reduce generation of dendritic grains and shrinkage, and increasing welding time tended to reduce shrinkage but promoted the transition of grains from preferable columnar to dendritic. Iron phase, existing between the Fe2Al5 fingers of a thin IMC layer facing the steel side, was observed to serve as crack propagation inhibitor and improve load carrying capacity of Al/steel interface. The amount of iron phase decreased as the IMC thickness grew, so did the load bearing capacity. Three fracture modes were observed in the cross tension test: interfacial fracture in the IMC layer, partial thickness fracture within the Al nugget next to the IMC layer, and partial button pullout fracture. All fractured coach peel test samples displayed consistent partial button pullout fracture mode following large deformation of the Al sheet. The crack in the cross tension test always initiated in the IMC layer while the crack in the coach peel test often started in the Al fusion zone. Two characteristic peak points were observed in the load-displacement curves of the coach peel test. The key point for improving mechanical performance under coach peel loading was to increase the first peak point by reducing Al thinning, increasing the Al nugget size, and limiting the IMC layer growth.
ISSN:0924-0136
1873-4774
DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.035