Loading…

Serum testosterone measurement in men: Evaluation of modern immunoassay technologies

Accurate measurement of serum testosterone (T) is essential for proper diagnosis of androgen deficiency. There are now several modern assay technologies, including automated ones, for measurement of T. In this study, we compared analytical performance of five modern immunoassay technologies commonly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The aging male 2005-09, Vol.8 (3-4), p.194-202
Main Authors: Goncharov, N., Katsya, G., Dobracheva, A., Nizhnik, A., Kolesnikova, G., Todua, T., Lunenfeld, B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3896-b7bb9ce9e8c9974451edab5d370992910680ae395eb4bbc4341bfbe9d81dbe9a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3896-b7bb9ce9e8c9974451edab5d370992910680ae395eb4bbc4341bfbe9d81dbe9a3
container_end_page 202
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 194
container_title The aging male
container_volume 8
creator Goncharov, N.
Katsya, G.
Dobracheva, A.
Nizhnik, A.
Kolesnikova, G.
Todua, T.
Lunenfeld, B.
description Accurate measurement of serum testosterone (T) is essential for proper diagnosis of androgen deficiency. There are now several modern assay technologies, including automated ones, for measurement of T. In this study, we compared analytical performance of five modern immunoassay technologies commonly used for measurement of total T: Vitros ECi (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics; normal range (n.r.) 4.6-34 nmol L); Architect (Abbott Laboratories; n.r. 9.7-34 nmol L); Access (Beckman Coulter; n.r. 5.3-23 nmol L); Delfia (Perkin-Elmer; n.r. 9.3-34 nmol L); and manual EIA DRG kits (n.r. 8.3-42 nmol L), with the classical RIA (3H-T), after extraction (n.r. 11-33 nmol L), as a reference method. Total T was measured using all above-mentioned methods in serum samples from 100 male patients, aged 16-65 years. Mean T concentrations in these 100 serum samples assayed by all non-isotopic methods were statistically significantly higher than those obtained by RIA. Delfia showed the highest T levels (19.3 nmol L versus 12.1 nmol L by RIA) with a positive bias 60-100%. Almost similar results were obtained using Architect, with a positive bias 40-70%. The closest correlation in results was found between Vitros ECi and RIA (12.7 nmol L versus 12.1 nmol L). In the studied samples, the median of differences ranged from minimal (−0.4 nmol L for Vitros ECi) to maximal (−7.25 nmol L for Delfia). For all non-isotopic methods, with the exception of Vitros ECi, differences in subjects with low T level ( 10 nmol L). All other methods showed different degrees of dissimilarities with the RIA, especially in the range of low testosterone concentrations, which is of importance in the clinical assessment of women and pubertal boys.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13685530500355566
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198238215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>971634111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3896-b7bb9ce9e8c9974451edab5d370992910680ae395eb4bbc4341bfbe9d81dbe9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qiOXrB_SCoh64pdjr-Kv0UqGlRULiUDhbtjNhs4ptaidU--8x3ZVaQHCaGc3zvpp5EfpE8BeCJT4llEvGKGYYU8YY5x_QHmkErbFQ-GPpy74ugJyh_ZxXGJO5EGIXzQinCouG76GbX5AmX42Qx5hHSDFA5cHkKYGHMFZ9KGP4Wi0ezDCZsY-hil3lYwspVL33U4gmZ7MuDm4Z4hDvesiHaKczQ4ajbT1AtxeLm_Of9dX1j8vz71e1o1Lx2gprlQMF0iklmoYRaI1lLRVYqbkimEtsgCoGtrHWNbQhtrOgWknaUgw9QCcb3_sUf0_lBe377GAYTIA4Zc0V5kQRVsDPL8BVnFIot2mi5JzK-V-IbCCXYs4JOn2fem_SWhOsn_LWr_IumuOt8WQ9tP8U24AL8G0D9KGLyZs_MQ2tHs16iKlLJrg-a_qe_9kz-RLMMC6dSfDfB2-qHwHw66El</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198238215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serum testosterone measurement in men: Evaluation of modern immunoassay technologies</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>Goncharov, N. ; Katsya, G. ; Dobracheva, A. ; Nizhnik, A. ; Kolesnikova, G. ; Todua, T. ; Lunenfeld, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goncharov, N. ; Katsya, G. ; Dobracheva, A. ; Nizhnik, A. ; Kolesnikova, G. ; Todua, T. ; Lunenfeld, B.</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate measurement of serum testosterone (T) is essential for proper diagnosis of androgen deficiency. There are now several modern assay technologies, including automated ones, for measurement of T. In this study, we compared analytical performance of five modern immunoassay technologies commonly used for measurement of total T: Vitros ECi (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics; normal range (n.r.) 4.6-34 nmol L); Architect (Abbott Laboratories; n.r. 9.7-34 nmol L); Access (Beckman Coulter; n.r. 5.3-23 nmol L); Delfia (Perkin-Elmer; n.r. 9.3-34 nmol L); and manual EIA DRG kits (n.r. 8.3-42 nmol L), with the classical RIA (3H-T), after extraction (n.r. 11-33 nmol L), as a reference method. Total T was measured using all above-mentioned methods in serum samples from 100 male patients, aged 16-65 years. Mean T concentrations in these 100 serum samples assayed by all non-isotopic methods were statistically significantly higher than those obtained by RIA. Delfia showed the highest T levels (19.3 nmol L versus 12.1 nmol L by RIA) with a positive bias 60-100%. Almost similar results were obtained using Architect, with a positive bias 40-70%. The closest correlation in results was found between Vitros ECi and RIA (12.7 nmol L versus 12.1 nmol L). In the studied samples, the median of differences ranged from minimal (−0.4 nmol L for Vitros ECi) to maximal (−7.25 nmol L for Delfia). For all non-isotopic methods, with the exception of Vitros ECi, differences in subjects with low T level (&lt;10 nmol L) were statistically significantly larger than in the subjects with high T (T &gt; 10 nmol L). All other methods showed different degrees of dissimilarities with the RIA, especially in the range of low testosterone concentrations, which is of importance in the clinical assessment of women and pubertal boys.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-5538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-0790</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13685530500355566</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16390746</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGMAF7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aging - physiology ; Androgens ; Androgens - deficiency ; Children &amp; youth ; Endocrine system ; enzymeimmunoassay ; Humans ; Immunoassay ; Immunoenzyme Techniques ; Male ; Males ; Medical diagnosis ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Patients ; Radioimmunoassay ; Reproducibility of Results ; Samples ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Testosterone - blood ; Testosterone - immunology ; Total testosterone in serum ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The aging male, 2005-09, Vol.8 (3-4), p.194-202</ispartof><rights>2005 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2005</rights><rights>Copyright CRC Press Sep-Dec 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3896-b7bb9ce9e8c9974451edab5d370992910680ae395eb4bbc4341bfbe9d81dbe9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3896-b7bb9ce9e8c9974451edab5d370992910680ae395eb4bbc4341bfbe9d81dbe9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16390746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goncharov, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsya, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobracheva, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nizhnik, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolesnikova, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todua, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunenfeld, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Serum testosterone measurement in men: Evaluation of modern immunoassay technologies</title><title>The aging male</title><addtitle>Aging Male</addtitle><description>Accurate measurement of serum testosterone (T) is essential for proper diagnosis of androgen deficiency. There are now several modern assay technologies, including automated ones, for measurement of T. In this study, we compared analytical performance of five modern immunoassay technologies commonly used for measurement of total T: Vitros ECi (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics; normal range (n.r.) 4.6-34 nmol L); Architect (Abbott Laboratories; n.r. 9.7-34 nmol L); Access (Beckman Coulter; n.r. 5.3-23 nmol L); Delfia (Perkin-Elmer; n.r. 9.3-34 nmol L); and manual EIA DRG kits (n.r. 8.3-42 nmol L), with the classical RIA (3H-T), after extraction (n.r. 11-33 nmol L), as a reference method. Total T was measured using all above-mentioned methods in serum samples from 100 male patients, aged 16-65 years. Mean T concentrations in these 100 serum samples assayed by all non-isotopic methods were statistically significantly higher than those obtained by RIA. Delfia showed the highest T levels (19.3 nmol L versus 12.1 nmol L by RIA) with a positive bias 60-100%. Almost similar results were obtained using Architect, with a positive bias 40-70%. The closest correlation in results was found between Vitros ECi and RIA (12.7 nmol L versus 12.1 nmol L). In the studied samples, the median of differences ranged from minimal (−0.4 nmol L for Vitros ECi) to maximal (−7.25 nmol L for Delfia). For all non-isotopic methods, with the exception of Vitros ECi, differences in subjects with low T level (&lt;10 nmol L) were statistically significantly larger than in the subjects with high T (T &gt; 10 nmol L). All other methods showed different degrees of dissimilarities with the RIA, especially in the range of low testosterone concentrations, which is of importance in the clinical assessment of women and pubertal boys.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Androgens</subject><subject>Androgens - deficiency</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Endocrine system</subject><subject>enzymeimmunoassay</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Immunoenzyme Techniques</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radioimmunoassay</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Samples</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Testosterone - blood</subject><subject>Testosterone - immunology</subject><subject>Total testosterone in serum</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1368-5538</issn><issn>1473-0790</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qiOXrB_SCoh64pdjr-Kv0UqGlRULiUDhbtjNhs4ptaidU--8x3ZVaQHCaGc3zvpp5EfpE8BeCJT4llEvGKGYYU8YY5x_QHmkErbFQ-GPpy74ugJyh_ZxXGJO5EGIXzQinCouG76GbX5AmX42Qx5hHSDFA5cHkKYGHMFZ9KGP4Wi0ezDCZsY-hil3lYwspVL33U4gmZ7MuDm4Z4hDvesiHaKczQ4ajbT1AtxeLm_Of9dX1j8vz71e1o1Lx2gprlQMF0iklmoYRaI1lLRVYqbkimEtsgCoGtrHWNbQhtrOgWknaUgw9QCcb3_sUf0_lBe377GAYTIA4Zc0V5kQRVsDPL8BVnFIot2mi5JzK-V-IbCCXYs4JOn2fem_SWhOsn_LWr_IumuOt8WQ9tP8U24AL8G0D9KGLyZs_MQ2tHs16iKlLJrg-a_qe_9kz-RLMMC6dSfDfB2-qHwHw66El</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Goncharov, N.</creator><creator>Katsya, G.</creator><creator>Dobracheva, A.</creator><creator>Nizhnik, A.</creator><creator>Kolesnikova, G.</creator><creator>Todua, T.</creator><creator>Lunenfeld, B.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Serum testosterone measurement in men: Evaluation of modern immunoassay technologies</title><author>Goncharov, N. ; Katsya, G. ; Dobracheva, A. ; Nizhnik, A. ; Kolesnikova, G. ; Todua, T. ; Lunenfeld, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3896-b7bb9ce9e8c9974451edab5d370992910680ae395eb4bbc4341bfbe9d81dbe9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Androgens</topic><topic>Androgens - deficiency</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Endocrine system</topic><topic>enzymeimmunoassay</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Immunoenzyme Techniques</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radioimmunoassay</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Samples</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Testosterone - blood</topic><topic>Testosterone - immunology</topic><topic>Total testosterone in serum</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goncharov, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsya, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobracheva, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nizhnik, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolesnikova, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todua, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunenfeld, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The aging male</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goncharov, N.</au><au>Katsya, G.</au><au>Dobracheva, A.</au><au>Nizhnik, A.</au><au>Kolesnikova, G.</au><au>Todua, T.</au><au>Lunenfeld, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serum testosterone measurement in men: Evaluation of modern immunoassay technologies</atitle><jtitle>The aging male</jtitle><addtitle>Aging Male</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>194</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>194-202</pages><issn>1368-5538</issn><eissn>1473-0790</eissn><coden>AGMAF7</coden><abstract>Accurate measurement of serum testosterone (T) is essential for proper diagnosis of androgen deficiency. There are now several modern assay technologies, including automated ones, for measurement of T. In this study, we compared analytical performance of five modern immunoassay technologies commonly used for measurement of total T: Vitros ECi (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics; normal range (n.r.) 4.6-34 nmol L); Architect (Abbott Laboratories; n.r. 9.7-34 nmol L); Access (Beckman Coulter; n.r. 5.3-23 nmol L); Delfia (Perkin-Elmer; n.r. 9.3-34 nmol L); and manual EIA DRG kits (n.r. 8.3-42 nmol L), with the classical RIA (3H-T), after extraction (n.r. 11-33 nmol L), as a reference method. Total T was measured using all above-mentioned methods in serum samples from 100 male patients, aged 16-65 years. Mean T concentrations in these 100 serum samples assayed by all non-isotopic methods were statistically significantly higher than those obtained by RIA. Delfia showed the highest T levels (19.3 nmol L versus 12.1 nmol L by RIA) with a positive bias 60-100%. Almost similar results were obtained using Architect, with a positive bias 40-70%. The closest correlation in results was found between Vitros ECi and RIA (12.7 nmol L versus 12.1 nmol L). In the studied samples, the median of differences ranged from minimal (−0.4 nmol L for Vitros ECi) to maximal (−7.25 nmol L for Delfia). For all non-isotopic methods, with the exception of Vitros ECi, differences in subjects with low T level (&lt;10 nmol L) were statistically significantly larger than in the subjects with high T (T &gt; 10 nmol L). All other methods showed different degrees of dissimilarities with the RIA, especially in the range of low testosterone concentrations, which is of importance in the clinical assessment of women and pubertal boys.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>16390746</pmid><doi>10.1080/13685530500355566</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-5538
ispartof The aging male, 2005-09, Vol.8 (3-4), p.194-202
issn 1368-5538
1473-0790
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_198238215
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aging - physiology
Androgens
Androgens - deficiency
Children & youth
Endocrine system
enzymeimmunoassay
Humans
Immunoassay
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Male
Males
Medical diagnosis
Methods
Middle Aged
Monoclonal antibodies
Patients
Radioimmunoassay
Reproducibility of Results
Samples
Sensitivity and Specificity
Testosterone - blood
Testosterone - immunology
Total testosterone in serum
Tumors
title Serum testosterone measurement in men: Evaluation of modern immunoassay technologies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A33%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serum%20testosterone%20measurement%20in%20men:%20Evaluation%20of%20modern%20immunoassay%20technologies&rft.jtitle=The%20aging%20male&rft.au=Goncharov,%20N.&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=194-202&rft.issn=1368-5538&rft.eissn=1473-0790&rft.coden=AGMAF7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13685530500355566&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E971634111%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3896-b7bb9ce9e8c9974451edab5d370992910680ae395eb4bbc4341bfbe9d81dbe9a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198238215&rft_id=info:pmid/16390746&rfr_iscdi=true